User talk:BiT

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Request for Help, please
Greetings Mr. BiT,

Nice to meet you.

Could you kindly help me translate these passages into the unique and interesting Icelandic language? please.

Content
 * "Receiving the promised Holy Spirit, evidenced by speaking in tongues, is the guarantee of our inheritance of the Kingdom of Heaven".


 * "Water baptism is the sacrament for the remission of sins and for regeneration. The baptism takes place in natural living water, such as the river, sea, or spring. The Baptist, whom already had received baptism of water and the Holy Spirit, conducts the baptism in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ. And the person receiving the baptism should be completely immersed in water with head bowed and face downward".


 * "The sacrament of washing of feet enables one to have a part with the Lord Jesus. It also serves as a constant reminder that one should have love, holiness, humility, forgiveness and service. Every person who has received water baptism should have their feet washed in the name of Jesus Christ. Mutual feet washing can be practiced whenever is appropriate".

Your help would be very Gratefully Appreciated, Thankyou very much. --Jose77 (talk) 05:05, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I do not wish to take part in proselytizing. --BiT (talk) 05:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Okay, that is your freedom of choice. I will respect it. --Jose77 (talk) 07:31, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I think it's odd that you remove comments of my user talk without my permission and then delete my comments of your user talk after you approached me for help. --BiT (talk) 07:56, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 05:16, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Recent changes
Your recent changes to Complement (set theory) and Parity (mathematics) seem to consist primarily of unnecessary addition of tags, and (in the case of Parity) unnecessary addition of symbols when the words are adequate. If you wanted to write:
 * $$(\forall k \in \mathbb {Z})2k+1 \mbox{ is odd},$$

it might make sense, but the mixed formulas and text is just jarring. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Aren't words also adequate in the formal definition of relative complements? --BiT (talk) 03:40, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm actually not convinced of that. There are too many pronouns to be sure of the meaning.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 08:39, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * In that case I'm sorry, I thought $$$$ was preferable to normally written formulae. --BiT (talk) 08:46, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Only in displayed formulas. Inline $$$$ is to be avoided, and certainly to be avoided if it can be done in text.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 08:51, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Isn't the example in Parity something that should be $$$$ 'd though, something like "∀k ∈ ℤ" looks far more legible as $$\forall k \in \mathbb{Z}$$ and the small explanation I added makes it all very clear in my opinion. --BiT (talk) 12:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * In retrospect my excessive LaTeXisation does seem unnecessary. --BiT (talk) 12:29, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Oint


The article Oint has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * LaTeX commands are not notable on their own (this is the only one in Category:TeX)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pnm (talk) 00:41, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ctypes


The article Ctypes has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A disambiguation page for which there is only one actual Wikipedia article, and thus no ambiguation.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 23:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Land of Lisp


The article Land of Lisp has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shadowjams (talk) 09:32, 9 November 2011 (UTC)

AfD and PROD notifications
Hi BiT,

Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification, which was part of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (there are links to the templates), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at mpinchuk@undefinedwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 20:58, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colon (punctuation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Haskell (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

File:EdwardArmster.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EdwardArmster.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:15, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=590194253 your edit] to Foreach loop may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Xload for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xload is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Xload until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ysangkok (talk) 08:31, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

1+ listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1+. Since you had some involvement with the 1+ redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SST flyer  02:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Scotia Major listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Scotia Major. Since you had some involvement with the Scotia Major redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 21:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

System testing
Your help is needed. Will you help steer the direction of this article that you have contributed to? See discussion at Talk:System_testing Stephen Charles Thompson (talk) 00:00, 20 October 2018 (UTC)

"Point break" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Point break. The discussion will occur at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 21 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 14:24, 21 September 2020 (UTC)