User talk:BigEars42

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, BigEars42, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! RJFJR (talk) 14:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Moved post
Note: I moved your post at Image copyright help desk to Media copyright questions where it is more likely to receive a response. -- &oelig; &trade; 10:05, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * I posted a follow-up answer, but it requires me to do some digging, which i cannot do at the moment. Please send me a reminder if I don't follow up by Wednesday.-- SPhilbrick  T  13:37, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The name I was trying to remember is Wittylama. Liam appears to be still active; it may be worth contacting him, explaining the project, and seeing if something can be done.-- SPhilbrick  T  21:38, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Un-Redirects
To edit a redirect, go to the redirect and let it redirect you to the target page; in the upper left corner there will be a blue link saying you were redirected from the original page; click this link and it will take you to the redirect page with out the redirect taking effect and you can then click the edit tab and change the redirect like any other page. (This is the easy way, there is another way involving editing the URL to add a command not to follow the redirect.) RJFJR (talk) 03:28, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Shagarakti-Shuriash
The reason is that Assyriology includes the Akkadian, old Babylonian and neo-Babylonian periods imo. Clearly you are more knowledgeable than me so it's up to you to choose the wikiprojects which might fall within the article's scope.--  R a f y  talk 01:04, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I have come to appreciate the German Wikipedia for its excellent coverage of Mesopotamian related articles. You can take a look at their version, Google translate usually does a descent job there if you have difficulties reading German.--  R a f y  talk 10:37, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

"Economic texts", archives
I replied to your post on my talk page. The wonderful thing of what you are inputting in the 'cuneiform histories', is that you are reading original material, unaltered, and non re-interpreted. As a result of doing Egyptian hieroglyphs, and some cuneiform, it is so.... satisfying living in a world of understanding, and 'seeing', but not with the eyes, with the "mind, heart, and soul". We live in this politically correct world of true Craziness, Overpopulation, Extinction-(Extirpation)... It was all done in the original "riverworld" societies of Ancient Egypt and Mesopotamia, and done in the 3rd and 2nd Millenniums BC... before the really big changes started with the full-blown production of the Iron Age, and the societal evolutions.

It is an adventure to watch all of this. I actually am as fascinated with how Wikipedia is going to be forced to evolve with the changes coming. So many articles (I think (IMHO)) are slanted, biased, and miss the mark. The articles are Old-School, based on all this "referenced" crap.... ("you can't teach what you don't know")). ....for now--(I'll look at some more of your articles, in Time....Right Now I am surviving 110 to 113 Degrees southwest Arizona-SonoranDesert Heat)(30 days so far equal or above 110 Deg))-(I added a N to "then" in the ReDirect discussion above...You do see how to get to the page, I assume?)Mmcannis (talk) 03:42, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

RE: Rabâ-ša-Marduk
Hello, and thank you for your commentary and contributions to Wikipedia. What you posted on my page does make sense, as he did appear to have a very lengthy career, as well as an illustrious one, as described by the source. I would be willing to use the term "lengthy" to describe the physician's career, but I would rather use factual data instead of that word, such as "...x year career". "Illustrious" is a term that I have POV and editorial concerns over; reason being is because the word is not extraordniarily detailed in itself. However, I could simply be overly concerned about the vocabulary, though, because I have received criticism on other pages while trying to edit such pages with WP:EDITORIAL on my mind. So, on a concluding thought, terms like "long" and "illustrious" are not terms that I'd use if writing or improving an article because of said WP:EDITORIAL concerns, but maybe I do overreact to similar terms on articles. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 22:37, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I think those words would be acceptable for this page. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 21:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Ancient Mesopotamia template
Hi BigEars 42,

