User talk:DErnestWachter
Welcome![edit]
|
April 2018[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Primitive Catholic has been reverted.
Your edit here to Primitive Catholic was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://gateofdawnchurch.wordpress.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:42, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
Your addition to Bhakti Ananda Goswami has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 05:30, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of User:DErnestWachter/BhaktiAnandaGoswami[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on User:DErnestWachter/BhaktiAnandaGoswami requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from bhaktianandascollectedworks.wordpress.com/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Vermont | reply here 09:56, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Bhakti Ananda Goswami is my siksha guru and he authorized me to make his Wiki page! You deleted it saying i violated his copyright! What do you need to verufy that he has asked me to create him a wiki page. I don’t want his page deleted next time I try to make it. Thank you DErnestWachter (talk) 19:56, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
May 2018[edit]
I don't know if you were joking with this edit or not, but it was unsourced and doesn't belong. So I reverted. What you are describing is necrophilia, and it's not a sexual orientation/romantic orientation. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:43, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Bhakti Ananda Goswami[edit]
Hello DErnestWachter,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Bhakti Ananda Goswami for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 07:38, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
The Brotherhood of Saint Sophia moved to draftspace[edit]
An article you recently created, The Brotherhood of Saint Sophia, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PATH SLOPU 09:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Transodox, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 15:08, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:The Brotherhood of Saint Sophia has a new comment[edit]
September 2019[edit]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Pepe the Frog. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Doug Weller talk 12:40, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
This appears to be a hoax or vandalism, hopefully neither, but I'd like your source(s)[edit]
At Peper the Frog you added this: "+ Some members of the Starseed Otherkin community have an identity narrative in which the pure Kekistanian people, known as the Vulkekin are actually a non-terrestrial people from the planet Kekhet. A Vulkek is one who is full of Kek. The Vulkekin community is active on social media sites and has taken the lead in promoting the traditional religious practices of the children of Kek, such as within the Kekistani Starovery." Doug Weller talk 12:42, 29 September 2019 (UTC)
Pepe in your signature[edit]
If you put Pepe emoticons into your signature again, you may be blocked for disruption. That's not acceptable. Acroterion (talk) 01:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Notice[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Acroterion (talk) 02:39, 30 September 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Dada (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hans Richter
- Johannes Baader (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Hans Richter
- John Covert (painter) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to New York
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:42, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of NIGER-REGIN square[edit]
Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as NIGER-REGIN square, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae (talk) 15:46, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Praxidicae’s deletion from the Book of Life[edit]
For opposing Our Lady when She chooses to have her voice heard Praxidicae will be deleted from the Book of Life I am told unless sincere acts of repentance are made. I do not control such things. Haters of Our Lady are just given back what their own hate deals out. The NIGER-REGIN square page is not vandalism. Deleting it is vandalism imho. I advice apologizing, followed by penance and severe asceticism for the rest of your life in order to avoid Hell Praxidicae. DErnestWachter (talk) 16:51, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
- Then please prove it exists with reliable sources and stop making threats. I'll wait. Praxidicae (talk) 16:52, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. This is on the basis of the following edits, which are clearly nonconstructive: [1] ("Do it or you will be reported to the authorities who are in charge of Meme Warfare"), [2] (describing subject of article as jerk), [3] (listing necromancy as a legitimate romantic orientation), [4] (strange personal attack on another editor). Mz7 (talk) 16:55, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
unblock|reason=Indefinite ban is inappropriate[edit]
DErnestWachter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am merely requesting that an end date be set to my block. Can a few Admins thoroughly review my FULL Wiki history, on both Article & Talk pages? I am not intentionally vandalizing. It should be evident that overall my contributions are beneficial and that I am still learning how Wiki works. I am not going to repeat mistakes once I learn the Wiki protocols. If after reviewing the history of all my contributions you still think Wiki is better off without me ever participating again, then keep me banned forever. I was making a sincere effort to make Wiki better, and I thought I was permitted to do everything I did. Obviously some things were not permissible, but you learn as you go.
Decline reason:
One unblock request at a time, please; you had two. You are asking for a specific end date to be set. That isn't how this works. When we can be sure you understand how your edits were disruptive, and can be sure you won't repeat the actions, you can be unblocked. Yamla (talk) 19:14, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
DErnestWachter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am only requesting that an end date be set to this block. Review my full Wiki history of contributions on both Article and Talk pages and it should be clear that overall by contributions are beneficial and that I am still learning Wiki protocols. I am not going to intentionally violate Wiki protocols. I am making a sincere effort to make Wiki better and learning as I go. If you still think a permanent ban is appropriate after reviewing my full Wiki history, then fine.
Decline reason:
Please read the first response before making additional requests. – bradv🍁 19:23, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
The Johannes Baader article needs reverted.[edit]
I improved the article and had someone fix the dates since I could not edit the pic. And now all the edits, even the ones I did not make, are gone and it is shameful that the Oberdada is suffering from such poor Administration. I advise that the corrections we made and the referenced supplemental biographical data all be put back. Look at the article. The dates in the photo are wrong. Look at the edits I made. They were all meticulously referenced and highly relevant. DErnestWachter (talk) 20:59, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Central Council of Dada for World Revolution[edit]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Council_of_Dada_for_the_World_Revolution I fixed this stub with meticulously referenced data about who the members were and what their most famous publication declared and now these edits are gone, even though they were all referenced. I advise that my edits be put back as now the article is again a stub and there is no reason to punish the Siki community just because some admin are upset with me. DErnestWachter (talk) 21:01, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
NIGER-REGIN square page[edit]
There was nothing wrong with the NIGER-REGIN square page I created. Any admin can review it and see it was perfectly fine and I was never given a chance to context the deletion. It was deleted before I could contest it. I contest it now and I name the person who marked it for speedy deletion as a corrupter of Wikipedia's core values who should be permanently banned. The NIFER-REGIN square page was worthy and the NIGER-REGIN square deserves a page on Wikipedia. DErnestWachter (talk) 21:05, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Stop[edit]
Stop. You have access solely so you can request that your block be lifted. Instead, you are asking that other users edit on your behalf. That is inappropriate, this is an attempt to violate WP:EVADE. That's fine, you didn't know, but don't do that again. WP:GAB can help you understand how to craft an acceptable unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 22:41, 8 October 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Transodox concern[edit]
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Transodox, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Brotherhood of Saint Sophia, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:24, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Transodox[edit]
Hello, DErnestWachter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Transodox".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 22:06, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Bhakti Ananda Goswami[edit]
Hello, DErnestWachter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Bhakti Ananda Goswami".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:10, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:The Brotherhood of Saint Sophia[edit]
Hello, DErnestWachter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Brotherhood of Saint Sophia".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 19:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)