User talk:Darkieboy236

Toptoners
A tag has been placed on Toptoners, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because it is an article about a certain website, blog, forum, or other web content that does not assert the importance or significance of that web location. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles, as well as notability guidelines for websites. Please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources which verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Talk:Toptoners. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. LittleOldMe 12:04, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Resourceful internet solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. LittleOldMe 12:06, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Autobiographical information
You may not be aware, but Wikipedians are actively discouraged from writing about themselves, people they know personally or companies and organisations that they are involved with. It is difficult to maintain neutrality when writing about people or companies that you are emotionally connected to. Regards LittleOldMe 12:10, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Please make sure that you include suitable summaries when editing pages other than your own userpages. You have not included any summaries for High Street, Lincoln. See Help:Edit summary. Adrian M. H.  14:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Message posted on Tuesday, May 1, 2007
Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Loganberry (Talk) 15:24, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

This edit
Hi. Do not change the titles of references. The title of the Bloomberg reference said 4.1, fact. Now they may be right or wrong, but that IS the title of the article. Mark83 16:37, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not "panicing". You were wrong to change the title and you would be better admitting that than being condescending. Also the correct place to address other users is their talk page (e.g. User talk:Mark83) not their user page (e.g. User:Mark 83). Cheers. Mark83 17:24, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * It is clear you changed the title of my reference because you thought the figure to be wrong. I am correct that you were wrong to do it. As for shouting, that was not my intention, it was to place emphasis (bolding not possible in edit summaries). So I apologise for that impression. One more thing about talk pages; it is convention to put new posts at the bottom. Thank you. Mark83 20:42, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * And remember to sign your posts using ~ . 00:56, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Wigan Pier
Hi Darkieboy - good stuff on the Wigan Pier article, but don't forget to sign your comments on the talk pages, by adding four tildes ( ~ ). as this will help future contributors to follow the thread. also, adding an increasing number of colons at the begiunning of each paragraph produces an indent, and is the convention when replying to a previous comment


 * so that each linked contribution (this para starts with ":", )


 * flows on to the next (this with "::",)


 * and so on... (and this one with ":::".)


 * etc. etc.

Cheers, Lynbarn 08:21, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

Using talkpages
Hi Darkieboy, when leaving messages on talk pages, PLEASE sign them by adding ~ and also, when including links to wiki articles, use the wiki tools, ie  Wigan Pier  instead of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wigan_Pier

Thanks, Lynbarn 14:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the info and tips, I'm fairly new to Wikipedia, so bare with me if I make mistakes. Mark.


 * Not to worry, you're learning pretty fast! Lynbarn 15:47, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Notability of The Way We Were (disambiguation)
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on The Way We Were (disambiguation), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because The Way We Were (disambiguation) seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting The Way We Were (disambiguation), please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate The Way We Were (disambiguation) itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:44, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
 * This is a link to a museum which is run by a local authority/council and therefore is non-profit making and the only connection to myself is that I was born nearby. The Way We Were building was in existence in circa 1777 and therefore pre-dates the film of the same name from 1973.  The Way We Were museum serves local and regional schools in an educational role by depicting life in 19th century Britain.  The museum also holds a conservation role for the built and industrial environment in the local area.  I have yet to add further information to the section on the Wigan Pier entry about the actual museum...I hope you understand.  Mark.

Darkieboy236 00:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Dynamic Cassette International
The full text of your deleted article is as below... be sure to include claims to notability when recreating this article to avoid further deletions. Cheers... -- Longhair\talk 09:47, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

''Dynamic Cassette International (DCI) is a Boston, Lincolnshire, UK based inkjet cartridge manufacturing company, producing products under the Jet Tec brand name. DCI is the sole UK manufacturer of inkjet cartridges.''


 * Your article still falls short of meeting the criteria for corporations. I've added the primarysources tag to notify editors the article is lacking external sources not directly related to the company which is the subject of the article. -- Longhair\talk 11:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I've removed the notice. Broadband problems afoot here too. Must be catching :) -- Longhair\talk 05:50, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

An English passport?
Hello Darkieboy236!

It seems a debate about the use of nationality and ethnicity has been stirred on the Bernard Manning article talk page (I do beg your pardon!). It is my believe that nationalism is spoiling the integrity of some articles, and have had Union flags and citations removed with no justification. Some are even asserting there is an English nationality!

