User:Gerda Arendt/ACE 2014

For 2013, see User:Gerda Arendt/Vote ACE 2013

In 2014, let's keep it simple. In my Wikipedia life, I was involved in one case, called Infoboxes (which was not about infoboxes, as I learned in a process that showed me how vulnerable I am). At times, Clarification and Enforcement were tried.

Question for the candidates: How would you have responded in this case:

Request concerning Pigsonthewing
 * User who is submitting this request for enforcement : 12:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC)


 * User against whom enforcement is requested :


 * Sanction or remedy to be enforced: Arbitration/Requests/Case/Infoboxes : "Pigsonthewing is indefinitely banned from adding, or discussing the addition or removal of, infoboxes"


 * Diffs of edits that violate this sanction or remedy, and an explanation how these edits violate it :
 * 1) 18 July 2014 - editor adds an infobox template

User was asked to self-revert and declined to do so.
 * Additional comments by editor filing complaint :


 * Notification of the user against whom enforcement is requested :

Filed at Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement/Archive153 if you want to study what some future colleagues said.

Answers
Yunshui matches my own evaluation best. My favourite response in the actual proceedings was by Floquenbeam who was an arb then, repeated by Salvio giuliano: no foul, play on. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:35, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Results