First off, I did not remove the templates because you wrote the articles, and second, please note that I acted in good faith. Why, then, did I make these changes? There is not a single reason but rather a number of smaller ones: I hope this clarifies things a little bit!--Zoeperkoe (talk) 18:46, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * To remove clutter (in general multiple side boxes on 1 page don't look good). You already have Template:Babylonian kings and Template:Assyrian kings, these allow easy access between the different kings, and I understand that navboxes should be used sparingly.
 * To make room for the Template:Infobox monarch, which I think is a much more useful use of the topright corner of each of the king-articles than the Anc.Mes. template. Since some of the pages on kings do have the monarch infobox and others don't, it would also be much more consistent to give each king a monarch infobox.
 * To prepare for a major revision of Template:Ancient Mesopotamia that I am working on, which, if of course accepted after discussion, will turn the template into a footer navbox (which in general look better than these side-templates, esp. if there are several on a page).
 * The main text in each page on each king already gives access to the relevant pages (i.e. Babylonia, Assyria, or whatever country they ruled), and whom they fought etc); whereas the infobox links to a whole number of pages that are in most cases not relevant. For example, a link to Enûma Eliš which is linked in the Anc.Mes. navbox is not really relevant to most of the kings you have described.
 * While apparently not an official policy, I do get the impression that most navboxes are actually indeed only included on the pages to which they actually refer.
 * In general, the removal of this navbox from these pages is part of my attempt to get some 'top down' organization into Mesopotamia-related pages on WP, whereby I ultimately see Mesopotamia as the main access page from where people can go further and delve into more obscure pages.
 * In general, a thousand wrongs don't make a right. I feel that putting these king-pages in or something similar would achieve the same thing (i.e. links to relevant pages on Kassites/Assyria) without having the irrelevant links that are also in the Ancient Mesopotamia infobox. However, if you feel so strongly about it, feel free to revert; I am definitely not going to war about this.

PS, just out of curiosity, exactly because of which links in the infobox did you decide to put it in every article you made?--Zoeperkoe (talk) 19:30, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It looks like I got off a bad start. I would like to apologize for my earlier replies; I might have been a little bit too uncompromising. Just to be sure, the work you are doing is absolutely great, so I agree it would be better to accommodate that. If the best solution turns out to leave the original Anc.Mes. template in there, I will happily revert myself. For the moment however, maybe we can leave it as it is, especially since I need some time to think about a good solution to make these articles more accessible. The least I can do is try to upload the new template I have in mind for Ancient Mesopotamia in my sandbox, and then we can decide whether that still fits these articles, or whether a new template might be better. I'll see if I can do that tomorrow.--Zoeperkoe (talk) 02:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Bold proposal to reorganize Template:Ancient Mesopotamia
I have made a proposal to reorganize Template:Ancient Mesopotamia. See here for the discussion; see here for the actual new draft. Your input is appreciated!--Zoeperkoe (talk) 18:45, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

List of kings of Babylon - edits by anon
Have you seen all the changes made today to List of kings of Babylon by 81.106.116.120‎. I don't know enough to be certain it is all vandalism or original research. Worth a check given you seem to have a strong interest in this period. Thanks --Chewings72 (talk) 10:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the quick response. I just wanted to check because the talk page for 81.106.116.120‎ had indicated problems in the past with inappropriate edits. --Chewings72 (talk) 11:19, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Suggestions at Talk:Itti-Marduk-balatu
Hello. I'm not sure if you saw my message on my talk page but I left some suggestions at Talk:Itti-Marduk-balatu for us to work through. With your knowledge of the subject it shouldn't take too long. Hope this helps, France 3470   ( talk ) 18:07, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Moreover/however
You wrote: "I do not understand your edit in Nebuchadnezzar I. The 'however' clearly refers to the preceding sentence. Can you explain why it makes no sense?BigEars42 (talk) 01:53, 21 February 2012 (UTC)"


 * Because "however" implies a contradiction from the previous sentence, which is not what is happening there. Since he's not related, there's no reason that think the name should be retroactively applied. Where's the contradiction? The "moreover" implies that the two ideas build off of one another, as I think is what those sentences are doing? E.g., not only are they unrelated, but also there's no reason to apply the name retroactively. I hope that clears up my edit. I find the "however" confusing because I don't see an implied contradiction between the two sentences. Cheers, Aristophanes 68   (talk)  18:17, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Ninurta-nādin-šumi
Thanks for writing on my talk page. I put expand section on the biography section, because I thought it contained abrupt details of his confrontation with predecessor etc. I am really not aware of the subject, I am reviewing articles as part of the ASE project. Please feel free to remove the template if you don't think there is more biographical information on this subject. Regards Curious81 (talk) 20:59, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Nazi-Maruttash inscription photo


