User talk:David.Monniaux

It appears that the entry at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Mattlobato has been deleted on the basis of an alleged copyright violation. I would be grateful if the decision to delete this entry could be reviewed in the light of the following information:

In fact as soon as I received an allegation that an infringement of copyright may have occurred, this was immediately remedied and the content deleted, and an entirely new version replaced it without delay with notice to the party alleging infringement. However, notwithstanding this, the new content appears to have been mistakenly deleted, and this amended version did not contain any copyright material whatever. I hope this clears up any confusion in this matter and I trust that the deleted content may now be restored. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mattlobato (talk • contribs) 19:33, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4

Proposed deletion of Londonistan (term)
I have proposed this article for deletion, as I think that the use of the term apart from being a title of a book is non-notable. Of course it could just be that I have not heard this term used much myself, if that is the case please provide references showing when and how this term was used and by whom. -- Q Chris (talk) 07:49, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Charlene Cafritz AfD
I added a courtesy blank tag--figured that was your intention. Blueboy96 20:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Obelisk
Hello

You added a lead image to this page a while ago; there is a discussion on the lead image for this page here. You might want to comment...Swanny18 (talk) 16:20, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Jersey Legal French
Bonjour. C'est vrai? On dirait de nos jours en français de France sire Philip Bailhache? Merci pour le conseil. Man vyi (talk) 18:47, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * En fait, on dirait sans doute "Monsieur Philip Bailhache". Sire et messire sont de l'ancien français. Sir n'est pas du français, c'est pourquoi j'ai rajouté le "e", peut-être à mauvais escient. David.Monniaux (talk) 19:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Mon dictionnaire français-anglais (d'Oxford) donne "Sir James" comme traduction de "Sir James". Pour des journaux, Le Monde semble favoriser uniquement l'usage de "Sir" (avec majuscule) dans les titres britanniques ou du Commonwealth, tandis que Le Figaro semble basculer entre "sir" et "Sir"  . Je n'ai pas pu trouver "sire" dans des journaux français dans le contexte d'un titre britannique actuel. Man vyi (talk) 06:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Onboarding article
David - Accepting my own bias, having written three books on the subject, I do not think we should delete the "Onboarding" article. If you Google onboarding, you'll find 768,000 entries. It's a large and growing subject that is making a dramatic impact on the acceleration of new employees and reducing their risk of failure. Of all the Google entries, the Wikipedia article is the first one.

You made some comments about some parts of the article not seeming academic enough. I took out all the corporate references and embedded sales pitches for onboarding software. The books cited were published by Wiley, the world's largest business publisher, and the Harvard Press, part of Harvard University - both extremely credible publishers that believe this is an important topic. Watkins was a professor at Harvard and is now at Insead. He's looked at this subject from the academic side. I've been building a body of knowledge around this for 20+ years from both a business and research perspective.

Net, let's evolve and improve instead of deleting. The article is definitely helping some people.

George Bradt —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gbradt (talk • contribs) 15:37, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Barbara Stcherbatcheff
I fail to understand your deletion of Barbara Stcherbatcheff as A7. The article needed work, and was potentially a candidate for a deletion discussion, but the article did assert in the lead that she is a published columnist. The body also showed that she's a published author. A7, as I understand it is for when an article makes no attempt to establish notability. -Verdatum (talk) 16:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * We had complaints on OTRS about it, from its subject. If an article is of interest only to its subject and its subject's personal enemies, that's definitely a problem and probably indicates lack of notability. David.Monniaux (talk) 18:29, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I see nothing wrong with the version in Google's cache. --Apoc2400 (talk) 19:21, 13 August 2009 (UTC)


