Talk:Shaheen Bagh protest/Archive 1

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussions at the nomination pages linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:21, 15 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Posters artwork at shaheen bagh caa nrc protests new delhi 7 jan 2020.jpg (discussion)
 * Posters at Shaheen Bagh 11 Jan 2020.jpg (discussion)

Delete the images proposed Chetan285 (talk) 08:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

Controversy
some people especially Right-wing parties supporters including BJP IT cell head Amit Malviya posted an unverified video claiming Shaheen bagh protestors are paid to sit in the protest venue but there is no proof of women being paid to protest. later Shaheen Bagh women sent a defamation notice to Amit Malviya

https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/shaheen-bagh-women-send-defamation-notice-to-bjp-it-cell-chief-amit-malviya-over-paid-protest-charge/ar-BBZa47p Usamaliberty (talk) 07:52, 21 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Adding it. A seprarate section will be made. Dey subrata (talk) 14:04, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia page as a banner at Shaheen bagh
Banner  D Big X ray ᗙ  05:29, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much for this update. I couldn't go for a day or two so I missed this. Now I certainly have a reason to go and click a pic in 4:3 ratio. :D :) Thanks DTM (talk) 13:43, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , you are welcome. At least your response clarifies that it was not you who had put up that banner. You may bask in the well deserved glory of authoring this page that is now a part of history :D Also ping User:Kautilya3 and User:Dey subrata as fellow contributors for this page.  D Big X ray ᗙ  13:50, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Indeed, well done DTM! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:54, 20 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Thats surely new, may be after NDTV's mention of the article. Because during my visit I didn't find this one. Dey subrata (talk) 14:32, 20 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Just a small update. 2 Pics, public domain, all licences waived, uploaded. DTM (talk) 13:27, 22 January 2020 (UTC)

Please put back the zeros, they say a lot
, I think the zeros in the infobox should be put back. They convey a lot. This should be non-controversial so I request you to place them back.DTM (talk) 13:35, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 * well, I don't know how zero data makes sense. But if you say so, I'll revert them. Btw, good job here. Kudos! Accesscrawl (talk) 13:38, 26 January 2020 (UTC)


 * , The message of non-violent, peaceful protest is conveyed with the info-box display, thats why the infobox is there, to give a summarised idea of the protest. Anyone unknown to this protest will surely think of, is there any death or arrest, and will wonder, when the info box is not conveying the information for which its added in the first place. Sometimes zero has value. Dey subrata (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Twitter handle
Dey subrata, If not in the infobox, maybe in the external links. This is nothing to do with promotion. It is a significant aspect. Media houses are taking news from there. DTM (talk) 13:37, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
 * cite few media houses quoting from the particular handle you've mentioned. However, I am still with DS, infobox isn't the right place. Accesscrawl (talk) 13:48, 26 January 2020 (UTC)


 * , it can quote, it is quoting. But, we should not portray the article as the medium of the protest. Already, some reputed media channel including NDTV is saying, "they" now have wikipedia article (not shaheen bagh protest article is created on wikipedia) which shows very poor on wikipedia's side as if the article is created by protesters and endorsing the protest. We must refrain from such, we are here to account history as happening. Secondly, as I said, twitter links are for any kind of organisations and person. Thirdly, a protest is not permanent, so a twitter handle is also can't be permanent. So, should not be added. Dey subrata (talk) 14:04, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Sharjeel Imam
Consideration for addition to the section about the recent news update on ex JNU student at Shaheen Bagh calling for break off of Assam from mainland India and subsequent sedition case filed against him Amitized (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Amitized


 * This is not Shaheen Bagh, Shaheen Bagh is different, this is from Aligarh. There is no verification of this video and the so called leader, facebook also says IIT professor, so why one identity. And with that I want to add for your future editing that the person is not saying "break off" or "cut off" Assam, don't create own interpretation, he clealy said to block road to cut resources to Assam through chicken's neck, wikipedia only adds what sources says which are factually correct. We don't add our opinions here. Secondly, the video is shared by Sambit Patra who has history of false claim, fake news, morphed photo sharing, doctored video sharing. This is a strong claim, so remember when such claims are made by people of tarnishing past, you must go for more sources to find out truth and fact checking site like alt.news. Thank you. Dey subrata (talk) 12:50, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

