User talk:Curbon7/Archive 2023

__ARCHIVEDTALK__ = January 2023 =

Your GA nomination of Ormon Khan
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ormon Khan you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrangaBellam -- TrangaBellam (talk) 11:01, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

Happy New Year!
Hello, Curbon7,

I don't know you, we've never really worked together but over the past few months, as I go through all of the day's expiring drafts, I see all of the articles you've "saved" to work on and gotten a particular image of what subjects you think are important, the drafts you think just shouldn't disappear into Wikipedia's dustbin forever. I like that you focus on history, especially in lesser-covered geographic areas and also on biographies. I hope beyond delaying deletion, you also get a chance to improve these drafts or bring them to the attention of a relevant WikiProject so, hopefully, these articles can eventually find their way into the main space of the project. I agree that most of the drafts you delay deletion on are on interesting but often neglected subjects so thank you for taking on this work. So few editors are even aware of the work that is done in Draft space, it's nice to see that some of the better content might be preserved. Any way, I hope you have a happy and healthy 2023! Liz Read! Talk! 04:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC)


 * , thanks for your very kind words! Curbon7 (talk) 22:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter January 2023
Hello , The October drive reduced the backlog from 9,700 to an amazing 0! Congratulations to who led with 2084 points. See this page for further details. The queue is steadily rising again and is approaching 2,000. It would be great if <2,000 were the “new normal”. Please continue to help out even if it's only for a few or even one patrol a day. won the 2022 cup for 28,302 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 80/day. There was one Gold Award (5000+ reviews), 11 Silver (2000+), 28 Iron (360+) and 39 more for the 100+ barnstar. led again for the 4th year by clearing 49,294 redirects. For the full details see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone!
 * Backlog
 * 2022 Awards

Minimum deletion time: The previous WP:NPP guideline was to wait 15 minutes before tagging for deletion (including draftification and WP:BLAR). Due to complaints, a consensus decided to raise the time to 1 hour. To illustrate this, very new pages in the feed are now highlighted in red. (As always, this is not applicable to attack pages, copyvios, vandalism, etc.)

New draftify script: In response to feedback from AFC, the The Move to Draft script now provides a choice of set messages that also link the creator to a new, friendly explanation page. The script also warns reviewers if the creator is probably still developing the article. The former script is no longer maintained. Please edit your edit your common.js or vector.js file from  to  '''

Redirects: Some of our redirect reviewers have reduced their activity and the backlog is up to 9,000+ (two months deep). If you are interested in this distinctly different task and need any help, see this guide, this checklist, and spend some time at WP:RFD.

Discussions with the WMF The PageTriage open letter signed by 444 users is bearing fruit. The Growth Team has assigned some software engineers to work on PageTriage, the software that powers the NewPagesFeed and the Page Curation toolbar. WMF has submitted dozens of patches in the last few weeks to modernize PageTriage's code, which will make it easier to write patches in the future. This work is helpful but is not very visible to the end user. For patches visible to the end user, volunteers such as and  have been writing patches for bug reports and feature requests. The Growth Team also had a video conference with the NPP coordinators to discuss revamping the landing pages that new users see.


 * Reminders
 * Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * If you no longer wish to be a reviewer, please ask any admin to remove you from the group. If you want the tools back again, just ask at PERM.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

some help needed
I am new to Wikipedia. so can you mention some points in my article why my article Draft:VB Nidhish is not pass to Wikipedia notability criteria for actors. Thank you.@Curbon7 Dineshkumar Dhandapani (talk) 16:32, 14 January 2023 (UTC)


 * , Wikipedia articles require significant coverage sources that are both reliable and independent. Simply winning a Guinness World Record is not enough to meet our general notability guidelines. Similarly, having some minor roles in a few movies and TV shows does not qualify for our specialized notability criteria for actors. Curbon7 (talk) 16:38, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for your reply @Curbon7. By making some changes, we can publish this article in Wikipedia? and if yes, please mention those changes. Dineshkumar Dhandapani (talk) 08:57, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 January 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