Your comments are very much welcome on the talk page, as I feel I'm talking to a brick wall. Jhamez84 22:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)


 * That's a pressure group - trying to restore the boundaries. It wouldn't exist if the boundaries had changed. It's a very old debate that was solved along time ago (see our policy Naming conventions (places)). The Heptarchy was never abolished, Pangea was never abolished, but today at least, we use the ceremonial counties of England as a geographic frame of reference thank you. There's an overwhelming consensus and body of literature which insists upon this. Jhamez84 10:19, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

High Street, Lincoln
Hi Darkieboy236. I thought I'd let you know I've removed the list of premises from the High Street, Lincoln article for the reasons I have given on its Talk page. Sorry about this as it's obvious it took a long time to build it all up. --A bit iffy 10:51, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi again. I've put a formal response on that Talk page. Actually, I suspect you're perhaps a bit put out about me deleting all that - if so, then sorry again. Also, I happen to know from personal experience it does take a long time to compile things like that because, curiously enough, I looked into (and started) doing something along similar lines but stopped as it was just taking too long. (It wasn't for Wikipedia, though, so if you're interested in my findings/thoughts you can contact me offline at z4eeotztit3c65m@jetable.net (which is just a temporary e-mail address valid for the next week only). Cheers, --A bit iffy 17:48, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. --Mais oui! 13:12, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Please ignore Mais oui!, he's the biggest edit war monger on Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.163.143 (talk) 14:31, August 30, 2007 (UTC)


 * How can I use the talk pages when Mais oui! keeps deleting my comments about the subject on his talk page? Mais oui! is stifling input and thought and censoring comment.    This is a blatant attempt at censorship through vandalism.


 * Mais oui! seems to have a problem with spoonerisms also, ref his comments regarding my user name, itself derived from a spoonerism. This is ignorance, and nothing to do with blatantly offensiveness.  Mais oui!, did you ever consider asking me where my user name originated?  Mais oui!, did you ever consider asking me my ethnic origin?  Mais oui!, did you ever consider entering into a discussion about my username?   No, no and NO!  Why don't you ask me about it?  I might just explain to you!  How about that? Darkieboy236 08:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

United Kingdom Location
A British company based in a United Kingdom is always based in the UK. The UK is the internationally recognised name of this country, not Scotland, England Wales nor Northern Ireland nor even Great Britain. I have no problem with any of the four regions being stated, but the UK must also be listed, as the UK is the official, legal and sovereign country name, like it or not. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and therefore must state accurate facts, not people's own personal preferences. In my humble opinion, this is a non-argument and the United Kingdom should take precedence. Darkieboy236 15:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Dear Darkieboy236, User:Mais oui! removed your message from his talk page on the grounds that he doesn't allow people with offensive user names to post on it. This is quite typical behavour by him if he disagrees with what someone has to say and he has no cogent argument to counter it. I have reverted the removal. A great many contributors agree with what you say, but Mais oui! is notorious for pushing his own POV to a degree amounting to obsessive compulsion - poor guy! 217.43.68.63 17:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Hi there Anon, Thank you for your message. My user name is derived from a spoonerism of my actual name, and has no racist or offensive actual meaning.  Your comments are much appreciated.  Mark. Darkieboy236 23:21, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. See WP:HARASS and WP:TALK, and please refrain from interfering with a user's legitimate management of his own talk page. .. dave souza, talk 22:08, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Re constituent countries + UK
Hi, just wanted to quickly post a message saying I agree entirely with your edit: the addition of UK is a good idea, on top of the named constituent country, for UK university info box fields. My reverts/edits of a user who was replacing the constituent country entirely (i.e. removing it, in preference for UK, which is POV pushing) were done quickly so I didn't have time to add it myself unfortunately. Basically: I agree that both should be listed. That way we avoid POV pushers and the article is factually correct. ColdmachineTalk 09:20, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Care needs to be taken not to clutter articles uneccesarily with the addition of "UK" just as a matter of principle. For instance London and Rotterdam in the article on Unilever are sufficiently well known not to need the addition of their countries - note the articles on these cities do not have the country in the title. For the very small number of people who may be confused, there is a difect link anyway. IMHO these country additions simply add clutter for no gain. :) Abtract 11:00, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Stating the UK is consistent with other Wiki FTSE 100 company entries and also accurate. The possibility it is cluttered is not an issue with regards the fact, but an issue with regards the layout of the page itself...perhaps this should be addressed? Other encyclopaedias would and do state "London, UK". There is no reason Wiki should be any different. It is essential to have consistency across Wiki and this Unilever article is now inconsistent. Darkieboy236 11:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Asthetics are important and sometimes more so than principles and consistency. Abtract 11:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Vodafone Following your recent message, please update the link 1, which results in an invalid page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jnason (talk • contribs) 16:01, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

