User talk:207.229.139.154

Welcome!
Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! SunDawn (talk) 04:38, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you! :) 04:39, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuan-ti (August 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Yuan-ti may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:207.229.139.154 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rich_Smith&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:207.229.139.154 reviewer's talk page] . or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 21:36, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Yuan-ti (August 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Salimfadhley was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Yuan-ti and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Yuan-ti, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Yuan-ti Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Salimfadhley&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Yuan-ti reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Salimfadhley (talk) 15:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Guardians of the Galaxy (2008 team)
You'll find his name under the Fresh Start section of List of Guardians of the Galaxy membersMark Rhodes 13 (talk) 13:31, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

Warnings
Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Partha Basak 20:09, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * Fair enough, I'm pretty sure this has been discussed at the WikiProject Comics talk page, but I will bring it up there again. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 20:12, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Hello, I'm Lectrician2. I noticed that in this edit to Clea, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Lectrician2 (talk) 04:00, 30 December 2021 (UTC)


 * I did explain why I removed it - it is unsourced. Information about actors playing characters in movies should always be sourced. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 13:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mockingbird (Marvel Comics). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yodas henchman (talk) 04:16, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * User:Yodas henchman, my edit, as indicated in the edit summary, was based on the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Comics. Do you disagree with the outcome of that discussion, or the way I handled removing the material? 207.229.139.154 (talk) 13:09, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jungle (board game), you may be blocked from editing. Fiwec81618 (talk) 03:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Fiwec81618, can you explain how adding a wikilink to the cited book is disruptive? Thank you. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 03:24, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It looks like the Playboy Press book is cited for the sentence "Jungle is a two-player strategy game and has been cited as resembling the Western game Stratego," and not the sentence that comes right before it where you added the wikilink to the book. Besides this, the source does not seem significant enough to spell out in the text of the lead. Fiwec81618 (talk) 03:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Assuming good faith however I think the edit may not have been disruptive. When I sent the warning I only checked the source for the sentence where you added it and saw that it did not agree with the added wikilink; I saw the Playboy Press source for the other unmodified sentence only after I saw your Talk page message. Fiwec81618 (talk) 03:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
 * You're right, I did add it to the wrong sentence! 207.229.139.154 (talk) 13:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to A-Train III. Garnarblarnar (talk) 16:00, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Garnarblarnar, can you explain how my edits on this article were vandalism, and why you feel I needed such a harsh warning? 207.229.139.154 (talk) 16:02, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Garnarblarnar, specifically, this edit that you pointed to, how is that vandalism? 207.229.139.154 (talk) 16:04, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oops! My mistake. I apologize for that, I am still trying to find out how to get a specific thing working. Sorry for any inconvenience. I hope you are doing alright today. Garnarblarnar (talk) 16:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm great, and thank you for taking the time to look at this. :) 207.229.139.154 (talk) 16:06, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Deleted warning, edit was ok, but unsourced. --Serols (talk) 14:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Serols, it looks like this edit before mine incorrectly identified Daredevil as a "mutant", so in my edit, I reverted it as being incorrect. Note that nowhere in the article is Daredevil identified as a mutant, as far as I am aware. If you think I made an error please let me know, and if you can explain how my edit was disruptive I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 04:58, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hello 207.229.139.154, please use sources. Regards --Serols (talk) 14:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Roundish   ⋆  t c) 21:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Please stop edit warring at Thor (Marvel Comics) and take your dispute to the article's talk page. -- MelanieN (talk) 00:03, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Hello, I'm Adakiko. An edit you recently made to Moon Knight seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 01:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I was removing unsourced text. I'm not seeing how this is a problem. I will remove it again if you are unable to better explain this to me. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 02:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Moon Knight. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 04:12, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Adakiko can you explain how removing unsourced text is unconstructive. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 04:13, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The sources is specified to be Marvel Universe #42992. You also changed the link "Infinity Wars" to "Infinity Warps" - no such article. Adakiko (talk)
 * Adakiko and what kind of a source is "Marvel Universe #42992"? Is that a comic book title, or another book of some kind, or a website? I'm pretty into comic books and I have to confess I actually have no idea what they are referring to and the person adding it did not specify where they got this information from. Now if you look at Infinity Wars and scroll maybe halfway down the page, you will see that there were indeed several titles published under the "Infinity Warps" warps name, although I will concede that there is no wikilink to that title, so changing it from "Infinity Warps" to "Infinity Wars" in this case actually makes the article less correct, but I can see changing it back without the redlink as being appropriate. In fact, if you look at the inline citations in that section, you will see that they still say "Infinity Warps" even after you reverted the section change. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 06:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Try https://marvel.fandom.com/wiki/Category:Earth-42992/Characters - I removed that section as OR. Adakiko (talk) 08:32, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, thank you! 207.229.139.154 (talk) 13:06, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Red Skull, you may be blocked from editing. Sahas P. (talk) 22:37, 28 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Sahas P., the content I removed was unsourced. Can you please take another look and advise as to whether it really belongs in the article as written? Thank you. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 22:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Sure, I will. Sahas P. (talk) 22:39, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you. Here is the revert for ease:  207.229.139.154 (talk) 22:39, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Unexplained manual revert
Since you chose not to leave an edit summary; please explain why you manually reverted my edit to Baldur's Gate (video game)  15:58, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I think I didn't understand why you added the parenthesis. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Other than suggesting that you do understand edits before reverting them in future; because the citation template was warning of a generic author name when the author(s) named by the source are actually generic. By wrapping the author value in that way, the template ignores what would be a false-positive. I will revert your ill informed reversion of my edit now.  21:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to Ch'od, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 08:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Adakiko, I did explain why, in my edit summary: That content is unsourced. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 08:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The whole paragraph is unsourced. Why that part? Adakiko (talk) 08:55, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Adakiko, because that text was newly added and unsourced, and is also greatly out of sequence with the rest of the text. But, if you believe it has value, then it's on you as the person who restored it so I'll defer to your judgement to its value being worth retaining. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 08:58, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * That makes sense. I restored your revert. Thanks for the interaction! My apology for your troubles. Cheers Adakiko (talk) 09:05, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 09:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

