User talk:Another Believer/Archive 36

Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Blablubbs
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Alvestrand • Black Falcon • Deathphoenix • Dppowell • Mark Arsten • JGHowes (deceased)



Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Callanecc
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Mkdw

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Galobtter

Guideline and policy news
 * Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
 * Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.

Technical news
 * DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under.

Arbitration
 * A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
 * Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
 * The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.

Miscellaneous
 * Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
 * The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

Templates For Discussion - AFL Player Significant Statistics Templates
A new discussion has begun regarding the AFL Player Significant Statistics Templates. Please add your thoughts there. DiamondIIIXX (talk) 00:30, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I don't know anything about sports...! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Roulette (Katy Perry so)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Roulette (Katy Perry so) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. JW 1961 Talk 08:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ohio NORML logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ohio NORML logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Philip Linn Pioneer Cemetery for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philip Linn Pioneer Cemetery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Philip Linn Pioneer Cemetery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 02:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Calvary Cemetery (Mt. Angel, Oregon) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Calvary Cemetery (Mt. Angel, Oregon) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Calvary Cemetery (Mt. Angel, Oregon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 15:27, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Escobar Cemetery


The article Escobar Cemetery has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Small generic local cemetery with no indication of notability. Source is a mere passing mention."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92Talk 15:29, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Saint Joseph Cemetery (Gresham, Oregon) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Saint Joseph Cemetery (Gresham, Oregon) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Saint Joseph Cemetery (Gresham, Oregon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 15:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Canopy by Hilton Portland Pearl District for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canopy by Hilton Portland Pearl District is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Canopy by Hilton Portland Pearl District until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mangoe (talk) 01:14, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Silly... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:01, 14 October 2021 (UTC)

ivote

 * wanted to remind you that you have a right to ivote in the AfDs. So far I only see comments from you. Lightburst (talk) 18:06, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
 * @Lightburst Thanks for the reminder. Yes, I often vote at AfD, but only when I'm confident an article should be kept or deleted. For the cemeteries, I'm hesitant to vote 'yes' when there's limited accessible coverage and some other editors feel so strongly in voting 'no'. Sometimes I just accept that the community may not prefer to have a Wikipedia entry about a certain topic at this time, even when the topic may indeed be notable. In other words, I pick my battles, and since right now I'm a bit frustrated by the noms, I'm working on other things. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: September 2021
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 22:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Forest Lawn Cemetery (Gresham, Oregon) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Forest Lawn Cemetery (Gresham, Oregon) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Forest Lawn Cemetery (Gresham, Oregon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Star  Mississippi  01:43, 17 October 2021 (UTC)


 * sorry, thought I unticked the box to template you. Came here to leave a personal note, so just appending this. I don't have the issue others do with the stubs where there are findable sources that just aren't present--but I cannot find anything on this one. Star   Mississippi  01:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
 * @Star Mississippi Yeah, these are tough. When I search "Forest Lawn"+"Gresham" at the Oregonian archives via Multnomah County Library, there are 8,443 returns just through 1987. Searching the same at the 1987 to present database yields 1,466 returns. I'm not going to comb through all those just to save this stub (shrug...), even if the site is indeed notable. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 02:34, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Dot com episode 1
Loved it. --Rosiestep (talk) 19:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)


 * @Rosiestep Thank you so much! I can't wait to hear the rest of the series. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Chicken and Guns and leave
I was about to put an inline comment on this, but maybe it's better handled this way. You wrote the Chicken and Guns owner was "placed on leave". It left me wondering who has the authority to place an owner on leave? Did he place himself on leave? ☆ Bri (talk) 19:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