Hello, from Arizona,USA. I want to extend My Greatest 'Thank You' , for the opportunity, To read, and/ or edit the "numerous", and sometimes "exciting" articles that you have put into Wikipedia. Regrettably, .... the world has no need for the "existential" and "historical" profoundness of what You are doing. I actually feel 'my personal efforts' in Wikipedia, are equivalent. IN fact there are hundreds, and thousands of Individuals doing things in Wikipedia, which will, eventually change the World, and People, because, as Humans, and as a Race of Humans, we are so "completely", lost,.... that it is hard to imagine we will survive our own human, or personal: "cluelessness" Our species, and our survival is in jeaporday, though few Know, or Accept it. (I am personally looking at my newly (acquired) book: Roadside Geology of Arizona, (to go with an older: Hiking Arizona's Geology. I've been busy with Mountain ranges, and Valleys, so it is my next step.) The photo you just put on Nazi-Maruttash was taken with the block UPSIDE-DOWN. It is hard to accept that it was put on dispay at the Louvre, in this format.

Could you contact the Wikicommons people, to rotate the Image?,,[It is a common request on Photos],,,,  (I am the creator of the category: Category:Cuneiform on media, (and many of the subcategories))).

Best Regards...(from the HOT-SonoranDesert,USA/(northwest)Mexico....Mmcannis (talk) 16:17, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Erishum I
Nice job on the limmu list. He is as far back as you can get isn't he? You gonna do that all the way down the line? Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 01:53, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

XcentY
Thanks for the correction. I googled it and found Ashur, Bel, Nish, Shu. Not many info about assyrian dictionnary or grammar on the web so I took what I found (some egyptian gods, some arab) I've no knowledge in assyria so you enlighted my search. — Preceding unsigned comment added by XcentY (talk • contribs) 22:13, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Ashur-rim-nisheshu
Hi! I'm the autor of the article about this ruler on polish wikipedia 1. I have done some research and seems that the name of this king should be written Aššur-rêm-nišēšu (Grayson, Reallexikon..., vol. VI, p.126; Grayson, RIMA 1, p. 101; Glassner, Mesopotamian Chronicles, p. 347), not Aššur-rā’im-nišēšu. Note that his name on his cone is inscribed mda-šur3-re-em-ni-še-šu (Grayson, RIMA 1, p.101.). So AG2 in his name mdaš-šur- ÁG-UN.MEŠ -šu means rêm or rēm (stativ form of râmu - to love) not rā'imu (participle). Initially I thought that -rīm- or -rēm- came from rīmum ("wild bull"), because I had found name dAššur-ri-im-nišēšu ("Ashur is the wild bull of his people") in rīmum, CAD R (vol. 14), p. 361, but now I know I was wrong :) Best regards from Poland Lamashtu2006 00:44, 13 August 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lamashtu2006 (talk • contribs)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Angim, BigEars42!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"reviewed seems fine."

To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you recently tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page. This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Cut and paste move repair holding pen. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 04:47, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Nebuchadnezzar I
To request a page be moved, see Moving a page Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:49, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * How long does the request take (already started). Unfortunately another editor is trying to change to tone of the article and make it "Biblical". As it was a carefully positioned neutral article about a Babylonian king who preceded the Biblical age, this is a problem and your reversion of my renaming has prevented my reverting his edit. I suspect an edit war may commence as this "editor" is very determined.BigEars42 (talk) 05:08, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * If the move is "not controversial" you should use  . Replace "reason for move" with your reason. It goes at the top of the redirect page: Nabu-kudurri-usur I Should be faster. P.S. put comments on the user's talk page, they may not be seen on the user's page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * To keep a conversation on one page, add the comment here and put on the user's talk page. Jim1138 (talk), 14 September 2012 (UTC)
 * BTW: Just saw your Sept 14th comment. You accidently put it on user:Jim1138. I moved it to my talk page. Users do not get notified of changes to their user page. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jim1138 (talk • contribs) 06:44, 25 September 2012

Edits for Ninurta-nadin-shumi
Since you enlightened me about what a "but one" is, the "predecessor to the predecessor", I now know why I could not read the sentence correctly. It took me awhile to realize, the sentence was meant to be correct the "but one, Ninurta-nadin-shumi..." looked like a sentence needing a verb ("but" as a conjunction). I guess the 'but one' is a pun for English "butt one" (hah hah). As an American I speak English, too, but obviously not "British English".-(I envy your access to the British Museum)...(Cheers! from HOT, ArizonaUSA, Sonoran Desert (on Colorado River).Mmcannis (talk) 00:37, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

JSTOR
Hi there. You're one of the first 100 people to sign up for a free JSTOR account via the requests page. We're ready to start handing out accounts, if you'd still like one.

