Talk:The Hundred of Hoo Academy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 10:18, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changes March 2011[edit]

The article has been considerably updated. This is to include new information and to cite sources ( the previous article had no sources). Also language has been changed so that the article is of encyclopaedic style rather than an advertisement.Dlangers (talk) 19:47, 22 March 2011 (UTC). Much work is still needed possibly with a slimmed down article removing the more 'newsletter' like elements. Dlangers (talk) 23:18, 22 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Malicious Changes[edit]

Deletions are being made without stated reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moz1992 (talkcontribs) 20:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the content, citing BLP issues. The sources given are not adequate for the claims made. Reaper Eternal (talk) 21:01, 23 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The source is a national newspaper which clearly names the school additionally a local paper carriers the same story. http://www.kentonline.co.uk/medway_messenger/news/2011/march/21/teacher_arrested.aspx

What additional evidence would be required?Moz1992 (talk) 21:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

information added with no danger of issues with BLP Moz1992 (talk) 21:37, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed section[edit]

I have taken the disputed section to the The Hundred of Hoo Academy/sandbox. Reversions without reading the changes don't work. They waste time, and destroy interpersonal relations. The material that was included in the staff handbook (which I cannot find at the moment) is a suscinct history of the effect reorganisations on a volatile community. Google searches are almost a waste of time as they just refer back. I left a detailed comment in my last edit summary that was blocked by an edit conflict - but the middle paragraphs are over detailed, and when referenced they need to be rewritten. I wont be on this page till late tomorrow- real life commitments. ClemRutter (talk) 00:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The school has had many lives, driven by external changes- so I have had another go, and split this the section and added geographic context. From 2012 we have two GOOD Ofsteds. A way forward maybe. --ClemRutter (talk) 17:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
KS3 , KS4, KS5 curriculums in place. As the school is moving toward being an all-through school adding the 1 FE primary classes is a challenge. We are missing ten years of recent history and building. All the IB is a bonus and the Ofsteds have unexploited referenced. ClemRutter (talk) 18:12, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]