User talk:Burmiester

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! --A NobodyMy talk 21:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Talkback
PrincessofLlyr (talk) 01:21, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Film article plots
Hi there. Just letting you know WP:MOSFILM states film plots in film articles should be no longer than 700 words. Ideally they should be around 500. Accordingly, whilst your edit to the page Final Destination was well written and accurate, as the plot was already at the maximum 700 words your edit has has been reverted. The article is about the film, not the films plot, the plot is just there to give the reader the gist about what the film was about. They do not require precise details. You may wish to check how long the plot already is before you start editing it in the future. I hope you find this information helpful. Cheers. :) Freikorp (talk) 22:54, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Image addtions
Would you please stop adding pointers to unverified images in cryptozoology articles. (By "unverified", I mean the photographer is not determined, not that the subject of the photograph is not verified.) — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 22:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Swing Vote (2008 film)
I am curious as to the reasoning behind your change. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 01:01, 12 June 2010 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Phil Baker (musician)


A tag has been placed on Phil Baker (musician) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:55, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Northampton State Hospital


The article Northampton State Hospital has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable building. (Not a speedy condition)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 00:57, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

June 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Northampton State Hospital. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- 220.101 (talk) \Contribs 18:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Clarinda Treatment Complex
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Clarinda Treatment Complex, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kirkbridebuildings.com/buildings/clarinda/index.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Clarinda Treatment Complex
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Clarinda Treatment Complex, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.kirkbridebuildings.com/buildings/clarinda/, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Clarinda Treatment Complex and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Clarinda Treatment Complex, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Clarinda Treatment Complex with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Clarinda Treatment Complex. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Clarinda Treatment Complex saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 12:34, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Himalayas, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Qwrk (talk) 22:15, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pandemia (book)


The article Pandemia (book) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * There is no indication that this unpublished series meets the notability standard of WP:Notability (books). Looking around I can't find a single review from a reliable source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guerillero &#124; My Talk 02:12, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ski Weekend


The article Ski Weekend has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * children's novel produced in serial with no claim of notabililty

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sadads (talk) 03:29, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Clue (book series) are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. --Hnsampat (talk) 21:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --Hnsampat (talk) 16:53, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Gacy art
I noticed you added an image to the article John Wayne Gacy. Please see discussion at. Thanks.  Jujutacular  talk 22:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Song lyrics and copyright
I noticed you added song lyrics to the article Ya Got Trouble. These lyrics are still under copyright. Wikipedia has very strict rules about the use of non-free works such as song lyrics, photographs, and sound files. I've deleted the lyrics, and I invite you to read further on non-free content so that you can avoid inadvertently adding non-free content where it cannot be used. Thanks! --NellieBly (talk) 21:51, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Signal (novel)
Thanks for taking the time to add to WP's articles on young adult and childrens literature. i added some material to the article, and de-orphaned it (see "what links here") to help it along. I like to revisit my earlier articles to see if i have learned how to edit better. I hope some of my edits help your editing skills. I have not read the book, so i dont want to touch the plot synopsis, but the online sources would be more succinct, so either rewording them, or trimming the current synopsis, makes sense. WP definitely needs to expand its young adult literature coverage, and this one seems notable to me. i also created the article on the author, which helps establish notability (usually an author is more notable than their individual works, unless they are known for one highly notable book only)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 18:00, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited List of Cult Films, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages From Beyond, The Silence of the Lambs and The Thing (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kermet Apio


A tag has been placed on Kermet Apio requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cloudz 679 20:52, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Kermet Apio, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Regan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Kermet Apio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kermet Apio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kermet Apio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Cloudz 679 11:14, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of The Babysitter IV


The article The Babysitter IV has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of signficant coverage. This article fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for books.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Neelix (talk) 01:38, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Welcome back!
Hey man. Glad you're finally back on the real Wiki. Oh, and there's a userbox that can replace the see also section on your userpage. See the "friends with" userbox near the bottom of my own userpage for details.

Anyway, I'm always here if you need me. T C  N7 JM  00:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Ha ha. Very funny. But seriously, I discovered a lot of pages recently and have decided to expand my own userpage. Thanks for the info! Burmiester (talk) 00:24, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 8
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * 20-gauge shotgun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to 12 gauge


 * Funland (film) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Michael McManus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Oh, no problem. Thanks for the friendly notice! (Burmiester (talk) 18:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC))

MP5
Please note that according to this, you are one of two bozos interfering with an experienced editors version of the article. Don't fret though, as according to this users list of contributions, it appears that the experienced editor and owner of said article has issues of their own.June 28 2013 (talk) 18:00, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Appreciate the message. Now, why is this experienced editor any more experienced than me? I've made over 2000 edits and been on here for 3 years! This guy is just being bullheaded and won't accept other revisions. At least I accept that not EVERYONE will agree with me and try to compromise. Just because he's been on here longer does NOT give him special privileges of his own and allow him to automatically veto other edits and insult anyone who disagrees with him. Glad to see that someone realizes that this "experienced" editor is hiding behind phoney rules and a longer edit list than mine. Thanks for the input!

