User talk:Danski14

DYK for Erionite

 * You're welcome, Danski14. Your nice new article deserves the spotlight on MainPage.  Please be encouraged to self-nom. your next new contribution to Wikipedia.  Happy ediing!  Cheers! :-)  --PFHLai (talk) 04:18, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Matthew Hunter
He's clearly notable, but you seem to have copied ll or almost all of it from the 2 references given. Please rewrite it in you own words; don't paraphrase--that still constistutes plagiarism. Rewrite from scratch. Invcluse a list of his major published works also, and see if there is any bio tribute to him from outside the university--there probably is. A science or engineering librarian should be able to help find it. DGG (talk) 17:34, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
 * it needs more thorough rewriting than that. Rewrite from scratch. And btw, we refer to people in the article after the first mention by their last name only, without the Dr. DGG (talk)

Waterfall Article
I've updated the original article and commented in the talk section. I've removed the "prod" tag, and would welcome comments there. 5minutes (talk) 20:00, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Waterfall on West Prong Hickey Fork
Hello Danski14, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Waterfall on West Prong Hickey Fork has been removed. It was removed by 5minutes with the following edit summary '(no edit summary)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with 5minutes before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 01:36, 18 August 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Danski14! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) J. Christopher Jaffe -

GA reassessment of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:15, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Giulio Giorello


The article Giulio Giorello has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Taroaldo (talk) 03:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Arrested Development logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Arrested Development logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk  04:17, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Your observation
I sympathize with you. I have been outspoken about the folks who trawl AfD arguments and search for articles to delete. If they understood the subjects they were criticizing, that would be a fair argument. Instead, far too many of them think they get brownie points for the number of articles they get deleted. We've been through this heavily in the BLP discussions a few months ago. You came to the right section for sports. If you care about academics, find the definition for the Wikipedia standards in those fields and help those folks to find help them establish those standards in terms that the AfD people can understand. When the argument is already settled by the guideline, you will have far less trouble. Personally, since this sports standard was written, I have yet to be challenged. Prior to this, I had a bunch of stuff deleted. I've been a pissed off wikipedian ever since, or at least a strong anti-deletion advocate. Seriously, folks like that can't be allowed to win. They are hurting the wikipedia project and effectively censoring what the world is allowed to know. Trackinfo (talk) 08:05, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

AfD of Best Behavior
Hello, this is a note to inform you the article Best Behavior is currently up for deletion as part of wikipedia's deletion process. I am leaving this note to everyone who was involved in the AfD discussion of Best Behaviour, covering the same topic. You can find the AfD at Articles for deletion/Best Behavior. Thank you.  Giftiger Wunsch   [TALK]  12:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Fenton Hill Observatory
 — Rlevse • Talk  • 06:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Not the Rensselaer Wiki
Hey. I want to have some links updated on the main page for the wiki. I'm also interested in reviving updates on the page. Any information on this? Please email me at jayjaywalker3 @ gmail.com. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.161.32.218 (talk) 06:29, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 15:35, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

William A. Wallace and List of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute people
The link you added for William A. Wallace under current faculty on the List of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute people page can't be right. The former page indicates a death date over 100 years ago. I undid your change, but please consider redoing your edit with a better link, or whatever it needs to make more sense. Thanks — Q uantling (talk &#124; contribs) 15:41, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Summary style
You were probably going to do it anyway, but I thought I'll point out the obvious. Since a very substantial segment was copied from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute to History of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute it should be tagged with Copied to provide proper attribution. Also, since this is summary style, the original section should be summarized, not kept as it was. Again, you were probably going to do both anyway, but I thought I'll point it out. --Muhandes (talk) 12:12, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I think summary style calls for an even shorter section. The current situation repeats quite a bit of data in the two articles. At the minimum, I think both the tables do not belong in summary style, and neither does the "Firsts" section (which seems a bit triviaish as it is) - these are exactly the things an interested reader would go to the main article to read. The other sections can may also be trimmed a bit more. I can have a go at it, but I think you'll do much better job at it than me. --Muhandes (talk) 10:06, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

