User talk:Claw of Slime

Claw of Slime, you are invited to the Teahouse
hi, could not withdraw my editing? thanks. Gdominik100 (talk) 22:03, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Disruptive edit in template area
Hello, Claw

Perhaps you must study our reverting policy: Every single revert must have an explanation in edit summary; for complex reverts, there must be talk page explanation as well as a user page notice. This is critical in template area and especially true for highly-used templates such as Template:Infobox OS. In addition, you don't just revert a change in template area after two weeks of its adoption.

In template area, you must be very careful because bold edits can easily end up as reckless edits.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 02:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Template:Latest preview software release/LibreOffice
Hello, you reverted my edit to this template. While the reason you gave "Alpha 1 is nightly build." is true, this makes no sense; because now we have the absurd situation where both "preview releases" are precursors to each of the "Fresh" and "Stable" releases, respectively. Enquire (talk) 00:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for accepting my contribution. :)

-Erick

Disambiguation link notification for July 30
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transport Layer Security, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBC. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

August 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=619398337 your edit] to History of Firefox may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:58, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * III |publisher=Betanews |accessdate=May 4, 2010}} and support for the  and   tags as defined in the HTML5 specification, with a goal to offer video playback without
 * 2012, the Mozilla Foundation announced the availability of an Extended Support Release (ESR)  version of Firefox. {{cite news |url=http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/01/10/delivering-a-

rvv'ing
I recommend waiting for 118.96.220.117‎‎ to be blocked, rather than reverting the edits immediately, and similarly with future cases. The history gets needlessly clogged, and you risk being blocked for violating WP:3RR. Wikipedia has many thousands of errors at any given time, so in my view it's preferable to just let the vandalism remain for a short while. On this note, I made a related edit that might interest you. I'm not sure what happened, or if I misunderstood something. —WOFall (talk) 18:14, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * In conclusion, *shrug*. —WOFall (talk) 19:24, 20 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you for comment. I will do so in the future :) --Claw of Slime (talk) 23:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transport Layer Security, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solaris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Summaries
Hi there.

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field – please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. --Dodi 8238 (talk) 16:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

Firefox: Adware
Mozilla Firefox is Adware since 2014-11-15. Why did you remove the category repeatedly?
 * Probably because the term "adware", despite what its article suggests, is generally understood to mean programs with obtrusive ads (appearing outside the originating program). In my opinion the existing list of articles in the "adware" category supports this. In any case, I suggest this discussion should be had on the firefox talk page. —WOFall (talk) 15:46, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Replied in Firefox talk page. --Claw of Slime (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Comparison of TLS implementations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solaris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Poly1305-AES, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 5 December 2014 (UTC)

"frequently updated" template
Hello. I saw that you changed the current version of Vivaldi to a "frequently updated" template. If possible, please do it to the Adblock Plus and NoScript articles too, because people keep editing these pages just to update the version numbers. If there isn't such template for the extension infox, please add it. -- Marawe (talk) 18:19, 29 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Done. --Claw of Slime (talk) 23:42, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Adblock Plus: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Adblock_Plus&diff=644768592&oldid=644673765], (Template:Latest stable software release/Adblock Plus, Template:Latest preview software release/Adblock Plus)
 * NoScript: [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NoScript&diff=644769031&oldid=643674596], (Template:Latest stable software release/NoScript, Template:Latest preview software release/NoScript)

Vivaldi (web browser)
Hi.

Infobox web browser has no such parameter as frequently updated.

Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 02:00, 30 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you for information :) --Claw of Slime (talk) 04:41, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Template:ECMAScript test262
I found this patrolling new templates. It is currently only used in one article. Usually, tables are only split into templates if multiple articles use them. Test262 redirects to the same article, and I don't know if this would be useful in browser articles. What were you planning to do with this? —PC-XT+ 12:08, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


 * The aim is to separate the edit histories about test262 table from those about core contents of ECMAScript. As you can see [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=ECMAScript&action=history], over 90% of latest history of ECMAScript is occupied by edit of test262 table. This situation makes it very difficult to trace the exact edit history about main contents. I referred to Template:Safari release compatibility and Template:SeaMonkey release history english, and have already applied same method to Template:TLS/SSL support history of web browsers, but no one regard these templates as questionable. --Claw of Slime (talk) 16:31, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


 * I see. I added documentation so someone doesn't merge it with the article without realizing why it has only one transclusion. A link to discussion leading up to the creation would also be helpful. If someone considers it single-use article text, (which would be against Template namespace,) and doesn't see enough reason for it, they may bring it up for discussion at TfD. It would probably be a good idea to document the other templates, as well. Cheers! —PC-XT+ 23:23, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you for adding documentation. I've added documentation to other templates. --Claw of Slime (talk) 04:36, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Chrome Release History
Template:Chrome Release History has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. NeoGeneric  💬  03:20, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

yaSSL
yaSSL is a library written in C++ and included with MySQL. It is a separate product, different from wolfSSL (previously called CyaSSL) written in C language. Having a single page about both libraries is confusing.

Either yaSSL should have a wiki page of its own, or the page for wolfSSL should be renamed to sth. like "Various products of wolfSSL Inc.". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtrojnar (talk • contribs) 09:51, 17 March 2015 (UTC)


 * The page is intended to cover yaSSL since [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WolfSSL&oldid=365671135 the first revision]. I have restored [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=WolfSSL&diff=380914600&oldid=380812445 the content removed in the past]. Also, renaming to "Various products of wolfSSL Inc." or something like that is nonsense. For example, Firefox cover the history when it was "Phoenix" or "Firebird". --Claw of Slime (talk) 12:50, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Implementations of AES
Hi, can you please explain at External_links/Noticeboard why you think those links do not violate ELNO? Thanks. --Ysangkok (talk) 12:10, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Removing only external link (e.g. axTLS -> axTLS) might be acceptable, however, are there any reason to remove content itself? I think it is just a lost of useful information (especially, you eliminated whole of Python and JavaScript section). In addition, removing of DataLocker and SocialDocs cannot be explained by WP:ELNO. --Claw of Slime (talk) 12:41, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Stunnel
You recently modified the Stunnel page to remove the initial capitalisation. I agree that this corresponds with the usage on the Stunnel website. However, at the beginning of sentences you also replaced "Stunnel" with "The stunnel". This does NOT occur on the website, and means that the article reads in a jarring way. I have no intention of making any further reversion but you might consider making the "The stunnel" occurrences more conventional yourself. Chrisj1948 (talk) 10:05, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, Claw of Slime, I see you created the version template for Vivaldi (web browser) and was wondering if you could create one for 1Password. I am unaware of how to do it and was wondering if you could help me out :D. Thanks! JC713 (talk) 12:23, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, JC713. I have made the template for 1Password, Template:Latest stable software release/1Password. Please enjoy! --Claw of Slime (talk) 14:06, 24 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much!JC713 (talk) 19:55, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Another template request
Hey Claw of Slime, I have another template request haha. The template of Meerkat (app) is incorrect. I was wondering if you could remove it and create a new one for it. Thanks. Any way I can learn how to do this? It seems useful. Thanks again! JC713 (talk) 01:13, 14 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I have fixed Template:Latest stable software release/Meerkat to be used correctly on Meerkat (app). --Claw of Slime (talk) 10:14, 14 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks so much. How can I learn to do this? It seems very useful xD! Thanks again. JC713 (talk) 19:35, 15 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Firstly, I made new template by copy&paste from existing templates. I don't understand fully about these template, however, important point is that matching "name" of the infobox of the article and the name of LSR/LPR templates.
 * e.g. in case of Meerkat (app), "name" of the infobox of the article is "Meerkat", so LSR template must be Template:Latest stable software release/Meerkat. I had made Template:Latest stable software release/Meerkat (app), but this did not work.
 * --Claw of Slime (talk) 01:49, 16 May 2015 (UTC)