 * Earlier versions contained demeaning comments, and the subject basically had to have an edit war to get them removed.
 * I myself see something wrong with this cached article - it's a biography of a living person largely without sources. The only sources cited are primary sources (she once wrote articles for, proof: see magazine), her own personal web site, her employer's web site and so on. If you compare to, say, the biography of Charles de Gaulle, you'll notice that the latter has a multiplicity of sources.
 * Wikipedia is not a directory of professionals, including professionals involved in journalism. David.Monniaux (talk) 20:34, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
 * If it was an attack page, then I believe that's a G10, not an A7. If the sources are ungood, that is an AFD or prod, not a speedy.  Am I mistaken in this? -Verdatum (talk) 15:11, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

This was a OTRS action because of repeat edit wars with unflattering commentary in an article otherwise violating Wikipedia's rules because of absence of independent sources. Apart from that, I'm not into wikilawyering and red tape. David.Monniaux (talk) 15:43, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I can appreciate that, I'm just trying to confirm the situation so I know what to do next. I don't think there's any point in proposing undeletion, since attacks should remain stricken, and selective history deletes are a pain.  I suppose I'll recreate the article minus whatever content that fails WP:BLP and see where it goes from there. -Verdatum (talk) 21:04, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Heads Up
David, If you ears are burning it might be because of this which references this. Not sure What M's point is thought since it seems a perfectly normal edit but you should be aware that you are being discussed. Cheers Spartaz Humbug! 06:43, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
 * and here too. Spartaz Humbug! 06:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Florissimo 03.JPG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Florissimo 03.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 21:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Constitutional Council of France
The article Constitutional Council of France you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Constitutional Council of France for things needed to be addressed. Arsenikk (talk)  12:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Edinburgh Make poverty history dsc06375.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Edinburgh Make poverty history dsc06375.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 18:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Edinburgh Make poverty history dsc06375.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Edinburgh Make poverty history dsc06375.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Edinburgh Make poverty history dsc06375.jpg
The image is non-free. State the copyright of the photograph and credit the photographer, but this can be done without the templates. Images should not have both "free" and "non-free" templates. J Milburn (talk) 20:49, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe, but please do not remove copyright and photographer information. David.Monniaux (talk) 08:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello David.Monniaux! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 14 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:


 * 1) Frédéric Dutoit -
 * 2) Patrick Bloche -
 * 3) Christian Paul -
 * 4) Jean Dionis du Séjour -
 * 5) Robert Poujade -
 * 6) Walter Butler (French businessman) -
 * 7) Jean Arthuis -
 * 8) Jean Audouze -
 * 9) Édouard-Jean Empain -
 * 10) Leila Shahid -


 * 11. Jean Bricmont
 * 12. Jean Giraud (mathematician)
 * 13. Éric de Montgolfier

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Le Parisien 2005 03 21.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Le Parisien 2005 03 21.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 10:26, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Le Parisien logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Le Parisien logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sahar (TV station)
A tag has been placed on Sahar (TV station) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ܥܝܪܐܩ (talk) 07:56, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

École Polytechnique
David.Monniaux, would you be so kind as to contribute to the selectiveness discussion on the  École Polytechnique talk page? We have competing claims, but no hard evidence to back either of them up. I'm inclined to remove all mention of selectiveness entirely unless and until the claims can be properly bolstered MyPOV (talk) 15:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Clyster1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Clyster1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:17, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Association de la Régie Théâtrale
Dear David,

As you can read on my talk page, Foobarnix is willing to develop articles on French theatre around Jean Giraudoux. I found a very nice site : Architecture Topaze, Affiches... I saw that you have some experience in getting permissions for images and furthermore I assume from your professional page that you're in Paris from time to time (I live in Germany) and I was wondering if you could help contacting the Association de la Régie Théâtrale and trying to get some images from them into commons.