WP:FLAGCRUFT
Please have a look at this page before plastering every single infobox with flags, thanks. --Barryob  Vigeur de dessus  23:37, 6 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I would say the same. Your additions at BAE Systems seem to add no encyclopedic value to the page. Please review the question I asked at Talk:BAE Systems. --John 16:15, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I third that! Please review my comments at Talk:BAE Systems also. Further BAE Systems' registered office is in Carlton Gardens, London. However a registered office does not have to be where a company conducts it business and in this case it isn't. BAE's HQ is in Farnborough, and that's what the infobox parameter is about.Mark83 16:38, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

"England" -v- "United Kingdom" on American Express
Please stop adding "United Kingdom" to the description nature of the American Express location. "Brighton, England" is correct as that is the location. "Brighton, United Kingdom" isn't correct because while "The United Kingdom" is the name of the country, it is not the name of a place. Adding "United Kindom" is also wrong because "Brighton, England, United Kingdom" is un-necessarily fussy in editorial. 87.127.44.154 12:52, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * INCORRECT. How can the UK not be the name of a place? The UK is the name of the country (a place) that I am from. The United Kingdom is the correct place as England is not a legal entity in itself.  The UK is correct because it is the official, legal and sovereign state that Brighton resides in.Darkieboy236 13:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * What on earth are you talking about? The United Kingdom is not a country and never has been.  It maybe a Nation State, but it isn't a country.  It is a nation state made up of the countries England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
 * And regardless of this, this section in the article isn't talking about a legal entity but about a location. The United Kingdom is not a location because it is shortened form of "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland".
 * Is Brighton in Northern Ireland? No.
 * Is Brighton in Great Britain? Yes.
 * What part of Great Britain? England.
 * If you think "England" is not a legal entity ask yourself why we have English law?
 * I do not want to breach the Three Revert Rule so I am seeking a third opinion from elsewhere. I don't know why you appear obsessed with unhelpful edits, but there is nothing to be gained by removing helpful locations to unhelpful locations.  England is the location.  87.127.44.154 13:50, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Correct: UK is shortened form of "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland". Correct: Brighton is not in Northern Ireland. Correct: Brighton is in Great Britain. Wiki itself states the following:
 * "The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (also known as the United Kingdom, the UK, or Britain)[7] is a country,[8], sovereign state and European Union Member State to the north-west of mainland Europe" on UK! Check your facts before you quote.
 * Correct: Brighton is in the England part of GB. However, Brighton is in the United Kingdom.  This is the official, legal and sovereign state.  Brighton is in the United Kingdom.  If England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland were countries in their own right they would be represented at the UN and EU as such, would have their own head of state and Prime Minister (and not a shared ones which are the Queen and Gordon Brown).
 * INCORRECT: We don't have English law. We have English and Welsh Law (Law in Wales Act 1535).  This law is applicable through GB except Scotland, which has its own legal system (with the exception of the House of Lords and possibly some other entities which have jurisdiction right across the UK.  This is comparable to other nations that have two or more legal systems in one country.
 * Furthermore, if England was a country in its own right, then I would have a passport issued by England and not a British passport issued by the GOVERNMENT of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. END OF STORY.  Darkieboy236 14:15, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * You are confusing "country" with "state". I will not argue this forever with you.  I am seeking advice as to how to take this issue for a wider WP community consensus 87.127.44.154 15:24, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * That's fine, I am quoting info from Wiki.   Take it to WP, that's fine, it's the Wiki community that has stated the info on the UK entry.  When I search your IP address it states "The IP address 87.127.44.154 is located in:
 * United Kingdom (United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland)". It does not say that you are in England, Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland.  That is because these are not the name of the sovereign country.  The UK is the one and only sovereign country on this island. Darkieboy236 15:37, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * But the reference in the article isn't about sovereign nation, it's about the location. And Brighton is in England. Sovereign nation, state, country or anything has nothing to do with WHERE Brighton is. 87.127.44.154 15:59, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Brighton is in the UK, England is not relevant. No argument. Darkieboy236 18:49, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