 * You know, I was wondering the same thing! I specifically came across this phrase in the source, which is why I used, but I think I need to review the sources in more detail. Perhaps the restaurant group has some authority? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Anonymous Apes monolith
Two notes in one day! If you haven't seen it yet: Activists Dressed as Apes Erect Monolith in Front of DEA Headquarters. Public art? Protest? Wiki-notable? New category for monoliths? (Utah monolith included)? ☆ Bri (talk) 00:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * @Bri Not sure this is independently notable. I'm not seeing enough about Anonymous Apes either to justify a new stub for the group. I almost wonder if there should be an entry for Cannabis protests or Cannabis demonstrations, since we have articles like Global Marijuana March, too. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:08, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * There's an existing category and a template Cannabis events with an unlinked title, so a full article seems appropriate and would cover the historical opposition to a long and disputed prohibition. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Page for DHS General Counsel Jonathan Meyer
Do you think it would be appropriate for you to create the article for Jonathan Meyer. POTUS Biden nominated him to serve as general counsel of DHS, essentially the number 3 position there. It has been highlighted in numerous articles. The nomination was recently confirmed the US Senate as shown here. Is this an appointment for which its own page should be created, particularly given the heightened publicity around the legality of DHS actions? 2601:14D:8A00:7390:ED5A:43FD:97B3:3271 (talk) 19:31, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you think it would be appropriate for you to create the article for Jonathan Meyer? :) --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:07, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Seedfeeder GAN?
Hi Another Believer, I'm reviewing this article at GAN and have made a few comments that probably deserve some kind of attention, even if only "we thought of that and it's not specially relevant, because...". Nom has made a few quick edits as suggested but it's their first GAN, and they haven't commented on the GAN page. I see from the AfD (simultaneous GAN and AfD, is that a 69 or something) that you see yourself as a contributor to the article, and wonder if you wouldn't mind taking a look at the GAN comments? I don't think much effort would be needed to get this to GA. Anyway, just an idea. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 10:25, 23 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reviewing. I have the review on my watchlist, but I'd like to give the nominator some time to catch up and and respond appropriately, before I jump in. I just pinged them here and hope other page watchers might take a look as well. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 12:50, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Seems I guessed right that they were too busy to respond, see the thread on the article's talk page. I've listed some sources and noted an obstacle there. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 14:19, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * @Chiswick Chap I am currently traveling and I doubt I will have time to follow the various sourcing discussions and complete the nomination on the other editor's behalf. I'll let you decide if the review should be closed. Bummer! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)@Chiswick Chap -- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 16:17, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
 * I think there's no hurry; indeed, I feel we should hold the GAN until the flurry has subsided, as it may well run to a third AfD. My view is that if the article passes *that* AfD then it should become a GA, as long as the key items on the GAN are addressed (whether by being actioned in the article or explicitly dismissed as unnecessary). So, we should wait, and I expect you'll be back from your travels by then. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 08:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * @Chiswick Chap Sure, no rush needed, but someone is going to have to dedicate themselves to picking up the nomination. You might post a note on the article's talk page seeing if anyone is interested? I prefer not to say how long, but I am actually going to be traveling for quite a while. I'll be checking in as possible, but I am unable to take on responsibility for following all related discussions and addressing all concerns. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:45, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'll think what to do. I think in the absence of further source analysis there will be little option but to close the GAN with suggestions for further improvement. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:49, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 October 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 31 October 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Clpo13
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Brian0918 • JDoorjam • Karanacs • MrDarcy • Mindspillage

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Evad37

CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Dreamy Jazz • Ferret • GeneralNotability • Girth Summit • RoySmith

Oversight changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Dreamy Jazz • LuK3

Guideline and policy news
 * Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.

Technical news
 * Toolhub is a catalogue of tools which can be used on Wikimedia wikis. It is at https://toolhub.wikimedia.org/.

Arbitration
 * , and  have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections.  and  are reserve commissioners.
 * Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves to stand in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections from 07 November 2021 until 16 November 2021.

Miscellaneous
 * The 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of five new CheckUsers and two new Oversighters.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

DYK for Statue of Minerva, Guadalajara
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Meals 4 Heels logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Meals 4 Heels logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 November newsletter
The WikiCup is over for another year and the finalists can relax! Our Champion this year is, who amassed over 5000 points in the final round, achieving 8 featured articles and almost 500 reviews. It was a very competitive round; seven of the finalists achieved over 1000 points in the round (enough to win the 2019 contest), and three scored over 3000 (enough to win the 2020 event). Our 2021 finalists and their scores were:


 * 1) with 5072 points
 * 2) with 3276 points
 * 3) with 3197 points
 * 4) with 1611 points
 * 5) with 1571 points
 * 6) with 1420 points
 * 7) with 1043 points
 * 8) with 528 points

All those who reached the final round will win awards. The following special awards will be made based on high performance in particular areas of content creation and review. Awards will be handed out in the next few days.


 * wins the featured article prize, for 8 FAs in round 5.
 * wins the featured list prize, for 3 FLs in round 5.
 * wins the featured topic prize, for 13 articles in a featured topic in round 5.
 * wins the good article prize, for 63 GAs in round 4.
 * wins the good topic prize, for 86 articles in good topics in round 5.
 * wins the reviewer prize, for 68 FAC reviews and 213 GAN reviews, both in round 5.
 * wins the DYK prize, for 30 did you know articles in round 3 and 105 overall.
 * wins the ITN prize, for 71 in the news articles in round 1 and 284 overall.

