User talk:Bcschneider53/Archive 3

What do you think?
I was wondering if you'd care to chime in on something Zappa brought to my attention. He and I are torn on whether to include any mention of all the throwback schemes in the 2015 Bojangles' Southern 500 article. There's certainly a lot of fanfare and Zappa says he's got plenty of sources for the schemes, but he and I aren't sure if it's notable enough considering we never track paint scheme changes from one race to the next and the throwback schemes won't affect the outcome of Sunday's race. What's your thoughts?--Nascar   king  02:17, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't overdo it, but mention it (maybe also mention that Ken Squier and Ned Jarrett are going to broadcast part of the race too). My current FAC, 2006 UAW-Ford 500, (briefly) talks about the repaving of the track in the background section. I'd suggest something similar be done here. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 02:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mind of a Man
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mind of a Man you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johanna -- Johanna (talk) 16:41, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

FAC
Sorry, I just saw your note at Featured article candidates/2006 UAW-Ford 500/archive3. I do understand your frustration (especially since this is the third nomination) but it was actually quite a way off from achieving consensus to promote. I don't know why, but sports articles of all kinds have always struggled to attract attention at FAC. -- Laser brain  (talk)  11:16, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply. I just thought it was going to pull through this time (2010 Sylvania 300 had four supports and an image and source review), so I figured we were getting pretty close. It's just particularly frustrating because I'm going for the Four Award, and I got all the way to GA status within about a week or two after creating the article. I thought I'd just breeze through FAC by completing some minor fixes and have an FA by March, and it's September, meaning it'll probably be Thanksgiving at the earliest by the time this gets promoted. I appreciate your time and everything you do; I'm just frustrated because in two weeks I have to start the process all over again and there's no guarantee it will pull through then. Thanks, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 12:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Once Ian is back from vacation I will be happy to review the article. I've been trying to stay away from reviewing because only Graham and I are working as FAC coordinators right now and we don't want to have to recuse from any nominations while Ian is unavailable. Let me know when you renominate it, in case I don't notice. Hopefully the other folks who have provided reviews and/or support will be willing to revisit. -- Laser brain  (talk)  13:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! So the earliest I can renominate it is 26 September, correct? --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 13:28, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * That's correct. -- Laser brain  (talk)  17:41, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of It Takes a Church
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article It Takes a Church you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johanna -- Johanna (talk) 19:21, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Interesting Larson article
If you plan to take the article to FA... 23W 01:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Perhaps I'll make use of it at some point; it's just that I'm EXTREMELY busy at the moment with 2 other GANs and real-life work. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 01:49, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mind of a Man
The article Mind of a Man you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mind of a Man for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johanna -- Johanna (talk) 01:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Rollback
There's probably a template that I'm supposed to give you right now. You probably don't need it, but I will mark the occasion with this note, and a link to the guideline. I tell everyone, be careful with it, it's all too easy to revert to a vandalised version. You're welcome... -- zzuuzz (talk) 15:14, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks again! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 15:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of It Takes a Church
The article It Takes a Church you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:It Takes a Church for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johanna -- Johanna (talk) 18:21, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

2006 UAW-Ford 500
I completely understand if you all are busy, but if you have the time, I'd appreciate you giving the above article a thorough review. It's currently on its FOURTH FAC nomination and while it can be argued that the prose was the main reason for its first failure, neither of the first two really garnered that much support. The third saw more attention but it still wasn't enough, so if you need something to do, I would greatly appreciate your help here. Thanks, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 18:30, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I probably won't be doing any reviewing until Ian Rose returns from wikibreak, since we are down to two FAC delegates and can't handle recusals very efficiently. If it's still open when Ian returns, I'll be glad to review it. -- Laser brain  (talk)  19:48, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Saw this ping, but I know nothing of auto racing, so reading it might prove to be a chore for me, unfortunately. I've found a ton of sources; shoot me an email for any excerpts you might want. 23W 19:48, 8 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I must congratulate you for getting the 2006 UAW-Ford 500 to FA status. It took longer than you expected, but you did not give up until you achieved your goal. Great work! Z105space   (talk)  08:58, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Well done! Saw it listed as a new FA in the Signpost. It was surreal to be reading the magazine and come across an image that I took. I spent a massive amount of time working on the Alan Kulwicki article just for it to fail at FAC; it shouldn't be too much work to finish it if you're interested...  Royal broil  13:55, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

simona de silvestro
I think that her 4th position at Nola 2015 is better finish that 13th in 2013, isnt that right? Mpmonzon (talk) 16:32, 1 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The best finish parameter in the infobox is supposed to be for the best points finish, as in the drivers' championship, not race finish.  NFL is Awesome  (ZappaOMati) 17:42, 1 October 2015 (UTC)