❌


 * We have to keep monitoring this of course. I am gathering some of his writings here:
 * Articles at The Wire
 * Articles at Firstpost
 * The Sentinel Assam covered the speech without any mention of Shaheen Bagh. I also don't buy that this is "sedition". It is protest. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 13:58, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Well section 124 (A) become a mighty tool for them now. Yes, the sedition law is itself a flawed one, sedition means anything against the country, but the law describe anything against govt. as during British Raj, Govt. was = Country, the same narrative is going on now. Anyway, untill such things not going on in Shaheen bagh we need not to think of any such materials. for this article. Dey subrata (talk) 14:15, 25 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The connection to Shaheen Bagh seems to have been made up. The Wire. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:43, 25 January 2020 (UTC)
 * It does not mention any tv channel name, secondly to my knowledge, Zee news was the culprit here who has spread the rumour of video Shaheen Bagh further to mastermind (as if its a crime going on :-) ), because within hours the video was debunked to be of Aligarh. Secondly, zee news or any news channel did not give any proof of it even any doctored video or photgraphs or any document to prove the mastermind. We no need to take zee news seriously, this could be in revenge of the defamation notice to zee news. Its totally a baseless claim, other controversies have subjects-photos or videos, but here for calling mastermind no proof, atleast Mr.Patra is better in manufactured rumours, atleast he can show Iwo Jima pic as Indian soldiers pic. :) Dey subrata (talk) 01:41, 26 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks subrata, I get your point. Amitized (talk) 15:15, 26 January 2020 (UTC)


 * The video was indeed from Aligarh.1. Sharjeel Imam was indeed a part of the group that initially organized the protest. He later announced terminatation of the protest 2, apparently it is now led by others. The Aligarh video is considered to be genuine.3.  The Lallantop has the text of the video transcribed.4 Other similar video recordings have been published. 5Sharjeel Imam was never a professor at IIT, just a student, and perhaps an instructor. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Malaiya (talk • contribs)
 * Well I did not mention anything different. His video was of Aligarh was debunked on same day. Many such allegations will be there in coming days for sure on the protest. Dey subrata (talk) 05:33, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Culture
, can we rewrite the culture and divide into culture and methods so that more things can be added, to me the section is not justifying the elements of the protest. What do you think, let me know. Dey subrata (talk) 00:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Dey subrata, sure, sounds like a sensible division to me. DTM (talk) 08:06, 27 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Ok I will add the different section but yu can still add on materials in the culture section, i will segregrate accordingly. Dey subrata (talk) 05:35, 28 January 2020 (UTC)


 * , moved the election issue as sub-section under heading "Efforts to remove blockade". I would ask if you can add another sub-section in the same heading about "police's role in blocking the road" as the protesters have said several times, police have placed various barricades in different roads including the arteries to block the road totally not the Shaheen Bagh protester, they only blocking one of the roads, that too just 1 km (between first shop to last shop on the road). Dey subrata (talk) 06:17, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Moved back into your version. Looks better with separate section, but try to add the police barricade blocking thing. Dey subrata (talk) 06:33, 28 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Dey subrata Keep up the good work with this article! Please do make sure to try and convey the maximum amount of information in the least amount of words. The article has excessive detailing in some parts. This is my fault too of course, but just wanted to say it aloud. I have a lot of difficulty sometimes in condensing text and paraphrasing it, but I guess a lot of people on Wiki have the same problem. DTM (talk) 12:40, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * , till now I think the article is in good shape. And excessive will not be appropriate for now, after all the page is there as a part of Split policy from CAA protest page, so that we can describe this particular protest in details. And don't worry, the materials that I will add in the Culture section will not be excessive, its basically on the methods and elements of the protest which can give a reader a visual of why the protest is so unique. Dey subrata (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Reactions
We need coverage of the Yogi Adityanath's remarks. "Current passes through Shaheen Bagh"? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:22, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Got it. Amit Shah . Oh boy! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:30, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Sigh, while the fun of the statements come through, so many of the BJP leaders are making statements related to Shaheen Bagh now. And with the first injury today, I hope no one else does anything too stupid, whichever side it is, no matter how many people wish a mess happened. DTM (talk) 13:46, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Oh God I just have seen news, God, whats happening to this country, people firing guns infront of police, Union Ministers giving hate speech. But no words on how to revive the economy and unemployement. Judiciary's backbone is broken. God knows what will happen next. Amit Shah is blowing hot and cold, he is the root of all these problem for sure, brainless decisions again and again. Yup, not yogi but shah's comment was the current passing one, yogi gave "the man sleeping in blanket while women are protesting" comment. Dey subrata (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Injured 0 > 1
This didn't happen directly in Shaheen Bagh, but I am increasing the number of injured to one nevertheless. India Today reports that the shooter had written "Shaheen Bagh, khel khatam (game over)" on FB. link DTM (talk) 13:40, 30 January 2020 (UTC)


 * , For now lets keep it, with time we will see how things develop. Dey subrata (talk) 15:18, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Kids or infants at Shaheen Bagh
Two changes were done in with this edit inorder to include following points in the article,


 * 1. Babies brought by parents to protest site is highlighted often in reports and also shown in ground reports in TV channels. It is not usual to bring babies to protests and also not usual to bring often. 20 day old baby was the youngest among all.


