User talk:1000Faces

EJ Photo
because the photo had already been removed and the link was empty. --Dexter_prog (talk • contribs • count ) @ 04:48, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:SheltieDuke.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:SheltieDuke.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 01:08, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

removal off jabiru image
Hello 1000Faces - I think it may not have been the best move to completely replace my photo on the jabiru page with yours. In some ways, mine is more encyclopedic (the head is in profile, and there is less motion blur). Yours is better in other ways (such as the view of the body). Perhaps in the future you can simply add photos as additional illustrations, unless the article already has too many - which Jabiru does not. Cheers, Debivort 03:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

IAST template commented out
Hi, I noticed that you commented out the IAST template on Vishnu with this diff. Can you please document the problem you detected with it? The IAST template is very widely used and I want to understand what problem you may have detected. Thanks. I also notice that you have raised formatting as an issue on the Dharmic religions talk page, which is great. You may want to give your question a couple of days on talk to see if you get any comments. When making changes to layouts you may also try making just one change at a time and then waiting to see if anyone reverts it. I have noticed that making several changes at once may result in all of the being reverted even if some would have stuck individually. Buddhipriya 05:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Jazz Alley
Jazz Alley, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Jazz Alley satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Jazz Alley and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Jazz Alley during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  New England  Review Me!/ Go Red Sox! 18:35, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:LetterFromHomeAlbum.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LetterFromHomeAlbum.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 15:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FalconSnowman.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:FalconSnowman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:03, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Amapoftheworldst.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Amapoftheworldst.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:58, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:StillLifeTalking.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:StillLifeTalking.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:03, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Ardipithecus
I made some changes you requested on the Primate project talk page, without having first seen your request. Check it out, contribute further improvements. For me, I have no definite plans to return to this article. MaxEnt (talk) 16:25, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Visual cliff
A tag has been placed on Visual cliff requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KurtRaschke (talk) 04:10, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Blamires thedavidblamiresgroup.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Blamires thedavidblamiresgroup.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:30, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

August (2001 Novel)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of August (2001 Novel), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: August (novel). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:30, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Indra's net image
I recently created and posted an image related to Indra's Net but used to describe the idea of integration in design and engineering. I'd love to see it used.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Indras_Net-03.png

David. —Preceding unsigned comment added by David.parrott (talk • contribs) 03:35, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Structural Family Therapy


The article Structural Family Therapy has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; RHaworth 04:13, 17 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello, 1000Faces. Thanks very much for the work you put into writing this article. Just a reminder, though, that it would be helpful to cite several independent sources when you write a new article. Best wishes, Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 05:43, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Neuroborreliosis
I noticed you commented on the poor quality of the article neuroborreliosis. I am just letting you know that I have added a signs and symptoms section to this article. Questions? Ask on my talk page. Immunize (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shirkry


The article Shirkry has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable fictional character, with 49 regular Google hits, zero Google News hits, one Google Books hit (in The Neverending Story itself) and zero Google scholar hits.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 12:41, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ushtu


The article Ushtu has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for references failed to find significant coverage in reliable sources to comply with notability requirements. This included web searches for news coverage, books, and journals, which can be seen from the following links: Ushtu – news, books, scholar Consequently, this article is about a subject that appears to lack sufficient notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abductive (reasoning) 12:46, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:DragonsBlood.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:DragonsBlood.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Blamires thedavidblamiresgroup.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Blamires thedavidblamiresgroup.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Prosocial behavior for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prosocial behavior is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Prosocial behavior until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 17:08, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pacific Northwest Booksellers Association Award


The article Pacific Northwest Booksellers Association Award has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced, no evidence of notability for this award

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 01:43, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Failed suicide attempt (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to NIMH


 * Suicide terminology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Fairbairn

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
You've done some incredible work on the Suicide terminology article. That was going to take me at least a year. Thank you. Markhenick (talk) 17:19, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the kudos! --1000Faces (talk) 17:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Wait list control group
Hello, 1000Faces. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Wait list control group, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TRL (talk) 03:38, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Relapse prevention


A tag has been placed on Relapse prevention requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://cocaine-addiction-relapse-prevention.blogspot.com/2013/07/relapse-prevention.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. red dog six (talk) 15:51, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TheMoralAnimal.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:TheMoralAnimal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of August (Rossner novel)


The article August (Rossner novel) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Appears to fail Notability (books). Majority of the article is simply a listing of characters in the book.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ifnord (talk) 19:48, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Crossover jazz


The article Crossover jazz has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Questionable notability, not enough sources. The content is wrong. Crossover jazz is a marketing term, not a genre. It refers to jazz that sells to fans outside of jazz and appears on record charts outside of jazz."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vmavanti (talk) 00:16, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Unmanifest for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unmanifest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Unmanifest until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Daask (talk) 22:13, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of David Blamires


The article David Blamires has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable sideman, no sourcing found. Claims of Grammy win were not substantiated and removed (the Grammy was for Pat Metheny, Blamires was only a sideman on the album)"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Crossover jazz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Crossover jazz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Crossover jazz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 04:17, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, 1000Faces. Thank you for your work on David Blamires. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 01:26, 20 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Humanistic therapy
I widened this redirect to point to existing articles - your comments welcome, regards, Timpo (talk) 09:48, 1 June 2024 (UTC)