User talk:Andrewpmk

Archives: /Archive 1 /Archive 2 /Archive 3 /Archive 4 /Archive 5 /Archive 6 /Archive 7 /Archive 8

'''Please add new posts to the bottom of the page. Please sign your posts by adding four tildes to the end of the post, like this: ~ '''

Speedy deletion declined: Explorers Program at Newark Museum
Hello Andrewpmk. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Explorers Program at Newark Museum, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 02:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations from STiki!
Hi, I appreciate your opinions on the deletion of my addition to the "Paraphilia" page. I understand your concern as not all of us are Christians or even Monotheists. I respect your work and you obviously have contributed greatly to the education of not only young people, but those of all ages. I would very much like to be able to put factual information into several articles, but I am really just an "Open Air" type of minister. Once again, thanks for your explanations as I am new to Wikipedia and how everything works out; but I am excited to learn so I can also begin to contribute. Kristjen Štjuprić (talk) 16:24, 25 July 2013 (UTC)Kristjen Štjuprić

Vandalism
Please stop vandalizing my constructive edits which bring only value and substance to Wikipedia, or else I will be forced to report you.

71.220.165.66 (talk) 19:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

edits
Oh dear. In America in 19th century it became the custom that women, on marrying, just added their husband's surname, as Ann Hathaway Shakespeare. This is not the custom in any European country, where a variety of different conventions are used. I do not see it as a useful exercise to attempt to impose this clumsy version of nomenclature on other countries and times, where it merely confuses anyone attempting to find the person in the original records under a name they did not use. Does that make sense to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.19.197.67 (talk) 22:14, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations!

 * Wow, you are fast! -- t  numbermaniac c 08:04, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

LOL
this really got me scared, for a second I felt like a vandal :P, It looks like you new here? you're doing a great job, fighting vandals! Yeah wikipedia is uncensored, so profanity is open here, and thanks for the heads up :)  Prabash.  Akmeemana   15:52, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

So anything you don't agree with is classified as vandalism? HAES preachings can kill people, plain and simple. It's much as if a group posted saying ERP - Eating Rat Poison is a stellar and healthy activity, blatantly false, misleading and dangerous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zshadez (talk • contribs) 01:21, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, and Thank you
When I edited the page for Isopropyl Myristate, somehow, I inadvertently deleted what you replaced. Thank you for taking care of that, someone else told me I had done so, my fault, and I hope I don't repeat that, because I don't really even know what or how I did it. Paul Kiler Pkiler (talk) 07:42, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Lafayette Federal Credit Union
Hello Andrewpmk - In what ways were my postings to Lafayette Federal Credit Union not constructive? They provided informative data about my credit union for Wikipedia users to learn more about. I have been through this process several times to correct the page. If you are claiming my page is not constructive, then please provide some specifics or help me to fix it so my page does not keep on getting deleted! I don't see how my edits were any different than those of various other financial institutions on Wikipedia. I used Navy Federal Credit Union's page to model my own....so why can NFCU's stay and mine continues to be deleted? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kfuzqcuoh498 (talk • contribs) 12:37, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Wait... Who are you, exactly?
Hello, Andrewpmk. I'm not quite sure who you are, or why you are judging whether or not my (or any) contributions are "constructive." How is it not constructive to include an actor's current role when it falls into a category of roles being discussed--in this case, lesbian characters, of which Lena in Ray Donovan is one? My other changes were "constructive" because they created a more consistent and clearer sentence. For consistency's sake, if one is discussing films, one should include all the films' directors or include none of the films' directors. Why throw in the name of one director (in this case, Terry Zwigoff) but leave out all the others? The same goes for character identifications/descriptions. If one character gets an identifying description (in this case, "the lesbian lover of"), the other characters should as well. As far as sentence clarity, when one lists items that contain commas, as I did in my changes, it is helpful and correct to separate the items with semi-colons. I am an editor by trade, so I do know what I'm talking about regarding consistency, clarity, and overall good sentence structure. Anyway, the real point here is that whether or not someone's contributions are "constructive" is always debatable. Wikipedia is what it is because everyone is allowed to contribute, so, unless a contribution is blatantly inaccurate or offensive, please do not interfere. Your personal opinions about a contribution's "constructiveness" are not grounds for undoing or deleting other users' work. I hope you understand this, and I hope no further action will be necessary. Thank you. Thevictor99 (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2013 (UTC)TheVictor99

