User talk:Arkangel lucifer

Nomination of Andenne Bears for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andenne Bears is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Andenne Bears until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 17:59, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Brussels Tigers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brussels Tigers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Brussels Tigers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Grez-Doiceau Fighting Turtles for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grez-Doiceau Fighting Turtles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Grez-Doiceau Fighting Turtles until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Liège Monarchs for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liège Monarchs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Liège Monarchs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:11, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Charleroi Cougars for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charleroi Cougars is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Charleroi Cougars until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Tournai Phoenix for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tournai Phoenix is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tournai Phoenix until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Luxembourg Steelers for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Luxembourg Steelers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Luxembourg Steelers until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 14:14, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Religion in Belgium, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. JimRenge (talk) 08:21, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

The infobox says 58% and the introduction 57%, please make up your mind! Arkangel lucifer (talk) 08:24, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2016 BFL playoffs
Template:2016 BFL playoffs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:28, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1999 BFL playoffs
Template:1999 BFL playoffs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:31, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:1996 BFL Division I standings
Template:1996 BFL Division I standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 15:28, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:2016 FAFL standings
Template:2016 FAFL standings has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:54, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Roots indoor American football tournament


The article Roots indoor American football tournament has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "I have been unable to find any sources for this, and the only reference given is a dead link not rescued by IABot."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Noyster (talk),  12:23, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Hadaka Matsuri
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.japanallover.com/2007/03/konomiya-hadaka-festival/. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:37, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BFL Playoffs 3Bracket
Template:BFL Playoffs 3Bracket has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:EFAF AC Bracket
Template:EFAF AC Bracket has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BFL Playoffs
Template:BFL Playoffs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:23, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:EFAF AC 2009
Template:EFAF AC 2009 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. fuzzy510 (talk) 09:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:EFAF AC 2010
Template:EFAF AC 2010 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. fuzzy510 (talk) 09:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:EFAF AC 2011
Template:EFAF AC 2011 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. fuzzy510 (talk) 09:25, 29 May 2023 (UTC)