AfC review.
Thanks for your super quick review of my lazy draft over at draft:2023 Carus Chemical fire, I do agree and admit it was sloppily sourced. I am just leaving this message to let you know I have fixed all the problems, so you can go back over and take a look if you wish. Cheers! BhamBoi (talk) 07:22, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Random question
What do all your abbreviations over at User:Curbon7/AfC log mean? I see nn, v, and many others. What do they all mean? BhamBoi (talk) 05:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Curbon7. I'm pleased to see that you have added the Women in Red user box to your user page but as far as I can see you have not yet registered with the project. You can do so under "New registrations" on this page. As you have written quite a number of biographies of women from around the world, it would be good to have you as a full member. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for following up on this, Curbon7, and welcome to Women in Red. I know you are an experienced editor but you might nevertheless find it useful to look through some of our Essays, perhaps starting with our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 15:27, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * , Thanks for your kind words! Curbon7 (talk) 20:52, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Tags
Just for the record, I was the one placing the Ready tag on Harunata. And for as long as I have been a part of this project, the Ready have been placed on articles deemed ready for posting. There might be some new consensus that I am unaware of concerning this matter. Regards,--BabbaQ (talk) 08:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Yes. The top of ITNC says: Items can also be marked as (Ready) when the article is both updated and there seems to be a consensus to post. —Bagumba (talk) 11:20, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * , In my view, ready tags aren't very useful, and can actually be detrimental to a candidate getting posted. As you'll know an admin still has to check the article, so the effect of the ready tag becomes redundant; for example, this ready tag was placed on an article that an admin checked and found to still have sourcing issues. On the detrimental point, when an admin is looking over the table of contents to see candidates, they may not see a ready tag nested between a bunch of posted tags, but they will definitely see a candidate with no tag or an attention needed tag. But of course, this is all just my personal take on it, so don't take it to mean any community consensus. Thanks! Curbon7 (talk) 17:10, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I can vouch that I do a search for "ready" to quickly screen candidates for posting. I often don't spend time perusing all the open candidates. Sure, it's not a guarantee that a "ready" is really ready, but I generally find it helpful.  I generally AGF, but frequent offenders, if any, can be dealt with individually.  Finally, I don't see how "needs attention" would be any easier to find than a "ready". Regards. —Bagumba (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Fair enough I suppose. Curbon7 (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ormon Khan
The article Ormon Khan you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Ormon Khan for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TrangaBellam -- TrangaBellam (talk) 06:21, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red in February 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:26, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

= February 2023 =

Precious
You are recipient no. 2805 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:17, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Suggestion
Hello, Curbon7! You might be interested in endorsing an essay in which creation I participated – WP:NOCONFED. Of course, this is just a suggestion, nothing more. Cheers! —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 22:05, 2 February 2023 (UTC)

Kyrgyz Confederation
Hello colleague. First of all, I would like to thank you for the article Ormon Khan, your work deserves respect. I am writing to you about the Kyrgyz state formations and tribal unions in the 15-17 centuries, I ask you to join the discussion and after analyzing the information from the article and the course of the debate, add your word. Th3Shoudy (talk) 09:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 February 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Debate to delete a Category
You have been Notified because you were once involved in a similar discussion involving Founding Fathers. There is a debate over whether to keep Category: Homes of United States Founding Fathers as a category. More opinions are needed. The discussion is located Here -- Gwillhickers (talk)

How can I fix the "reoganize" notification?
Hello Curbon7. I would like to fix the reorganization notification for the 'Pedro Gross' artist template. I don't know what you are referring to or how to do it. Thank you very much! Fakkek21 (talk) 19:34, 10 February 2023 (UTC)


 * It had been fixed, but the template was not removed. Curbon7 (talk) 03:40, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe Bishop-Henchman for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Bishop-Henchman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Joe Bishop-Henchman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Sal2100 (talk) 17:18, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 February 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

WP:USPLACE
Please can you clarify your position on Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)?

You said it should be handled case by case, and I agree. ---  Tbf69   P &bull;&#32;T 16:48, 24 February 2023 (UTC)


 * I am in favor of the current system with some limited exceptions determined by local consensuses. Curbon7 (talk) 16:56, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

February stories
Thank you for consistent reviewing on ITN! - My story on 24 February is about Artemy Vedel (TFA by Amitchell235), and I made a suggestion for more peace, - what do you think? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:16, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

today: two women whose birthday we celebrate today, 99 and 90! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:09, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

= March 2023 =

"Probably notable"
Hi! You commented in October on a recent draft of mine that the subject was "probably notable". I've added some more sources and was wondering if you were willing to give the AfC submission another look. — Ixtal ( T / C ) &#8258; Non nobis solum. 14:07, 5 March 2023 (UTC)


 * , I've gone ahead and accepted it, just take care of the categorization. Curbon7 (talk) 22:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * , much appreciated. I added some categories and will see if I can find ways to un-orphan it soon. Hope you have a good rest of the week :) — Ixtal ( T / C ) &#8258; Non nobis solum. 22:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Request on 03:13:54, 7 March 2023 for assistance on AfC submission by FunnyManLuke
Hi Curbon7

After seeing your notes on my draft, I am in need of either some clarity or assistance.

