User talk:Dissoxciate

Your submission at Articles for creation: Umngot River has been accepted
 Umngot River, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Umngot_River help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Rusalkii (talk) 23:51, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

thankyou! much obliged. Dissoxciate (talk) 00:08, 16 February 2022 (UTC)

BLP
Hi Dissoxciate, I have made a edit in Rahul Pandita & Vivek Agnihotri page about his self idenfication of his caste. There seems to be seem to be some confusion from my side regarding the same. Since the person has self identified himself which is in accordance to Wikipedia BLP Policy Please refer the link mentioned for the same and it is not Original research

Could you please provide the reason for removing the same. Thanks, Pranesh Ravikumar Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 12:42, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Even if a person has identified himself as belonging to a certain caste, you're not supposed to insert castes of people into Wikipedia unless WP:RS indicate that caste is important to their notability. A person might have several personal claims concerning himself, but that doesn't necessarily equal significance on Wikipedia. It's not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist. Furthermore, biographies of living persons should be written with extra care and intricacy, therefore addition of content such as yours adds undue weight to those articles, WP:UNDUE. Please stop adding back the same edits over and over again. Thanks, Dissoxciate (talk) 13:41, 18 March 2022 (UTC)


 * With self-identification like that, it's highly likely that admins will see your reverts unfavorably. My suggestion would be to drop this. Hemantha (talk) 02:17, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

I see your point. This topic is a huge mess, either way. Dissoxciate (talk) 03:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Hi Dissoxciate,

I have currently removed my two edits about self identification of their caste for further clarification. Based on your recent conversation with Hemanata i think we could proceed to add the same since it is self identified by the person itself.

Thanks Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 07:36, 19 March 2022 (UTC)


 * FYI: Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics/Archive 49 — DaxServer (t · m · c) 11:12, 19 March 2022 (UTC)

Notice
— DaxServer (t · m · c) 20:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wei Sawdong Falls has been accepted
 Wei Sawdong Falls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Wei_Sawdong_Falls help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! RPSkokie (talk) 06:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

thanks for informing! Dissoxciate (talk) 06:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

Invite

 * this seems interesting, just joined! thanks for the invite. Dissoxciate (talk) 14:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Chenrezig Statue Cum Skywalk has been accepted
 Chenrezig Statue Cum Skywalk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Chenrezig_Statue_Cum_Skywalk help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Atlantic306 (talk) 00:59, 27 April 2022 (UTC)


 * thanks for the info! cheers.Dissoxciate (talk) 05:27, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Changey Falls has been accepted
 Changey Falls, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Changey_Falls help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Theroadislong (talk) 00:28, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kagyu Thekchen Ling Monastery has been accepted
 Kagyu Thekchen Ling Monastery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Kagyu_Thekchen_Ling_Monastery help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Gusfriend (talk) 07:15, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Invite to Animal Rights Wikiproject
Hi. Hope you’re interested in contributing to Animal rights–related articles in Wikipedia. If so, I would like to invite you to add your name under the “Participants” section in WikiProject Animal rights. Cheers. Bhagya sri113 (talk) 08:20, 12 May 2022 (UTC)


 * yes, i'm interested to contribute. i'll join. thanks for the invite! Dissoxciate (talk) 09:11, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Singshore Bridge, Pelling has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Singshore Bridge, Pelling. Thanks! Gusfriend (talk) 02:04, 13 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi, I checked your comment! So as far as I could find, to answer your first question; it appears that the bridge is primarily for pedestrians. However, light vehicles can cross the bridge as well. This reference discusses it, and a number of tourist reviews elsewhere state the same. For the second question, although there isn't any forthright statement addressing the question, from most references provided it can be made out that the bridge was constructed with the exact purpose of reducing the time and distance between the two gorges (and connecting those two hills), which implies there wasn't any lower bridge prior to its construction. I couldn't find any numbers for the third question, unfortunately. Although all references are consistent on the claim that the bridge attracts significant footfall, none provide any numbers.


 * There's also one discrepancy that has come to my attention, so I'd request you to review that. The reference(s) I've used in the article mention that the bridge was built 'in the early 2000s', but the aforementioned reference states that it was inaugurated in 1993. I'm not sure which to go by. Please address this. Thanks! Dissoxciate (talk) 08:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Singshore Bridge, Pelling has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Singshore Bridge, Pelling. Thanks! Dwaipayan (talk) 00:30, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi @User:Dwaipayan. I checked your comment and it does turn out that the claim is dubious, I felt so too while writing the article. Although most reliable sources claim it is the second highest bridge in Asia, I can't seem to find any leads which specify if it's the second highest pedestrian bridge in the continent. Ergo, I've removed that part. Please check back and let me know! Thanks. Dissoxciate (talk) 07:59, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Singshore Bridge, Pelling has been accepted
 Singshore Bridge, Pelling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Singshore_Bridge,_Pelling help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Dwaipayan (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: JetSetGo (September 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DGG were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:JetSetGo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:JetSetGo Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:JetSetGo reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 DGG ( talk ) 06:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

fair enough. thanks for the response! Dissoxciate (talk) 12:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

AfC versus create direct
Authors with experience in creating articles may choose to not go through AfC, which has a backlog of drafts waiting for review. Risk for creating directly is that a person at new pages patrol may Speedy delete or start an AfD rather than just revert the article to draft if in their opinion not good enough to be accepted. David notMD (talk) 12:40, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for this, David notMD. So far, I've only created articles using AfC (except i believe 3 on certain species). Since the procedure is fairly time-consuming (and since I've gained a certain level of experience on here), I decided to create an article directly (ofcourse, not before assessing its notability). But the risk, as you said, always remains. Which is why I wanted it to get reviewed, and hence, my inquiries.

Should I just leave the article as it is for now, then? Dissoxciate (talk) 12:46, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * I am not an AfC reviewer nor a NPP participant. David notMD (talk) 13:26, 11 December 2022 (UTC)


 * fair enough. Dissoxciate (talk) 15:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:JetSetGo
Hello, Dissoxciate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:JetSetGo, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 11 February 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:JetSetGo


Hello, Dissoxciate. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "JetSetGo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Santhal Family has been accepted
 Santhal Family, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Santhal_Family help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:33, 23 March 2023 (UTC)


 * thanks! Dissoxciate   (talk)  15:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Abraxas irrorata
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Abraxas irrorata, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:18, 11 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abraxas_irrorata&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1159689816%7CAbraxas%20irrorata%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Mentioning caste in a "Biography of a Living Person"
Do not add caste in a WP:BLP article if it is not self-identified by the subject per WP:CASTEID policy period. Doesn't matter if you have 1001 sources where third-parties mention the subjects caste, they wouldn't be applicable. Failure to comply with the policy is disruptive editing/edit warring. But, you can add caste in articles of dead people, using a WP:RS ofcourse. Thanks. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

A fox for you!
Thank you so much for being a contributor. Your edits and pages are greatly appreciated! :-)

SomebodyNamedAlex (talk) 03:59, 15 June 2024 (UTC) 


 * @SomebodyNamedAlex, thankyou for the fox! much appreciated :) Dissoxciate   (talk)  12:02, 15 June 2024 (UTC)