Talk:Zeno Clash

Improving the article
For an independent game, there are a lot of sources floating around online for the reception and development sections. I think we can bring it up a notch! I'll be working on this article for a while, and help is very much welcome. I'll dump some useful links here: Regards, BlazerKnight (talk) 02:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Zeno Clash blog, primary source with development notes
 * Rock, Paper, Shotgun, has a bunch of useful news stories like announce of DLC and so forth
 * Kotaku, same as above
 * Metacritic page, GameRankings page, for links to more reviews
 * I've added more citations and expanded on several sections. Hope to push for GA. I noticed a bunch of unformatted external links at cut it from the article. I'll eventually sift through them and see if they can be used as relevant citations. Feel free to help.

BlazerKnight (talk) 06:35, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Media & News
 * Teaser Video - Gametrailers
 * Gameplay Video - Gametrailers
 * Game's announcement - IGN
 * Developer Interview - That Videogame Blog
 * Developer Interview - Casualty Gamer
 * Hands-on preview - Eurogamer
 * Review - Eurogamer
 * Review - Horror Style Magazine
 * Interview with Andres Bordeu, Designer of Zeno Clash - Horror Style Magazine
 * Postmortem: ACE Team's Zeno Clash

2009-11-05 Assessment

 * The Reception section is really the only big thing here keeping this article from B-Class. Be sure you mention the aggregate scores in the prose of the section (it would be nice in the lead, too).
 * Check for spaces between the ending of a sentence or phrase and the start of a cite. Cites should always be as close to the text as possible
 * The Development section could use merging into three, or maybe even two paragraphs.
 * As the Post-release section is short in content, it may be best to combine sub-sections into one.

Overall a really nice read. Fix up those few little things and it's a easy B-Class, and well on it's way to becoming a GA. --Teancum (talk) 13:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for helping, Jade. Teancum, I believe I have addressed the last point - mentioning the aggregate scores in the lead and the reception section. I have taken the liberty of upgrading it to B class as your last edit seems to have intended. Thanks for reviewing! BlazerKnight (talk) 04:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)