User talk:Alexandharrison

See My Wiki

Welcome!
Hi, Alexandharrison. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place   on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. §everal⇒|Times 15:33, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: This Article is Wrong (November 10)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! LionMans Account (talk) 06:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)

I Can't edit it --Alexandharrison (talk) 02:45, 10 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Were you trying to create an "inline" article tag ? Wikipedia already has a large collection of those, which you can check by visiting Template:Inline tags. There is an even larger collection of the "banner" article tags, which you can review by visiting the index page at Template messages. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:43, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: This Article Contains Opinions (November 19)
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [ Articles for creation help desk], or on the [ . Please remember to link to the submission!
 * You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A412  (Talk &bull; C) 00:22, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to Corn on the Cop
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Greenmaven (talk) 23:05, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of If you reviewed an article and it got deleted


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. ...William 19:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Articles Needing Special Reviews
Articles Needing Special Reviews, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles Needing Special Reviews and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Articles Needing Special Reviews during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Removal of infobox on Corn on the Cop
Can you let me know why you are removing the infobox on Corn on the Cop please? --Greenmaven (talk) 20:36, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * In fact you are removing most of what seems to be a perfectly good article. --Greenmaven (talk) 20:38, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Written by User:Alexandharrison: don't put me in the Wikipedia Jailbox ,only if it exists,don't put inside it.

November 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles Needing Special Reviews. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:48, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Jack Greenmaven. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Corn on the Cop because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ''Please edit responsibly. Do not remove material from articles without proper cause or explanation.'' Greenmaven (talk) 20:51, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Apologies from the Wikipedia community
Alex,

It looks like you've had a tough time with joining Wikipedia, and I would like to apologize to you. We try to tell editors to not bite the newcomers, but sometimes things don't quite work out as they should. If you're having a tough time understanding how things work here, I would suggest you head over to the teahouse, where editors should do a good just helping you out. I hope that we haven't driven you out for good and would like to see you continue editing.

Thanks, Ego White Tray (talk) 02:02, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK medal
Claiming on your user page that you Have Made 5 good Articles and tons of edits and I get the "DYK Medal" when you have made no edits at all to DYK or GA reviews is a bit misleading to say the least.  Spinning Spark  13:53, 27 November 2013 (UTC) IM SORRY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


 * I'm not going to delete it, but I think you ought to yourself, it makes you look really bad.  Spinning Spark  09:33, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Help:Add a article to be reviewed
Help:Add a article to be reviewed, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Help:Add a article to be reviewed and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Help:Add a article to be reviewed during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John of Reading (talk) 08:00, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
 * I think you may have been looking for Your first article, Simple guide to creating your first article or perhaps the Article wizard. Although those pages are more complicated than the ones you created, the extra detail really is needed. -- John of Reading (talk) 10:14, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nickelodeon Shows (1965-1988), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double Dare (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 29 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/This Article is Wrong


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hack (talk) 13:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Sorry! It was not a test I should not make articles and just edit existing articles.--Alexandharrison (talk) 17:40, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
You have been editing Wikipedia since 25 October 2013. In the past approximately two months, you have created a variety of new pages that have been deleted. In addition, from 21:12, 25 November 2013 to 22:59, 13 December 2013, your edits outside of your user pages have been undone/reverted, including transcluding a non-existent AfD discussion, removing categories, removing refimprove templates from article pages, introducing apparent factual errors, removing hat notes and hidden instructions, and adding implausible links to a disambiguation page.. If you continue in this way, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Jreferee (talk) 13:46, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- Jreferee (talk) 14:00, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Does this like mean that I am blocked from Wikipedia for 24 hours or some amount of time or mean i can't create articles and just edit existing ones? --Alexandharrison (talk) 14:14, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * No, you are not blocked. It simply means that you and others are invited to discuss your recent edits.-- Auric    talk  14:51, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi Alexandharrison, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Guidance for younger editors and On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:04, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Why didint you just tell me to remove the thing rather then destroying my whole thing. You know I will not be able to view that ever again forever for the rest of my life. --Alexandharrison (talk) 16:18, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I have the ability to restore parts of your page. Would you like for me to do that? ​—DoRD (talk)​ 17:44, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Yes, please restore the following sections: --Alexandharrison (talk) 12:55, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Things I Witten About
 * TAAHS
 * Main Section (except Infobox)


 * Okay, I have recreated part of your page, but have not included any personal information. As I said above, please do not reveal personal details on Wikipedia (or any other public website, really).
 * Also, if you have not done so yet, please read this page. Please enjoy the site, but also stay safe! ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:43, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * P.S. I added the help me below so that someone will notice your request for assistance. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 13:43, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

I Want to Make a special page for my user
Can anybody give me some info on making a page. (Please Note: this is not my first article.) I Want to Create a article (well a "special" page) called: User: AlexandHarrison/My Members--Alexandharrison (talk) 13:30, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * What do you mean by a "Special page"? -- Mdann 52   talk to me!  14:05, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * It looks like he just means a sub-page. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:18, 18 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi. It would need to be called "User:Alexandharrison/My Members" to match the lower-case "h" in your actual username. Then all you need to do is enter "User:Alexandharrison/My Members" in the search box at the top right and it should take you to a page asking if you want to create it. In fact, I've done it for you and you now have User:Alexandharrison/My Members with a couple of words of sample text in it - just edit it the usual way. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:02, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

I Want to protect my subpage so only I can edit it. How will I do that --Alexandharrison (talk) 22:42, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you make its name end with .js or .css then only you (and admins) will be able to edit it. Note that if you do this, formatting won't work in it. If you're okay with other established users being able to edit it, you can request it be semi-protected at WP:RPP. That way, it will work like a normal page. Jackmcbarn (talk) 22:58, 18 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alexandharrison/My Members/User of the week archive


A tag has been placed on Alexandharrison/My Members/User of the week archive requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, image description page, image talk page, mediawiki page, mediawiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, or user talk page from the article space.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Dream out loud (talk) 22:20, 19 December 2013 (UTC) It's a subpage for my user! --Alexandharrison (talk) 22:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC) And I made it to a subpage out of the original so please don't delete it or the other will be deleted too! --Alexandharrison (talk) 22:21, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * This was the redirect left over from when you created the page in the wrong location and then moved it to the right location. I have deleted this redirect, but your subpage is still there. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 22:24, 19 December 2013 (UTC)

December 22, 2013
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (2012 TV series) (season 1). Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Diffs:  There was no TMNT episode entitled "Booyaka-Showdown". This was on-air promotional rhetoric that fans misinterpreted and proliferated as fact on Wikia, then attempted to force onto Wikipedia. When the two-part episode aired, it was was titled "Showdown". If you submit this information again, administrative intervention will be pursued, since it does not appear that you are here to build an encyclopedia constructively. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:01, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

I was blocked forever --Alexandharrison (talk) 12:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/This Article Contains Opinions concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/This Article Contains Opinions, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/This Article Contains Opinions concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/This Article Contains Opinions, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:26, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/This Article Contains Opinions


Hello Alexandharrison. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "This Article Contains Opinions".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:41, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Daffy Duck: Tales from the Duckside listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Daffy Duck: Tales from the Duckside. Since you had some involvement with the Daffy Duck: Tales from the Duckside redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:58, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Bugs Bunny: Truth or Hare listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Bugs Bunny: Truth or Hare. Since you had some involvement with the Bugs Bunny: Truth or Hare redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 21:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)