User talk:DuKot

Template:Current U.S Senators
While your ambition is much appreciated at Wikipedia, your template is very large and blocky; thus, it does not contribute much to Wikipedia articles. It has already been requested for deletion, an action which I agree with.

Please hold off adding this template to further senator's articles. --tomf688 (talk) 05:39, Apr 3, 2005 (UTC)

Tag on Template:Tfd
I have not seen your handle around the recent dust-up about adding tags to template bodies, so I think it's possible that you might allow me to fill in some background for you. If you are already aware of all the issues, and have taken sides, please forgive me. It is your right to choose to be partisan. But on the offchance that you are not, I beg your indulgence as I recap the debate.

Netoholic has spoken strongly against templates which include other templates; he wrote a long opinion piece on the subject and tried to force it into policy over considerable objection, even over attempts by sympathizers to improve the opinion. I wrote a factual rebuttal to the opinion, to which he failed to respond -- directly.

In place of direct discourse, he has systematically nominated for deletion a series of templates which I created -- one of which I used in the text of my rebuttal, in fact. He has nominated both useful and foolish templates with an equal hand. In each case, he has insisted that the only proper way to perform such a nomination is to insert the {tfd} tag into the body of the nominated template. This is a bad idea in many cases, perhaps all. At the least, it creates exactly the sort of trouble he himself has spoken against.

My every attempt to reason with him have failed. He refuses to accept insertion of {tfd} into the nominated template's Talk page as a workable substitute for insertion into body. He is strident on the subject, upholding this principle with fervor. This is all the more surprising since he himself raised the issue of tag insertion last year.

I have nominated Template:Tfd itself for deletion, since it does more harm than good. Netoholic continues to insist -- and demonstrate -- that {tfd} must be included in the body of every template nominated, which leads inescapably to the conclusion that it must be included within {tfd} itself. In a perfect world, this would generate a {tfd} tag of infinite length, as every instance of {tfd} would include yet another instance. In practice, the MediaWiki engine prevents this (or so I assume; I shall not put it to the test, lest I be wrong). But, in accordance with stated and vigorously upheld procedure, I have inserted (directly, not by reference) the tag {tfd} into the body of Template:Tfd.

Please do not remove this tag. It is inserted in strict accordance with established procedure. If you think this is a bad idea, then I suggest you comment in the proper place for such comment. If you think the matter absurd, then I ask you to reflect on the evils inherent in reliance on authority over good common sense. Thank you. &mdash; Xiongtalk 18:15, 2005 Apr 5 (UTC)

template for U.S. federal representatives
Hi - I see you've created the generalized version of the template I've proposed. There's some discussion on this at Wikipedia_talk:Avoid_using_meta-templates which hasn't really converged to a consensus yet. Can you work on something else for a while pending a consensus on this? Feel free to join the discussion. Thanks -- Rick Block 20:26, 12 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Images
Hi, just wanted to offer a few hints. First of all, you should note the source of your images (it looks like many of them were taken off of House websites, but I can't be sure). Second, you should be sure to tag them with licensing information; for example, you can put on public domain govt. photos. Thanks for all the contributions. Best, Meelar (talk) 19:33, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)


 * OK, thanks. I've always found it easier to add when uploading, but do as you see best. Yours,Meelar (talk) 19:38, Apr 13, 2005 (UTC)

TFD subpages
Hi there. I noticed that you created a subpage for a TFD vote. While I appreciate your good-faith effort to ensure that WP:TFD was clean, please don't make subpages for votes. The reason for this is that when the voting process is over, that page can't be deleted because it holds information in the history about who voted what.

