Talk:St. Joe Company

Neutrality disputed
I came across this article, and it reads like a hatchet job. Somebody with an axe to grind against this company has edited in all sorts of uncited, biased nonsense. Additionally, what is cited is written in a highly slanted tone. I have no particular affinity for the company, but the tone of this article is thoroughly inappropriate for an encyclopedia. I will leave this tag in place for a couple of weeks, but after that I will go through and rewrite the article to restore some semblance of neutrality.  Horologium  (talk) 03:54, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Agreed. It is unsurprising that the primary contributor is Mgreason, who has had problems with sourcing and neutrality before. I've removed some of the more biased wording and negative material.--Cúchullain t/ c 16:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Facebook or an Encyclopedia
This article reads like a ranting Facebook post. Came here to get some information on the subject, as we are having issues with the subject. But can't use any of this as it is just hate talk. Can someone please provide factual information on this subject. Also many claims are not cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:4C1:C980:3DA0:84E4:E81:4B43:BADD (talk) 01:09, 30 December 2021 (UTC)