(Burmiester (talk) 05:21, 29 June 2013 (UTC))
 * First, please don't make personal attacks, even if you feel you've been attacked first. Secondly, just as a note, "wheel-warring" is something that only applies to administrators, so please don't use that term when you mena "edit-warring". Thanks. - The Bushranger One ping only 01:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Nice to finally meet you, Bushranger. I've seen your discussions before when you've helped to defend Dave's rather childish insults to other users, as illustrated in the link above. Along with User: Baseball Bugs, you seem to be Dave's go-to accomplice who appears to have a full time job defending him from an ever-growing list of enemies, so your message on this page isn't particularly a surprise to me. Wonder why that is that this Dave has so many enemies. Hmm... Anyway, I am not meaning to make any personal attacks to this Dave fellow, but it is making me very angry that he is hiding behind "rules" to force his edits on other people. I appreciate your input but when I copied and pasted Dave's rules for his talk page, I wasn't only referring to wheel warring. I wasn't at all, in fact. I was referring to the text behind it. Thanks for your time and I appreciate your input. By the way, I was very impressed with your user page the first time I came across it, so I hope you don't mind if I took some of your userboxes to use on my page. Even if we seem to disagree on this Dave person, I bet we would be friends in real life because we have so much in common. And I hope you don't take offense to this, but as an administrator who appears to be very kind and intelligent, why are you backing this Dave1185, who seems to get very angry whenever someone doesn't agree with them and goes as far as to insult them? Just wondering. (Burmiester (talk) 18:04, 30 June 2013 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for July 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Interdynamics MKR, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blowback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Oh, thanks! Sorry about that. I'll change that right away. Thanks for letting me know (Burmiester (talk) 16:22, 17 July 2013 (UTC))

IMFDB
I noted your edits to Die Hard and that you claimed your source was IMFDB. I'm not sure whether that's the same site as IMDb (I got redirected when I tried IMFDB.com), but if so, or if it's similar, please be aware that such sites are generally not considered reliable sources per WP:RS/IMDb, and should not be used for reference purposes. Happy editing! DonIago (talk) 16:51, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * LOL, thanks! It's imfdb.org. And I would consider it a reliable source since it uses armory records for the film itself and also uses dates and models to identify what weapons were used. So it is very accurate even if you don't consider it reliable. I would just ask that people do their homework on firearms before automatically reverting my edits. Thanks and cheers!
 * Fair enough. :) I can't speak to that particular site as I'm unfamiliar with it (in fact, I can't even access it from my current location). DonIago (talk) 17:24, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Just a note re: Die Hard changes
IMDB is not considered a reliable source since it is primarily from user contributions. And we generally avoid making assumption on things like a type of weapon just from visual identification (in addition to being too much of a detail). --M ASEM (t) 16:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * IMFDB. It's a website about firearms. And since I'm a member of the Wiki Firearms project I know of firearms. And since Die Hard is a very firearm driven film, I think that it only makes sense to at least provide links to the weapons used since they're already mentioned in the text. Like, with Tony's weapon, why not provide a link to MP5? And it should be noted that he is armed only with his pistol since this is the conflict for much of the film as well. The Die Hard summary is far from "too much detail". It's short and concise and providing links to weapons is no different than providing links to Bearer Bonds or C-4 Explosives. How are they different? It's expanding the encyclopedia and providing links to related pages. How is this overdetail?
 * I think the general feeling is that unless the specific model of firearm is somehow essential to the plot it's a trivial detail, especially with regards to the Plot section where we should try to limit our word count. It may be worth including in the Production section, but I would recommend only doing so if a third-party source took note of the firearms for some reason, which I'm guessing in this case is possible but unlikely.
 * Also, while not required, it's generally considered good form to sign your posts, which you can do by adding 4 tildes (~) to the end of it. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 17:22, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I apologize that I forgot to sign my posts. Actually I'm trying to make the plot more concise, and add necessary details. What does it hurt to provide links to radio used along with the MP5, which is pretty essential to the plot, as is his Beretta 92F service sidearm.