Many thanks for your help,

--Anneyh (talk) 07:07, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:HIA Percy.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:HIA Percy.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:36, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Florissimo 03.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Florissimo 03.JPG. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:03, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Ni Putes Ni Soumises cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Ni Putes Ni Soumises cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calmer  Waters  05:28, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TOUBON.GIF
 Thanks for uploading File:TOUBON.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:14, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Petillon drawing.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Petillon drawing.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

DRN discussion
Just FYI, there is a discussion going on at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard over a dispute about part of an edit which you made in 2005. Regards, TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 21:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

MSU Interview
Dear David.Monniaux,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:
 * Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
 * Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
 * All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
 * All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
 * The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 14:09, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Karen Russell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Russell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Karen Russell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 21:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Competitive examination


A tag has been placed on Competitive examination requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Vivek Rai (talk) 16:22, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Trust Bonvoisin Krief.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Trust Bonvoisin Krief.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:38, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:SuperLiar.png
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SuperLiar.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:58, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Happy 9th Wikipedia Anniversary to you :)
Hi David.Monniaux :) Greetings on your 9th Wikipedia Anniversary since your joining of Wikipedia on 13 September, 2003! Best Wishes. Regards and Happy Editing! TheGeneralUser (talk) 18:25, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Association for Computing Machinery logo.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Association for Computing Machinery logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Toulouse
Hi! Are you still in Toulouse? WhisperToMe (talk) 23:31, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:RDDV mecontent 573.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:RDDV mecontent 573.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:52, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Please see
Most recent talk entry at Paclitaxel. Your comments welcome, even before the edit being addressed appears. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 23:16, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Misinterpretation of sources about the status of Scientology
Hi,

After seeing this and that, I think you could help on this topic (I already asked for help here but to no avail).

Thanks. Apokrif (talk) 14:12, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

== Reminder: Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 31 December ==

''This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.'' I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 2,014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

''If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 2,015 deadline.''

Thank you,

Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

''Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 06:23, 22 December 2015 (UTC) • Access to nonpublic information policy/MassMessages/Follow-up notice to OTRS volunteers • m:Talk:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

== URGENT: Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 31 December ==

''This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.'' I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 2,014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

''If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 2,015 deadline.''

Thank you,

Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

''Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 20:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC) • Access to nonpublic information policy/MassMessages/Follow-up notice to OTRS volunteers • m:Talk:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

== URGENT: Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 31 December ==

''This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.'' I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 2,014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

Even if you have signed the confidentiality agreement for functionaries (general agreement), you must also sign the OTRS agreement to retain your OTRS access.

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

''If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 2,015 deadline.''

Thank you,

Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

''Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 21:48, 27 December 2015 (UTC) • Access to nonpublic information policy/MassMessages/Follow-up notice to OTRS volunteers • m:Talk:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

== URGENT: Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by 31 December ==

''This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.'' I wanted to follow-up on an message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 2,014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

Even if you have signed the confidentiality agreement for functionaries (general agreement), you must also sign the OTRS agreement to retain your OTRS access.

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

''If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 2,015 deadline.''

Thank you,

Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

''Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 08:39, 30 December 2015 (UTC) • Access to nonpublic information policy/MassMessages/Follow-up notice to OTRS volunteers • m:Talk:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

FINAL NOTICE: Please sign new Wikimedia confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information by TOMORROW
''This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation. Translations are available.'' I wanted to send one final follow-up on a message I sent you in September regarding the need for you to sign a confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 in order to maintain your access from Wikimedia to nonpublic information, and specifically to the OTRS system.

As you may know, the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees approved a new "Access to nonpublic information policy" on 25 2,014 after a community consultation. The former policy has remained in place until the new policy could be implemented. That implementation work is now being done, and we are transitioning to the new policy.

An important part of that transition is helping volunteers like you sign the required confidentiality agreement. All Wikimedia volunteers with access to nonpublic information are required to sign this new agreement, and we have prepared some documentation to help you do so.

The Wikimedia Foundation is requiring that anyone with access to nonpublic information sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 to retain their access. You are receiving this message because you have access to nonpublic information by way of the OTRS system and are required to sign the confidentiality agreement under the new policy. If you do not sign the new confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015, you will lose your OTRS access.