Talkback
--74.130.133.1 (talk) 23:48, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

Responded again. --74.130.133.1 (talk) 01:04, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Sam Hornish, Jr.
Let me know when you're done, since we're edit-conflicting.  Mini  apolis  18:13, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Oops! So sorry! Just wanted to make a minor adjustment. Anyway, I'm through now, guess I should wait until the ce is 100% done. Thanks again! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 18:17, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you wouldn't mind waiting, that would be great; I should finish the copyedit tomorrow, and don't care what you do after that :-). All the best,  Mini  apolis  22:40, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ... but feel free to work on sections I'm not (I work top to bottom, and you can see what I'm up to in the history).  Mini  apolis  22:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks again! I was hoping I'd get you as copyeditor because I know you always do a great job. Looking forward to seeing the finished product! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 22:45, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Aww, thanks for the kind words.  Mini  apolis  23:09, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Arthur Chu
The article Arthur Chu you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Arthur Chu for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 01:20, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Please consider the following
Please, consider reviewing at least two (2) articles at Good article nominations, for every one that you nominate.

Thank you,

&mdash; Cirt (talk) 06:28, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

Arthur Chu
Hi. You've done well in getting the article on Arthur Chu up to Good Article. As a fan of some of the stuff he's done, I'd like to give a quick thanks. Thanks! PeterTheFourth (talk) 04:50, 17 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I probably could have gotten it done sooner, but with the whole Gamergate fiasco, it made more sense to wait. Thanks again for your message! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 11:08, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

WikiProject Motorsport tagging
Hi Bentvfan54321, I've noticed you adding the Wikiproject Motorsport tag to a large number of American racing articles, together with the American Open Wheel Racing one. As a general rule of thumb, it is not always necessary to add the tag of the parent Wikiproject (WP Motorsport) on the talk page if the article in question is wholly within the remit of a child project. So for example, an article about an Indycar race would only need the WP American Open Wheel Racing tag, while one for a driver who also competed outside of America needs to have both tags. It is, of course, entirely harmless to add both to an article, and it certainly isn't wrong, but it may make your job easier in the future if you only add the one when necessary. QueenCake (talk) 18:20, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the message! I've usually just been copying and pasting (unless, of course, the article should be at a different class and/or importance) so it really isn't that much extra work, but since I'm trying to get all these articles assessed, it's good to know only the one is absolutely necessary. Thanks again, --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 21:18, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Carpenter (game show contestant)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article John Carpenter (game show contestant) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 01:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Carpenter (game show contestant)
The article John Carpenter (game show contestant) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:John Carpenter (game show contestant) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 08:40, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

2006 Subway 500 - FAC
Hi Ben. If you are not busy, would you care to comment at the FAC page on the 2006 Subway 500. All comments are very much appreciated. Z105space  (talk)  18:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * When Mike is finished his review, I'll take a look. Thanks again for your support at 2006 UAW-Ford 500! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 19:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Are you still up for reviewing my article? If not, then I understand if you are busy. Z105space   (talk)  06:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I have been quite busy and completely forgot. May not have time to do it tonight, but it's certainly on my mind. Thanks for the reminder. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 23:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

The Deletion to Quality Award

 * Please add your entry to our Hall of Fame !!! &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of John Carpenter (game show contestant)
The article John Carpenter (game show contestant) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:John Carpenter (game show contestant) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cirt -- Cirt (talk) 00:43, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

About the NFC east
Can you please reply on my talk page about who will win the NFC East. Thank you! --74.130.133.1 (talk) 22:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 1
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 2001 Molson Indy Toronto
 * added a link pointing to Team Green


 * Tony Renna
 * added a link pointing to Greg Moore

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sam Hornish, Jr.
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sam Hornish, Jr. you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Z105space -- Z105space (talk) 17:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Four Award

 * Thanks again! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 13:19, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

NASCAR standards proposal
You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2015_NASCAR_Sprint_Cup_Series. Thanks. –  Nascar1996  ( talk • cont ) 01:38, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

