User talk:Ageo020/Archive 7

Citation for image use
Hi! I hadn't been t aware I was mis-citing images. I've added several and thought I was doing it correctly on the great bulk of them &mdash; but I can go back in and make fixes, and if there's one particular recurring thing, please let me know and I'll rectify it.

I appreciate your taking the time and making the effort to go the adminship page and making this constructive comment. Thanks! --Tenebrae 13:21, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Chicago - Batman Begins
readded tag after adding relevance to article. TonyTheTiger (talk/cont/bio/tcfkaWCDbwincowtchatlotpsoplrttaDCLaM) 17:58, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD process
Thanks for the information on processes. Can you tell me if I have correctly nominated the article at: Articles_for_deletion/Log/2007_May_20. If I have made further errors in process please advise. Buddhipriya 21:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Processes
"For speedy deletion, the article must have been created within 3 days", posted here. I'd like you to point out exactly where in WP:SPEEDY it says that, because I can't find it. There are some fairly strict criteria for speedy deletion, which the article in question probably doesn't meet, but tenure isn't one of them. Orpheus 00:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Re:Speedy Deletion
There is no limit, but the article must still meet speedy deletion policy just like in normal conditions. Nishkid64 (talk) 22:33, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Most definitely not. I saw tagged it for CSD G11, but that does not apply for this article. The article is written in a NPOV form, in my opinion, and G11 doesn't make sense. I think CSD A7 does not apply here because an assertion of notability (whether or not it complies with WP:BIO is another story) has been made in the article.  Nishkid64 (talk)  22:41, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion assertion
Howdy! I just read an assertion you made on a talk page that articles must be less than 3 days old to be speedy deleted. That's inaccurate, where did you hear that? An article could be on Wikipedia in some corner for years, then speedily deleted if it meets WP:CSD without regard to the creation date. Please review and understand policies before correcting others, bad information is much worse than not saying anything. - C HAIRBOY (☎) 22:38, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 21st, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 04:53, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your comments in my RFA. I wanted to "be bold" and nominate myself, as I do feel I can and will make for a good amin here. I am using everyone's comments, both positive and negative to improve my editing in hopes of an approval when I do nominate myself in the future. Wildthing61476 23:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Hi Ageo. I'd like to thank you for your support of my RfA. It was closed at surprising 75/0/0, so I'm an admin now. Max S em 21:19, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Peacent's Rfa
Hello, Ageo. Thank you so much for your kind support on my recent Rfa, it succeeded! I feel thrilled and hope to live up to your expectations. If you spot me messing things up, feel free to shout at me :) Best wishes, PeaceNT 06:51, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

My RFA
Many thanks for your support at my RFA. It ended successfully and I am now a glorified janitor. If I can be of any assistance please don't hesitate to contact me through my talk page. Happy editing! &mdash; O cat ecir  Talk  18:12, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of George W. Hough
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on George W. Hough, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because George W. Hough seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting George W. Hough, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate George W. Hough itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:44, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

db-spam Penny Dreadful Players
You don't think you were a little hasty in requesting the immediate annihilation of this article? Stevage 03:03, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for May 28th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:47, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Lucas Giba
Then the article is a hoax, which is not speediable. The article certainly asserts the notability of the subject, playing for one of the top European soccer teams makes you notable, and so is not speediable under A7, even if what it says is wrong. Tag as a hoax, and either prod it or AfD it. J Milburn 22:20, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

RfC
Just wanted to let you know that I opened an RfC on myself in response to the concerns raised during my RfA over my actions in the Gary Weiss dispute. The RfC is located here and I welcome any comments or questions you may have. CLA 12:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

INCOTW updated
You voted for Bofors scandal, this week's Indian Collaboration of the Week. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article.--Dwaipayan (talk) 06:28, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 4th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Dear, thanks for your support in my recent RfA, it was, however, unsuccessful. I am not the type of editor to be disheartened by such a result, and have gained much experience. If you have anything to contribute by way of improvements or comments, please don’t hesitate to tell me.

I will run again. Until then, Cheers, Dfrg.msc 08:02, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 11th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 02:09, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 18th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 08:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for June 25th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:18, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for participating in my RfA. It was successful, and I am now, may God have mercy on us all, an administrator. Look at all the new buttons! I had heard about 'protect,' 'block user,' and 'delete,' but no one told me about 'kill,' 'eject,' and 'purée.' I appreciate the trust the community has in me, and I'll try hard not to delete the main page or block Jimbo. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

My recent RfB
Thank you so much for your participation in my recent RfB. Though it closed with 72% support (below the required 90%), I'm still quite pleased at the outpouring of support shown by a fair percentage of the community.

I'm currently tabulating and calculating all opposing and neutral arguments to help me better address the community's concerns about my abilities as a bureaucrat. If you'd like, you can follow my progress (and/or provide additional suggestions) at User:EVula/admin/RfB notes. Thanks again! EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 04:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 2nd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:21, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 9th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 07:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for your support in my successful RfA. I appreciate the trust you and the WP community have in me. Carlossuarez46 22:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 16th, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 19:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

India quiz set
You answered the last question of the Round 21 of WP:PINQ correctly. Round 21 is now archived. You are to ask the first question of round 22. Thank you. Regards.--Dwaipayan (talk) 18:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

My RfA
Thank you for participating in My RfA which closed successfully. I am honored and truly more than a little humbled by the support of so many members of the community. It's more than a bit of a lift to see comments on my behalf by so many people that I respect.

On a personal note, I appreciate your early support! - Philippe &#124; Talk 03:34, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for July 23rd, 2007.
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)