Talk:W. H. Burford & Sons

Why should this article be split?
Imagine News Corp. article is having whole biography of Rupert Murdoch. Awkward. JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 17:56, 17 September 2013 (UTC)


 * It has been suggested that this article be split into multiple articles accessible from a disambiguation page.
 * It has been suggested by whom?
 * Where is this suggestion?
 * What are the reasons for this suggestion?
 * What are the reasons for the split?
 * What would the disambiguation page be called?
 * What are the pages it would be split into, and what would be their names?
 * Please explain. Pdfpdf (talk) 12:03, 16 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Today, I suggest this article be split into W. H. Burford & Son (the company), W. H. Burford (the person) and William Burford (his son) because I believe the current situation of this article is against Wikipedia's policy. Enough? JSH-alive/talk/cont/mail 14:07, 18 September 2013 (UTC)


 * What would the disambiguation page be called?
 * I believe the current situation of this article is against Wikipedia's policy. - Which policy or policies?
 * Pdfpdf (talk) 16:00, 18 September 2013 (UTC)


 * What would be gained by splitting? Not readability. It's not (and never will be) a huge article. Doug butler (talk) 15:05, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Confusion about history
I don't have time to investigate now, but the histories seem to be confused as per this WP article (which needs better citing), the info in this one and the info attached to this photo. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:37, 26 April 2019 (UTC)