Congratulations to everyone who participated in this year's WikiCup, whether they made it to the final round or not, and particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup, some of whom did very well. Wikipedia has benefitted greatly from the quality creations, expansions and improvements made, and the numerous reviews performed. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition, not forgetting User:Jarry1250, who runs the scoring bot.

If you have views on whether the rules or scoring need adjustment for next year's contest, please comment on the WikiCup talk page. Next year's competition will begin on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; the WikiCup is open to all Wikipedians, both novices and experienced editors, and we hope to see you all in the 2022 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)

GAR Skeptic's Toolbox
Skeptic's Toolbox has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. A. C. Santacruz &#8258;  Talk  15:28, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @A. C. Santacruz I'd recommend notifying WikiProject Oregon, in case project members are interested. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * thanks! Just did :) A. C. Santacruz  &#8258;  Talk  15:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:33, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge fifth anniversary

 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:22, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Books & Bytes – Issue 47
 The Wikipedia Library Books & Bytes

Issue 47, September – October 2021 
 * On-wiki Wikipedia Library notification rolling out
 * Search tool deployed
 * New My Library design improvements

Read the full newsletter Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: October 2021
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 06:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Idaho Statues...
Hey, I am trying to populate things like Category:Sculptures in Idaho, Category:Outdoor_sculptures_in_Idaho and Category:Public art in Idaho and could use whatever help you can offer. I started a todo list at: WikiProject_Idaho/Culture. Appreciate any help. - Mjquinn_id (talk) 01:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Mjquinn id I'll try to revisit this once I'm back home from my travels. I'm especially interested in statues and monuments at the Idaho State Capitol (I assume some are installed on the grounds). A very quick search did not turn up helpful sources with details about Capitol artworks, but once I have more time I'll do a bit more research. Good luck with this effort! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:27, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

2022 N.America convention
Hello, and I hope your travels are going well. Was interested in recommending that the 2022 North American convention be held in Las Vegas (Viva WikiVegas), both as a celebration of hopefully post-serious covid revelry and to put the convention back in the western part of the continent. I'd assume one of the main strip hotels (as I said in a note to Kevin, leave downtown to Britannica) would welcome the Wikipedia and Wikimedia crew with deep discounts on both a large block of guest rooms and conference halls. MGM owns many of the strip hotels and may bundle w. in with lots of extras. I don't know who organizes the choice of city, but know that you,,, and a few others are active, so wanted to post you for thoughts and guidance. Randy Kryn (talk) 18:30, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
 * The scarce resource for deciding where to have a conference is having a few people commit to do local planning. In the past all WikiConferences had several people in the chosen city who made up the local team and who met with local partners, photographed the site, signed local contracts, and in general did things which were challenging to do without being there. I know that the online team at meta:WikiConference North America get attention for being around year to year, but local contacts have mattered a lot in the past.
 * It is possible to organize without local contacts but it helps to know if they exist. Anyway, if you have other ideas, post to meta on that WikiConference page. So far as I know there are no standing proposals for where or how to do 2022, or even if it will be in person. I just had a colleague from a government agency decline to join an event due to their employer's COVID restrictions, so that is still happening.  Blue Rasberry   (talk)  19:54, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks . Would be nice to get back to in-person conferences in late 2022 after a three-year break. By, say, late October or early November those who wish to attend could attend and those who don't could join via teleconferencing. Viva WikiVegas would celebrate a return and enhance the type of formal and informal discussions which can only occur at live events. MGM, which owns much of the strip, may be excited about hosting Wikipedia and, with the chance they'd "donate" many or even all of the rooms to the non-profit (in "exchange" for goodwill, good tax writeoff, and for bringing maybe a thousand people to their casinos, shows, and buffets....yummm, Vegas buffets), could be worth serious negotiation. On the ground arrangements could be made with a few trips into town over the months and then bringing in a couple or more people a week or two before the event to set-up and arrange. Volunteers anyone (besides, no arm twisting needed, me...yummm, Vegas buffets)? Will piece some of these comments to make a case at the Meta page. Thanks again, and I hope you and yours are doing well. Randy Kryn (talk) 16:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Help me create Brian Malarkey page
Hi, @User:Another Believer I saw you help improve the page of Shota Nakajima and Byron Gomez page and you also help other food and drinks projects like the Top Chef. Can I ask a favor to help me start Brian Malarkey's page because I created it and it always ends up being deleted or reverted. I also ask for your guidance on this one. Rice25kg (talk) 07:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

