User talk:Dank/Archive 47

FAC review
Hey, Dank! I hope you're doing fine. I just re-nominated Juan Manuel de Rosas for a FAC. The last one failed for lack of reviews. Would mind taking a look at it again (or repeating your vote, whichever you prefer). Also, could you invite someone to review it as well, if you can? Here's the nomination page: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Juan Manuel de Rosas/archive3. Kind regards, --Lecen (talk) 13:25, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure, I look at all the military history FACs. No need to solicit anyone; this FAC will soon show up at the top of this talk page with the other Milhist FACs, and many other pages too. - Dank (push to talk) 16:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

TFA November
Just to let you know I'm away until 8 November, so I won't be able to respond immediately to TFA issues that arise this week. I hope things will rmain quiet. Thanks again for your indispensible "blurb" work. Brianboulton (talk) 08:35, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks kindly. I'll hold down the fort. - Dank (push to talk) 14:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry to bother you, Dan, but the image in Today's featured article/November 11, 2015 doesn't have a caption, and no text appears when the mouse is hovered over it. Do you think it might be possible to add the caption "Rhodesia (today Zimbabwe), highlighted on a map of Africa" or something along those lines, so people know what the image is? Thanks, —  Cliftonian   (talk)  16:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Pinging David Levy, since he's handling image issues. - Dank (push to talk) 17:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Ah, sorry about that. Cheers, hope you're well. —  Cliftonian   (talk)  17:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Yep. My colon problems of a few years ago have disappeared, and the best news is, if the problems come back, there are now pills for related problems that provide cure rates of around 95%. Yay. - Dank (push to talk) 17:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added the requested caption. —David Levy 21:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

MacGregor
This is just a note to let the participants at the MacGregor peer review know that the article is now up at FAC here. Cheers and I hope you're having a great weekend. —  Cliftonian   (talk)  12:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Almost done. - Dank (push to talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

TFA (November 27, 2015)
Firstly, my apologies for accidentally omitting the "e" (and thanks for catching this).

Secondly, I don't think that we encountered an ENGVAR issue. I'm American, but it was "resuming" that struck me as odd in this context (though I realize that it wasn't incorrect), so it must be a U.S. regional difference or just one of those things. "Assuming" probably is the best choice, given that it's followed by "her former name" (which conveys the fact that the name was used previously).

Thanks again. —David Levy 20:37, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure, not a problem David. Well ... I was going to say that it probably is an Engvar issue, since "reassume" is a perfectly good word in BritEng, but I didn't get a hit in the two AmEng dictionaries I checked. (See AHD.) But now that I check a second time, it does occur in M-W.com, but not on its own page: re-. So you're right, it's not a WP:COMMONALITY issue, my apologies. But we're agreed that "assuming" probably works best. - Dank (push to talk) 20:45, 26 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I never heard the word "reassuming" even once before this. Corinne (talk) 19:36, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Twenty years ago, I wasn't doing much copyediting so I can't be sure, but my recollection is that AmEng dictionaries didn't record "reassuming" at that time, favoring "resuming". (And even if they had, AmEng dictionaries then weren't even in the same league as the best ones available now.) Nowadays ... for me personally, if either M-W or AMHER lists a word without noting that it's iffy in some way, I'm almost never going to put up a fight and say the word isn't good enough for Wikipedia. - Dank (push to talk) 19:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Apologies re "long after the war ended." My bad. :-( Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:21, 27 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, Ed, but it did reinforce for me that I need a better way of being notified of TFA changes. Stuff like this is going to happen. - Dank (push to talk) 22:24, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject historian and newcomer of the year awards now open!
On behalf of the Military history WikiProject's Coordinators, we would like to extend an invitation to nominate deserving editors for the 2015 Military historian of the year and Military history newcomer of the year awards. The nomination period will run from 7 December to 23:59 13 December, with the election phase running from 14 December to 23:59 21 December. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

TFA blurbs
Hi Dank. I'm sorry I haven't been doing some of the monthly TFA blurbs, as I volunteered to do a few months ago. I've been quite busy here with other things (especially RfA reform). In case you think I've forgotten about it, I just wanted to note that I after I complete my reform work (hopefully in a few months) I plan to retire from the public reform sphere and spend much more time on content work for history articles and such, and I might become a more active member of the MilHist project. (And of course, I'll still contribute to admin work.) When I do this, I'll probably have time to start working on the blurbs again, so I haven't forgotten about it. Thanks, Biblio  worm  06:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know, just ping me when you're free. Your RfC work seems to be going well. - Dank (push to talk) 13:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
 * With the most feasible reforms accomplished for the moment, there is not much else to do at this time, since any attempts to immediately propose new things will probably be viewed unfavorably. I do have more ideas, but for certain reasons they absolutely must wait for at least a few months to have any chance of success. Therefore, I'll be taking a break from RfA reform for that time. Now that everything is winding down, I'll probably have time to start working on the blurbs again. Also, Happy New Year! :) Biblio  worm  20:45, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Same to you and yours. I can't comment on RfA stuff yet, since I plan to close or co-close the next one. For TFA, sure, jump in, and we'll see how it goes. My standards keep going up so it's not as easy as it used to be :) - Dank (push to talk) 21:02, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Question about FA
Hello, I was wondering can a feature article contain an unreferenced footnote. Specifically, I can't find a direct source that talks about Pitman's ancestry down to fraction besides that he is part Hawaiian and Caucasian, but sources do state he had a white father and a white great-grandfather on his mother's side. I left the citation without reference because I realized that would be creating a synthesis.--KAVEBEAR (talk) 04:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)


 * I know that all text (other than things that are broadly known or obvious) needs to be sourced, but I only do prose reviews at FAC. - Dank (push to talk) 04:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello, I looking at Featured article candidates. If I agree with some but disagree with other improvements/suggestions or oppositions of a reviewer and I feel that in principle the suggestions or concerns being made are not legitimate problems, I am only required to state that, correct? :Basically, can I disrespect the opinion of a reviewing editor if I believe I have legitimate reasons to?--KAVEBEAR (talk) 06:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Senior Loans deletion
So I'm confused... you and another user who's no longer active marked an article I authored in 2009 for deletion, "Senior Loans" citing copyright infringement from a site on which you found an article on the same topic name (which btw is no longer active either). See below.