JSTOR will provide you access via an email invitation, so to get your account, please email me (swalling@undefinedwikimedia.org) with...


 * the subject line "JSTOR"
 * your English Wikipedia username
 * your preferred email address for a JSTOR account

The above information will be given to JSTOR to provide you with your account, but will otherwise remain private. Please do so by November 30th or drop me a message to say you don't want/need an account any longer. If you don't meet that deadline, we will assume you have lost interest, and will provide an account to the next person in the rather long waitlist.

Thank you! Steven Walling (WMF) &bull; talk   21:06, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Land grant kudurru, by Meli-Shipak II


I did the Category:Kudurru boundary stones, 1-June-2007, and googled for photo pics of kudurrus. I made the articles-(2-3 day weekend Event), that I could, including a few king names. I see I made 2-articles referring to the same kudurru. Could you rename one (the Move function, that I know you are aware of, that still keeps the Article Revision history). The article that has external links to the most sites is Kudurru of Melishihu, the one that you can move. The 2nd needs to be redirected, (unless a Wikipedia Administrator, thinks a Merge, with 2- Histories, to do what with:...a Redirect, still keeps the history of the Redirected Article)...The redirect is #REDIRET [target to the new article that you have renamed by the "Move"]].

So, I'm suggesting you move Kudurru of Melishihu to a new name, and reWrite the article (it is now a 5-yr old article). It is the Melišipak kudurru-Land grant to Marduk-apal-iddina I-(article to redirect)-(and it should have said Marduk-apla-iddina I-(which I Miss-spelled)....Cheers, from HOT-Arizona,Southwest USA...Mmcannis (talk) 15:09, 1 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Hello, from Arizona....I see the two articles had two separate write-ups (at the Louvre?). I'm going to move both articles to new names (not ReDirect yet); correct the one name, and modify the second name with the nice, large photo, and description-(K. of Melishihu). Probably move it to "Kudurru of Milishihu (Meli-Shipak II land grant to Marduk-apla-iddina I)". I still don't know what the best article title should be... "Land grant to Marduk-apla iddina I by Meli-Shipak II". I'm gonna go with for now: Land grant to Marduk-apla-iddina I by Meli-Shipak II. You can just reMove the article to a new name, start the reWrite, and do whatever with the other article, probably redirect it.--(from the HotSonoranDesert, ArizonaUSA)--Mmcannis (talk) 22:10, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

kudurrus in Wikidata
Hi, just letting you know that I have added a few basic info about various kudurrus in Wikidata. Additions will alway be appreciated :). --Superzoulou (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

By the way, I do not know much about the topic, but judging by their external link, I am not sure Marduk-zakir-šumi_I_kudurru and Marduk-apal-iddina II kudurru are relevant articles. --Superzoulou (talk) 09:08, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for the explanation.
 * Wikidata is a multilingual knowledge base. Its most immediate purpose is to help Wikipedias in smaller languages, at they will be able to grab the interwikis and the infobox data directly from Wikidata, without the need to maintain all of them. Other uses are potentially numerous, but will depend on what the community puts into it. Having more structured data will almost certainly help importing data from other datbases and detect inconsistenies. It should also make many things more searchable (for example, you should be able to use it to find items about objects found in Mesopotamia that are held in German museums, and also restrict the search to those that have an article in German, but not yet in English). Also, Wikidata items are not real articles, so that it is fine if they are really smallish. I suppose it would be relevant to have an item for all 160 kudurrus. --Superzoulou (talk) 11:30, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=553641876 your edit] to Sealand Dynasty may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:40, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
930913(Congratulate) 16:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

JSTOR Survey (and an update)
Hi! Just a quick update that while JSTOR and The Wikipedia Library discuss expanding the partnership, they've gone ahead and extended the pilot access again, until May 31st. Thanks, JSTOR!