No hard feelings :) Thanks for trying to improve WP:TFD! If TFD ever gets big enough to switch to subpages, then you can feel free to make as many as you want :) See you around! -Frazzydee|&#9997; 01:05, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Why did you link to an archive? This causes inconsistency in the log. -Frazzydee|&#9997; 18:09, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Template:Current U.S. Senator
Well, considering that the consensus appears to be keep, changing my vote is moot. The smaller text and columns make the template less obtrusive, but I still think the colors make it look rather unpolished and are unnecessarily redundant, but c'est la vie. older ≠ wiser 01:20, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)

Speedy deletions
Please check the grounds for speedily deleting an article: Criteria for speedy deletion. Mel Etitis ( &Mu;&epsilon;&lambda; &Epsilon;&tau;&eta;&tau;&eta;&sigmaf; ) 21:34, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Lists of Stalinists
Sorry, but I cannot find any list or category for StalinistsTDC 23:23, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

I am having a problem here and am feeling like an idiot. What I want to do is place a template with lists and categories similar to the other political subsets, but I am having formatting issues. TDC 23:31, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

Since the category you referred to does not seem to exist, could you clarify your vote? Gazpacho 01:45, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

Family Ties
Um, why did you revert me without discussion? The page, quite frankly, looks ugly now with that picture just dangling there at the bottom. Mike H 20:06, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)


 * No problem. The picture can go back if more stuff is written on the show. As it is now, though, there's just no space for it. Mike H 22:34, Apr 20, 2005 (UTC)

Ranking
Personaly, I like the idea, however I had a simmilar suggestion that failed. People dont want ranking primarily because of the prospective abuse. I personaly dont agree. Cat chi? 10:18, 21 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Ranks look fun. One hint is that you might like to use forward slashes (/) for your subpages. There's a couple of technical advantages, as the software recognises them as subpages. &mdash; Matt Crypto 15:48, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

rfd on redirects for Congressional Delegation templates
I created 2 redirects to fix broken links on the templates and these are now in Redirects for deletion. Since you put these templates together, I wanted to let you know. NoSeptember (talk) 21:20, 5 Jun 2005 (UTC)

India images
Works of the Indian government is not in Public Domain. Please do not assume this. The Copyright Act 1957 copyrights Indian Govt. works for sixty years. Also, the Rail image is a .gif format, unsuitable for Wikipedia. = Nichalp ( Talk )= 06:43, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikiproject Indian states
Nice Kerala portal. You might be interested in conforming Kerala-locations to Wikiproject Indian states and Wikiproject Indian cities. Thanks. =Nichalp  «Talk»=  07:40, July 12, 2005 (UTC)

Wilson Image


What's the source for this image? Can you note that and the copyright status on the page?

Molotov cocktail
Hi DuKot,

Whilst I have no problem with you replacing the image on the Molotov cocktail page (the painting was far from perfect), the image used to replace it does have quite a few problems. The main one being that you haven't given it a copyright tag. Fortunately it has a source link, but that page at the CQ Press suggests that all the content is copyright. Also, although it was probably accidental, it wasn't the best idea to use the same filename as the image on Commons. Fortunately the only other place the Commons image appears to be being used is on the Dutch Wiki, so the shadowing problem isn't too critical. -- Solipsist 08:12, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Not sure what you mean by replacing an older image. There was no image before in the Molotov cocktail page. I dont see any other image also in the history of the Image:Molotov_cocktail.jpg page. Please advise. --DuKot 15:40, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * You're right - it looks like a coincidence. It was an image I added two days ago, but it looks like it was someone else who reverted it. You can find it if you back up two steps in the edit history - except it is confusing, since it now shows up as the image you added, since the Commons version is now shadowed. Its not much of a problem if the new image can be tagged with a free license. I'd also agree with Gfad1s revert comment that the bottle-face on the other image is a little odd. -- Solipsist 16:16, 31 July 2005 (UTC)
 * Now it makes sense --DuKot 22:13, 31 July 2005 (UTC)

MyDD icon
Hi. I noticed that your upload of the MyDD icon lacks copyright notices. I'm guessing it'd be on the MyDD page. Guettarda 14:18, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

delegations
You should merge the "current" delegation (by state) pages with the list of past delegations for that state. We don't need two separate pages. -- Netoholic @ 07:20, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
 * I disagree. To find current members in the list of all delegations you have to browse all the way down. This is a much cumbersome process for a person who would be trying to find the currentnly serving members of the U.S. congress. Anyways in the page Current state delegation there is link to past delegations. So if somebody is looking for that information it is already available. --DuKot 08:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

