User talk:Athulbnair

Welcome
Hello, Athulbnair, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you created appears to be an article about yourself. This is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself has been or will shortly be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, but if you want to use the content from it, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Shirt58 (talk) 09:15, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Speedy deletion nomination of Athul nair


A tag has been placed on Athul nair requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. AllyD (talk) 10:06, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ente Katha


A tag has been placed on Ente Katha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Abhijay Talk?/Deeds  17:54, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sangeetha (hotel)


A tag has been placed on Sangeetha (hotel) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Bihco (talk) 14:11, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

N. P. Rajendran
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of N. P. Rajendran, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.mathrubhumi.com/english/story.php?id=112770.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 09:20, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 31
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dasharatham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jagannathan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Stub tags
Please take care not to add stub to any article which already has a more specific stub tag (as you did here), as it's just a waste of both your and other editors' time. Thanks, and Happy Editing. Pam D  19:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited K. P. Ummer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

BLP Sources Tag
Please be careful when adding the BLP sources tag and confirm before doing so that there are significant elements that are unreffed. You recently added tags to several Mongolian footballers where in fact the reference given covered every single item noted in the article. It is worth reading through references given before applying any tag, or how else do you know? Pleasedo this in future to avoid wasting other editors' time undoing your edits. Thank you. Fenix down (talk) 16:37, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of N. P. Rajendran


The article N. P. Rajendran has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No real indication of notability, article subject seems to be a regional head of a press agency. Unclear how such a position would fulfill WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fenix down (talk) 16:39, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you recently removed some content from N. P. Rajendran without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tb hotch .™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions.  16:51, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of N. P. Rajendran for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article N. P. Rajendran is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/N. P. Rajendran until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Fenix down (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: FEDIMA
Hello Athulbnair, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of FEDIMA, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 11:41, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Praveen Togadia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 23:02, 8 February 2013 (UTC)


 * That is not revert experiment, edit summary had clear reasons and verify the talk page of the article. If someone is on edit war I am not responsible.--atnair (talk) 02:17, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing Ghaleb badran, Athulbnair.

Unfortunately FreeRangeFrog has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"CSD; please check authority control files if there is one on a bio of a 25-year old programmer."

To reply, leave a comment on FreeRangeFrog's talk page.

Hi Athulbnair. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Shree kshetra audumbar, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. ''Please read CSD; I don't believe there is any reasonable way to claim the article has no content. I thank you a lot for your work with curating new articles and recommend you read the CSD criterias in detail before tagging articles for speedy deletion. '' :) · Salvidrim!  ·  &#9993;  07:15, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Phillip Swift
Could you answer my question at Articles for deletion/Phillip Swift (Pirates of the Caribbean)? Best, 79.123.57.130 (talk) 14:00, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Article Feedback deployment
Hey Athulbnair; I'm dropping you this note because you've used the article feedback tool in the last month or so. On Thursday and Friday the tool will be down for a major deployment; it should be up by Saturday, failing anything going wrong, and by Monday if something does :). Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:59, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Wgolf. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, 2014 Sony Open Tennis – Men's Doubles, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 00:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Western Canadian Select article you curated as refimprove January 2013
This article was created on 13 January 2013. When it was just one paragraph with one reference you curated it as refimprove. Since then it has had numerous edits with inline citations and dozens of references added. Could you either remove the refimprove or comment on specific inline edits without citations that require them or provide examples of inadequate referencing? Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.Oceanflynn (talk) 20:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

New Page Review needs your help
Hi ,

As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).

Since July there has been a very serious backlog at Special:NewPagesFeed of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted. Although New Page Reviewing can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.

It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at WP:PERM and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at WP:NPR and the new tutorial.

(Sent to all active AfC reviewers) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

JavaScript RegExp problem
I noticed you have experience in JavaScript. I'm hoping you can help me with a problem I've run into writing a userscript.

Please see my post at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject JavaScript.

Thank you. The Transhumanist 12:10, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2014 Mumbai stampede


The article 2014 Mumbai stampede has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Tragic, certainly, but I'm not seeing sustained coverage past the immediate event that would establish GNG; cf. WP:NOTNEWS"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eddie891 Talk Work 21:22, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mayajalam (1998 film)


The article Mayajalam (1998 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Appears to fail WP:NFILM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donald D23  talk to me  01:36, 27 May 2022 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list
Hi Athulbnair! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at WikiProject Biography/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 3 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting WikiProject Biography/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:08, 27 June 2022 (UTC)