List of RPI fraternities and sororities
I just came across this article. It's not the way a Wikipedia article should look. More compliant comparably articles are Greek organizations at Washington & Jefferson College and List of fraternities and sororities at Arizona State University, and more can be found at Category:Lists of chapters of United States student societies by college. Do you want to do the dirty work or shall I?   Will Beback    talk    23:59, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. There's no rush. I'll leave it in your hands. Let me know if I can be of any assistance.   Will Beback    talk    21:40, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note, the page was finally overhauled in January, 2012. It took me a while to get to it, but it turned out it wasn't much work! Danski14(talk) 00:53, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage engagement strategy released
Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox -.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:14, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Ice XI
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:05, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

question about one of your photos
Danski 14 I would like to ask you permission to use one of your photos. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Simons_Center_for_Geometry_and_Physics.JPG

If you read this message, could you please let me know if you have an email where I can send you a message?

I will explain to you the details there as I have a question about the photo. Thanks best ilaria — Preceding unsigned comment added by Imazzoleni70 (talk • contribs) 23:22, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

GR template
Hi Danski. I noticed you made some earlier edits to the Template:Theories of gravitation. I've made some new, major edits. Perhaps you'd be interested in improving it. Teply (talk) 06:24, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Hubble Groth strip diagram.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Hubble Groth strip diagram.jpg

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 16:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wayne D. Gray


A tag has been placed on Wayne D. Gray requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Alexf(talk) 12:29, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Norton's dome
Hi. I was going to create an article on Norton's dome. My first search for the name on Wikipedia found your text at User:Danski14/prep, and I've now used it as a starting text for the article, which I intend to expand later. I have credited you both in the initial edit comment and on the talk page for the article. I hope you don't mind my doing this. Many thanks for your contributions, -- The Anome (talk) 17:04, 5 August 2014 (UTC)

Path integral molecular dynamics
I'm afraid I've identified a copyright problem with your creation of Path integral molecular dynamics, as I've explained on the talk page. It may be necessary to write the article from scratch without copying anything from the "SklogWiki". Are there any other articles where you have copied from SklogWiki?

I'm sorry to have to post this bad news. -- John of Reading (talk) 19:55, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, that sucks. I was under the impression CCSA3 was OK, because I've seen other articles that use information from SkLogWiki. Is this a change in policy? I have a writeup about this topic that I wrote myself in LaTeX, but converting it to Wiki format will take some time, so I won't be able to do it now. Maybe in a few months. We could try to get permission from the author on SkLogWiki to re-license it but I'm sort of too busy to try that at the moment, so do what you need to do Danski14(talk) 20:33, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * CC-SA is good, but CC-NC-SA isn't. I'm sorry I won't be able to help with the rewrite - I just stumbled across the attribution notice while scanning for a particular kind of grammar error. -- John of Reading (talk) 20:39, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Ah, OK, that's what tripped me up I guess. I haven't created any other articles from SkLogWiki. There's one i've been meaning to create, but it will involve just copying some of the equation markup from there, and I plan to write all of the text myself.Danski14(talk) 20:42, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * I'm here to add insult to injury, I'm afraid. John is right that the licence is not acceptable (it's the "non-commercial" bit that's the stumbling-block), so, as rewriting the content is unfortunately totally beyond me, I've had to remove it instead. I'm truly sorry about that. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:52, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Combining rules, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page H. A. Lorentz. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Fixed Danski14(talk) 15:34, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Source code of Breit rabi diagram
Hi, thanks for creating the breit-rabi diagram for 87Rb. Can you please share the MATLAB code? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Breit-rabi-Zeeman.png# That would be great. Wirwe (talk) 09:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Responded to this on your talk page [User_talk:Wirwe Danski14(talk) 20:10, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Awesome, thank you! Wirwe (talk) 21:04, 20 July 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RPI Genericon Logo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:RPI Genericon Logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:50, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

December 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=694932201 your edit] to Omega Point may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:02, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * publisher=Viking Books|location=New York|isbn=978-0-670-03384-3}}, pg 476; see also 375, 389-390  Like Kurzweil, Teilhard predicts a period of rapid technological change that results in a