So I have three sources in the draft that talk about different facts of the group, but I'm struggling to see what is actually wrong with the sources. I'm assuming it's because they're not well known academic journals. But since one of the articles is a direct interview and the other two was directly made about before and during their career, and subsequently all 3 contain valuable information, why exactly do these not work?

Also, a lot of the information I pulled (specifically in the history section) was from the TikTok's they have on their page. Is there a way that I need to cite the TikTok videos where the information came from? I noticed there was no option for that when drafting, but if there is, I would like to use it to confirm the information from the TikToks.

In advanced, thank you for the help -FunnyManLuke

FunnyManLuke (talk) 03:13, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 9 March 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Koshi Province politician stubs


A tag has been placed on Category:Koshi Province politician stubs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 03:51, 16 March 2023 (UTC)


 * , Fixed. The category was moved following a request at CfD/S, but no one updated the stub templates themselves. Curbon7 (talk) 05:28, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

John Hawkins (Maryland politician) -> John Hawkins (politician)
Curious on this edit. There were already multiple "John Hawkins" noted as politicians at John Hawkins, so it seemed right to be "more specific" with John Hawkins (Maryland politician). Perhaps, I should have created and linked John Hawkins (politician) to redirect to the disambig, but maybe I'm missing some other policy/practice here. Any advice? --Engineerchange (talk) 01:08, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


 * , thanks for letting me know, I've gone ahead and reverted the move. I hadn't taken a look at the disambig page prior. Curbon7 (talk) 02:10, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 March 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:15, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red April 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A barnstar for you!
= April 2023 =

The Signpost: 03 April 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Your sockpuppetry rev on Janice McGeachin
I was using Huggle and came across your revert and your reasoning. I was wondering, what made you come to the conclusion that this IP is a sock? No other IPs have edited in a while, so I was a bit confused on why you labeled them as a sock. Thanks!  interstate five   23:37, 8 April 2023 (UTC)


 * , this regards Sockpuppet investigations/Fenetrejones. Timeframe matches up (just a day after the last sock was blocked), as does behavior (this sort of religious categorization is Fenetrejones's MO and the reason they were originally blocked, and the prose and citation styles line up with their previous edits). Curbon7 (talk) 23:50, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. The IP got checkuser blocked for 3 months, anyway.  interstate five   23:55, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

New Page Patrol – May 2023 Backlog Drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Talk:People's Assembly of Gagauzia
Hello, Curbon7,

When move an article, please leave a redirect for the Talk page along with the article or we end up with broken talk page redirects. I have created a redirect at Talk:Halk Topluşu so that the broken redirects aren't deleted and hopefully, one of our bots will correct the double redirects. Thanks. Liz Read! Talk! 06:42, 23 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Oops, I got so caught up in trying to figure out the redirect category template that I forgot to do the talk page as well, sorry. Curbon7 (talk) 07:41, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:16, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mujib Rahman Ansari
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mujib Rahman Ansari you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cessaune -- Cessaune (talk) 06:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red May 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:27, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ITN recognition for Emily Meggett
= May 2023 =

Issue about your revision
Hello, I would like to inform you, that as you did declined Draft:Jiří Kopal due to Wikipedia notibility guildelines, the user who submited it subsequently created the article without your approval. I am very much certain that user who created it is another account of Jiří Kopal, who created article about his own person. I found out this because images of the ribbons he used was uploaded on Wikimedia Commons in nearby time by his another account named Kopal.jiri. This is not permitted as I know. Thank you. ThecentreCZ (talk) 22:12, 5 May 2023 (UTC)