Since England is more specific it is preferred to UK in this instance. No argument. Abtract 23:25, 18 September 2007 (UTC)

You have reverted much the same edit 4 times in the last 24 hours and presumably are in danger of being blocked. You might like to consider that simplicity and clarity are preferred to pedantry and that yours is not the only view (despite signing off with "no arguement" and "END OF STORY". Abtract 10:59, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * People, users and contributors, have not expressed any confusion with the UK since the entry was first added. I see no reason why it should be changed to England, UK being the official, legal and sovereign entity.  If you continue to vandalise this entry then I will report you.Darkieboy236 11:20, 19 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Please do so. Abtract 15:37, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
31 hours for a 3RR violation. My usual entry level block is 24 hours but I have added a bit because you have signally refused to consider any compromise on this and because you haven't attempted to use the article talk pages to reach a consensus. When your block expires I strongly advise you to discuss contested changes on article talk pages rather than revert warring over your preferred version. Spartaz Humbug! 16:27, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Surely it is the responsibilty of the person that made the change to discuss and justify any changes made and not to keep changing an established article?Darkieboy236 17:34, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I hope we can work together to improve wp when yr block expires. I suggest that we find some way of opening a debate on the issue of how to define British places in order to get a consensus ... I have learnt the hard way that this is best. Abtract 21:56, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Procter & Gamble
Thanks for the helpful vivisection facts that you have added to this page. I can't see the ref for the first sentence on what they test on now though - currently ref 14. Can you point out the page in the document where it says that?Obina 19:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the feedback. I will check the reference for you, but will be tomorrow or even the day after as I am currently at work and don't have my primary sources to hand.Darkieboy236 19:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Great. The link to ref 14 on the page seems right - the title matches etc.  It does have many facts we can add - just not the one you have in the article now now. Also ref 15 is not a WP:RS as is - if you have more information like its title and where a copy can be inspected that would be helpful.Obina 22:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Bonekickers
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bonekickers, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://bonekickers.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ┌Joshii ┐└chat ┘ 23:25, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Counties of England
Hello there Darkieboy236,

I must bring to your attention our policy on the use of the counties of England on Wikipedia. Please read PLACE with much care and attention. This is an issue that can court alot of controversy. The use of "traditional counties" are, overwhelmingly frowned upon on Wikipedia, whilst saying "X lies within the historic county of Y" is using a neologism - something to be avoided; try to use the phrases "lies within the historic county boundaries of X" or "historically a part of Y", as this approach has prooved to cause the least amount of uproar and objection.

I hope that helps, --Jza84 |  Talk 23:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi
Hi Darkieboy236, I've noticed your edits to several Wigan articles recently and just wanted to say hi, as I live in Orrell and have worked on the Wigan pages in the past. I look forward to working with you in the future. Man2 (talk) 13:04, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Opus Energy
A tag has been placed on Opus Energy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Ecoleetage (talk) 12:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

{subst:adw|Opus Energy}} Ecoleetage (talk) 15:12, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Tennis article
Please stop changing the spelling of terms in the Tennis article to British spellings. The sport does not currently have "strong national ties" to Britain versus other nations. See this. Tennis expert (talk) 20:33, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Yep, even as a British English speaker, I'm with Tennis expert on this one. Tennis currently has no strong ties to the UK (apart from being founded there), and the rest of the entire article is in US English - there's no point in changing just one word to British English, and the article has been stable with US English for a while now, so changing the whole article to British English would be a bit silly. Dreaded Walrus t c 20:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. TestEditBot (talk) 16:51, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

KT is BRITISH
Why, KT Prefers to be known as scottish Plus, "Scottish" is more specific than "British". It's a bit like calling a Scotsman "English", it's very annoying. As soon as a Scotsman or woman does something positive [like the Curling team winning a gold medal], they're British, as soon as they fail a drugs test, they're Scottish, according to the London-based media of the UK. Best to call her Scottish all the time, and make everyone happy. --78.149.102.73 (talk) 23:28, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * It is irrelevant what she thinks. Her Legal nationality is British, when she goes abroad she uses a British passport and if she needs help abroad she goes to the British embassy.  Her nationality is a fact.  Darkieboy236 (talk) 23:31, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

