User talk:108.56.178.153

August 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Dark energy has been reverted. Your edit here to Dark energy was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://www.reddit.com/r/MyTheoryIs/comments/ftvckv/theory_black_holessingularities_are_responsible/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 16:43, 21 August 2020 (UTC) If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. El_C 22:49, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Reddit is not a reliable source
Hi, I noticed you've been trying to add content to Dark energy cited to Reddit. Reddit is not a reliable source and will not be accepted to support content in an article. You'll need to find a reliable source for the information that you want to add. Schazjmd  (talk)  23:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bob Woodward. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 03:34, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop it or you will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 03:37, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bob Woodward, you may be blocked from editing.   Sievert 81 (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bob Woodward.   Sievert 81 (talk) 03:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 03:42, 10 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Hello, I'm Transcendental36. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse.   Transcendental36 (talk) 21:19, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Transcendental36 (talk) 21:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)


 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of genocides by death toll, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — MarkH21talk 20:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2020
Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Insatiable (TV series)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 04:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Septic tank—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 19:35, 20 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm Phuzion. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Chinese nationalism—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Phuzion (talk) 15:35, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Rosemont Seneca Partners. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to San Francisco District Attorney's Office, you may be blocked from editing. LizardJr8 (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Cesar Chavez. ChipotleHater (talk) 05:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2021
Hello, I'm Uranium Site. Your recent edit(s) to the page Environmental, social and corporate governance appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been removed for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Uranium Site (talk) 05:21, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 2016 shooting of Dallas police officers. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.   Hydrogenation (talk) 19:14, 19 June 2021 (UTC)