User talk:Bcschneider53/Archive 4

Your GA nomination of 2010 Air Guard 400
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2010 Air Guard 400 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 17:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 Air Guard 400
The article 2010 Air Guard 400 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2010 Air Guard 400 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 15:41, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 Air Guard 400
The article 2010 Air Guard 400 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2010 Air Guard 400 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Good888 -- Good888 (talk) 15:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jeff Gordon into List of NASCAR race wins by Jeff Gordon. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:56, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I'm trying to build a lead for the page as part of a greater effort to make it a featured list. I'll try altering the prose to make it my own, and if I need to take more references from Gordon's main page, I'll do as your message suggests. Thanks, --Bcschneider53 (talk) 21:46, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 Pepsi Max 400
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2010 Pepsi Max 400 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 12:21, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017 WikiCup newsletter
And so ends the first round of the competition, with 4 points required to qualify for round 2. It would have been 5 points, but when a late entrant was permitted to join the contest in February, a promise was made that his inclusion would not result in the exclusion of any other competitor. To achieve this, the six entrants that had the lowest positive score of 4 points have been added to the 64 people who otherwise would have qualified. As a result, some of the groups have nine contestants rather than eight. Our top four scorers in round 1 were:


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, last year's winner, led the field with two featured articles on birds and a total score of 674.
 * 🇪🇺 Iry-Hor, a WikiCup newcomer, came next with a featured article, a good article and a tally of 282 bonus points for a score of 517. All these points came from the article Nyuserre Ini, an Ancient Egyptian pharaoh,
 * 🇯🇵 1989, another WikiCup newcomer, was in joint third place at 240. 1989 has claimed points for two featured lists and one good article relating to anime and comedy series, all of which were awarded bonus points.
 * Peacemaker67 shared third place with five good articles and thirteen good article reviews, mostly on naval vessels. He is also new to the competition.

The largest number of DYKs have been submitted by Vivvt and The C of E, who each claimed for seven, and MBlaze Lightning achieved eight articles at ITN. Carbrera and Peacemaker67 each claimed for five GAs and Krishna Chaitanya Velaga was well out in front for GARs, having reviewed 32. No featured pictures, featured topics or good topics yet, but we have achieved three featured articles and a splendid total of fifty good articles.

So, on to the second round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:52, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 Pepsi Max 400
The article 2010 Pepsi Max 400 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2010 Pepsi Max 400 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 23:02, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 Pepsi Max 400
The article 2010 Pepsi Max 400 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2010 Pepsi Max 400 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 03:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for 2010 Pepsi Max 400
Mifter (talk) 00:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for 2010 Pepsi Max 400
Mifter (talk) 00:03, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK for 2017 Firestone Grand Prix of St. Petersburg
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Divided (U.S. game show)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Divided (U.S. game show) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 17:01, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Divided (U.S. game show)
The article Divided (U.S. game show) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Divided (U.S. game show) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Argento Surfer -- Argento Surfer (talk) 19:41, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

Note to my talk page stalkers
I'm leaving for Mexico today and will not be back until the wee hours in the morning on April 25. If anything major happens while I'm gone, feel free to let me know through an email or through social media. I may have a chance or two to log in here and there, I may not. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 11:16, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for 2017 Toyota Grand Prix of Long Beach
Mifter (talk) 02:13, 28 April 2017 (UTC)

Help with FAC
Hello again! I would greatly appreciate it if you could help me with my current FAC if possible? I would greatly appreciate your help with this if possible. I understand if you do not have the time or energy for this as it is a busy time of the year. I hope you have a wonderful rest of your weekend. Thank you either way! Aoba47 (talk) 00:21, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi Aoba; no promises as usual (the school year is winding down) but I will keep this in mind! Thanks, --Bcschneider53 (talk) 00:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you and good luck with school! Aoba47 (talk) 00:32, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

May 2017 WikiCup newsletter
The second round of the competition has now closed, with just under 100 points being required to qualify for round 3. YellowEvan just scraped into the next round with 98 points but we have to say goodbye to the thirty or so competitors who didn't achieve this threshold; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Our top scorers in round 2 were:


 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 Cas Liber, led the field with five featured articles, four on birds and one on astronomy, and a total score of 2049, half of which came from bonus points.
 * 🇯🇵 1989 was in second place with 826 points, 466 of which were bonus points. 1989 has claimed points mostly relating to anime and Japanese-related articles.
 * Peacemaker67 took third place with two FAs, one GA and seven GARs, mostly on naval vessels or military personnel, scoring 543 points.
 * Other contestants who scored over 400 points were Freikorp, Carbrera, and Czar. Of course all these points are now wiped out and the 32 remaining contestants start again from zero in round 3.