I Understand she uses a british passport as she can not use a Scottish passport as it is a part of the United Kingdom. I Would find it fair to leave it at "Is a Scottish Singer" as the english singer have "Is an English Singer" shown, so why cant scotland (Plus they dont have Much). Please Leave it as Scottish singer plus it has been "Scottish singer" since the page has been created--78.149.102.73 (talk) 23:34, 8 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Singers listed as English should also be listed as British. How do you account for a person with a Scottish dad, English mother and born in Wales.  British is the only fair option.  Darkieboy236 (talk) 23:41, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

No it isnt fair. This has been brought up already at the dscussin page for KT Tunstall and wikipedia admins say to Keep it as SCOTTISH go and check it out. I Think the page has every right to remain as KT tunstall is a Scottish singer. --78.149.102.73 (talk) 23:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

Your edit to Alexander Graham Bell
Please see WP:MINOR for etiquette when you revert another editor, particularly the section starting with: Reverting a page is not likely to be considered minor under most circumstances. --Old Moonraker (talk) 12:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Barbarella (2010 film)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Barbarella (2010 film), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  TN ‑ X - Man  13:14, 11 September 2008 (UTC)

UK/Britain/Scotland etc
You seem to be on some sort of mission to assert UK over Scotland/England etc. In some cases this may be appropriate but not in all cases where the constituent country may be more relevant. You also came close to 3RR on Scotland which given your history could have resulted in a longer ban. Please be more circumspect. --Snowded TALK  22:17, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Trust us Darkieboy236. I've tried (months ago) to bring Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland & England articles into sync, under the UK. I didn't succeed. GoodDay (talk) 22:20, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I supported you in getting consistent language on the four country pages GoodDay, and we improved it. This is different however, Darkieboy seems to be trying to reduce the number of references to identity in the constituent countries.  Not something that you attempted.  --Snowded  TALK  22:26, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oops. My blunder. GoodDay (talk) 22:29, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thats OK.  By the way Darkiboy, I see you used English here, so hopefully you will respect the use of English, Scottish etc. elsewhere.   --Snowded  TALK  22:31, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Lincoln Lincolnshire
Recent revert. Hi I note you removed all of User Mrimp s edits as advert and pov. I think that may have been a bit harsh as the editor appears to be a new registered editor not an IP. please consider WP:please do not bite the newcomers, I often check out users edit history first. A note on the user page explaining why would be useful ( I note you did say WP:Good faith in your edit summary). I've added a welcome note to their page with a few tips on verification etc. (Agree a lot of it was of little value). But for example the road bit and some of the culture section.

I Also note you have created several Lincolnshire articles would you consider assisting WikiProject Lincolnshire by adding the WikiProject Lincolnshire banner to the talk pages of any suitable Lincolnshire related articles. As you are active at cleaning up article from Unsoured statements and advert rubbish, which is also prevalent in some of the other Lincs articles, along with a lack of references and a proliferation of Inline External links (often Averts). - Cheers BulldozerD11 (talk) 00:54, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Fair comment about my revert. Yep, will add the banner...another day, as going to bed now and busy tomorrow with Christmas Market weekend!  Dark. Darkieboy236 (talk) 01:20, 5 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for acknowledgement revert, and adding banner. Bit cold for standing on the market all day hope its busy for you.  - cheersBulldozerD11 (talk) 02:14, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Canals of the United Kingdom
Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any other tests that you may do and take a look at the welcome page, if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Ronhjones (talk) 23:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

English => UK
Like it or not English is still a nationality. Are you on some sort of campaign for this? --Blowdart | talk 10:25, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * BRITISH is the correct nationality. We cannot assume that everybody knows that England is in the UK. Darkieboy236 (talk) 10:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * So you'll be going through every US person and adding USA to their bio box? If they want to know more they can click though, that's what links are there for. --Blowdart | talk 10:34, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


 * People from the USA general have the city, state and USA listed. I don't see the problem with having Norwich, England, UK listed.  I won't be going through USA people because I am not interested in them.  BRITISH remains the correct and legal nationality of a British person, like it or not - an encyclopedia is for informing other people accurately - English/Welsh/Scottish/Northern Irish is not a legal nationality. Darkieboy236 (talk) 10:38, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
 * People from the US generally have the City and State, *not* the Country. Adding the UK is clumsy. Saying British is problematic, especially when you enter people into Northern Ireland. We've already been threw this with categories for NI. It's also part of self identity. MOS:BIO already acknowledges there is no standard, and until that happens then English/Scottish/Welsh whatever is acceptable. --Blowdart | talk 10:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Ribble Steam Railway
Hi. No, i'm not associated with the railway, however i'm very interested in it. A1personage (talk) 14:20, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Adding UK to infobox templates - stop this
Having apparently been repeatedly questioned on this by numerous editors and continued to do so, I'm now asking you to stop making these edits until they can be properly discussed. There is certainly no mandate to provide the "full and legal country" of origin in article infobox templates; there is only one England and if it is provided then that is sufficient to identify where a person is from. Infobox templates are meant to provide concise, at-a-glance comparative information only; they are not substitutes for legal documentation.

