User talk:Dougsim

Ringing
Hi, I've redone your edits to Bell>Ringing. English-style clappers move faster than the bell and strike roughly horizontal going up. If a clapper is on the other side of the bell it is termed "going up wrong" and has the reputation of leading to cracked bells. It's certainly far harder to stand the bell and you get a distinctive double strike when it's up wrong. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 11:06, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!


Hello, Dougsim, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎)

Central Council of Church Bell Ringers
Someone else has proposed this page for speedy deletion. I thought you should know. 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 21:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi Dougsim. I've fleshed out my ideas from CCCBR a little at talk:campanology. I've left things open for a week (in part to ensure I'm not accused of WP:OWN or similar). Any comments would be appreciated. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 23:20, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Governor (device), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page PID. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:57, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Oct 2016 Edits on Control theory
Good morning. You recently added a section on PID control to the article on Control Theory. There was already a section on PID control further down in the article. I suggest that you merge your new content with the older content in whichever position it makes the most sense. Cheers. Constant314 (talk) 15:51, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Programmable logic controller into Automatic control. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 00:00, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Copyright issues
I know it was not your intention to commit a copyright violation, but you inadvertently did so with this edit, though it is not that difficult to work out where the text came from. When using text from elsewhere in Wikipedia it is important that the source article is identified correctly in the edit summary. This is to preserve the attribution for the purposes of the CC BY-SA 3.0 copyright licence.

I have fixed the issue for you so you do not need to do anything. 86.186.169.144 (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Church bell
Hi Doug. I note that you are including sanctuary bells in the "Church Bells" article and hence saying that bells are heard within the church. I suspect a lot of readers will think of the big tower bells when seeing "Church bells", and indeed most of the article is about them. In many churches the tower bells cannot be heard inside the church either at all, or when there is any speaking or singing – let alone if the organ is being given its head! I wonder if you would like to recast the first sentence of the lead to split the two usages? I'd wade in myself but you are doing a good job here and I don't like trampling on another editors work. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 09:44, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bell, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Tuning and Zvon. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Grandsire bobs and singles.png
Thanks for uploading File:Grandsire bobs and singles.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 20:45, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

Doug, I've removed the di-no notice from the above file now that you've provided self. Regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 21:38, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

I maent to upload to commons, but it went into WP by mistake. Just on with Albert pitman and john holt at the moment. Dougsim (talk)

July 2017
Your addition to International Radiation Protection Association has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:26, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

File:St Bees bells in up position.jpg
Hi Doug. Is it my imagination or are numbers 2 & 3 up "wrong" in the photo? Quite possibly only experienced ringers will notice, but if you get a chance to retake the photo you might want to ensure the bells are up right. BTW, number 7 looks as though she's at balance point rather than set. This may be the camera angle though. Kind regards, Martin of Sheffield (talk) 22:26, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

The photo was taken a number of years ago, and I did notice it only recently. You are the first other to notice and contact. I will post a more correct photo when convenient, but as not many people even knows what this means - until they start ringing, when they are correctly instructed, I don't think it is an urgent issue. I have been talking to one of the UK's leading authorities of bell tuning, and I hope to get those contributions on WP better sorted out in the future. Dougsim (talk) 13:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

I totally agree it is not urgent, just a niggle for those in the know! There is certainly no rush. We started to talk about a reorganisation a couple of years ago (see Talk:Campanology), but I got side tracked and I think you were involved in detail work. It might be a starting point though? BTW, your expert. If he's the gentleman who introduced computer tuning to Whitechapel, then I've rung with him. He is indeed very knowledgeable. Martin of Sheffield (talk) 14:39, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Piror view from quad.jpg


The file File:Piror view from quad.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, low resolution. Better photos at Commons:Category:St Bees Priory."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kelly hi! 15:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Whitehaven, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carlisle ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Whitehaven check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Whitehaven?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

Edits to Metrology
Hello! When you made your edits to the Metrology article you added a reference to cipm_106 however it is giving a citation error. I took a quick look at it but could not easily remedy the problem. Do you have the material that you were referencing easily available to fix the citation issue? Thanks -- Imminent 77   (talk)  15:15, 23 November 2018 (UTC)

Akane Yamaguchi
Hello. Help copy edit for article. Thanks you. Cheung2 (talk) 08:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Chernobyl explosion crater recreation
Hi Dougsim. I'm glad you appreciated my GIF of the Chernobyl explosion crater. Have you seen < > that the GIF was clipped from? The link was on the Chernobyl disaster page below the GIF for a few days before it was taken down by another wiki editor, reason - spam/ not reliable source (which I can't really contest). I am busy upgrading my computer animation skills so I can produce an animated sequence of the actual explosion showing how it happened and what it looked like. I'm trying to establish what happened in small explosion no.1 and then massive explosion no.2 to keep the re-creation as accurate as I possibly can. --Tadpolefarm (talk) 09:37, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:00, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:38, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:39, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Chernobyl disaster lead
Hi Dougsim, I wanted to thank you for further improvements to the lead section of Chernobyl disaster, especially for the improvements to my wording - it flows much better now, I feel.

I also wanted to give you a heads up that I effectively undid two of your edits: Both changes are part of larger edits that should contextualize them too. But I'll be happy to hop into a discussion on the article's talk page if you disagree.
 * I removed the mention of the emergency systems again, as they would have been immaterial to the accident anyway (but just mentioning them implies otherwise).
 * I removed the word "automatic" when discussing the reactor shutdown, as that action was manual.

Thanks, Pasky (talk) 23:12, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ionizing radiation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fission. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
You get kitten Kitten good

BobThyMostMightiestbuilder (talk) 13:46, 5 May 2021 (UTC) 

Disambiguation link notification for October 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Electronics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antenna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Scafell
When tweaking existing prose, please take a moment to check that what you've done reads well and is grammatical. I've fixed this now. Pam D  10:07, 2 November 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Electrical power distribution
Template:Electrical power distribution has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:17, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)