NASCAR Results
Hi Bentvfan54321, It was me who edits Kyle Busch's NASCAR results all the time. I think you are wrong - that different colors are for positions 1-10, 11-20, 21-30, 31-43. It doesn't matter if the driver finished the race or not as you said (regular visitor doesn't care anyway, he wants to see just that finishing position). And by the way - I edited all Kyle Busch's results and no one but you claimed it's wrong. And for example, take a look at 2008 Nationwide Series race at Kentucky (No. 16) - Kyle finished 30th, he wasn't running at the finish and the color is different than at 2015 Xfinity Series race at Homestead (No. 33) and no one cares. So what's the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mannoroth81 (talk • contribs) 11:13, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Take a look at the key, Template:NASCAR driver results legend. Finishes of 21st or worse are all the same, with a different color used for DNFs. Perhaps a few others (pinging ) could provide some insight as well?
 * Also, if other results such as Kentucky are wrong, having one of us check the results for accuracy as Jahn recently did with Jeff Gordon may not be a bad idea either. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 12:49, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

I see. Sorry about that continuous changing all the time then. I was wrong and I'm gonna fix Kyle Busch's results soon. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mannoroth81 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries! It took me a while to learn the ropes too. Let me know if you need anything else. --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 15:35, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Your work at 2001 American Memorial
Hi, Bentvfan. I created the article linked above and wanted to thank you for the updates and improvements. In particular, this edit caught my attention, as those are accessibility features seen in featured lists. If you're ever looking for something to do, those of us who frequent the featured list process would be interested in what you could do, if that edit is any indication. There are currently no FLs related to NASCAR or American open-wheel racing, making for rare gaps in our sports FL collection. Between individual race winners (Daytona 500, Indianapolis 500, etc.), season champions, all-time leaders, award recipients, halls of fame, and other categories, there's a lot of potential high-quality articles out there. I don't know how interested you may be in this type of editing, but if you can reformat a table like that, you're capable of making a table in an FL, and I don't see that often among editors with no previous involvement at FLC. It's something that I wanted to note and commend. While I'm here, have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year. Giants2008 ( Talk ) 01:16, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I actually learned that standard while going through the FAC process for 2010 Sylvania 300. A few NASCAR editors tried to start an FL collaboration last offseason, but it never really took off. I'll certainly keep that in mind though for the future. Merry Christmas! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 14:48, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas


We wish you a McMurray Christmas, we wish you a McMurray Christmas, we wish you a McMurray Christmas and a Happy New Year! Good tidings we bring, to you and Larson, we wish you a McMurray Christmas and a Happy New Year!  Zappa  24  Mati   19:04, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Million Second Quiz is/was...
I'm old school and want to use the past tense when talking/writing about things that happened in the past. Either I'm just noticing it more lately or people really are more often using the present tense for everything which I find unnecessarily confusing. Your comment when changing my change from 'was' to 'is' had the acronym MOSTV which I don't recognize. I'd love to hear your thoughts, references, etc. behind your 'is'. Thanks! MiriamPschtto (talk) 21:49, 29 December 2015 (UTC)MiriamPschtto .................... Answered my own question re: MOSTV. I'm not crazy about using the present tense as laid out in the style guide but such is life. Thanks again. MiriamPschtto (talk) 22:01, 29 December 2015 (UTC)MiriamPschtto

Your GA nomination of Sam Hornish, Jr.
The article Sam Hornish, Jr. you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sam Hornish, Jr. for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Z105space -- Z105space (talk) 22:42, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

2007 Coca-Cola 600
Hi Benjamin. If you aren't too busy with real life stuff, would you care to review my Featured article nomination of the 2007 Coca-Cola 600? Z105space (talk) 20:14, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Hi Micheal, rather tied up right now (March is on pace to be one of my least active months ever in terms of total edits) but I'll keep this in mind and comment if I get a chance. In the meantime, 2 days till St. Pete and 9 till Melbourne! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 20:57, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2001 American Memorial
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2001 American Memorial you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johanna -- Johanna (talk) 16:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2001 American Memorial
The article 2001 American Memorial you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2001 American Memorial for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johanna -- Johanna (talk) 04:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Today's featured article/June 27, 2016
Hi Ben, I'm working on this one for TFA now. You nominated the article at WP:FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 00:30, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:50, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you! --Bentvfan54321 (talk) 12:57, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you for today's 2006 UAW-Ford 500! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:35, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Catch 21
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Catch 21 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 07:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Catch 21
The article Catch 21 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Catch 21 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Catch 21
The article Catch 21 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Catch 21 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 16:01, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


 Zappa  24  Mati   is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas6}} to their talk page with a friendly message.