Notability of n-category cafe
I am concerned with your deletion of the small article n-category cafe, the deletion based on the claim that that group blog is not notable to warrant the treatment as a separate wikipedia entry, what I here challenge. I do not know what metrics has been used to diminish the role of the site and the content is moved as a paragraph in the page on one of the coauthors of the blog, John Baez. I know that in general scholarly materials in mathematics and natural sciences do not have the level of popularity as celebrity sites or fictitious side-characters in Hollywood movies, widely and in excessive detail covered in wikipedia, but they have much longer and lasting real impact on the scholarly, scientific, technological and hence also general issues. n-category cafe has been one of 3-4 most popular contemporary online resources on category theory (other being the Category List and nLab), a major branch of contemporary mathematics, with increasing impact within mathematics and on physics, computer science and neighboring area. The site has contributions of many people, John Baez being only one of them (most prolific at the beginning phase and again in the most recent months), including 10 current official "hosts" of the blog and many guest contributors. The discussions within n-category cafe were often in the past an impetus for original research, first online appearances of new notions in category theory (e.g. magnitude of a category, higher factorization systems etc.) and these efforts resulted in a number of published works. nLab is one of fruitful online spin-offs of the site (nForum being another), now a standard online source in the subject. The wider community including nLab, n-category cafe and nForum dedicated lots of structured effort and scientific knowledge in efforts close in spirit to wikipedia (especially within nLab), and some of these materials are often copied or cited within wikipedia, and very regularly within MathOverflow, the most active online community in research-level mathematics. Many of the authors of these circles have also been active contributors to wikipedia. On the basis of all of these, I request reestablishment of the independent article for n-category cafe. Zoran.skoda (talk) 15:03, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
 * I responded on your talk page User_talk:Zoran.skoda. Danski14(talk) 03:29, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Randall Schweller
I've prodded this stub, which you've edited. Please fix the problems noted or it will be deleted. Bearian (talk) 19:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Greene Building, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute


A tag has been placed on Greene Building, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. TM 17:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * seems legit Danski14(talk) 17:32, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Greene Building, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute


A tag has been placed on Greene Building, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion,. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. TM 13:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Greene Building, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Greene Building, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Greene Building, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TM 20:39, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Waves of Sound yahel.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Waves of Sound yahel.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 26 August 2018 (UTC)

Lawrence Aviation Industries, Inc.
In the future, please add attribution when copying from public domain sources: simply add the template after your citation. I have done so for the above article. Please do this in the future so that our readers will be aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:44, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I meant to -- thank you. Will be more careful in the future. Danski14(talk) 15:53, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

Joe Biden Edit and "Warning"
Hi Danski14,

Thank you for your reversion on the Joe Biden. I would like to apologise for it as I understand it shouldn't have been public -I thought it was a sandpaper box and was using it for a prank amongst my own friends. I therefore accept the warning as I do concede I made a mistake on my part.

That being said however - I find this reversion also somewhat ironic and unfair as a matter of principle. Since the last sentence of the introductory paragraph on Joe Biden states as follows.

"The ongoing Trump-Ukraine scandal was largely initiated by President Donald Trump's efforts to coerce the administration of Ukraine to open investigations into Biden and his son Hunter for political gain."

This has been disproved in court, and therefore a belief many have based on their political opinions rather than factual knowledge. This could amount to political lobbying such as my edit on Joe Biden was the case (even though it was an accidental publication). If my edit was reverted yet that statement remains (not cited as well) - surely this is act could amount to hypocrisy on you as an admin? You are willing to let these contentious and somewhat disproven statements be posted for the general public (specially in election time) yet my "Sleepy Joe" constitutes to  "vandalism".

Thanks

Suriyanarayana (talk) 10:34, 23 February 2020 (UTC) Suriyanarayana
 * I haven't looked at the other parts of the article, but your edit was definitely vandalism. Please be more careful in the future. I would take your issue up with the editors on the talk page. Danski14(talk) 20:42, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Asuppim for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asuppim is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Asuppim until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Editor2020 (talk) 00:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Inanimate Objects Party (logo).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Inanimate Objects Party (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Andy hunter life.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Andy hunter life.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Medad (name)


The article Medad (name) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No evidence of notability, fails WP:NNAME, no reliable sources given."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 23:16, 13 January 2024 (UTC)