"Animal skeleton" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Animal skeleton and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 23 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Adumbrativus (talk) 12:12, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Kelly and Luke
Didn't realize that they had their own pages. 32.214.191.219 (talk) 21:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
Hello. Your edit to Mr. Sinister was reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.

I'm not sure why you fact-tagged some other entries, even though you had just added uncited material in other entries, but a given work can function as its own primary source for its existence, credits, and content, even though secondary sources are preferred. However, entires on a comics character's appearances in other media should be succinctly summarized, without excessive detail about those works' plots.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 15:15, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Gen Con
Oops! Good catch on the year for Gen Con. As a side-note, you might have an easier time around here if you registered an account. Of course it isn't required, but it does seem to help. The Wordsmith Talk to me 17:07, 1 February 2023 (UTC)


 * No worries, I'm happy to help clean up little things here and there. :) 207.229.139.154 (talk) 05:53, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Reverting
STOP REVERTING MY EDIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IT WAS CONSTRUCTIVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 * If you say so. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 05:44, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Hello, I'm TheManInTheBlackHat. An edit that you recently made to HeroQuest seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! TheManInTheBlackHat  (Talk)  02:57, 16 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I fixed the part that I messed up. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 02:59, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Siege (video game)
Why did you revert the edit which expanded the bare reference? Hope you'll not repeat it. Egeymi (talk) 10:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)


 * You've got the full cite web this time, thank you, so no I won't remove it again. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 13:29, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Roleplaying game reviews
Please note that reviews should be placed on the talk page of an article to be used as sources per WP:ELMAYBE. There should be no review section in the main article. Sciencefish (talk) 08:50, 9 April 2023 (UTC)


 * I moved some of them into the reception section, which is not easy as I'm using Google Translate to give me an idea of what the foreign review says. Do you think it would be acceptable to include these under a "Further reading" section until someone is able to add them actually into the articles? 207.229.139.154 (talk) 14:31, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Bare URLs
Please don't use bare urls in citations as they are subject to WP:LINKROT. Sciencefish (talk) 14:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yes. Stop mangling articles by adding fake sections and broken date formats, which violate MOS:LAYOUT, MOS:DATES, and WP:PROSELINE at the very least. You actively destroyed valid section layouts, prose, and date formatting and you never format citations, such as bare URLs. You and BOZ and possibly others have spammed this identical pattern of robotic, profoundly disruptive, and WP:TENDENTIOUS editing for years, leaving a huge mess for everyone else to clean up. You stop right now and go back and clean every single one of these edits. Users can be blocked for disruptive editing, and I'm reporting it. — Smuckola(talk) 06:48, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Hello. Thank you for your efforts. However, if you're going to be adding sources without actually writing any content, please be aware of WP:LINKFARM. Lists of random links at the bottom of articles are not desirable. Feel free to keep finding sources, but put them on talk pages for other editors to implement if you're not willing to implement them yourself. Thanks. Sergecross73  msg me  13:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)


