Talk:Video game monetization

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2018 and 11 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Olionheart.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:40, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Good job!
For me as a novice reader, some technical terms are unfamiliar to me. But the description covers the key point very well. Zhaoyebai (talk) 14:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Putting this article under categories
Here are some categories I think this page can belong to:

Category:Video game industry

Category:Video game marketing

Category:Video game design

It can be mentioned in page like: Video_game_design

--Zhaoyebai (talk) 10:53, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Video game monetization. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151208140232/http://skillz.com/blog/2013/03/15/not-just-hype-the-rise-of-indie-game-developers/ to http://skillz.com/blog/2013/03/15/not-just-hype-the-rise-of-indie-game-developers/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:05, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Missing the phenomena of blockchain games
Aka play-to-earn, GameFi. They are only briefly mentioned under 'player trading'. Considering the growth of this phenomenon, I think it needs its own section. There is content at Blockchain (stand alone article was deleted in 2018 but IMHO the topic is notable now: Articles for deletion/Blockchain game). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:20, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Right now, its still a lot of speculation, which is the problem, and given that it is also tied to cryptocurrency, an area that WP is extremely wary about covering, I'd be hesistent about expanding out too much more until we have clear viability in this area. Its all still pie-in-the-sky based on media sources. --M asem (t) 14:57, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I've been active in the crypto spam cleaning a while ago, but recently I switched around to thinking crypto has outgrown its immature spam phase and is becoming notable. The coverage I see seems to meet GNG criteria (in-depth, independent, reliable). Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:44, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * I do not disagree that we're getting GNG-quality sourcing (you'll see I expanded on these a bit more). I just think that the market around it is still highly speculative as to have a standalone at this time. --M asem (t) 13:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * @Masem Why should the speculative factor matter? Notablity is not temporary. Even if it is a short-lived fad and it dies out soon, it if achieved notability now, it deserves a stand-alone article forever. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Research Process and Methodology - FA22 - Sect 200 - Thu
— Assignment last updated by Luciuszlt (talk) 00:45, 4 December 2022 (UTC)