When an editor reverts a change you make, the next move is to discuss the issue to conclusion, not to merely provide a rapid justification and continue as you were. If you continue to mass-edit articles in this manner (especially edit warring with other users when they revert it), administrative action may need to be taken.

Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:52, 11 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Agreed and as mentioned above the UK is not the only case where the country isnt mentioned. George W Bush and Barack Obama just say town and state, they do not include the United States. However i do agree with ur concerns on nationality issues, i think it is very messy for people to choose if they want to mention someones British or Scottish but such things need agreement to change them on the talk page, otherwise people will just revert. BritishWatcher (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron


I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.

Ikip (talk) 00:58, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Medea International on disambiguation page
Thought you might like to know that I've removed the 'Medea International' entry from Medea (disambiguation). Feel free to add it again when you create the page, but until then, it's another redlink on a page that already has quite a few. Hope you don't mind. – Sasuke Sarutobi (talk) 14:45, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Harbinger Capital
A tag has been placed on Harbinger Capital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Manish EarthTalk • Stalk 11:24, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

ize v ise
You have fallen into a common error. ize or ise are acceptable in British spelling, see American and British English spelling differences. Cheers. Jezhotwells (talk) 08:55, 12 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, just to emphasize (re your recent edit to Patrick Moore) that Jezhotwells is quite correct. The OED itself gives -ize spellings in the first instance, then -ise spellings. Both are acceptable in British English; -yze spellings, however, are not (analyze, paralyze etc). Regards, Ericoides (talk) 09:57, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Sorry so late in saying welcome!
I am really glad that you added the Article rescue squadron template to your user page.

Please take a minute to sign your name to our list of 270+ members:
 * ARSM

Good news, we are building our first newsletter and should sent out this weekend, keep an eye out for it!

And a warm welcome to the squadron!

{| style="border: 4px solid #CC0000; padding: 6px; width: 80%; min-width: 700px; background: #FFFAF0; line-height: 20px; cellpading=30" align=center Hi,, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
 * colspan="2" |

LCH.Clearnet
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of LCH.Clearnet, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Clearing house (finance). It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page&mdash; you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
MLauba (talk) 13:52, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

West Britain
I've reverted your changes, because you haven't provided any references to support your claim that the term "West Britain" was used to describe Ireland. If you can provide verifiable sources, and can demonstrate that its use was sufficiently notable to be worth mentioning, then it will need to be reconsidered. Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:04, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Global Infrastructure Partners
A tag has been placed on Global Infrastructure Partners, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alastair Rae (talk) 18:18, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Wikilinks
Hi. Please see WP:OVERLINK before adding any more links. Thank you. --John (talk) 17:28, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * And kindly discuss your changes when reverting, rather than use edit summaries, as edit-warring is considered to be disruptive. I see other editors have mentioned this to you before, and if you do it again, you will be blocked for disruption. Rodhull  andemu  17:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Your edits
You have been asked by multiple users to stop. If you continue I will take the issue to ANI and seek a block. Jeni ( talk ) 17:40, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Also, I'm sure you won't mind me asking, and I'm sure you'll have a perfectly good explanation, but why are you posing as an administrator? You added administrator 4 days ago in this edit. Jeni  ( talk ) 18:22, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I would also like to know why you are displaying the administrator logo on your user page as I can find no evidence that you have administrator privilege. Please give a link to your WP:RFA or remove this misleading information from your your page. If no action is taken then you will be blocked for impersonating an administrator. Keith D (talk) 18:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Rescue
Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 13:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

V for Vendetta
The actors were American no? American film studio, released to an American audience. The common rhyme means little to warrant the article to be written in a British format. And when there are disputes over version of English formatting, it is customary to go with the original.--Iankap99 (talk) 04:12, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

