Template:Did you know nominations/Huawei Honor 4X

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 4meter4 (talk) 02:54, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Huawei Honor 4X[edit]

Created by SSTflyer (talk). Self-nominated at 15:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC).

  • The article is new enough (16th to today), large enough (2500), neutral, cites sources, and doesn't appear to have any copyright violations (although I can't run the Earwig tool on this device). QPQ is fine, and there's no image in the nom. I think that it needs a new hook though - it uses source 2 for the price comparison and source 3 for the feature comparison, but the hook uses "devices" and the article only really compares the Honor to the Moto G, making the plural problematic. Perhaps a hook that directly compares features between the two, or a hook that mentions that it's in the same price range as the Moto G and the Xperia M2, but is the only phablet of the three? I'm open to whatever else you come up with. Mobile Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 18:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
  • Err, sorry, I guess that I didn't communicate what I wanted to. So the issue is that, as the article reads right now:
Source 2 compares the Honor with other devices (plural), but only in phone size
Source 3 compares the Honor with one other device (singular), favorably
So changing "devices" to "smartphones" doesn't fix the issue, which is that unless you're talking specifically about size, the Honor has been compared favorably to one device (singular), not devices (plural).
How do you feel about either of:
ALT3 might be a bit on the advert-y side though. Ugh, I'm probably making mountains out of molehills. If you don't like either of the ALTs, please feel free to get a second opinion on whether your original hook is suitable. If someone else says it's fine, it's probably fine. Mobile Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Yeah, ALT2 is good. I agree that ALT3 is too advert-y. I would recommend changing the first "is" to "was" though, because mobile phone pricing decreases quickly. ALT2a: ... that while the Huawei Honor 4X was in the same price range as the second generation Moto G and the Sony Xperia M2, the Honor 4X is a phablet? sst✈discuss 15:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
That's fine. Mobile Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)