User talk:Diegotorquemada

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

If you have any questions, please feel free to write on my talk page. Cheers, Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 20:39, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Pages to read

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reference_desk

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Tutorial_%28Wrap-up_and_more_info%29

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Three-revert_rule

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Lamest_edit_wars_ever

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sign_your_posts_on_talk_pages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikiquette

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writers_rules_of_engagement

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoiding_common_mistakes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedians

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikifun

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Glossary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requested_articles

Graph Correction
Would you be able to correct this graph so it says July 2006 in the title, instead of July 2007? Thanks in advance. --  tariq abjotu  11:04, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Moonblood Split-Up
I guess it's better to write down split-up status? I'd want your opinion on it first though. :P Darksteel 16:09, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Done and done. I'm thinking about writing some articles on Moonblood's splits, tapes and rehearsals, post me a message if you want to help. Darksteel 12:57, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Hehe, yeah, anytime. i'm busy with school during the weeks and only have some free time on sundays, but pm me anytime if you need help. Kampfar definately needs it's place here. Darksteel 19:57, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Hey, thanks for the barnstar, it made my day :) –Gustavb 21:31, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Moonblood Blut und Krieg.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Moonblood Blut und Krieg.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 10:46, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Kampfar_logo.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Kampfar_logo.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:06, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Convergence of measures
Hello Diegotorquemada,

The use of the word "strong" in "strong convergence of measures" is just in keeping with the convention that a topology induced by a metric is "strong", whereas one induced by reference to a dual space/space of test functions is "weak". Since one may choose different (possibly inequivalent) metrics on a collection of measures, there are multiple strong topologies. Likewise, choosing a different space of test functions will give a different weak topology. This is further complicated by the fact that even a weak topology may be metrizable!

I would recommend any of the three references given at the end of weak convergence of measures as suitable for an introduction to this stuff.

Kind regards,

Sullivan.t.j 07:37, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Logistic growth
Thanks for checking my logistic model. The maximum rate of growth might well be a few months sooner as I said because I usewd 6 months averages. HenkvD 19:54, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your reply. One remark related to graph of the first derivative [[Image:Wikigrow firstderi.svg|thumb]]. The blue line should be a straight line as a first derivative of an exponential line is a straight line. HenkvD 12:47, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


 * No HenkvD, the exponential model is: $$y = \exp(at+b) = \exp(b)\exp(at)$$
 * And its derivative, $$\frac{dy}{dt} = a\exp(b)\exp(at) = a\exp(at+b)$$ is not a straight line, it also an exponential. It will be a line if this is plotted in a log scale.
 * Diego Torquemada 13:40, 7 April 2007 (UTC)


 * You are right. I was mistaken with a parabola. HenkvD 15:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia growth
I have replied on my talk page. Thanks. --Seattle Skier (See talk tierS) 21:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:SatanicWarmasterlogo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:SatanicWarmasterlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:02, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kampfar_band.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kampfar_band.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 09:56, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Kampfar logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Kampfar logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot (talk) 14:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Re:Moonblood page
You are correct that I don't have a clue of the relevance of this band - there's nothing in the article to help anyone to understand their relevance, hence the notability tag. I think you misunderstand what constitutes notability. Counting google hits is not a valid demonstration of notability. If you could edit the article to indicate how this band meet our notability criteria, that would be helpful. Thanks.--Michig (talk) 06:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Re:Metal logos
Nothing is decided on Wikipedia by 'boards', everything is decided by consensus. The acceptable way to use non-free logos in an article on a band would be inline, along with sourced commentary of the logo, as per the way it is used in Motörhead, Godsmack or Metallica, all featured articles. Note that many featured articles (including Slayer, Megadeth and Alice in Chains) don't actually feature any band logo, as, a lot of the time, it is just trivia, not overly relevent to the band and just further use of non-free media, which is something we should avoid using as much as possible. J Milburn (talk) 12:14, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Comparison of web conferencing software
I have nominated Comparison of web conferencing software, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Comparison of web conferencing software. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Beloved Freak  19:03, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Followup to Tacoma Narrows Bridge reversion
Specifically, where I reverted you and added a ref to the main article on the topic, I suggest you take a look at the recent editing history rather than just the last one before you revert an article, so you can see what was up. If you have an issue with my changes, please let me know by replying to this comment. Thanks. - Denimadept (talk) 22:50, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
 * That's because you are supposed to read the actual article which that section points you to. Do NOT revert that. - Denimadept (talk) 13:10, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

Requests for page protection
Hi, just a friendly note- when adding a request for page protection, please place the notice on the top of the page (I have fixed yours already). It will help us see your request more quickly. Have a great day! A8x (talk) 14:22, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Discrete metric
As the revision history of article Discrete space shows, you have entered the statement:
 * “the discrete metric $$\rho$$ on X is defined by
 * $$\rho(x,y) =

\left\{\begin{matrix} 1 &\mbox{if}\ x\neq y, \\ 0 &\mbox{if}\ x = y \end{matrix}\right. $$
 * for any $$x,y \in X$$. In this case $$(X,\rho)$$ is called a discrete metric space or a space of isolated points.”

without a reference. I'd like to doubt that there is one, because of all my understanding a metric $$d $$ with
 * $$d(x,y) =

\left\{\begin{matrix} c &\mbox{if}\ x\neq y, \\ 0 &\mbox{if}\ x = y \end{matrix}\right. $$ where $$c > 0 $$ should establish at least a "space $$(X,d) $$ of isolated points" as well, if not represent a discrete metric $$d $$. I would like to ask you courteously to add a reference.--Nomen4Omen (talk) 18:17, 27 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Moonblood


The article Moonblood has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non notable band, no reliable independent coverage"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 00:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)