User talk:113.197.13.138

Welcome!
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I greatly appreciate your constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Recent changes patrol

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you  [ create an account] . Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits, such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (113.197.13.138) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chipmunkdavis&action=edit&section=new my talk page], or ask your question and then place  before the question on this page.

Again, welcome! CMD (talk) 07:46, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Java and Sumatra
I see you're new to Wikipedia. Thanks for being WP:BOLD When editors revert your work, you need to discuss them and achieve consensus. See WP:BRD. You can't just keep reverting. See WP:3RR.Please raise this on the article's talk page before proceeding further. --Merbabu (talk) 06:18, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * No... you keep reverting, I will keep reverting you.113.197.13.138 (talk) 05:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * "No" you won't take it to talk page? I would cut the reverting out. Take it to the talk page to discuss. You've now got four separate editors disagreeing with you. Wikipedia needs and welcomes good new editors. But it will also block people who can't work within it's policies and guidelines. --Merbabu (talk) 09:51, 16 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Stop hand nuvola.svg Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution.  In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Davidelit (Talk) 07:50, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm Merbabu. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Manus Province that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. "Use your brains" is not per our WP:CIVIL policy Merbabu (talk) 11:19, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 08:48, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring at Sumatra
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. per a complaint at the noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 19:10, 18 June 2020 (UTC)


 * This doesnt make any sense. Why was i blocked? The other persons were not blocked.113.197.13.138 (talk) 06:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * That's because five separate people each rolled back your edit. You kept going. They suggested you raise it on the talk page as is the Wikipedia way. Read: WP:3RR and WP:BRD. There's other things to learn, but that's enough for now. Also, there are instructions on how to appeal the block. But it's only 31 hours. If continue the same way when you're unblocked, the next block will be longer, and so on, until it's permanent. As we said, use the article talk pages. For example Talk:Sumatra. --Merbabu (talk) 07:24, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Okay. What about the other articles. Someone asked for sources and i put a source. But it was reverted. Can you explain? Thanks. 113.197.13.138 (talk) 07:33, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Did you mean edit on Manus Province? Because you put content about detention center on economy section, so you need to provide clear connection between detention center and economy with proper source. Information about the detention center itself is already mentioned on lead/intro section. Ckfasdf (talk) 07:41, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes. Manus province.113.197.13.138 (talk) 06:44, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Your recent editing history at List of tallest buildings in Abu Dhabi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Austronesier (talk) 09:17, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 09:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Whats your problem Austronesier?? Ive put sources and more info into that Andaman and Nicobar Islands page. 113.197.13.138 (talk) 07:40, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Please stop your disruptive editing on the Conversion to Judaism page. If you feel so strongly about the change you wish to make, raise it on the talk page. You can't try to force things on Wikipedia; that's not how things work. Île flottante (talk) 13:25, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Hannah Clarke, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:47, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at South Australian State Emergency Service, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 14:26, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit warring at List of tallest buildings in Abu Dhabi
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 10 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. The full report is at the noticeboard. You are getting into trouble so many different places it is hard to WP:Assume good faith. EdJohnston (talk) 16:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Well, thats not just my problem. Other editors dont want to listen to me by the looks of it, Ed.113.197.13.138 (talk) 07:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, it is correct that now we don't want to listen to you anymore, after giving you more than ample hearing on a number of pages. People have been patient and helpful, but there are limits. Also, have you not noticed that you are alone against least 1/2 dozen editors? I'm guessing more editors if we did a thorough tally. As was noted in Talk:Java, it is you who haven't listened (read). It is now disruptive to wikipedia and good editors' time. That is why you are blocked. --Merbabu (talk) 07:27, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * By the way, your access to your talk page (ie, this page) is not yet blocked. You can appeal your block - see the instructions above. However, note that you can also be blocked from this page if it gets disruptive. --Merbabu (talk) 07:30, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I'll appeal the block now then. Is that okay? 113.197.13.138 (talk) 07:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Murder of Hannah Clarke, you may be blocked from editing. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 04:51, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * You are vandalizing. Now stop it!!113.197.13.138 (talk) 04:52, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Timeline of major crimes in Australia. Trains2050 (talk) 05:24, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at South Australian State Emergency Service. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Timeline of major crimes in Australia, you may be blocked from editing. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:18, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sydney Airport. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


 * You are the offing vandal!. Go ahead, I will have you blocked113.197.13.138 (talk) 07:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Sydney Airport shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Andrewgprout (talk) 08:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Enough is enough. You have been blocked. Graham 87 12:30, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Samaria (disambiguation), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 06:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC)


 * You can leave it alone. Thanks. You made a mistake. 113.197.13.138 (talk) 06:13, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Canadian passport, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 07:10, 9 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Yes, you wanted a source and Ive added it.113.197.13.138 (talk) 07:21, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Hello, I'm 1AmNobody24. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Smuggling, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 08:10, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Arms trafficking, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 08:11, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Moustache, you may be blocked from editing. 1AmNobody24 (talk) 08:12, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Moustache. Materialscientist (talk) 08:17, 14 December 2022 (UTC)


 * There is a source now! Stop being disruptive ok?113.197.13.138 (talk) 08:17, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Adequate sourcing does not mean you can add what you want wherever you want. Materialscientist (talk) 08:19, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

September 2023
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ivan Kulesh, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:51, 15 September 2023 (UTC)