Talk:Trello

Trello Marketing Removal
All content removed was from the companies own website. It is advertising/marketing when the companies plants information in wikipedia and then uses their own website to back it up.

Thereandnot (talk) 13:54, 1 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Not quite. If it's a direct copy of their text, then it's a copyright violation and should be removed, otherwise. it's just supported by a primary source, which isn't ideal, but not wrong. I have a serious problem with your editing though. I think you should avoid editing articles by your competitors until you have a better understanding of how Wikipedia works. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)


 * These claims are not verafiable anywhere expect their own website. Small companies like these can claim anything on their website and it is not true. These are Self-Published sources WP:BLPSPS.


 * Competitors? What the hell are you taking about?! You are showing bad faith(WP:BADFAITH). I am not a competitor to this company. I am just calling this advertising like it is!
 * Thereandnot (talk) 14:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Sorry. I confused you with an editor who has been complaining about articles like this and gutting them. Since you have cleared up my confusion, I need to clear yours up. Since this is not a biography of a living person, BLPSPS does not apply, WP:PRIMARY does: "Unless restricted by another policy, reliable primary sources may be used in Wikipedia; but only with care, because it is easy to misuse them". The material is not being misused as far as I can see, but perhaps you can explain it. I have restored the material while we discuss this. Walter Görlitz (talk) 15:35, 11 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I edited the article to make it seem less deceptive to users. There is a healthy skepticism around these numbers they are pushing. They are the only ones reporting them. Thereandnot (talk) 02:32, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * I noticed. I would argue it's poor writing as well, but you had an agenda and you can have your way this way too. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:18, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Once again, I have no interest in this software or its competitors. However, I will rip down anything that seems like small or large corporate manipulation of people or violation of neutrality. If you feel like you need a neutral third party weighing in on a situation that is similar(corporation posting information about itself evidenced only by claims on its own website), post on my wall and I will step in with consistency.Thereandnot (talk) 23:20, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

2015 news item to consider for use
I don't have time to contribute based on this source at this time ... but can later ... unless you do it first :-) &mdash; "Trello: Your digital replacement for sticky notes and whiteboards?" at http://www.techrepublic.com/article/trello-your-digital-replacement-for-sticky-notes-and-whiteboards/ . --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 01:44, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Impowement
How to be take to the organisation page to add members click on the member tab 158.62.57.34 (talk) 06:19, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Proposed system
Architecture of trello app 206.84.224.97 (talk) 09:56, 18 February 2023 (UTC)