U.S. Congressional Delegation from Michigan
This currently is in Category:Government of Michigan, but that is incorrect. The U.S. Congressional delegation has no official role in state government. I don't understand how the template works to be able to change it. A more appropriate single category would be Category:Michigan politicians or else it should go in the more specific categories for Category:U.S. Representatives from Michigan and Category:United States Senators from Michigan. older ≠ wiser 16:23, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Kerala Catergory
I found you very active in Kerala related Articles. I thought, I can have your opinion. Do you think there are lot of Articles in Category:Kerala. ? I think Category:Kerala should contain only sub categories regarding Kerala, just like Category:India.

btw, Is there any wiki group for Kerala editors ? -- Soft coder  Talk 08:50, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

FAC
Hi DuKot, I wanted to let you know that the Political integration of India is now FAC. I hope you will have some time to consider the work and give it an up or down vote. Please don't consider this soliciting - I'm requesting your participation. Thanks! Rama&#39;s Arrow 04:31, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Naming convention for districts
A couple of days back you posted a question on India portal. I found the answer to question on the WikiProject Indian districts.

"In many cases a district and its headquarters share the same name. For example, Mysore is the name of a city, district and division. For such cases, contents of the district should be added to Mysore district and the division should be added to Mysore division. Thus Mysore will be having only matter relating to the city. However all three should be linked in the respective articles.

Please note: the word district should be with a small d."

- Ganeshk  ( talk ) 00:16, 4 February 2006 (UTC)

Userbox for all IITians
We need to consolidate all IITians in one category. Please add this userbox. user iit deeptrivia (talk) 14:29, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Indian_Railways_Map.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Indian_Railways_Map.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 12:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Lets bring all Kerala Wikipedians under one list
Hello! I've created a template Template:User KERALA wiki as well as a category, Category:Kerala_Wikipedians in an effort to bring together all the Kerala Wikipedians. I believe there are no such existing categories. So, please add either the template (which will automatically add the category) or the category to your userpage. Thanks! thunderboltz 06:01, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Huh?
I think there's a bit of confusion here regarding Template:Current U.S. Senators. I made the template font smaller, not bigger. I'm reverting because I think you made a simple error in judgement. In case I'm wrong, please hold off on reverting back and let's discuss the matter on the template's talk page instead, okay? As it's a fairly well used template, a revert "war" would be a very, very bad thing. See you around! Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk? ) 07:02, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm using Internet Explorer (6.0) and the default skin. I can't imagine why it's appearing bigger for you... actually, maybe that's why the template was too big in the first place--because you didn't realize that it looked weird to other people. Anyways, I looked at the talk page, and it seems that many other people had the same problem I did with the older version of the template, so I think my version probably will end up helping out more people. Your thoughts? Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk? ) 07:10, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * That's a good point. I'm getting tired and wanting sleep, so I'm not going to do it tonight, but a poll is a very good idea. We could post something on the Village Pump about it (to draw attention from all sorts of browsers) and see which template people like best. Matt Yeager ♫ ( Talk? ) 07:15, 16 March 2006 (UTC)


 * I have re-done the template, using  instead of the apparently made-up  . Mind taking a look and seeing if you like it? Matt Yeager <b style="font-size:medium; color:#B46611;">♫</b> ( Talk? ) 04:36, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Kerala_thumb.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kerala_thumb.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 17:08, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Kottayammap.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Kottayammap.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this:.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 19:51, 20 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:NSG1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:NSG1.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ( T / C ) 18:43, 25 March 2006 (UTC)

Review request
Hi! I've put the Kochi article up for a peer review. Could you please see the article and post your comments here? Thanks!-- thunderboltza.k.a.D e epu _ Joseph 10:15, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

Invitation and Recommendations for writing articles on Hindi Wikipedia
<blockquote style='border: 1px solid blue; padding: 2em;'> Hindi wikipedia invites and welcomes Wikipedians to contribute for the cause of spreading knowledge and the Hindi language. This page contains guidelines for writing a wiki-article on any topic at the Hindi Wikipedia, with special recommendations for writing in Hindi (Note: The script/font-family for Hindi is Devanāgari; the script/font-system for English is Roman script, also, the Hindi spelling system is not completely standardized). This article is yet in English language (mostly), in order to encourage even non-native/foreign people who have learnt/are learning Hindi to contribute to the Hindi wikipedia, and native Hindi speakers who normally write in English. The examples given below are only for explanation.