"Willamette Stone and Willamette Meridian" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Willamette Stone and Willamette Meridian. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 November 19 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Mdewman6 (talk) 19:36, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Another Believer

Thank you for creating Crack: Cocaine, Corruption & Conspiracy.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:08, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you
Hello again. I hope you are doing well. Apologies in advance if I have already posted this in the past, but I really want to thank you for all your help with the Holly & Ivy article. You were so warm and kind to me when I first joined Wikipedia, and I genuinely believe that played a large part in me continuing to be an editor for this long. I was very fortunate that you were one of the first editors that I really interacted with on this site. Anyway, I just wanted to let you know that I have decided to really retire from Wikipedia (after I complete a current GAN review) to focus my time and energy elsewhere. Apologies for getting super sappy, but my decision to retire made me feel sentimental and go back to the first article I edited on here. Maybe one day, I will go back and do a FAC for that as it would be a nice full circle moment. Either way, I just wanted to say thank you for everything! Aoba47 (talk) 05:36, 25 November 2021 (UTC)


 * @Aoba47 Awww, thanks so much for the kind note. I appreciate your thoughtfulness. While I'm bummed to learn you're retiring, I appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia and hope you might come around now and then. Please take care, --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:26, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2021
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Six Flags AstroWorld
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Six Flags AstroWorld you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FormalDude -- FormalDude (talk) 16:40, 1 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Putting this on your radar as well! Hope you can help address any concerns which may arise. Happy editing, all! --- Another Believer  ( Talk ) 17:30, 1 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).



Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg A Train • Berean Hunter • Epbr123 • GermanJoe • Sanchom • Mysid

Technical news
 * Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page.
 * The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse.

Arbitration
 * Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
 * The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Six Flags AstroWorld
The article Six Flags AstroWorld you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Six Flags AstroWorld for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of FormalDude -- FormalDude (talk) 19:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 19:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Congrats Another Believer for taking the time and putting in the effort to get this accomplished! The WikiProject very much appreciates it! --GoneIn60 (talk) 10:10, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
 * @GoneIn60 Thanks for your kind words and help! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:07, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

"The Last Paradise (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Last Paradise (film). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BOVINEBOY 2008 16:19, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

"The Divine Ponytail (film)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect The Divine Ponytail (film). The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 4 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BOVINEBOY 2008 21:56, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 GOCE Newsletter
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2021
About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 11:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Ate-Oh-Ate for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ate-Oh-Ate is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ate-Oh-Ate until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Capsulecap (talk • contribs) 12:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
You are an amazing Wikipedian, and an even better human since your work helped me find the Wikiproject; LGBTQ Studies and Wiki Loves Pride 2021 Campaign, which I truly support with all my heart. Thank you and keep up the great work. Have a good day/night ;)

SassyGamer483 (talk) 20:34, 13 December 2021 (UTC) 


 * You're too kind! Thanks for the note. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 21:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Tony Bennett Celebrates 90: The Best Is Yet to Come for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tony Bennett Celebrates 90: The Best Is Yet to Come is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Bennett Celebrates 90: The Best Is Yet to Come until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sricsi (talk) 23:40, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

Survey about History on Wikipedia (If you are resident in the United States)
I am Petros Apostolopoulos, a Ph.D. candidate in Public History at North Carolina State University. My Ph.D. project examines how historical knowledge is produced on Wikipedia. You must be 18 years of age or older, reside in the United States to participate in this study. If you are interested in participating in my research study by offering your own experience of writing about history on Wikipedia, you can click on this link https://ncsu.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_9z4wmR1cIp0qBH8. There are minimal risks involved in this research.

If you have any questions, please let me know. Petros Apostolopoulos, paposto@ncsu.edu Apolo1991 (talk) 18:12, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pearl Tavern
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pearl Tavern you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 15:21, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pearl Tavern
The article Pearl Tavern you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pearl Tavern for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 04:21, 17 December 2021 (UTC)


 * @Gerald Waldo Luis Thanks! BTW, since you've reviewed quite a few PDX restaurant entries, you might be interested in the Ate-Oh-Ate notification above. Either way, thanks again and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:59, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * @Gerald Waldo Luis I've nominated La Bonita, if you're curious to look. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:04, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of The Alaska Triangle for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Alaska Triangle is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Alaska Triangle until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 02:06, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Sigh --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:14, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Gabby's Dollhouse
Thanks on this. Was just about to come here to tell you I was about to restore your Talk edit following the hist merge, but didn't want to override your assessment. Star  Mississippi  03:23, 21 December 2021 (UTC)


