Talk:Year 2011 problem

Untitled
It should perhaps be Y1H rather than Y1C if you're making an analogy with Y2K: 1000 = M (Latin numeral), or k (SI prefix); 100 = C (Latin numeral), or h (SI prefix). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.140.96.21 (talk) 15:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Looking at the date...
Given that 1 January 民國100 has been and gone, shouldn't the article be updated to reflect this? Where would one find reliable news on the ROC in English? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Odin of Trondheim (talk • contribs) 01:47, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, you may google it here. However, it is still Chinese version.  203.186.23.33 (talk) 15:28, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Y1C Problem. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20100313141209/http://y100.dgbas.gov.tw:80/y100/faq/faq.asp to http://y100.dgbas.gov.tw/y100/faq/faq.asp
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091210072831/http://y100.dgbas.gov.tw:80/ to http://y100.dgbas.gov.tw/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:15, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Is there a citation/justification for the page rename done in March 2020?
I didn't do an extensive search, but I don't see any indications that this incident was called "the year 2011 problem". There are a number of instances that can be found -- a couple of which are already cited in the article -- of it being called "the Y1C problem".--NapoliRoma (talk) 00:31, 6 September 2020 (UTC)