Vivvt submitted the largest number of DYKs (30), and MBlaze Lightning achieved 13 articles at ITN. Carbrera claimed for 11 GAs and Argento Surfer performed the most GARs, having reviewed 11. So far we have achieved 38 featured articles and a splendid 132 good articles. Commendably, 279 GARs have been achieved so far, more than double the number of GAs.

So, on to the third round. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 2 but before the start of round 3 can be claimed in round 3. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 13:16, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 AMP Energy Juice 500
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2010 AMP Energy Juice 500 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 11:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 AMP Energy Juice 500
The article 2010 AMP Energy Juice 500 you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2010 AMP Energy Juice 500 for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 17:40, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Whammy! The All-New Press Your Luck
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Whammy! The All-New Press Your Luck you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 03:01, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 AMP Energy Juice 500
The article 2010 AMP Energy Juice 500 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2010 AMP Energy Juice 500 for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MPJ-DK -- MPJ-DK (talk) 12:41, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for 2017 Desert Diamond West Valley Phoenix Grand Prix
Gatoclass (talk) 00:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Whammy! The All-New Press Your Luck
The article Whammy! The All-New Press Your Luck you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Whammy! The All-New Press Your Luck for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 05:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Whammy! The All-New Press Your Luck
The article Whammy! The All-New Press Your Luck you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Whammy! The All-New Press Your Luck for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Carbrera -- Carbrera (talk) 23:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RSSRacingLogo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:RSSRacingLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

FAC proposal
Hi, Bcschneider. I have to say that I don't personally see the article as being of FA standard. It's hard to put a finger on it, but I just don't have a feeling that it's there. Even if you look at some of the FAs we have on races, they just look more fully developed than this one. I'm proud of this article and think it's a good GA, but that's as far as it goes. Sorry if this provides a shock, but I have to call them like I see them or I won't be very credible as a reviewer. Giants2008 ( Talk ) 13:17, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I see. No worries, everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion and I appreciate your honesty :) I know you said it's hard to put a finger on it, but what exactly do you think is lacking? I'll also note that our other FA race reports are all Formula One or NASCAR races, so in terms of in Indy race report going to FA, there's nothing we can really compare it to because, well, no Indy FA race reports exist at the moment. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 13:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * If you look at some of those FA articles, the various sections are generally more fully developed than in this article. Some of that is because sources for NASCAR and Formula One are more readily available, but I can't promise that there aren't reliable sources out there that would make this article more comprehensive. In addition, over a quarter of the references are archived CART articles, which are okay for GA, but I think the number of primary sources might be questioned in an FA review. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 17:30, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for your quick responses, something I don't always get around here. I'm not one to back down from a challenge...if I take some of these into consideration and improve this thing, would you be willing to be a co-nom if you thought this had a shot after said improvements were made? I'll do my best to research and see what I can do. Regarding primary sources, I've used a lot of them in the NASCAR FAs and I've never had that objection come up, though I agree that it would be good to get some more secondary ones in the article if they're out there. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 18:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Truthfully, I can't see myself ever wanting to co-nom this one. While I'm not one to complain about potential improvements to an article I started, I'm content with it being a GA. Giants2008  ( Talk ) 20:10, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok, that's fine then. I'll see if I can surprise you and bring it up to FA status :) --Bcschneider53 (talk) 22:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for The American Bible Challenge, "a Biblical-themed game show that aired on Game Show Network from 2012 to 2014. The series was hosted by Jeff Foxworthy, perhaps best known for his career as a comedian and host of the highly successful Are You Smarter than a 5th Grader? on Fox. The series received a Daytime Emmy Award nomination and broke several ratings records for GSN over its three seasons."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:55, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

My Danica Patrick comment
Nothing that I said in my comment was untrue. Danica has one win in more than 300 races. She has never won in NASCAR and has seldom been competitive. As a driver she is mediocre at best. What I said here in my edit change the other day was totally true.