 * , thanks for letting me know. It seems that the draft was accepted by an AfC reviewer, so I have no issue with it at the moment; regardless, I've tagged it for notability. Since it was copy-paste moved from the original draft, I have requested a WP:HISTMERGE. Curbon7 (talk) 22:21, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you, however I am not satisfied with it in this moment. I'll probably bring this issue for report furthermore. I'll tell you interesting story. This user Frantisek828 = Jiří Kopal did a post on Facebook, where he is celebrating that he got "significant life achievement", that he have now his own Wikipedia page and it is so prestigious for him. When I have had posted there a comment about that he created his page himself, he subsequently removed my comment and banned me. I even did discussed this issue with some local people, and they suggested that I could easily present this to the local city council and make it a cause as a reason to getting him famous. Afterall this is maybe only thing he could be well-known for to make his page. ThecentreCZ (talk) 22:46, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 8 May 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft:National_Institute_of_Oceanography_and_Applied_Geophysics
Hi Curbon7 you have reviewed a page draft that I created a few months ago: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:National_Institute_of_Oceanography_and_Applied_Geophysics I made several adjustments after receiving suggestions from you and other editors. I have already had positive feedback from the last user who reviewed the page, but I have been waiting for a long time for the draft to be moved to the articles section. I wonder if you could take another look at it.

Thank you very much Marinadalessa Marinadalessa (talk) 11:00, 9 May 2023 (UTC)


 * , Hi. I've gone ahead and accepted the draft and have given it a copyedit. Curbon7 (talk) 00:10, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mujib Rahman Ansari
The article Mujib Rahman Ansari you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Mujib Rahman Ansari for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Cessaune -- Cessaune (talk) 02:02, 10 May 2023 (UTC)


 * I respectfully disagree with many points (e.g. Can't do much about images when no non-free ones exist, and the infobox image was pulled directly from the RFE article). Thanks for pointing out the parts with missing citations, I must've overlooked those and I'll fix those now. Regarding the Saudi Arabia part, that could've been worded better, but this was taken from the cited article. Regarding neutrality, I think the coverage is completely WP:DUE considering he was a Taliban preacher and in the way it is presented, and otherwise it would be a WP:FALSEBALANCE. In light of all that, I think this should have been put while I resolved the few limited issues. Regardless, thanks for the review, c'est la vie. Curbon7 (talk) 02:56, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
 * See my further comments at the article's talk page. Curbon7 (talk) 05:17, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

I worked SO hard on that edit...but you seem like you know what you are doing...
I was not aware of the consensus Petjayso (talk) 14:01, 17 May 2023 (UTC)


 * You were reverted when you attempted to make the same edit last year . Curbon7 (talk) 15:38, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok true...but I was not informed that the consensus existed. I was also not aware of how to add citations. Petjayso (talk) 03:41, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 22 May 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:38, 22 May 2023 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Tina Turner
Thank you for the nomination! What a relief to see her on the Main page promptly! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:08, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

Pentecost was full of music, and my story today is that 300 years ago today, Bach became Thomaskantor, with BWV 75, writing music history, - my first OTD blurb. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:36, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - June 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:15, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

= June 2023 =

I am confused
Dear user, You are calling me a sock yet I have never edited Wikipedia until like a few days ago and I have never had account and my IP adress is verified. So what is the issue?

—- Floridamanfan (talk) 19:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I am 100% certain you are a sockpuppet. Please refer to the new comment I left at your original talk page. Curbon7 (talk) 20:01, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I have never seen that account until now. And they actually verified that my account was legitimate. Floridamanfan (talk) 20:03, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Who ? Curbon7 (talk) 20:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alina_Garcia&diff=prev&oldid=1158063888 Floridamanfan (talk) 20:04, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * @Liz Floridamanfan (talk) 20:05, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * That was a procedural decline because you aren't yet blocked, not a declaration that you aren't a sockpuppet. Behavior is a 100% match. Again, refer to my comment on your original talk page: please stop sockpuppeting. Curbon7 (talk) 20:06, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * But I am not a sock puppet. I just have a Twitter circle that is into Florida politics and we worked on editing. I am not a sock puppet though. Floridamanfan (talk) 20:09, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Déjà moo! BilCat (talk) 20:42, 1 June 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 5 June 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:20, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