 * That's reasonable, thank you. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 13:22, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you for hearing me out, I appreciate it. Sergecross73   msg me  13:31, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Hello, I'm Aviram7. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Menzoberranzan—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 🥇 Àvî Râm7 (talk) 🩺 11:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)


 * @Aviram7, OK I will add the "sic" template myself since people want to alter a quotation. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 11:21, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Warren Spector
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Warren Spector, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Warren_Spector&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1154616981%7CWarren%20Spector%5D%5D Ask for help])

Stop citations
Stop adding your studied citations JosephWC (talk) 18:34, 25 May 2023 (UTC)


 * So, I should add citations that have not been studied? 207.229.139.154 (talk) 19:35, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * It looks like you keep adding Backstab. They're not considered a reliable source. Not yet anyway. I highly suggest you check out this page for a list of sources. And if you feel strongly, then make a new post on the talk page there. Xanarki (talk) 04:31, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm assuming that magazine has been checked for reliability on the French wikipedia? Anyway, I'm almost done with that source now. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 05:15, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Enough with the vandalism
What you're doing is vandalism whether you realize it or not. You keep removing titles from citations and messing with links. If this continues you will be reported. Silbad (talk) 22:09, 25 May 2023 (UTC)


 * If you're referring to unformatted citations, please use a citation template rather than slapping some random title on a bald link. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 00:30, 26 May 2023 (UTC)


 * As you can see from the last comments in here, I'm not the only one complaining about your edits. You do not remove the title from the citation. If you don't think it's good enough, you either improve it by adding something more to it, or you just let it be. You do not remove anything from it. That's not improvement, that's making it worse. Silbad (talk) 01:26, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * "If you don't like that I do it the wrong way, then fix it the right way yourself." Got it. :\ 207.229.139.154 (talk) 02:19, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * cite web isn't that hard to use or figure out. If you see I or someone else has stripped the "title" from your bare citation, you can also activate User:Citation bot on that article to get it to generate a citation template. Threatening me over it is kind of silly when you're the one not doing the work in the first place. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 02:29, 26 May 2023 (UTC)
 * And if you're still not sure, please see WP:BAREURLS, which explains that what you're doing is still a bare URL and how to more easily add a helpful citation template. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 12:32, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Stop adding picture requests to small articles
Adding more images than necessary violates WP:NFCC, and there are covers already in the articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:19, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Still need a citation for Clea
You removed my citation-needed mark for the pronunciation of Clea’s name, stating that there was there’s a citation for this in the infobox. Which citation, specifically, tells us how to pronounce Clea’s name? Neutron Jack (talk) 19:18, 1 June 2023 (UTC)


 * My apologies @Neutron Jack, I misinterpreted. I thought your cn tag was for her name being "Clea Strange" (for which there is a citation in the infobox), not for the pronunciation itself. Add it back, I will not revert. 207.229.139.154 (talk) 19:52, 1 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you—I will. I’ll add the cn tag inside of the parens, to emphasize that it's about the pronunciation. Neutron Jack (talk) 18:59, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Rocket Racoon
Hello, Just apologising for reverting your recent edit on the page (and correcting it in the 1st place, if it was yours originally).Your version was grammatically correct and clear! I realised it too late. I've restored it, of course. Yours, —  MY, OH, MY!   (mushy yank) — 20:50, 4 June 2023 (UTC)


 * No problem, and thank you! 207.229.139.154 (talk) 05:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Luke (The Walking Dead) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luke (The Walking Dead) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Luke (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Questions? four OLIfanofmrtennant (she/her) 15:25, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kelly (The Walking Dead) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kelly (The Walking Dead) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kelly (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 11:42, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Leah (The Walking Dead) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Leah (The Walking Dead) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Leah (The Walking Dead) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. . Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)