I posted it knowing full well it would probably not "stick."

I can understand your unwillingness to leave my comment.

Still it seems to me that without such information the article about her is somewhat less than honest.

If Danica, with her record, were male, hardly any attention would be paid to her.

I would feel very differently about her if I saw ANY improvement. But there has been none. And in my view, she is not a very nice person based upon her frequent negative public comments and her nastiness toward fans who pay good money to see her and deserve better treatment.

And there have been other female drivers who have had more than one win.

Considering her record, I find it a stretch to call Danica "successful," except in terms of the money that she has made. If I am "not neutral" then so be it, but I find it hard to consider her "successful" with 1 win in more than 300 races and no wins in NASCAR.

Anyway, thank you for your message. And in advance for reading this reply. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.161.182.9 (talk) 18:59, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Let me walk through one by one:


 * 1) Yes, it is true (I even noted that in my edit summary :)). Just because it is true does not mean it should be on a Wikipedia page. Your edit included phrases such as "Though some claim" and "only" one win, which may be seen as coming from an un-neutral point of view, even if that's not what you meant. It also deleted several of her stats from the lead.
 * 2) I would generally advise against making edits that you "know full well" may get reverted :)
 * 3) It's not that I'm unwilling, it's that I'm trying to follow the guidelines laid out in WP:NPOV.
 * 4) I respect your opinion, but again, Wikipedia is not a place for opinions. Her article lists out her credentials. Perhaps the lead needs some expansion to deal with her NASCAR struggles a bit more, but your edit deleted most of her credentials and simply stated, "She's never won."
 * 5) "If Danica, with her record, were male, hardly any attention would be paid to her." Probably, but again, that isn't something that needs to be mentioned in an encyclopedia article.
 * 6) "frequent negative public comments and her nastiness toward fans" Hey, she's had a lot of bad accidents that weren't her fault. Everyone gets frustrated from time to time. How about all the other autograph sessions she's held? You haven't heard of them because they were normal, there was nothing to report. When she blows up, of course the media tries to make a big fuss out of it.
 * 7) That's irrelevant. Extensively comparing her to other females is not the point of the her article, she is the point of her article.
 * 8) The article simply says "She is the most successful woman in the history of American open-wheel racing." This is true by definition. Two top-fours at Indy and a win. No other woman has done that. If the article said, "she is one of the most successful racing drivers in history", obviously that would be a stretch.
 * 9) You're welcome. It takes a little while to learn the ropes, and I sympathize with anonymous IPs because I was an anonymous IP. I'm still learning things around here myself. Feel free to reply with any other questions you may have. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

YGM
~ Rob 13 Talk 21:26, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 July newsletter
The third round of the competition has finished in a flurry of last minute activity, with 288 points being required to qualify for round 4. It was a hotly competitive round with all but four of the contestants exceeding the 106 points that was necessary to proceed to round 4 last year. Coemgenus and Freikorp tied on 288, and both have been allowed to proceed, so round 4 now has one pool of eight competitors and one of nine.

Round 3 saw the achievement of a 26-topic Featured topic by MPJ-DK as well as 5 featured lists and 13 featured articles. PanagiotisZois and SounderBruce achieved their first ever featured articles. Carbrera led the GA score with 10, Tachs achieved 17 DYKs and MBlaze Lightning 10 In the news items. There were 167 DYKs, 93 GARs and 82 GAs overall, this last figure being higher than the number of GAs in round 2, when twice as many people were taking part. Even though contestants performed more GARs than they achieved GAs, there was still some frustration at the length of time taken to get articles reviewed.

As we start round 4, we say goodbye to the fifteen or so competitors who didn't quite make it; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them (some people have fallen foul of this rule and the points have been removed).