 * No prob, thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:29, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Whiteguru. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Templo de Nuestra Señora del Carmen, and have marked it as unreviewed. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Whiteguru (talk) 07:04, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Templo de Nuestra Señora del Carmen
Hello, Another Believer,

Thank you for creating Templo de Nuestra Señora del Carmen.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Churches must meet the notability guidelines for buildings and/or organisations. See WP:THREE for reconsiderations."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 07:05, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of La Bonita
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article La Bonita you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 16:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Red Light, Green Light (Squid Game) for deletion
A discussion is taking place to determine if the article Red Light, Green Light (Squid Game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Red Light, Green Light (Squid Game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dr <b style="font-family: Verdana; color: #6633FF;">Salvus</b> 19:50, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of La Bonita
The article La Bonita you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:La Bonita for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Gerald Waldo Luis -- Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 20:41, 25 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Thank you! If you're interested, I've nominated Shanghai Tunnel Bar as well. Before you ask!, I already have plans to take photographs of the bar's exterior (and hopefully interior) and I've been unable to confirm the year in which the establishment opened. Happy editing and happy holidays! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:02, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

A somewhat premature New Year's greeting

 * Thanks! Happy holidays and happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:47, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Immaculate Conception Cemetery (Oklahoma City)
Hi! Courtesy heads up that I've unfortunately sent this to AfD. I have some ties to the city and wanted to improve it, but I have been unable to find anything to meet WP:ORG. Didn't PROD as I thought it required discussion and have the utmost respect for your creations, so maybe someone will find sources. Star  Mississippi  23:46, 27 December 2021 (UTC)


 * OK! Thanks, --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:49, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

January 2022 Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:01, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 28 December 2021
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:06, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

FLC
Hey there! Saw in your user page that you've also made a couple of discography list articles to featured, and I recently opened Featured list candidates/Ben&Ben discography/archive1. It's relatively recent so it's pretty much attracted just one user, so I thought you might be interested in reviewing (it's pretty short in terms of prose), but no pressure if you're busy ^ ^  Gerald WL  14:29, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Happy new year !
Nattes à chat (talk) 22:00, 1 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you. Same to you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 23:54, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Amalthea • Ihcoyc (deceased) • Kateshortforbob • Kirill Lokshin • Rifleman 82 • Ryan Norton • Wrp103

Interface administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Mr. Stradivarius



CheckUser changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Cabayi • Donald Albury • Enterprisey • Izno • Wugapodes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Opabinia regalis
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Casliber • David Fuchs • Newyorkbrad • SoWhy

Oversighter changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg Cabayi • Donald Albury • Enterprisey • Izno • Wugapodes
 * Gnome-colors-view-refresh.svg Opabinia regalis
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Casliber • David Fuchs • Newyorkbrad • SoWhy

Guideline and policy news


 * Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.


 * Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.

Arbitration


 * Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee:, , , , , , ,.

Miscellaneous


 * The functionaries email list () will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.

Discuss this newsletter

Subscribe

Archive Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2022 WikiCup!
Happy New Year and Happy New WikiCup! The 2022 competition has just begun and all article creators, expanders, improvers and reviewers are welcome to take part. Even if you are a novice editor you should be able to advance to at least the second round, improving your editing skills as you go. If you have already signed up, your submissions page can be found here. If you have not yet signed up, you can add your name here and the judges will set up your submissions page. Any questions on the rules or on anything else should be directed to one of the judges, or posted to the WikiCup talk page. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will move on to round 2. The judges for the WikiCup this year are: and. Good luck! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:45, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shanghai Tunnel Bar
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Shanghai Tunnel Bar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 16:21, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:23, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Shanghai Tunnel Bar
The article Shanghai Tunnel Bar you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Shanghai Tunnel Bar for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kavyansh.Singh -- Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks! I've also nominated Joe Brown's Carmel Corn, if you're interested. Either way, happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:42, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joe Brown's Carmel Corn
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Joe Brown's Carmel Corn you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 00:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)


 * @Asilvering Thanks! Looking forward to addressing any concerns. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 00:52, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @Another Believer All yours for tweaks/questions. All pretty quick things, I think. -- asilvering (talk) 03:18, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @Asilvering Done, thanks! Holler if anything needs to be revisited. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 04:16, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Joe Brown's Carmel Corn
The article Joe Brown's Carmel Corn you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Joe Brown's Carmel Corn for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Asilvering -- Asilvering (talk) 05:21, 8 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks for reviewing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 05:21, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