And in the little inserts in the Die Hard four star collection movie case they do confirm the weapons used. (Burmiester (talk) 17:27, 22 August 2013 (UTC))

FN P90 image
Hi,

I undid your revert. That's not a real P90. Why don't you listen to someone who actually has one? That's an airsoft gun, not a real gun. The markings are 100% fake and so are the bullets. It's a Tokyo Marui P90 TR airsoft gun. Furthermore, WP infobox images should have neutral backgrounds whenever possible. The current infobox image at FN P90 is a real P90 on a neutral background. ROG5728 (talk) 00:21, 10 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I stand corrected. Thanks for the info. (Burmiester (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2013 (UTC))

Double eagle
I have responded to your question at Talk:Saint-Gaudens double eagle.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:25, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
Please do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. —Largo Plazo (talk) 01:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you have to delete the page? The Room is regarded as the worst film ever made. That isn't disputed. I'm remaining neutral here. It's not an attack page. It's documenting reception to the firearms. In no way is Lorcin an attack page. I have not insulted or threatened anyone, but I'm merely stating fact. I'll change the page, but it shouldn't be deleted.(Burmiester (talk) 01:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC))
 * I know you're acting in good faith here, but I do see how it was taken as an attack page because you botched the point of view. This is obviously written from the standpoint from somebody who thinks Lorcin pistols are the worst ever made, whereas your example The Room, is written neutrally while still touching on the aspects of the film that make people consider it the worst ever made. T  C  N7 JM  02:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Would it be possible to recreate the page from a different point of view? I think it's completely unreasonable to delete the page without responding to my questions and wishes to change the page. Man, people on wikipedia can be so uptight rather than just using common sense to correct the problem. Maybe that's why I like Wikia better. (Burmiester (talk) 17:08, 25 September 2013 (UTC))

Edits to your user page
Hello, I stumbled upon your user page while checking the contributions of an IP vandal who appeared on my watchlist. I'm not sure if the last edits to your user page were by you or not, so I've undone them just to be on the safe side. See [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Burmiester&diff=594166803&oldid=584871510 this edit summary] for my reasoning. Feel free to undo my reversion if it was an error. Graham 87 07:23, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * I just undid it myself, but Twinkle cut off my full edit summary. I meant to also note that the IP appeared to be from a school district according to geolocation and that it's very possible that these were two different people especially considering the two-month gap. T  C  N7 JM  13:33, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks; didn't think to check that. Sorry for any bother. Graham 87 14:06, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SIG P227, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Double action. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:21, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi-Point CF-380
This article, Hi-Point CF-380, which I think you mostly wrote, is kind of lacking in solid sources. Do you remember having any more that might have been left out? The two there now are pretty weak. I'll leave a note on the article talk page. Rezin (talk) 01:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

A River Runs Through It (film)
A River Runs Through It (film)

I removed your edit [1] to this article, which was copied from the following website

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105265/synopsis

As I understand wp:policies and guidelines it is not allowed to post duplicated content from other publications, unless it is published under a wikipedia compatible license and you would still need to attribute it. wp:copyright may help you understand. Govindaharihari (talk) 07:42, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello Burmiester, just want to let you know that I have finished my expansion on the article for the horror film I Drink Your Blood and I have already incorporated what I have done so far on the draft page into the actual article itself. However its still needs a little more work done to it though, namely giving proper citations to unsourced material, updating citations, and expanding the section on the film's controversy. At the moment I am finished with the article, and I am leaving it up to others to further modify and expand it. I am also working on a new article to collaborate on for WikiProject Horror. It is the article on the infamous horror character Leatherface which is pretty significant but, unfortunately, it is in a state of severe underdevelopment and suffering from poor writing and few sources. My plan is to expand it significantly so that it reaches its full potential, and quite possibly become a featured article like the one on Jason Voorhees. However, for this particular project I will need the help of as many editors as possible since the level of expansion needed would be too daunting for any one or even three editors. Similar to the other collaboration that I have done with I Drink Your Blood, I have already created a draft for the use of expanding the article which I will include the link here. Let me know whether or not you would be able to help expand the article on my talk page and see if you can get other people on this.

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Nomination of List of cult films for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cult films is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of cult films& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Thank you. Gaioa (t,c,l) 15:16, 11 March 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of List of cult films for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of cult films is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of cult films& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Onetwothreeip (talk) 01:00, 13 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Burnnie the Bunnie: Tails from the Light Side for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burnnie the Bunnie: Tails from the Light Side is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burnnie the Bunnie: Tails from the Light Side until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dronebogus (talk) 04:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CreepingCoffin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:CreepingCoffin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

The Many Saints of Newark
Please update the box office of The Many Saints of Newark. Box Office Mojo updated over a day ago to 11.4 million, but no one has made the changes and the film article still shows the gross as 10.8 million. 59.91.230.22 (talk) 03:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Will do. (Burmiester (talk) 20:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC))
 * Please update it in the lede and reception part too. The Many Saints of Newark. Change the domestic box office to 8.1 million from 7.9 million, the international box office to 3.3 million from 2.9 million, and the total box office to 11.4 million from 10.8 million. The box office isn't just listed in one place. And also in the lede change it to "The film has grossed $11 million against a budget of $50 million". 59.97.199.198 (talk) 22:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Kermet Apio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kermet Apio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kermet Apio& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Pepper Beast   (talk)  19:15, 2 December 2023 (UTC)