User talk:Coasterdude1

The Mind of Jake Paul moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Mind of Jake Paul, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  19:23, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

File:The Secret World of Jeffree Star Poster.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Secret World of Jeffree Star Poster.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Abequinn14 (talk) 01:29, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:The Secret World of Jeffree Star Poster.png
Thanks for uploading File:The Secret World of Jeffree Star Poster.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 11:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC)

File:The Secret World of Jeffree Star Poster.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Secret World of Jeffree Star Poster.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Abequinn14 (talk) 20:45, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Tigris-logo 750xx1521-856-0-13.png
Thanks for uploading File:Tigris-logo 750xx1521-856-0-13.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 17:01, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of United Shane Dawson Conspiracy Series


A tag has been placed on United Shane Dawson Conspiracy Series requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Melcous (talk) 00:30, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve United Shane Dawson Conspiracy Series
Hello, Coasterdude1,

Thanks for creating United Shane Dawson Conspiracy Series! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains (talk) 02:20, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of United Shane Dawson Conspiracy Series for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article United Shane Dawson Conspiracy Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/United Shane Dawson Conspiracy Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sheldybett (talk) 07:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from United Shane Dawson Conspiracy Series, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. —teb728 t c 08:32, 11 January 2019 (UTC)

Conspiracy Series by Shane Dawson moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Conspiracy Series by Shane Dawson, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Britishfinance (talk) 20:36, 18 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Conspiracy series by Shane Dawson.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:25, 19 January 2019 (UTC)

Articles_for_deletion/Conspiracy_Series_by_Shane_Dawson
Hi. A couple of things: first, there is a deletion discussion going on for an article you created. You are welcome to participate, but what you must not do is remove the tag on the article or falsely put the "kept" tag on the talk page while the discussion is pending. Another act such as that will surely get you blocked. Second, if you are not familiar with deletion discussions, may I suggest you have a look at this page. Cheers. Xymmax So let it be written   So let it be done  01:05, 20 January 2019 (UTC) Thanks for telling me! Coasterdude1 (talk)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to FBI (TV series). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 00:49, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Conspiracy series by Shane Dawson.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Conspiracy series by Shane Dawson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:33, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Conspiracy Series (Special Edition) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conspiracy Series (Special Edition) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Conspiracy Series (Special Edition) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sheldybett (talk) 05:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Conspiracy Series (Special Edition)


A tag has been placed on Conspiracy Series (Special Edition), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jovanmilic97 (talk) 11:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I have deleted this under WP:G4. Please do not recreate it under any title.  Continued attempts to recreate this article will result in you being blocked.  -- RoySmith (talk) 16:36, 31 January 2019 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:DCappela at their first show.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:DCappela at their first show.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 10:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Defunctland


A tag has been placed on Defunctland requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Whpq (talk) 17:09, 25 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi! I moved this to your userspace at User:Coasterdude1/Defunctland. The issue here is that I don't see where this YouTube channel has received enough coverage for it to be considered notable. I'm familiar with (and subscribed to!) this channel, but so far it looks like most of the places that would cover his work haven't really paid a huge amount of attention, which is a shame. It's really hard for YouTubers to gain the needed coverage since there's so many channels and so few outlets that cover them, so most channels won't pass notability guidelines. A case in point are the articles for Danny of GameGrumps and PewDiePie. Despite both of them having huge followings, they didn't initially pass notability guidelines because they didn't have the needed coverage. It actually took a few years for the coverage to come in. In any case, I added the sources I could find and I moved it to your userspace so you can continue to work on it. ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  17:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

File:DCappela at their first show.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 17:59, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Defunctland
The article does not show how the web series is notable. Simply having an IMDB page is not sufficient. Please see general notability guidelines and notability of web content for more information. ... disco spinster   talk  14:59, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * You moved my page Defunctland to draft. Why? It has a IMDb page . Every Shane Dawson series has a page on here The Secret World of Jeffree Star, The Mind of Jake Paul and Conspiracy Series with Shane Dawson. So why they can be on Wikipedia but my page can't? Don't give the answer of "undersourced, unclear notability".Coasterdude1 (talk) 15:18, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I told you above why it was moved. There is no evidence it is notable. I provided you with links explaining what we mean by notability – significant coverage in multiple reliable sources. I don't know what else to tell you. ... disco spinster   talk  18:34, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * It is on Wikipedia, so you can’t do anything about it because they reviewed it and if you move it you will be block from editing on Wikipedia. I won. Coasterdude1 (talk) 18:50, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I suggest that you take a serious look at improving the sourcing for the article to establish notability. If not, there is a possibility the article will be deleted instead of just bein moved to draft space. -- Whpq (talk) 19:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * what about now?? Can you take a look at it??? Coasterdude1 (talk) 21:45, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Your recent editing history at Defunctland shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Only an admin, copyright clerk, or OTRS agent should remove the copyvio template. Bakazaka (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Happy?? I Deleted all the summaries. Happy?!?!Coasterdude1 (talk) 22:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
 * That's a question for the administrator, copyright clerk, or OTRS agent who reviews the copyvio issue and decides what to do. Bakazaka (talk) 22:44, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Gabbie Hanna - 2WAYMIRROR.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Gabbie Hanna - 2WAYMIRROR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve DCappella
Hello, Coasterdude1,

Thanks for creating DCappella! I edit here too, under the username Doomsdayer520 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:13, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know about that. I did not know. Coasterdude1 (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

File:The Mind of Jake Paul Poster.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The Mind of Jake Paul Poster.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Abequinn14 (talk) 19:41, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Your RFA
Hello, Coasterdude1.

You made an RFA a while ago. It hasn't appeared on the RFA page because it hasn't been formatted correctly—do you want to move forward with it? If so, I suggest you follow the RFA guide and Nomination guide. Abequinn14 (talk) 20:09, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't know if you use discord, but we have WP:Discord if you ever want to talk about stuff! :D &#8211; MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 21:16, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * , may I ask again? &#124; abequinnfourteen 21:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:28, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Home Lander (talk) 22:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:04, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The Beautiful World of Jeffree Star, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.  DGG ( talk ) 06:13, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:38, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Infinity Train Book 1 (Original Soundtrack).jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Infinity Train Book 1 (Original Soundtrack).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Phineas-ferb-disney-plus-logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Phineas-ferb-disney-plus-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Closed for Storm (2021 film)


The article Closed for Storm (2021 film) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable future film, fails WP:NFF. Should be moved to Draft or deleted until it is released an notability can be established."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 22:38, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Closed for Storm for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Closed for Storm is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Closed for Storm until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Donaldd23 (talk) 16:50, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Closedforstormposter.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Closedforstormposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)