 * 2. Four month old infant got severe cold for being exposed to winter chill weather at protest site. After family returned from protest that night, unfortunately the baby died in home in sleep because of the severe cold.

It was reverted back with a reason that infant died in home and not at protest. But, is it not needed,
 * - to include first point, of infants at protest site? from 20 days old to 4 months to crawling babies.
 * - to include partially the second point: infant catching cold at protest site? or to drop completely.

XGammaRay (talk) 00:53, 4 February 2020 (UTC)


 * "Live in a tiny shanty put together with plastic sheets and cloth" which is called as Jhuggi Jhopri. Hundreds of people dies in jhuggis every year1 and many cities in India during winter. The baby may have died due to cold, living in jhuggi is highly susceptible even elder people die during winter living in makeshift tents but calling it died because the baby was exposed during protest is very strong claim. Secondly, no mention of doctor inspected the baby to confirm the death is due to exposure. Its hard to buy this claim. Dey subrata (talk) 01:13, 4 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Ok, that answers second question. But first point on including information about infants at protest site mentioned in multiple reports.XGammaRay (talk) 01:18, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
 * The first part is already mentioned in the about section. Though I am adding a direct mention of it. Dey subrata (talk) 01:24, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Dey subrata (talk) 01:35, 4 February 2020 (UTC)

Disclaimer first
How interesting,
 * Since 1 February 2020, "the organisers have made people sign a disclaimer which states that views expressed are are personal, before they are allowed to speak." (ET) DTM (talk) 12:58, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Yup they literally changed how a protest must be done, with time now the discourse and terminology of protest changed. The most observed in Hong Kong, it can now be caled as mother of all protest, the way they cope with obstacles with use of technology, innovation and unique ideas. Though not to that level, Shaheen bagh surely changed the patois of protest, they know how to take measures to tackle obstacles, they know how to oppose to fake things, they made a protest into a cultural site, never happened in India, surely marked themselves boldly in History. I am already writting a separate section on it, will add shortly as soon as I complete the writing. Dey subrata (talk) 14:54, 6 February 2020 (UTC)

Second paragraph Background#Causes needs attention
The second section of Background#Causes needs redoing. It is becoming too vague. The sources themselves do not connect to Shaheen Bagh. Just like you have written above about the cold above that children all over India die so shouldn't be added.
 * The Oxfam India data states that the richest 1% of the population's control over the country's wealth increased from 58% to 73% between 2018-2019, while the wealth of the poorest 50% increased by 1%. The WPS-index (Women, Peace and Security index) ranked India as 133rd out of 167 countries in 2019-20.[31]

This is becoming OR or SYNTH. What do you think? DTM (talk) 13:26, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * This is to clarify the scenerio of economy, unemployment and poverty. Protesting for Women safety, rising cost of commodities, increasing unemployment and poverty act as catalysts for the protest. The datas, indexes and report are to clarify how much economic slow down, unemployment, its record high or record low. This have to be added for reader to give a clear background, to relate themselves with the India's economy, unemployment and women safety for which the protest going on. Just like the background of the CAA protest main article. Dey subrata (talk) 16:55, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok, so if I think India's space mission is also important for this Shaheen Bagh article, can I put that too? Money spent on space as a cause of poverty; the money should go to the protesters in the form of schemes etc? Right? DTM (talk) 05:30, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No ofcorse you can't add that, that metaphor does not reflect the line added. Thats not what the line is telling you. that line is about HDI (Economic inequality, "1% of the population's control over the country's wealth increased from 58% to 73% between 2018-2019, while the wealth of the poorest 50% increased by 1% " it shows that the IHDI is in downward curve. That line is not suggestion the metaphor you added. Its showing economic development of Indian people is worsening and poverty is rising in country where 1/4th of the population is in extreme poverty level. Dey subrata (talk) 05:51, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Volunteers involvement
Starting this section again as previous discussion was archived. In previous discussion, Zee news was doubted to be the first to call Sharjeel as "mastermind" behind Shaheen Bagh Protest.