The actors were largely British. It is based on a British comic. The writer of the comic was British. IMDB states the country as UK. It is about a British subject, set in the UK and paid for with British money. The date "the 5th of November" is how the date is depicted in the UK, which is the essence of the film. So, therefore, British dates. --Darkieboy236 (talk) 10:07, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Message from WikiProject Punk music
You are receving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile and move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Cheers

--Guerillero &#124; My Talk   03:16, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LTMX Group


The article LTMX Group has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Proposed name for an amalgamated entity that isn't going to come to exist.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <font color="#880088">PK <font color="#449900">T (alk)  18:34, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Marbles
The Jonnie Marbles article got deleted so be prepared for your article to come under deletionist attack :-) Francium12  17:42, 2 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Cheers. Darkieboy236 (talk) 17:48, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

It was deleted per an AFD discussion. Please do not recreate it unless the concerns raised in the discussion are no longer relevant due to some material changes in circumstances. A good way to think about it is to consider whether the people who said it should be deleted would now think that the objections were no longer applicable. Regards, causa sui (talk) 19:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Local date format on Rihanna
Hi,

You recently made several edits to Rihanna where you reversed month and day on several dates, mentioning the "Local date format" in your edit summaries. I just went and reverted your edits in one fell swoop, because (a) I skimmed through the refs and saw there were clearly predominantly month day, year; and (b) I know from WP:DATESNO that there's no comma included even when one does use day month year. Further, the article has been using month day, year, for quite some time now, so a change just seems wrong.

Now, I've started to have second thoughts, and I'm wondering if maybe you'd be right about changing to what may be the date format local to Barbados, if that's what you meant by local (I assumed you meant local to the article). Is that where you were aiming? And can you point to good arguments in favor of changing an article that's already solidly formatted in one way? Specifically, do you think Rihanna has "strong national ties" to Barbados, considering that she's lived in the U.S. for the last 7 years? Thanks, &mdash; JohnFromPinckney (talk) 15:40, 27 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Hi there, by local I did mean local to Barbados. Barbados follows UK date formats.  The reference may be local to the USA, which is the only country to use MDY.  Most other world countries use the UK format DMY (which is the more logical of the two).  My decision was based on the information on this page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Date_format_by_country.  Also, Barbados only has a tiny population and probably few who use Wiki and maybe not enough to influence rightly the decision on what date format should be used.  I find many UK articles written with the incorrect date format...it is just "Americanisation".  As America is the only country on the planet to solely use MDY and is the largest English speaking nation on Earth (I believe) then its influence (on Wiki) can be overwhelmingly biased.  I have previously changed a number of UK articles to DMY only for an American to change it back.


 * I would always suggest local format is the most appropriate to use in an article - the same goes for spelling. In the Rihanna article, spelling which is more UK than American is used.Darkieboy236 (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, if you check Barbados you will see that the date format is DMY. The comma after the month is just a grammatical addition, in my opinion.Darkieboy236 (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Absolutely Anything


The article Absolutely Anything has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:CRYSTAL WP:NFF

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gaijin42 (talk) 17:30, 26 January 2012 (UTC)


 * It is not a matter of substantiation of the information. It is that there are specific guidelines saying articles like this (movies so far in the future) should not exist. WP:CRYSTAL WP:NFF. Baically the python guys have said "hey we should do another movie". that is not enough to make an article about it, regardless of the level of coverage of that statement that can be found. Until the film is fully cast, and funded, and principal filming has been begun, we shouldn't have an article on it. Gaijin42 (talk) 19:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Absolutely Anything for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Absolutely Anything is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Absolutely Anything until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Basa <font color="CC9900">lisk inspect damage⁄<font color="CC9900">berate 22:31, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Golden Eagle, Lincoln


The article Golden Eagle, Lincoln has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I am unable to see why this pub warrants it's own Wikipedia article. It does not appear to be any more noteworthy than any other pub. This page also reads like an advertisement.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fraggle81 (talk) 01:57, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of St. Helens Reporter