Signing the confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information is conducted and tracked using Legalpad on Phabricator. We have prepared a guide on Meta-Wiki to help you create your Phabricator account and sign the new agreement: Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

Even if you have signed the confidentiality agreement for functionaries (general agreement), you must also sign the OTRS agreement to retain your OTRS access.

If you have any questions or experience any problems while signing the new agreement, please visit this talk page or email me (gvarnumwikimedia.org). Again, please sign this confidentiality agreement by 31 2,015 to retain your access to nonpublic information. If you do not wish to retain this access, please let me know and we will forward your request to the appropriate individuals.

''If you wish to stop receiving these notices, you may remove yourself from this list. Please note that doing so will not prevent you from losing OTRS rights and access after the 31 2,015 deadline.''

Thank you,

Gregory Varnum (User:GVarnum-WMF), Wikimedia Foundation

''Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery, 09:31, 31 December 2015 (UTC) • Access to nonpublic information policy/MassMessages/Follow-up notice to OTRS volunteers • m:Talk:Confidentiality agreement for nonpublic information/How to sign

Autograv
Hi David, I was looking for images of gravimeters, and I found an entire category on commons of your photos. I would be about to use these images in a page on it.wiki, but I have to ask you a question before editing properly: I saw the gravimeter displaying the acceleration in mGal, showing an average value around 4000 mGal. I know that acceleration of gravity on earth is about 976-983 Gal, so I can't understand what the instrument was measuring while you took the pictures. Can you dispel my doubt please? If it's not too much trouble, answer me on my discussion page on it.wiki, here. Thanks--Samuele Madini (talk) 20:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC) Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give GIGN a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Requests for history merge. Thank you. Bradv 20:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins
Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers
Hi.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins) .MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes
 * Gnome-colors-list-add.svg NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67
 * Gnome-colors-list-remove.svg Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news
 * A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
 * Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
 * Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news
 * When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
 * Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
 * The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration
 * The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries
 * JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:38, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:8th RPIMa.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:8th RPIMa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Khaled Kelkal


The article Khaled Kelkal has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Laun chba ller 05:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Investigative news sources has been nominated for discussion
Category:Investigative news sources, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 21:40, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Superdupont.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Superdupont.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

You've got mail
Asking about an indefinite IP rangeblock you placed in 2005 which is showing up in Database reports/Rangeblocks. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:28, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
   

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:53, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sophia Antipolis


The article Sophia Antipolis has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The only 'source' for the entire article is a directory of organisations on an investment website, and it's written like an advertising fluff piece."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. St Judas the Lazarene (talk) 12:09, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Beauf


The article Beauf has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No references. Wikipedia is not a dictionary."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 05:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:02, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jean-Arnold de Clermont


The article Jean-Arnold de Clermont has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. jp×g 02:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Presipaute de Groland.png
Thanks for uploading File:Presipaute de Groland.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)

Message at Commons
Hi David. I have left a message on your talkpage at Commons. ErikvanB (talk) 14:18, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled
A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:05, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users
Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. —&thinsp;JJMC89 bot 00:01, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity
Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux  Talk 00:43, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

File:Armed insurgents, First Ivorian Civil War.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Armed insurgents, First Ivorian Civil War.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 08:47, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Glossary at Judiciary of France
Hi, David,

I can see that you aren't here very often anymore, but next time you pop in, could you have a look at Judiciary of France? I know that it's been a very long time since you wrote it, but I'm interested in the Judiciary of France section, and would like to spin it off into a new article, and expand it. However, I can't do that currently, as there are no citations. Do you have any recollection where you got these terms from? Was it a translation from somewhere? It doesn't seem to correspond to anything at fr:Organisation juridictionnelle (France). If you could find the source for those glossary terms, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 03:54, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Neuilly-Auteuil-Passy


The article Neuilly-Auteuil-Passy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable: This name for a geographical area has no official or administrative status and is not mentioned in any reliable sources."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Los Carayos for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Los Carayos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Los Carayos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. UtherSRG (talk) 17:47, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)