User talk:Cap020570

Cap020570/David Gorski
Hello,, and thank you for your contributions!

I wanted to let you know it seems an article you worked on, Cap020570/David Gorski, is copied from another Wikipedia page, David Gorski. It's fine to do this as long as you provide the following information in the edit summary:


 * 1) a link to the article you copied from
 * 2) the date you copied it

You can do this now by editing the page, making any minor edit to the article, and adding the above information into the edit summary.

If you're still not sure how to fix the problem, please leave a message at the help desk. It's possible that I made a mistake, so feel free to remove the tag I placed on the article.

Thanks again for helping build the free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 13:50, 27 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Just to let you know, I moved Cap020570/David Gorski to User:Cap020570/David Gorski. I assume you meant to create it in your userspace. The page ended up in the article space; it needs to have the "User:" prefix before your username to make it be in the userspace. Cheers! --Nick—Contact/Contribs 13:55, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks NickW557! That's exactly what I meant to do. I'm still pretty new at this and the code stuff has a way of melting my brain. Thanks again!! Cap020570 (talk) 14:04, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Joe Arpaio
The court decision you added to the above article was placed in the section for the Department of Justice racial-profiling lawsuit section. It was for the Melendres v. Arpaio case and belongs in the Melendres v. Arpaio racial-profiling class-action lawsuit section. This guy is so slimy its hard to keep track of the muck. If this is the stuff he is being successfully sued for, I can only imagine what else he is up to. I figured I would let you know instead of changing it myself. Thanks. (Bill from GSoW) MrBill3 (talk) 03:12, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Pandagon
I believe, though don't quote me on this, that she blogs on Raw story/pandagon. It seems pandagon.net is now guest bloggers / stories. Question: would you classify her as a "radical feminist". Note previous edit war: history User_talk:Jim1138 User talk:98.166.88.177 User talk:Falkirks diff Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:52, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Gorski
Sorry I thought you were done. I'll step away for awhile. But please review the article when you are done and remove any duplicate into, like the Orac thing. That's already been said. Thanks.-- — Keithbob • Talk  • 14:19, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Also, if you could improve your citation format as that's very time consuming for others to clean up behind you. This kind of format, which you are using does not contain enough information:
 * Best way is to choose PROVELT in your preferences or some other citation helper. Or do it manually like this:
 * Date, Author (last name first), Article name, Publication name, URL link, date accessed
 * Thanks, -- — Keithbob • Talk  • 14:25, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, -- — Keithbob • Talk  • 14:25, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Please see my comments on the Gorski talk page. -- — Keithbob • Talk  • 14:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration. Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 20:31, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
 * Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
 * If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Re: CPCs
Hey there. Thanks for cleaning up the external links section. I'm a bit worried that we're potentially losing out on information that could be used to expand the article, though - did all those links pretty much just support the existing material with little to no new content that could be added? –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:11, 19 August 2013 (UTC)


 * No problem, Roscelese!They all pretty much contained the same information. The NPR interview I pulled some new information from. I'll be mindful though. Cap020570 (talk) 18:15, 19 August 2013 (UTC)


 * OK, glad to hear we're not missing anything. BTW, on the talk page I have a list of things in the article that could be added/expanded, so if you came across any info that would help with that... –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 18:21, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Roscelese Looked at it, great ideas!Cap020570 (talk) 18:25, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, I totally missed your talkpage comment before you started. Well, thanks! It's good work. If you stick around at the article, maybe sometime we could split up the list of sources and look through them for material on stuff to add (delaying, adoption, role in movement), since there are a lot of sources. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 18:28, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Roscelese I just got done reading "The Child Catchers" It discusses the role of CPC's in the evangelical Christian adoption tract. I may have to get it back and pull some quotes out of it. That and this article, I think, would be good too. Cap020570 (talk) 18:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I was going to hit the little "thank" button but I thought instead I would come here and praise your recent work on the CPC article. I see I'm second in line! :)
 * Best wishes – Binksternet (talk) 23:07, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Binksternet Thanks so much!! Cap020570 (talk) 02:54, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

David Gorski
Nmillerche Thanks!! If that --wasn't-- a learning experience, I don't know what is! Cap020570 (talk) 02:10, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Opting in to VisualEditor
As you may know, VisualEditor ("Edit beta") is currently available on the English Wikipedia only for registered editors who choose to enable it. Since you have made 50 or more edits with VisualEditor this year, I want to make sure that you know that you can enable VisualEditor (if you haven't already done so) by going to your preferences and choosing the item, " ". This will give you the option of using VisualEditor on articles and userpages when you want to, and give you the opportunity to spot changes in the interface and suggest improvements. We value your feedback, whether positive or negative, about using VisualEditor, at VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 20:23, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014
The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the User WPMed template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.

BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors
Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Medical Translation Newsletter
 Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce

Medical Translation Newsletter

Issue 1, June/July 2014 by CFCF, Doc James

sign up for monthly delivery



This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice. note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject Medicine

Spotlight - Simplified article translation

Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.

Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:
 * WHO's list of Essential Medicines
 * Neglected tropical diseases
 * Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.

We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.

What's happening?

I've () taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.
 * IEG grant

For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.
 * Wikimania 2014

There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish. What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.
 * Integration progress


 * Swedish Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that. Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May.
 * Dutch Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie.
 * Polish Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article. (This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration
 * Arabic The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.

Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.
 * Integration guides

Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here

News in short


 * To come
 * Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
 * Proofreading drives


 * Further reading
 * Translators Without Borders
 * Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

Amanda Marcotte edits and weird definitions of "Concise"
I notice that you have gone to great lengths to remove significant amounts of verifiable, sourced material from the Amanda Marcotte article. You claim in your summary description that you "made concise" these sections, but what those edits actually do is gut them completely. They obfuscate the nature of criticisms against Ms. Marcotte by replacing entire paragraphs with vague phrases, and likewise eliminate her specific damning statements (coincidentally matching identically with articles Marcotte has deleted from her own blog). Not only that, but you removed references that should have remained even after your deletions. "Making concise" would imply that you reduced a few details and perhaps rephrased wordy passages, but that the essential nature (and source citations) of the original version remains. That's not what happened in this case.

If I didn't know better, I'd think those edits were ideologically motivated by an individual who would prefer to see any and all criticism banished into the Orwellian memory hole, much like critical comments on FTB and other social justice warrior hangouts. If I didn't know better.

I eagerly await your defense. In the meantime, I think your edits will be on my watchlist from here out. You know, just in case I'm wrong in my assumption of good faith. 96.255.138.217 (talk) 11:15, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Instead of coming to my user page and trying to intimidate me with your anonymous account,why don't you go over to Marcotte's talk page where this was discussed, openly, over a year or so's time. Cap020570 (talk) 12:28, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Your draft article, User:Cap020570/scottmandia


Hello, Cap020570. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "scottmandia".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CalOtter (talk) 19:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Cap020570/martyklein


Hello, Cap020570. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "martyklein".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CalOtter (talk) 19:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Cap020570/ffrf


Hello, Cap020570. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "ffrf".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CalOtter (talk) 19:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)