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 05:37, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Time for the big one!
After a nice copy edit and "final" revisions, I've put Double Dare up as a FA nominee! Thanks for your help and encouragement throughout the process. I'm excited to see it go through the process! — 'Chad1m EmailTalk Cont. 18:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem, Chad. Best wishes! I'll take another look myself eventually. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 19:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for 2017 Rainguard Water Sealers 600
Alex ShihTalk 12:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

The Chase (U.S. game show) scheduled for TFA
This is to let you know that the The Chase (U.S. game show) article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 6 August 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/August 6, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:29, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the show! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Drivers list for NASCAR Heat 2
Hi Bcschneider53. I apologize for not citing a source for the confirmed drivers list for NASCAR Heat 2. I apologize since I was in a hurry to do this. I would also like to say that I am new to editing in Wikipedia so please excuse me for not adding the source since I am still new at this. There is a source however. The website is "www.nascarheat.com" The specific pages for the drivers list is "www.nascarheat.com/nascar-xfinity-series/" and "http://www.nascarheat.com/nascar-camping-world-truck-series/" 704Games have recently also added the confirmed drivers list for the Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series drivers, yet they have not updated their website. I currently still do not have the time availability to list the sources on the Wikipedia page. If you have the availability to add the source I would greatly appreciate it! I have seen your page and now know that you are a student, so if you are not available at this time that is fine. Thanks! -SteeledDock541 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SteeledDock541 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Hello SteeledDock541! Nice to meet you. I'd like to refer you to WP:TRIVIA. The drivers list is not really necessary information for an article like this; it would be like including a list of every team in NBA 2K18. If you would like general assistance in learning how to cite sources, please see WP:CITE. I appreciate you reaching out to me. I sympathize with new, inexperienced editors because I was once one myself. Please let me know if you have any other questions! Also, please sign your talk page posts by typing " ~ " after your post. Thank you! --Bcschneider53 (talk) 23:38, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Since you're still doing it, I'd like to point out WP:GAMECRUFT, particularly Rule 8: "Lists of gameplay items, weapons, or concepts" (which includes drivers/"characters") are considered to be beyond the scope of video game pages and should not be added. There's a reason why we do not add individual drivers to past articles, like how we do not add all 32 teams and the Fantasy Challenge teams to Madden NFL 09.  Zappa  24  Mati   22:09, 26 August 2017 (UTC)

What the hell???
TV show articles by default should contain a list of episodes as most on wikipedia do and what the do you mean by Game Show Wiki????????? 23:27, 30 August 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.224.3.221 (talk)
 * Actually, even better, there's a Hollywood Game Night wiki with an Episode Guide of its own. Such lists are meant for fansites such as this. They're only used on Wikipedia for shows with a long-running theme or plot line (dramas, comedies, etc). If you want further explanation, read the AfD for the list of episodes. If you want to try to come to a new consensus on whether or not the episode lists should be included, take it to the talk page of Hollywood Game Night and we'll go from there. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 00:12, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 September newsletter
Round 4 of the WikiCup has ended and we move forward into the final round. In round 4, a total of 12 FAs, 3 FLs, 44 GAs, 3 FLs, 79 DYKs, 1 ITN and 42 GARs was achieved, with no FPs or FTs this time. Congratulations to Peacemaker67 on the Royal Yugoslav Navy Good Topic of 36 items, and the 12 featured articles achieved by Cas Liber (5), Vanamonde93 (3), Peacemaker67 (2), Adityavagarwal (1) and 12george1 (1). With a FA scoring 200 points, and bonus points available on top of this, FAs are likely to feature heavily in the final round. Meanwhile Yellow Evan, a typhoon specialist, was contributing 12 DYKs and 10 GAs, while Adityavagarwal and Freikorp topped the GAR list with 8 reviews each. As we enter the final round, we are down to eight contestants, and we would like to thank those of you who have been eliminated for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia. The lowest score needed to reach round 5 was 305, and I think we can expect a highly competitive final round.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 10 days of "earning" them. If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews Needed. It would be helpful if this list could be cleared of any items no longer relevant. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck, and let the best man (or woman) win! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Godot13, Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth 06:25, 1 September 2017 (UTC)

TFL notification
Hi, Bcschneider53. I'm just posting to let you know that List of NASCAR race wins by Jeff Gordon – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 29. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008  ( Talk ) 22:20, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:49, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

LaMelo Ball GA nomination
Hello, seeing that you have reviewed basketball-related articles before, I was wondering whether you could take a look at the LaMelo Ball article and possibly consider starting the GA review (nomination on "Talk" page). Thank you. TempleM (talk) 16:33, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reaching out to me; however, I don't currently have the time necessary to properly review an article of that size (and perhaps controversy, considering who his father is...). Still, best of luck with the nomination. If it's been a while and the nomination still hasn't been reviewed, ping me again and I'll consider it. Cheers, --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Would you consider reviewing the Alex Owumi article, which was nominated a while back but still hasn't been reviewed. Really interesting story as well. TempleM (talk) 18:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Wow, quite a story indeed. I'll think about it; from first glance, it appears to be in good shape, so that's a good sign. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 18:47, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the AOWR tags
I looked through my Watchlist today and saw you went through basically every article I've created/redirected/so that they're included under the WikiProject:AOWR guidelines. Thank you for doing this!