Hello again. Thank you for getting rid of that strange coding. I did notice a few lines of code-like characters at the top of the page when I previewed the article in the VisualEditor, but I figured it was part of the new editor. Since it's only in the beta stage, the appearance of code on the final page may be a bug that needs fixing. I did not, as you seem to assume, intentionally add it. Why would I? I will add, however, that I've found both messages you've left me to communicate a rather condescending tone, and I, like most people, do not appreciate that. Thevictor99 (talk) 02:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)TheVictor99

hi
hi - please check again. i also advise you either not to erase my changes or just alter them because the defenition sentance of 3d coding is not friendly as it was to people who are not fermilierChronomaster5779 (talk) 05:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Margaret Lloyd George
What part of "Updated article to ensure it matches the Stevenson article. Stevenson's position as his mistress verified in sources in Stevenson's article and in every history book, as well as her diaries published in 1971" led you to think my edit was vandalism? You have just reminded me what I left this place. 213.233.148.21 (talk) 04:10, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Not vandalism
Hello. FYI: This edit wasnt vandalism and/or an edit test, but an valid entry on the disambiguation page. But the entry was alredy on the list, so it should be removed. Christian75 (talk) 10:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Regarding to structure follows strategy
Hi, first sorry that I accidentally deleted your original postings. It is a very informative and helpful. Everything seems correct, the only thing I do concern is the antithesis part. It seems that the counter proposal which is structure causes strategy was first suggested by Bower (1970) in his Managing the resource allocation process: A study of corporate planning and investment. Hall & Saias indeed has proposed a similar idea (as suggested in the current wiki page), however, their ideas are proposed later in 1980.

Hope you may take a look at it, and thank you for your time.67.255.112.236 (talk) 01:40, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Hey sorry about the Reading FC page.
I kinda just wanted to see my edit appear on this website that turns live WP edits into music I just found on Reddit. We cool? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Horsesarenotonlybeautifulbutuseful (talk • contribs) 00:52, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Zayn did 9/11
I put the whole story and provided reference why did you undo that ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shalashtein (talk • contribs) 21:15, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Mervyn Silva edits I'm not quite sure who you are, or why you are judging whether or not my (or any) contributions are "constructive". Please read the full article to decide for yourself about the constructivness of my edit, before jugding me.. or else leave it as it. Dont think its your call to make this judgement. -- — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.222.93.224 (talk) 14:48, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

76.120.178.238's edit to Jefferson County
I have undone your reversion to this edit and, on the user's talk page, challenged your complaint. What Wikipedia is not is over 7000 words long; a newbie should be directed there if a particular section is specified so the editor knows what to look for. Your complaint that his/her edit's "depth or nature of detail are not consistent with our objectives" is hopelessly vague; please do not use this expression again. Depth and detail can reasonably be expected of an extensive edit, but not of one that merely adds four words. Don't bite the newbies! Peter Brown (talk) 16:55, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Eydie Gormé
Thanks for catching the goof. I had the article open in two editing windows -- one full-page and one just the "Music samples" section. I performed a cut-and paste and somehow got the minor section edit pasted over the full article. — QuicksilverT @ 15:40, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Oatsoatsham
My edit to Lorene Drive was necessary, because the info box I deleted contained only a plea for the former lead singer of the group to return- clearly not objective material. if I made a coding snafu and deleted something actually important, please let me know on Oatsoatsham's talk page. Otherwise, look at the previous edition of the article to see if an edit is good, so I don't have to (twice)

·Update: I did not delete what I thought I did, or deleted too much (-890? Whaaaaaat?) thanks for the clarification and sorry for showing up irate on your talk page. Oatsoatsham (66.231.201.147) over and out.

66.231.201.147 (talk) 17:27, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Gundam Age
Sorry about deleting the infobox! That was completely unintentional! It really should be have instead of has in that sentence though!

99.14.101.5 (talk) 08:57, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Andrés Cantor
Hello, I am 67.54.187.27. I am posting this message because on August 6, 2013, at 2:04, you undid a contribution that I made to Andrés Cantor. I did not have the intention of vandalism, and I believe the edit was constructive. If you believe otherwise, or have any other questions, please leave a message on my talk page. Thank you.--67.54.187.27 (talk) 00:58, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Home-improvement center, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rona (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Pan American Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page LEED (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Paris Metro/transfer
Template:Paris Metro/transfer has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk • contributions) Use &#123;&#123;ping&#124;Jc86035&#125;&#125; to reply to me 02:43, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

209.193.84.77 (talk) 00:41, 14 October 2015 (UTC) We are students and a professor at Colorado Heights University. Wikipedia said all students are bilingual. We know of at least two students that are NOT. So we change the word "All" to "most". We are curious as to why that was removed as it is neither copyrighted material nor is it incorrect.

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:RER/background color
Template:RER/background color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ottawa Race Weekend, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ian Fraser ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ottawa_Race_Weekend check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ottawa_Race_Weekend?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Paris Metro/header line
Template:Paris Metro/header line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:55, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Paris Metro/text color
Template:Paris Metro/text color has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)