Bill Kerdyk Jr
You un-PRODded Bill Kerdyk Jr. I should say I messed up - I didn't mean to say NPOV in my PROD nomination, I meant NOTABILITY - I believe Bill not to be notable enough to deserve an article. regardless, I don't think putting it to PROD again is allowed, so let me know if you think I should move to AfD or something or if you think the article should exist. Thanks! QueensanditsCrazy (talk) 17:02, 14 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the message! An WP:AfD is the next natural step if you think the article is non-notable. Curbon7 (talk) 17:13, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

New Pages Patrol newsletter June 2023
Hello , Backlog

Redirect drive: In response to an unusually high redirect backlog, we held a redirect backlog drive in May. The drive completed with 23851 reviews done in total, bringing the redirect backlog to 0 (momentarily). Congratulations to who led with a staggering 4316 points, followed by  and  with 2868 and 2546 points respectively. See this page for more details. The redirect queue is steadily rising again and is steadily approaching 4,000. Please continue to help out, even if it's only for a few or even one review a day.

Redirect autopatrol: All administrators without autopatrol have now been added to the redirect autopatrol list. If you see any users who consistently create significant amounts of good quality redirects, consider requesting redirect autopatrol for them here.

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team, consisting of, and also some patches from , has been hard at work updating PageTriage. They are focusing their efforts on modernising the extension's code rather than on bug fixes or new features, though some user-facing work will be prioritised. This will help make sure that this extension is not deprecated, and is easier to work on in the future. In the next month or so, we will have an opt-in beta test where new page patrollers can help test the rewrite of Special:NewPagesFeed, to help find bugs. We will post more details at WT:NPPR when we are ready for beta testers.

Articles for Creation (AFC): All new page reviewers are now automatically approved for Articles for Creation draft reviewing (you do not need to apply at WT:AFCP like was required previously). To install the AFC helper script, visit Special:Preferences, visit the Gadgets tab, tick "Yet Another AFC Helper Script", then click "Save". To find drafts to review, visit Special:NewPagesFeed, and at the top left, tick "Articles for Creation". To review a draft, visit a submitted draft, click on the "More" menu, then click "Review (AFCH)". You can also comment on and submit drafts that are unsubmitted using the script.

You can review the AFC workflow at WP:AFCR. It is up to you if you also want to mark your AFC accepts as NPP reviewed (this is allowed but optional, depends if you would like a second set of eyes on your accept). Don't forget that draftspace is optional, so moves of drafts to mainspace (even if they are not ready) should not be reverted, except possibly if there is conflict of interest.

Pro tip: Did you know that visual artists such as painters have their own SNG? The most common part of this "creative professionals" criteria that applies to artists is WP:ARTIST 4b (solo exhibition, not group exhibition, at a major museum) or 4d (being represented within the permanent collections of two museums).

Reminders
 * Newsletter feedback - please take this short poll about the newsletter.
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord and on IRC.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Your GA nomination of Mayme Schweble
The article Mayme Schweble you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mayme Schweble and Talk:Mayme Schweble/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammielh -- Sammielh (talk) 12:20, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:08, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Kristin Hedger for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristin Hedger is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kristin Hedger until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mpen320 (talk) 03:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)


 * For future clarification, my only edit to this article was adding a notability tag, so I'm not sure why I received this notification. Curbon7 (talk) 04:52, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mayme Schweble
The article Mayme Schweble you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mayme Schweble for comments about the article, and Talk:Mayme Schweble/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammielh -- Sammielh (talk) 16:42, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Martin Chester Deming moved to draftspace
Hello - I noticed you recently created Martin Chester Deming but left it mostly blank - I've moved it to draftspace for now and it is available at Draft:Martin Chester Deming. Tollens (talk) 06:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)


 * , Thanks, I had meant to create that in draftspace. Oops! Curbon7 (talk) 07:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ITN recognition for Lowell Weicker
= July 2023 =

New pages patrol needs your help!
Hello , The New Page Patrol team is sending you this impromptu message to inform you of a steeply rising backlog of articles needing review. If you have any extra time to spare, please consider reviewing one or two articles each day to help lower the backlog. You can start reviewing by visiting Special:NewPagesFeed. Thank you very much for your help.