GA nomination of first homosexual movement
Would you be willing to review my GAN for this article? It would be much appreciated. (t &#183; c)  buidhe  06:04, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Sorry, I don't complete GA/FL/FA reviews. I'm more into creating content than reviewing. Perhaps post a note at WikiProject LGBT studies? --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 06:06, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Photo requests
Hello. I'm planning a few walks for the next few weeks to collect some photographs for pages in the Cambridge MA area. I noticed your photo request template at Talk:1881 Gate, and was wondering if you can think of any pages that you (or others) have written regarding architectural features in that area which don't have photos yet. I found a few through User:Mx._Granger/Photo_program but I know I haven't found anywhere near all of them. Thanks! - Astrophobe  (talk) 20:01, 9 January 2022 (UTC)


 * @Astrophobe Wow, great question! There may be some entries to consider at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in Middlesex County, Massachusetts. Meyer Gate comes to mind. Can't think of any others off the top of my head, but thanks for asking! Enjoy your walking tours, --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 20:23, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh great idea, thank you! It would be a shame if I got the 1881 gate but missed the Meyer gate. If you happen to run across any others, please let me know :) - Astrophobe  (talk) 21:38, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
 * It took a little longer than I'd have liked (it's ridiculous how early the sun sets here and I kept failing to get out of the house in time to take daylight photos), but 1881 Gate is now illustrated. :) - Astrophobe  (talk) 00:12, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @Astrophobe Thank you! I've removed the 'photo needed' tag on the article's talk page. Happy editing! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 01:26, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh great point, I forgot to do that. Thanks! - Astrophobe  (talk) 01:32, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

You're invited! January 29: COVID-19 Pandemic in the U.S. Edit-a-thon / Translate-a-thon
--Wil540 art (talk) 19:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: December 2021
<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">About This Month in GLAM · Subscribe/Unsubscribe · Global message delivery · Romaine 10:46, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Category:Defunct LGBT nightclubs has been nominated for merging
Category:Defunct LGBT nightclubs has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 09:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for merger of Template:420Collaboration2017 and other related
Template:420Collaboration2017 has been nominated for merging with Template:420Collaboration2018. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 16:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)


 * @Gonnym I've suggested making a single template like Template:Wiki Loves Pride talk, which can be used to show collaborations for multiple years. Feel free to revisit the merge discussion if you have thoughts. Thanks! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 16:30, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

DragRaceProgressTable/14
Hello I want to point out that some registered users in particular Slay-12345678910 and Lorenzo 1109 who are repeatedly removing the DragRaceProgressTable/14 template on the page RuPaul's Drag Race (season 14), as usual, by inserting tables that do not respect the neutrality of the platform quoting the "Can yall give credit to the queens work .... like only showing who won the btm and elim can completely make someones track seem better or worse. like crystal methyds track looks way worse than it actually is. This is why people don't use wiki for track records anymore", which I find IMO nosense since we report the data that are actually announced during the episode (WIN - BTM - ELIM).

Of course, I've already helped re-adjust the table to standards, but ut there is an urgent need for blocking changes for both users and anonymous IP addresses that persist in modifying the deletion table. --- « Ðømīnīk  •  Cåpuån  » 16:48, 24 January 2022 (CET)
 * I am not an admin, so there's little I can do. However, I've submitted a request for temporary page protection at Requests for page protection. If problems persist, you may need to seek help from admins at Administrators' noticeboard or an appropriate subpage. --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Elephants Delicatessen for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elephants Delicatessen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Elephants Delicatessen until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 17:46, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Sigh, let me google that for you... --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 18:03, 24 January 2022 (UTC)

Copy-edit of Pearl Tavern

 * Thank you! --- Another Believer ( Talk ) 17:51, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Corten Steel Sculpture for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corten Steel Sculpture is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Corten Steel Sculpture until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A. C. Santacruz &#8258; Please ping me! 15:04, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * @A. C. Santacruz Next time just try redirecting or posting an article Talk page note. I've already voted to redirect so editors don't have to waste time at AfD. Happy editing, -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 15:43, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 January 2022
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:19, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

February with Women in Red
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hi please help
Hi User:Another Believer i saw you on recent changes and wondered if you could help me, I am trying to create a redirect from Charity Shop Sue to Shane Meadows would you be able to do this for me please. Thanks Linda Binson (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)