Message re Firefox for mobile version template
Hi. Left you a message w/ question here. -Mardus (talk) 23:53, 23 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Read and answered on tamplate talk page. --Claw of Slime (talk) 00:09, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Firefox and Gecko
Why is this worth mentioning in the first few sentences of the introduction? Risc64 (talk) 06:53, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Template:Comparison of SHA functions
I don't understand "<80" being put back in template. No collisions in SHA1 have been found though this is probably imminent due to fairly low cost of doing so. Please see Talk:SHA-1, preferably explaining what <80 means or whether this should be changed to something more sensible. Thank you. crandles (talk) 10:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Undo K-Meleon HTML5 support
I'm trying to be polite and civil here.

The HTML5 test page (http://html5test.com/) gives the proof. I don't see a mess-free way to put this ref-note into the table, or I would do that. One thing that some people should learn, is BEFORE madly undoing, check facts.

Actually, maybe we should delete the entire table, since no browser mentioned has a ref-note with evidence attached. And I'm serious about that. 124.171.245.136 (talk) 07:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * No. only shows the score with the browser which accesses to the page (now, I can only see the score with Firefox 47.0b1). We need a reference like  which is already attached as the reference. --Claw of Slime (talk) 01:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes. Ref added, but HTML5test cannot parse/read useragent strings so cannot recognise the browser in "Mozilla Gecko rv:31 K-Meleon 75.0 20150624", so calls it an "unknown browser".  Paste that UA string into http://www.useragentstring.com/ and see the difference.  Just because a test site is incompetent with browser identification is possibly one reason we should delete the entire table--after all, I can easily spoof just about any browser with very little effort: K-Meleon was designed to get around user-sniffing from the start.  This means that most entries in their records must now be highly suspect.  124.171.245.136 (talk) 08:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:ECMAScript test262
Template:ECMAScript test262 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:TLS/SSL support history of web browsers
Template:TLS/SSL support history of web browsers has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:34, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

I noticed you program in JavaScript...
The JavaScript WikiProject is now up and running. We organize and develop JavaScript articles, navigation aids, and user scripts.

Scripts undergoing development, and the state of JavaScript on Wikipedia, are discussed on the talk page.

For an overview of JavaScript coverage on Wikipedia, see Draft:Outline of JavaScript and Index of JavaScript-related articles. For everything on user scripts, see User:The Transhumanist/Outline of scripts.

The WikiProject also organizes every resource it can find about JavaScript out there, such as articles, books, tutorials, etc. See our growing Reference library.

If you would like to join the JavaScript WikiProject, feel free to add your name to the participants list.

Hope to see you there! The Transhumanist 15:19, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Documenting interoperability prblems with Bernstein ChaCha and the IETF's ChaCha?
Please forgive my ignorance... Documenting interoperability problems with Bernstein's ChaCha and the IETF's ChaCha is important for implementations and others parties interested in the technical details of the algorithm. Why was it reverted?

The interoperability issue was brought up with the IETF. It was suggested the IETF call their algorithm TLS-ChaCha to avoid ambiguity and not mislead folks who were implementing the algorithm. They choose a really weak argument [to paraphrase], "We published our algorithm as RFC 7905. In the context of the RFC it is the correct name". It an epic security engineering nightmare, and it promulgates interoperability problems that have plagued standards for decades. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noloader (talk • contribs)


 * I already replied at Talk:Salsa20. Please let's keep this discussion together on that page. -- intgr [talk] 07:21, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Latest preview software release/GNU Privacy Guard
Template:Latest preview software release/GNU Privacy Guard has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 07:46, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Latest preview software release/Vivaldi
Template:Latest preview software release/Vivaldi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 07:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)