It would be really helpful for growing the program if you would fill out this short survey about your usage and experience with JSTOR:

SURVEY

Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:47, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Please fill out your JSTOR email
As one of the original 100 JSTOR account recipients, please fill out the very short email form you received just recently in order to renew your access. Even though you signed up before with WMF, we need you to sign up again with The Wikipedia Library for privacy reasons and because your prior access expired on July 15th. We do not have your email addresses now; we just used the Special:EmailUser feature, so if you didn't receive an email just contact me directly at jorlowitz@undefinedgmail.com. Thanks, and we're working as quickly as possible to get you your new access! Jake (Ocaasi) 19:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)

Erra-imitti
in Erra-imitti, you wrote: "When the omens predicted impending doom for a monarch, it was customary to appoint as a substitute a statue though animate as a scape-goat for a hundred days to deflect the disaster, at the end of which the proxy and his spouse would be ritually slaughtered and the king would resume his throne. " Someone soon changed "animate" to "inanimate" - but neither version makes sense to me. A real person was involved here (hence, animate) but how is he a "statue"? Or was appointed by statute" the intended meaning? Are you trying to say that a person was declared a living statue of the king? Rmhermen (talk) 13:09, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I've taken the liberty of adding talkref here, to keep the footnote in the quotation in this section, rather than dropping it to the bottom of the page in the usual footnote location. --Thnidu (talk) 01:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!
We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways: Sign up now Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
 * Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
 * Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
 * Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
 * Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
 * Research coordinators: run reference services

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Rimush
You are right, I should have said Kramer for the first part and Liverani for the second part of that. Philip Mexico (talk) 15:09, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Gutian rulers
Hi BigEars42,

Since you´re editing a lot of articles on Mesopotamian rulers (for example Ibranum), you might want to chip in on this. Editor SomeGuyWhoRandomlyEdits has been mass-creating articles on Gutian rulers as they appear in the Sumerian King List, and has been adding actual regnal years to them, which he probably took from the article Gutian dynasty of Sumer, which also doesn't list a source for the regnal years. I don't think that there are good sources for these regnal years (or the kings' existence for that matter), so maybe we shouldn't add this information to articles. What's your take on this? Best, --Zoeperkoe (talk) 07:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for chipping in anyway! I've suggested to remove the dates; they're unsourced anyway. --Zoeperkoe (talk) 11:54, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

I have returned
Hello Sir. I used to edit your (Amazing) articles for Mesopotamia. And admit I did NOT study any one in depth. But I started by creating the category for kudurrus, and I have been away from the computer for (literally) years. When I edited your articles, it took me weeks and months sometimes to catch up with you in time. Because I was doing my own creating. I think Wikipedia, is just the beginning of WHAT IS HAPPENING. And on earth (and beyond) -- a lot is constantly changing. So I will see what new articles you have come up with. For me, the Epic of Gilgamesh is the greatest existential story--- Though I believe most don't see it that way. It was humans -- figuring out there place in the world (As is still continuing today). I just wanted to say Hello to you. ///// Michael in Yuma, AZ -- the Hot desert of Arizona. User talk:Mmcannis ( I have forgotten how to sign )

Enlil and Anunnaki
Hello! I have no idea if you are still an active editor, since you only made eleven edits last year and have not made any at all this year. I saw your name in a conversation from seven years ago at Talk:Sumerian literature and, looking at your edit history, I see you mainly edit articles about ancient Mesopotamia. I have worked on several articles about ancient Sumerian deities. (I recently brought the article Inanna up to "Good Article" status.) I nominated the articles Enlil and Anunnaki for "Good Article" status back in August and September of 2017 respectively, but they are both still awaiting review. I was wondering if you would be able and willing to review them, since you seem to have knowledge on the subject. --Katolophyromai (talk) 03:22, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Agum II
Hi,

I got a message that you reverted my edit. Is there any way to indicate that the brackets are to indicate reconstructed text? I made the edit because I'm on the Typo Team andt was detectedas missing spaces next to brackets by an automated spellchecker. I'll sumbit your reason, but it sill may still be detected by other spellcheckers. if others intending to make a similar edit see your reason, they won't do it. THAnks.

Ira

Ira Leviton (talk) 20:34, 28 November 2019 (UTC)