 * 1) But it was Reuters report from 24 December 2019 which called Sharjeel & Aasif as "The masterminds of the intricately organised operation are two young engineers". The same was carried by other media houses too The Telegraph, Yahoo.
 * 2) They were called as "The Protagonists" in a detailed report by CNBC from 26 December 2019.

The Reuters report also includes video in which Sharjeel has said "What we intend to achieve is to inspire communities across India, who are against this act, that they block their own cities, so that India comes to a halt." Similar statement on "ChakkaJam", he has given to CNBC report. Detailed timeline of events and role of Sharjeel is described in Asian Age report.

With these the earliest detailed reports of Shaheen bagh protests. Is it not needed to mention the following aspects in section "The Protest",

XGammaRay (talk) 05:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) December 15 afternoon protest at Shaheen Bagh with crowd addressed by Amanathullah Khan and Sharjeel. Further blockade of both sides of road by night. This corroborates with traffic alerts released by Delhi Traffic Police. First issued on traffic on December 15, then 16 and continues. Currently in Wikipedia page, Dec. 14th is mentioned as the first day and jumps further. But most reports consider protest on 15th as major step-stone.
 * 2) As mentioned in several reports, Sharjeel and Aasif who formed "12-member Shaheen Bagh Coordination Committee", played major role in starting road blockade or "ChakkaJam" from the night of December 15. Also did setup platform, organised the needs and planned events in initial days.


 * It was not started by them, initially some women gathered on 14 December afternoon as mentioned, that was just a demonstration not the sit-in type. Later those volunteers around 300 of them from different Universitiea and colleges came there and cordinated the protest from crowd control to food and medicine as women and children were there and so that the protest become continuous. So why and how one become "mastermind", the report did not say much, his work was to bring speakers to the protest. He was not leader, some were arranging food, some were arranging medicine, some were looking after security, some were controlling crowd, some were taking care of sound sytem and electronic, there are 100s of students who were volunteering, not one. Yes these things can be added in a summarised way, I will add in the "the protest section" but not this editorial commentary and words. Give me some time I will add by tonight or tomorrow morning. Dey subrata (talk) 07:31, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

materials about the participation and cordination of the volunteers in making the protest effective, under the sub-section "The protest". Dey subrata (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 12 February 2020
There has been death of a four months old infant who was brought to the protest inspite of illhealth 182.77.97.126 (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2020 (UTC)


 * ❌. It's not clear what changes you want to make. Moreover, any additions must have reliable sources to support them. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 03:23, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Deacon Vorbis, the changes that have been requested are quite fair; now that the matter has reached the Supreme Court too and involves a Bravery Award child**DTM (talk) 12:37, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Link for reference. DTM (talk) 12:42, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I went ahead and made the change to the infobox with a note and two references, matter can be elaborated in the body as case proceeds. DTM (talk) 12:53, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * It has been discussed before also here, the child died at home, not at Shaheen Bagh, and due to cold in sleep, who lives in makeshift tent with no facilities, such death are not cause of a protest. With that there was no medical check up of the incident. Tomorow if I go out for work and on his way home he get in accident, then its not his work responsible for his accident. Living in makeshift tents itself is highly susceptible to cold, every year many people including adults die due to cold living in streets and slums in Delhi and country. Dey subrata (talk) 14:59, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * For future reference, I declined this request because a basic statement like that isn't precise enough to act upon. Edit requests need to be precise so that editors unfamiliar with the article can tell exactly what's being requested, along the lines of "Please add ___ at the end of the ___ section" or whatever.  What was in the request was too vague to implement, so it's an automatic decline.  Even if it had been precise enough, requests like this require a source, and none was provided, and would have been declined for that as well.  If a regular page editor sees the request and decides to do the legwork to hunt down what's needed, then great, but those of us who patrol the edit request queue will almost always decline a request like this.  –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 17:33, 15 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Deacon Vorbis, thanks for the explanation. Your decline makes more sense to me now. Sorry.
 * Dey subrata, the articles are connecting the death of the child with protest, the bravery award winner is doing that and in turn the Supreme Court. There are so many reasons. You cannot disconnect the death all by yourself. SAY, if people are protesting for a hundred years and start dying due to old age I would surely add that to deaths/fatalities in the protest. I am changing it back to one... else a compromise, it can stay zero, but with a note about the death. DTM (talk) 11:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * That seems ok, a footnote can be added, keepiing zero. Adding it. Dey subrata (talk) 15:35, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
 * . Dey subrata (talk) 19:13, 16 February 2020 (UTC)