The article St. Helens Reporter has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails to establish Notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mais oui! (talk) 06:33, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup
You are invited to "Come Edit Wikipedia!" at the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, July 27th, 2013. There will be coffee, cookies, and good times! -- Olegkagan (talk) &mdash; Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 03:26, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia Meetup
Help build the Wikipedia community in Southern California at "Come Edit Wikipedia!" presented by the West Hollywood Library on Saturday, August 31st, 2013 from 1-5pm. Drop in for some lively editing and conversation! Plus, it's a library, so there are plenty of sources. --Olegkagan (talk) &mdash; Message delivered by Hazard-Bot at 02:10, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link fixing one-day contest
I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Customer Service System for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Customer Service System is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Customer Service System until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <font style="color:#ffffff;background:black;"> the panda <font style="color:#000000;background:white;"> ₯’ 20:43, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Flair Leisure Products


A tag has been placed on Flair Leisure Products requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   23:48, 25 May 2015 (UTC)

This Thursday: Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center
You are invited to join the Women in Architecture edit-a-thon @ Getty Center in LA on October 15! (drop-in any time, 10am-4pm)--Pharos (talk) 18:25, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

July 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=730378812 your edit] to SoftBank may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Supercell 75%
 * author=Mike Rose|work=gamasutra.com}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:04, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

7th Annual Los Angeles Wiknic
It's the 7th Annual Los Angeles Wiknic! Sunday, September 30, 11:00-4:00 PM Pan Pacific Park, 7600 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90036 Hang out. Consume crowd-sourced BBQ! Bask in the glory of late September in Los Angeles (and the glory of our new user group, Wikimedians of Los Angeles). RSVP (and volunteer) here. We hope to see you there! JSFarman (talk) 02:50, 9 September 2018 (UTC) Join our Facebook group, or follow us on Twitter! To opt out of future mailings about LA meetups, please remove your name from this list.

Invitation to attend a Southern California Regional mini Unconference
Who: All Wikipedians & Wikimedians

What: Southern California Regional mini Unconference.

When: Sunday 3 March 2019, 2:00PM PST / 1400 until 4:10PM PST / 1610

Where: Philippe's at Chinatown, Los Angeles

Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host:

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, due to the limited size of the cafe.

(Delivered: 00:38, 10 February 2019 (UTC) You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list & the Los Angeles mass mailing list.)

Speedy deletion nomination of David English (cricketer)


A tag has been placed on David English (cricketer) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Jalen D. Folf  (talk)  17:00, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Southern California Wiknic & Bonfire invitation
<div style="; width: 550px; text-align: center; margin-right: 1em; border: 1px solid /777777;padding:0.5em 1.0em; background:#F5D020;background-image: radial-gradient(#74F2CE,#7CFFCB)"> Meetup-San Diego-September 2K19 Who: All members of the public

What: Southern California Wiknic & Bonfire.

When: Sunday 1 September 2019, 2:00PM PDT / 1400 until 10:00PM PDT / 2200

Where: La Jolla Shores

Sponsor: San Diego Wikimedians User Group ( US-SAN )

Your host:

Please add your username to our attendees list so we know how many will be attending, and please add your intended potluck contribution to the list.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject San Diego at 18:27, 1 August 2019 (UTC). You can unsubscribe from future invitations to San Diego Wikimedians User Group events by removing your name from the WikiProject San Diego mass mailing list, and from the Southern California meet-up group by removing your name from the LA meet-ups mailing list.

Draft:David English (cricketer) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:David English (cricketer), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:David English (cricketer)


Hello, Darkieboy236. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "David English".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 01:36, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

August 2020
Your recent editing history at Dani Behr shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:37, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year from Wikimedians of Los Angeles!
--JSFarman (talk) 02:08, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of James Lawrence Isherwood for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Lawrence Isherwood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/James Lawrence Isherwood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 01:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society
Dear ,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. &#x200B;

Best regards, Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 19:16, 29 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Gist Limited for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gist Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gist Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Kleuske (talk) 10:22, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Linde plc into Gist Limited. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 13:29, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of High Street, Lincoln


The article High Street, Lincoln has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The content has been copied into the Lincoln City Centre article and is more indepth while this one relies on outdated sources and is not as in depth. Propose deletion of the article or merging to Lincoln City Centre"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DragonofBatley (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

as you've stopped editing
<div class="boilerplate metadata" style="background-color:#E6E6FA; border: 1px solid #7D00B3; margin: 0.5em auto; padding: 0.5em; width:90%; text-align: center"> Removal from member list You have been inactive for more than 6 months and have been removed from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee birthday list. If you become active again please feel free to re-add yourself.

Best wishes,  Chris Troutman  ( talk )  19:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately I have been quite ill with pneumonia.
 * DB. Darkieboy236 (talk) 16:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)