Reminders:
 * There is live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Please add the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

Sent by using  at 06:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John ? (MP for City of York)


A tag has been placed on John ? (MP for City of York) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/John ? (MP for City of York). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fram (talk) 07:20, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * , WP:G4 does not apply here as I did not re-create the article ( but instead created a redirect. Take it to WP:RfD instead. Curbon7 (talk) 07:28, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read the closing statement of the AfD, which you linked to on the talk page. A redirect was explicitly decided against at the AfD. Please delete the redirect and take it to DRV if you disagree. Fram (talk) 07:30, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Let's see how the CSD is determined first. Curbon7 (talk) 07:35, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 3 July 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:13, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2023
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Battle Of Burshek
You claim that the war was fabricated by 20th century nationalists. But the source of the war period is in the works of Tursun Bey and Kemalpaşazade. Keremmaarda (talk) 23:18, 25 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Please keep comments related to the AfD at the AfD. Additionally, I did not say that this battle was fabricated (I even stated that something like it probably did occur); rather, I discussed the historicity of the numbers reported. Please re-read my comment. Curbon7 (talk) 23:32, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The Signpost: 1 August 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:37, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

= August 2023 =

Requesting inputs
@Curbon7,

Hi, I am user Bookku. Usually I work in information and knowledge gap areas.

Thanks for your recent copy-edits to the article Sengol. Presently I am working on the article Indian sceptre ( a sandbox draft). I am looking for some preliminary copy-edit support for the same.

Besides reference provided at Indian sceptre are likely to be more than adequate to say Sengol sceptre installed in Indian parliament is not the only instance of Sengol from Indian state of Tamil Nadu.'Sengol' is a regular common noun in Tamil language usage where as Wikipedia article is inadvertently ending up using the same as a proper noun.

To avoid such mismatch, I had started a discussion at t/p Article title naming and scope mismatch, I would like to request your inputs in the same. If you wish to skip the discussion there, you can let me know your feed back on other possible alternatives (for title naming or more accurate introductory statement of the article Sengol) to describe the Sengol installed in the Indian parliament, if possible.

warm regards

&#32;Bookku   (talk) 10:44, 2 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, sorry for the late reply! Indian history is not something I'm really interested in or knowledgeable about; I don't mind giving it a copyedit when it's in mainspace, but I think WP:GOCE would be a better venue. Curbon7 (talk) 02:39, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 August 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:16, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Catrin
Thanks, I've made a couple of amendments to the Welsh language article, which should hopefully now be more consistent with the English version. See what you think. Ehrenkater (talk) 16:20, 15 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks, looks good! It was nice getting to research this subject, very interesting time-period. Curbon7 (talk) 20:14, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Cornwall - dummy edits
Hi, Why the dummy edits? Why not just discuss the issue on the talk page, that is what it is there for. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 10:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)


 * I realized that my argument in the first edit summary was quite narrow and wanted to further clarify my point prior to discussion. Curbon7 (talk) 23:17, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Suggestion for appropriate AfD
Hi there, just regarding your recent revert on the article I tagged for deletion, do you have any suggestions for the appropriate AfD?

Though I agree with you some of the later articles of the series are more substantial, and by extension notable, the issue I have with many of the earlier articles is that they appear redundant. Indeed, many link to the nominated Emperors' pages.

So I had the idea, based on the above, to merge the June 1198 article in question with the page for Otto III of Germany, but I saw from that page that the information is already entirely there, making a merge (and in my opinion the June 1198) page redundant. The same applies to the pages for 1138, March 1198, among others.

Suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks! Yr Enw (talk) 05:31, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

September 2023 at Women In Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Draft:Sarah Keitt
You reverted a decline on this saying that Keitt is not a local politician. If this is correct I have made the same error, and require guidance, please. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:10, 29 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Indeed, total votes cast of ~10k suggests her to be local. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:12, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi . As a US state representative, she passes WP:NPOL. Curbon7 (talk) 07:22, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Have now read it in further detail, and will go back and accept. Thank you 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:31, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * , oops, the article already existed with a disambiguator! My bad on that one, I usually check with G13's but seems I forgot this time. Curbon7 (talk) 08:49, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I reckon that's "one all!" 😈😇 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 08:54, 29 August 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 August 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

= September 2023 =

A. J. Rosier

 * Hi Curbon7, I've added a [citation needed]] tag in "Early life and education" because I found an uncited quotation; "at an early day". Direct quotations should be directly cited per WP:MOS, otherwise there are no major problems with the article. Good luck with your planned GA nom and cheers,  Baffle☿gab  01:45, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Roy Earl Parrish

