Talk:Vaccine Confidence Project

Vaccine industry funding
I have restored the quite proper and uncontroversial acknowledgment that this body is funded by vaccine manufacturers. Another editor has persistently sought to suppress this information, offering his or her opinions about the relevance of this fact. Plainly it's relevant, acknowledged by the body itself and, according to standard practice, its director has acknowledged these links in scientific papers. There is no legitimate reason to suppress this information, as it is properly sourced and relevant to our understanding of who stands behind this body. If the editor wishes to add other sources of its funding, he is free to do so, so long as it is supported by proper referencing. Dreamwoven (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

COVID-19_misinformation#See_also and link back?
Iv'e put a link to this article in the "See also" section of COVID-19_misinformation, shall we put a "See also" section here too and link back - don't know if that's recommended? Cheers, SvenAERTS (talk) 23:27, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Adding links in the See also section is potentially confusing, since the purported connection is not strong enough for a link in the article, but someone thinks they are nevertheless linked. This organization may merit mention there because of it's role in fighting misinformation about COVID vaccines, but I don't immediately see that there would need to be a see also link back from here to every topic where it might be seen to have related activities. There is certainly no global expectation that all see also links be reciprocal.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 02:22, 22 November 2021 (UTC)