protest table
, the table becomes very inconsistent and I hardly get any proper updates on News, website, youtube. I think better to write it down rather than to keep in table. I initially thought it would be good for the section, but now lack of sources making it redundant. Let me know what do you think about it.Dey subrata (talk) 01:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * I made a couple of changes to the table. I get what you are saying, maybe it can be given a few more days? A couple of media sources are throwing out something or the other every now and then for these other locations. Let it dry up maybe a bit more? DTM (talk) 14:05, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok we will wait because the Park Circus, Aligarh, Mumbai Nagpada is still going on. Dey subrata (talk) 15:02, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * need updates, there is a protest in Chennai, Malerkotla and Ludhiana. If you can plase update, I will add more materials at night if I get anything else worthy to add.Dey subrata (talk) 08:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
 * yes, indeed. the table is starting to look messy too. Will attend to it as soon as I can, tomorrow, if no one else does it first. Thanks for the reminder!DTM (talk) 14:37, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Source to expand

 * https://thewire.in/government/shaheen-bagh-traffic-delhi-police-wajahat-habibullah -- ⋙–D Big X ray ᗙ  19:02, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

blocked major highway
It said protesters have blocke dthe major highway, while in reality a road has been blocked. I have added that "Delhi police has blocked neighbouring major highways around the area."-- ⋙–D Big X ray ᗙ  10:16, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

Supreme court appointed team has submitted its report saying the barricades have been put up by the delhi police, and the road blockade is not related to shaheen bagh protestors. Moreover there is no evidence that the protests are anti hindu or anti national, and the fees is 500. Thats a total lie based on whatsapp messages forwarded by team of IT cell of the ruling bjp party. One of the member of IT cell have told earlier, how they capture the trending list on social media platforms. Ethanhunt1604 (talk) 18:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 March 2020
The page has been vandalised recently and the subject has been painted in a biased view without any citations or sources. 2402:3A80:123A:D3A2:42E5:A4FE:BCB0:B9A7 (talk) 19:33, 18 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 21:05, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 18 March 2020
The page has been vandalised recently and the subject has been painted in a biased view without any citations or sources e.g. these bits "ongoing anti-hindu and anti-national protest, led by muslim women" Mnshanbhag (talk) 22:23, 18 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The edits are reverted, I ahve just seen the vandalism. Dey subrata (talk) 22:32, 18 March 2020 (UTC)

Google search preview of this page displaying false info
https://en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki Shaheen Bagh protests - Wikipedia The Shaheen Bagh protest is an ongoing anti- hindu and anti-national protest,...

Above is the page's Google search result preview.

The part - 'The Shaheen Bagh protest is an ongoing anti- hindu and anti-national protest', makes anyone believe what is totally false and merely an attempt to defame the peaceful protest.

Kindly help to change this preview text to something sensible. Mdms03 (talk) 04:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The edits were reverted already and the google is not showing anything like that anymore so far I've checked. Dey subrata (talk) 13:39, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

Shaheen bagh peaceful but taking place against the permission of the govt.
Should mention that the protest has been taking place without any official permission from the govt & it is peaceful, but the protesters have to unfortunately block the roads/streets for everyone in the locality as they are not aware how to take a simple document for holding a protest officially.

Also the article can mention that the law is for religiously persecuted minorities and nothing to do with Muslims. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paparaju (talk • contribs) 12:17, 21 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Its a protest !! permission from govt. to protest against govt !! joke of the day...start meditation, it may help. The article appropriately mentioned what law says and what the law excludes and includes and what the protestors' concerns are. Dey subrata (talk) 14:04, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 March 2020
Shaneen Bagh as a political experiment: Many political leaders used this protest as a means to settle scores with the ruling BJP govt. The president of the congress party, Sonia said this, “It is duty of all of us to come out of our houses and do andolan,” Sonia Gandhi had said in a speech. She had called the anti-CAA protests “aar-paar ki ladai”. Hindu Dialogue (talk) 00:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