"04:12, 8 May 2009 Dank (talk | contribs) deleted page Senior Loans (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion: G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.fccm.com/senior_loans.htm)". Who's to say they didn't copy me?!

What's more confusing is that while you and the now inactive user processed that claim more than 6 years ago, I only just a week or two ago received an email alert to that affect.

My composition was in fact in my own words and contributed to educating readers on the topic, I'm unsure whether I saved my composition but at this point I'm likely to simply forego attempting to republish it.

It's a shame all these faceless people have belabored what used to be simple and open and conducive to sharing knowledge freely to advance learning around the world via wikipedia.


 * You were notified of the impending deletion of that article on your talk page repeatedly back in 2009 and have edited Wikipedia occasionally since then... Nick-D (talk) 10:40, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

UK team
Re this, it's not a problem. The wording I changed it to works, regardless. The whole UK/GB/England thing is darn confusing, especially when it comes to sports teams. --Dweller (talk) 17:11, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Sure ... it was 50-50 for me whether to say anything. My bottom line is: if people are likely to get the wrong impression (in this case, that I changed the wording) from something someone says in an edit summary or at ERRORS, then I will try to neutrally (and casually) describe what I did. Thanks for keeping an eye on TFA, and please keep doing that. - Dank (push to talk) 18:07, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Iwane Matsui
Iwane Matsui, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.CurtisNaito (talk) 16:52, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * GANs and GARs aren't my department, at least within Milhist. - Dank (push to talk) 19:12, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings
To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 16:50, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

 * Thanks everyone, best of the season to you and yours. - Dank (push to talk) 04:12, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Dank: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America1000 15:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Legal awareness
Hi,

Seasons Greetings, from your user page it sseems you have been closely associated with legal fraternity. I will apreciate any support from your side for article Legal awareness.

Thanks and regards

Mahitgar (talk) 05:12, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello Dank: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers,  Frankie talk 14:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

Bruce Kingsbury
Hi, Dank. Could you clarify the reason for the Bruce Kingsbury revert? The article clearly states he died in 1942, yet the TFA template says "born 8 January 1918", as if he's still alive. Brandmeistertalk  19:38, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The TFA also clearly states that he died, and gives the date. I try to minimize the repetition of information in TFAs. I do see your point, though. The custom at TFA is not to give full birth and death dates to start off with, and I hate arguing about this stuff at WT:MAIN. Let me think if there's a way to do what you want that meets the various constraints. - Dank (push to talk) 19:42, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Sigh. I'm going to reinstate your edit, and remove the second mention of the death date. This will probably start a fight, but some fights can't be avoided. - Dank (push to talk) 19:47, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Discussion is at WT:TFA. - Dank (push to talk) 20:04, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I know that dates aren't welcome there, while mere birth/death years are usual practice, just decided to put since birth date was already there. Brandmeistertalk  20:11, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * You made a good call. - Dank (push to talk) 20:13, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

78.26's RFA Appreciation award

 * My pleasure, and thanks for volunteering your services. - Dank (push to talk) 01:51, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy Christmas!

 * Thanks everyone, best of the season to you and yours. - Dank (push to talk) 19:02, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

 * Thanks everyone, best of the season to you and yours. - Dank (push to talk) 00:47, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Today's featured article/January 15, 2016
Thanks for the message informing me about Gateshead International Stadium being considered for Today's FA. I'm not really that active on the project nowadays and as a result the article needs a little updating I think. Nothing major, but some obvious bits need amending – some info about the 2013 European Team Championship and additions reflecting the move of Gateshead Thunder to Newcastle in 2014 are the two stand-out omissions. I'm pretty much free all day tomorrow so I'll try to do what is necessary then. Meetthefeebles (talk) 23:10, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that would be very helpful. If you find that it needs more than you can do, let me know so we can find someone. - Dank (push to talk) 23:19, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I've made some additions. Let me know if any more work is required. Meetthefeebles (talk) 12:58, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not a subject I know much about. - Dank (push to talk) 00:30, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Phase II RfC
Hi Dank. One month has passed since the opening of the Phase II RfC, so I just ended voting. (I'm actually on a wikibreak right now, but I do want to make sure everything is closed up properly.) Would you kindly be willing to close it? The results seem rather straightforward; four pass, the rest fail. Someone still has to perform the formal process of closing it, though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biblioworm (talk • contribs)
 * I'll go have a look; I hadn't planned to close this one. - Dank (push to talk) 14:29, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Posted a closing request at WP:AN. I won't let it just sit there, that would erode the momentum going into the next RfC. - Dank (push to talk) 16:51, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

2016 year of the reader and peace
Thank you for the polishing of TFA articles, - thanks with my review, and the peace bell by Yunshui! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:20, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Nice work Gerda! Thanks so much for caring about the people behind the text. - Dank (push to talk) 13:26, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Click on bell for the soft sound of peace (and - as you know - jest, in the TFA for 1 Jan) ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:25, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Dank!


Happy New Year! Dank, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:34, 31 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

Happy New Year, Dank!


Happy New Year! Dank, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Liz Read! Talk! 21:07, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.


 * Thanks everyone, best of the season to you and yours. - Dank (push to talk) 18:28, 3 January 2016 (UTC)