I focus more on creating start-class articles with the hopes of going back to them and fleshing them out later, but the few I have fleshed out I would like your opinion on. The 2001 Freightliner/G.I. Joe's 200 and 2001 Molson Indy Vancouver you rated 'C' Class in quality. I want to know what I need to do to make those articles better besides pictures (I wish fair-use IndyCar pics were as plentiful as they are in F1). I also want to let you know that I created/fleshed out the 2001 Lehigh Valley Grand Prix and 2001 Marconi Grand Prix of Cleveland articles but they're still listed as 'start' class. Any chances you could review those too?

Thanks in advance. Rocks with Salt (talk) 16:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi! Thank YOU for the creation of these articles! I am happy to take a look at those two. Give me a few minutes and I'll get back to you... --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:34, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm quite impressed with the amount of work you've put in. Both are easily C-class material in my opinion. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 16:36, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * What does it take to get up beyond C Class though? That's what I would like to know. Rocks with Salt (talk) 17:21, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Simply put, substantial references are required. From what I see right now, the race report sections of your articles lack inline citations. Instead, you have the ref in the section header, when it should be used multiple times in the race report. I'd also suggest adding as many references as you can in general. Also, FWIW, I'm not sure the "Race statistics" sections are entirely necessary. My race reports have attained GA and even FA-class status without them, and I personally think they may be a bit too trivial to merit entire sections and tables.
 * Also, for a general B-Class guideline, see WP:BCLASS. For GA and FA (which require nomination processes), see WP:GAN and WP:FAC. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 18:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Line (game show)
The article The Line (game show) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Line (game show) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 18:41, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks! My pleasure, anything to trim the GAN backlog. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 00:14, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Wow, I went over a year without a single barnstar, and now I get two within 23 minutes! Thanks for all you do, particularly with these football bios. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 00:34, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2017 November newsletter: Final results
The final round of the 2017 WikiCup is over. Congratulations to the 2017 WikiCup top three finalists:
 * First Place -
 * Second Place -
 * Third Place -

In addition to recognizing the achievements of the top finishers and everyone who worked hard to make it to the final round, we also want to recognize those participants who were most productive in each of the WikiCup scoring categories:
 * Featured Article – Cas Liber (actually a two-way tie with themselves for an astonishing five FAs in R2 and R4).
 * Good Article – Adityavagarwal had 14 GAs promoted in R5.
 * Featured List – and  both produced 2 FLs in R2
 * Featured Pictures – improved an image to FP status in R5, the only FP this year.
 * Featured Topic – has the only FT of the Cup in R3.
 * Good Topic – Four different editors created a GT in R2, R3 and R4.
 * Did You Know – Adityavagarwal had 22 DYKs on the main page in R5.
 * In The News – had 14 ITN on the main page in R2.
 * Good Article Review – completed 31 GARs in R1.

Over the course of the 2017 WikiCup the following content was added or improved on Wikipedia: 51 Featured Articles, 292 Good Articles, 18 Featured Lists, 1 Featured Picture, 1 Featured Topics, 4 Good Topics, around 400 Did You Knows, 75 In The News, and 442 Good Article Reviews. Thank you to all the competitors for your hard work and what you have done to improve Wikipedia.

Regarding the prize vouchers - please send  an email from the email address to which you would like your Amazon voucher sent. Please include your preference of global Amazon marketplace as well. We hope to have the electronic gift cards processed and sent within a week.

