Talk:TC Energy

Untitled
-- Under "Corporate Governance", this article discusses the "current members of the board of directors." Among these names, if you clicked on "David O'Brien", you discover that this director was an actor, and that he died in 1989... making it unlikely that this is the same "David O'Brien" that is on the BoD for TransCanada. Thrantos 19:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Biased?
Why is the Keystone XL Pipeline the first section of this article? Why is there hardly any history or background on this company? This seems more and more like a PR stunt.70.79.10.110 (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Keystone v's Keystone XL
There is a section in this article called Keystone. But the "Keystone" pipeline is an existing, legacy, pipeline, and the proposed "Keystone XL" or "Extra Large", is a different (as-yet-to-be-built) pipeline:

http://www.transcanada.com/oil-pipelines.html

v's

http://www.transcanada.com/keystone.html

Bad articles leads to bad judgment?

143.120.99.10 (talk) 01:06, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Removal of material critical of TransCanada
Edits by Paperfire yesterday to the TransCanada Corporation article removed the following sections: Keystone Pipeline, Emininent Domain, Protests, Spills, British Colombia gas export pipelines, Proposed Oakville Generating Station that provided critical perspectives on the company. I've left a message on their talk page asking for an explanation. Strangely their user page is just the company article. Here's the direct link to the revision I am referring to: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TransCanada_Corporation&type=revision&diff=830412928&oldid=822746894&diffmode=source mennonot (talk)


 * Response: I rewrote the entire article and removed both outdated and insignificant information. In recognition of your concerns, I added a criticism section.


 * I've added back in some of the sections you deleted on March 14. Full details of that deletion here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TransCanada_Corporation&oldid=830252292

Removal of material critical of TransCanada, Part 2
Paperfire, can you explain this edit here?: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=TransCanada_Corporation&type=revision&diff=831262823&oldid=831083803&diffmode=source

The article referenced in the article is clearly critical of TransCanada:

https://www.pressreader.com/canada/vancouver-sun/20171101/281930248243140

Rather than rephrase this critical perspective, you just removed it.

Are you being paid to edit this page? If so, please note that Wikipedia has a Paid Contribution disclosure policy which you can read here: Paid-contribution disclosure mennonot (talk)