 * Thank you for dealing with my tendency to overuse commas, two articles in a row! Curbon7 (talk) 10:07, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

New page patrol October 2023 Backlog drive
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:13, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of people with surname Williams, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frances Williams.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Draft question
Why did that person submit deletion for nothing, And when is the discussion going to be closed, I just want to edit my Donald Cheney draft some more. 98.17.165.55 (talk) 15:38, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Eva Segmüller
Hello, Curbon7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eva Segmüller, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Rashid Mohamed Mbaraka Fatma
Hello, Curbon7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rashid Mohamed Mbaraka Fatma, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 September 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:35, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Deletion review for Princess Anna of Saxony (1903–1976)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Princess Anna of Saxony (1903–1976). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 62.181.221.7 (talk) 08:42, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

New pages patrol newsletter
Hello ,

Backlog update: At the time of this message, there are 11,300 articles and 15,600 redirects awaiting review. This is the highest backlog in a long time. Please help out by doing additional reviews!

October backlog elimination drive: A one-month backlog drive for October will start in one week! Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled. Articles will earn 4x as many points compared to redirects. You can sign up here.

PageTriage code upgrades: Upgrades to the PageTriage code, initiated by the NPP open letter in 2022 and actioned by the WMF Moderator Tools Team in 2023, are ongoing. More information can be found here. As part of this work, the Special:NewPagesFeed now has a new version in beta! The update leaves the NewPagesFeed appearance and function mostly identical to the old one, but updates the underlying code, making it easier to maintain and helping make sure the extension is not decommissioned due to maintenance issues in the future. You can try out the new Special:NewPagesFeed here - it will replace the current version soon.

Notability tip: Professors can meet WP:PROF #1 by having their academic papers be widely cited by their peers. When reviewing professor articles, it is a good idea to find their Google Scholar or Scopus profile and take a look at their h-index and number of citations. As a very rough rule of thumb, for most fields, articles on people with a h-index of twenty or more, a first-authored paper with more than a thousand citations, or multiple papers each with more than a hundred citations are likely to be kept at AfD.

Reviewing tip: If you would like like a second opinion on your reviews or simply want another new page reviewer by your side when patrolling, we recommend pair reviewing! This is where two reviewers use Discord voice chat and screen sharing to communicate with each other while reviewing the same article simultaneously. This is a great way to learn and transfer knowledge.

Reminders:
 * You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
 * Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
 * To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of A. J. Rosier
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article A. J. Rosier you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Muttnick -- Muttnick (talk) 17:41, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Mail
<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  13:21, 27 September 2023 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. JM2023 (talk) 07:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

= October 2023 =

The Signpost: 3 October 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:29, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you
I have to admit that I'm not sure how well my judgment was exercised here, I think I just saw a promotional article of a non-notable person that appeared to qualify as spam. You're very right when you say the user should have time to improve it, and I thank you for that and apologize for any inconvenience I may have caused. JeffSpaceman (talk) 13:16, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Olga Jokisalo
Hello, Curbon7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olga Jokisalo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:02, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Roswitha Arens
Hello, Curbon7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roswitha Arens, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:01, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Marco Polo
I had been sort of hoping that RSN would resolve the issue, although it doesn't look like a source reliability question. But I agree with you that a dispute cannot be at two noticeboards at the same time, and it actually is slightly more of a DRN issue than an RSN issue. If you had replied, I would have closed it at DRN. Since you closed it at RSN, it will probably come down to an RFC (which is a common result at either RSN or DRN). Robert McClenon (talk) 04:22, 22 October 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2023
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

November Articles for creation backlog drive
<div style="border: 2px solid #484898; background: #FFF; background-color:#98FB98; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%"> Hello Curbon7:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!

The goal of this drive is to reduce the backlog of unreviewed drafts to less than 2 months outstanding reviews from the current 4+ months. Bonus points will be given for reviewing drafts that have been waiting more than 30 days. The drive is running from 1 November 2023 through 30 November 2023.

You may find Category:AfC pending submissions by age or other categories and sorting helpful.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.

There is a backlog of over pages, so start reviewing drafts. We're looking forward to your help! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC) <!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/November_2023_Backlog_Drive/Invite_list&oldi