[https:// swarajyamag.com/politics/delhi-riots-heres-a-list-of-hate-speeches-that-were-barely-reported-in-the-run-up-to-the-violence Swarajya] Hindu Dialogue (talk) 00:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * ❌. It's not clear what changes you want to make. –Deacon Vorbis (carbon &bull; videos) 01:16, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Standing map of India and JMI association
It is uncertain whether the map of India had anything to with JMI. I wanted to include the name of the artistes but somebody rightly raised the issue of their notability. Therefore, I am changing it a neutral description: "35 feet high map of India which stood at Shaheen Bagh during the 101 days of protests." If anyone has any issue with this, please discuss here before editing the description. Thank you. --Hindustanilanguage (talk) 14:19, 29 March 2020 (UTC)


 * , read again, what was written, it did not mention JMI has to do anything with the scale model. Second you line is factually correct, was not there for 101 days, it was erected in January. Third, you've removed what the picture is showing. Fourth, read WP:BLPNOTE. Dey subrata (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Addition of a CAA protest
There was one more protest in Asanso West Bengal which started on 15 January till and ended on 24th March due to lockdown. I was named Kazi Nazrul Baagh. I think it was the second largest protest in India against CAA after Shaheen Baagh Delhi. Around 3.5 lakh people joined this protest in The District Pashchim Bardhaman. Tashhiru (talk) 16:14, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Sources please. Dey subrata (talk) 21:51, 8 May 2020 (UTC)


 * I can provide pictures and video. Tashhiru (talk) 21:52, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
 * , Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, Citing sources is the first and one of the core policy, without citation a single line will not be added, that too should be reliable. Photos and videos comes second, sources first. Dey subrata (talk) 23:03, 8 May 2020 (UTC)

Undiscussed page move
, why did you move this page to "Hundred Days' Protests"? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 14:02, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 December 2020
Please add Wikilinks to the book publishers mentioned in the Further Reading/Books section. Change Bloomsbury Publishing to Bloomsbury Publishing and Speaking Tiger Books to Speaking Tiger Books. Ujwal.Xankill3r (talk) 05:18, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Why? -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:43, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes check.svg Done since there's no harm in it although I'm not sure there's any reason to either. --Paul &#10092;talk&#10093; 09:54, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I was just checking out the article for a book/author I was reading and found the publisher page to be a stub with very few pages linking to it. But there are lots of pages that mention the publisher so I thought it would be good to have them actually wikilink to it at least. Hopefully provides further information to the reader and highlights the article itself so others with more info on it already can help improve it. Ujwal.Xankill3r (talk) 10:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, I rarely link publishers, even though I often link authors. Too many links in a citation are distracting. The truly interested reader wants to read the book, not a Wikipage on the publisher. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:39, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
 * I completely agree - but like I said I was adding wikilinks to the publisher page itself because even though searching for the name returned a lot of results not many pages were actually linking to it. I did check other publisher pages like Penguin Random House to make sure that this sort of wikilinking is ok and it turned out to be the case. I wikilinked to the publisher - Speaking Tiger Books - on some other pages as well but since they were articles about the authors or the books themselves no other wikilinks were needed. Do you think it would be better to shift the wikilink to a cite-book for each book entry? I can look up info on these books and put in a new edit request. Ujwal.Xankill3r (talk) 07:54, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * The template:citation provides a "url" field, for the book, and "authorlink" fields for the authors, and none for the publishers. If it is a relatively unknown publisher, it is ok to link it, but not for major publishers. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:13, 12 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Understood. Ujwal.Xankill3r (talk) 09:16, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

Title
The title should match the first sentence of the article. Should it be "Shaheen Bagh Protests" (title) or "Shaheen Bagh protest" (article)? If in doubt, don't capitalize is what MOS:CAPS mostly says. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  23:32, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Yes, I guess "Shaheen Bagh protest" would be suitable. DTM (talk) 16:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I also feel the same. --Hindustanilanguage (talk) 16:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * I do think the plural form is best since there were multiple demonstrations over months, so I would support "Shaheen Bagh protests" as it is in the infobox. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  16:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 February 2021
Delhi riots investigation The Delhi Police on November 22 filed a supplementary charge sheet before a Delhi court against Umar Khalid and Sharjeel Imam in connection with the Delhi riots that broke out in February 2020 in the northeastern part of the city. The police informed the court that the sanction to prosecute the accused persons for sedition and other sections was still under consideration. Khalid was arrested under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in September. The Delhi Police arrested Sharjeel Imam under the same Act on August 25. Imam was booked for allegedly delivering inflammatory speeches against the Citizenship (Amendment) Act and the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in December 2019 Author Rishi (talk) 15:09, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:06, 20 February 2021 (UTC)