Talk:Swoon hypothesis

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Swoon hypothesis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110129181729/http://www.blueletterbible.org:80/commentaries/comm_view.cfm?AuthorID=3&contentID=3129&commInfo=8&topic=Crucifixion to http://www.blueletterbible.org/commentaries/comm_view.cfm?AuthorID=3&contentID=3129&commInfo=8&topic=Crucifixion

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 15:52, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

why is other perspective of an indian hindu guru put under "islamic perspective"?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swoon_hypothesis#Other_perspective

this probably should not be here and if anyone insists on keeping this, please remove it from the heading of islamic perspective. Mhveinvp (talk) 14:10, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
 * It was moved to its own Rajneesh movement section for now, — Paleo Neonate  – 04:59, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

I don’t think Rajneesh’s opinion needs to be here, since he doesn’t bring up any arguments or advance the theory in any way beyond supporting it. Maybe it can be mentioned in the article, but I certainly don’t think it needs its own section. Bagabondo (talk) 20:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)