We will open up a discussion for comments on process and scoring in a few days. The 2018 WikiCup is just around the corner! Many thanks from all the judges. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. ,, and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:41, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

The American Bible Challenge selected as TFA
This is to let you know that The American Bible Challenge has been scheduled as today's featured article for December 24, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Today's featured article/December 24, 2017.--Wehwalt (talk) 20:17, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips at the Glen
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips at the Glen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:41, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips at the Glen
The article 2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips at the Glen you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips at the Glen for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips at the Glen
The article 2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips at the Glen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2010 Heluva Good! Sour Cream Dips at the Glen for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 08:02, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kenzie Ruston Hemric
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Kenzie Ruston Hemric you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 09:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kenzie Ruston Hemric
The article Kenzie Ruston Hemric you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Kenzie Ruston Hemric for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 18:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Kenzie Ruston Hemric
The article Kenzie Ruston Hemric you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Kenzie Ruston Hemric for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MWright96 -- MWright96 (talk) 19:01, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

WikiCup 2018
So the 2017 WikiCup has come to an end. Congratulations to the winner, to the other finalists and to all those who took part. 177 contestants signed up, more than usual, but not all of them submitted entries in the first round. Were editors attracted by the cash prizes offered for the first time this year, or were these irrelevant? Do the rules and scoring need changing for the 2018 WikiCup? If you have a view on these or other matters, why not join in the WikiCup discussion about next year's contest? , and. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hollywood Game Night
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Hollywood Game Night you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 21:21, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Hollywood Game Night
The article Hollywood Game Night you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Hollywood Game Night for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 16:41, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1 vs. 100 (U.S. game show)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 1 vs. 100 (U.S. game show) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 03:40, 26 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of 1 vs. 100 (U.S. game show)
The article 1 vs. 100 (U.S. game show) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:1 vs. 100 (U.S. game show) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 03:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Diffey
That is one photo I do not have, but will attempt to acquire and contribute one. Doctorindy↔Talk 14:15, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Emogenius
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Emogenius you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 03:41, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Tony Stewart
I made edits on the Tony Stewart page knowing he didn’t race under the Monster Energy Series banner. He’s my favorite driver. I know this stuff. However, when the series is renamed, historical events are still referred to using the current name. For example, Jeff Gordon is referred to as a 4-time Monster Energy NASCAR Cup Series (MENCS) Champion. Even though Jeff’s last championship win was in 2001. At that time it was NASCAR Winston Cup. He’s never raced under the MENCS name either. The Andrew Swain (talk) 01:06, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your message. The standard here on Wikipedia is to use the title name under which the driver raced in his/her final season. For Stewart and Gordon, this would be the Sprint Cup Series. You are correct that they'll be referred to in the media today as MENCS champions, but this is largely due to sponsorship obligations with the television networks. If you would like to propose that we change this standard, feel free to do so at WT:NASCAR. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 01:47, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Emogenius
The article Emogenius you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Emogenius for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AmericanAir88 -- AmericanAir88 (talk) 05:02, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Rollback error
Hola. I clicked the wrong button accidentally reverting your edit on Russian Roulette (game show). Sorry about that. Just wanted to leave a note in case you get a notice. AldezD (talk) 18:55, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Maureen Wroblewitz
Help for improvement this article. Thank you!Haiyenslna (talk) 04:34, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry, that's not really my area of expertise. I'm also quite busy with other projects right now. I'd suggesting asking people involved with WikiProject Top Model if you want help improving the article in question. Cheers, --Bcschneider53 (talk) 04:37, 17 December 2017 (UTC)

DYK for 2007 AT&T 250
Alex Shih (talk) 00:03, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Deep Space Homer
Hello,

I currently have Deep Space Homer at FAC. This will be my first FAC and I am wondering if you could help me out in leaving comments and looking it over. I totally understand if you're busy, but do you have any interest in looking over it? I'd be happy to return the favor if you have any outstanding nominations yourself. If you have any GAN's you need to get cleared, ill be more than happy to review them. Thank you so much for your contributions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 04:06, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I go back to college soon, so I'm getting ready for that. Don't let me forget about it though...hopefully I'll have time at some point this week. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 14:25, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok Thank you, Hope all goes well. AmericanAir88 (talk) 15:26, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Any time for looking at it? AmericanAir88 (talk) 05:04, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
 * My apologies; real life caught up to me and I forgot. I'll try taking a look today. --Bcschneider53 (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank you AmericanAir88 (talk) 00:10, 9 February 2018 (UTC)