Recommendations:
 * 1) Firstly for proper viewing, it is recommended to keep all links NOT-UNDERLINED. Otherwise the मात्रा below the Hindi alphabets might get partly hidden behind the underlines. For this, please go to My Preferences (मेरी पसंद) at the top of the page, then click Misc., and then choose "underline links -> Never". Save your settings. Also, do not click yes for "justify paragraphs", otherwise on some browsers, the devanagari script will appear highly distorted.
 * 2) All users are requested and encouraged to contribute articles here, especially, to create new articles on general topics. They are also encouraged to expand the existing articles, and improve upon them. A non-user can also do the same; it is recommended but not required to register yourself as a wikipedian user at the Hindi wikipedia. As far as possible, each article should be written with a Neutral Point of View (NPOV)—no nationalistic or partiality or hatred based articles are welcome. The articles should be based on facts—and appropriate references should be provided as and where needed. See the English wiki's help page for editing in general. Almost all the general wiki-features are available for editing on Hindi wiki too. Guidelines for the content matter is mostly the same as given in English wiki.
 * 3) Since the Hindi wiki is at its initial stages, users are welcome to take introduction and basic points from the English (or another) wikipedia's corresponding article and translate them for small articles. An in-page link to the English wiki's article will be deemed sufficient for references (a template might be created stating this). For longer articles, it is recommended to mention the references separately.
 * 4) Since most computer users in India and elsewhere have the standard Western-type keyboard, it is best recommended (but not necessarily required) to use the virtual (software) keyboard like the one of Hindimozhi or of ISIS (Tavultesoft Keyman)—which are freewares. These are advantageous because the contemporary Hindi-speakers in India often write messages/chat using Hindi words but written in Roman (English) script, and the layout of these keyboards is quite the same that such people use. For example, using the "normal" keyboard with this software, typing ga would give ग and ghaa would give घा.
 * 5) Create the article with its name written in Hindi (devanagari script). Always take care to include the nukta (dot below) for foreign / Urdu loanwords wherever it occurs in the standard spelling. For non-Indian names, use that spelling (for article name and other words) which is commonly encountered in Hindi newspapers, G.K.-books, Hindi-dubbed TV documentaries and Hollywood films and magazines. e.g., America-अमरीका (या अमेरिका), China-चीन, French-फ़्रांसिसी. For English acronyms/short-forms, use the initials in Roman script, and again create a full form in Hindi and redirect it to the short form. e.g. IPA (अन्तर्राष्ट्रीय ध्वनि वर्णाक्षर); UNO (संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ). Doing the opposite is also fine. But creating the article with the Hindi short form, as सं०रा०सं०, is not recommended. Also, the article proper must be written with the proper nukta, as फ़ारसी, and then, a non-nukta (mis-)spelt version फारसी should preferably be created to redirect to the correct spelling.
 * 6) Hindi wikipedia strongly recommends the users to write articles in everyday common Hindi in the खड़ीबोली dialect (Hindustani or Hindi-Urdu, i.e., बोलचाल वाली हिन्दी, which may include many loanwords from Persian and Arabic). The use of शुद्ध संस्कृतनिष्ठ हिन्दी is in general neither required nor recommended. E.g., use: वजह instead of कारण, ख़ास instead of विशेष, वगैरह instead of इत्यादि, लेकिन instead of परन्तु etc. However, for technical and specialized vocabulary, the use of शुद्ध संस्कृतनिष्ठ हिन्दी  is recommended and usually mandatory. Thus: upper House of Parliament—संसद का उच्च सदन, but not Urdu—मजिलिस का ऐवान-ए-बाला ; Foreign Minister—विदेशमन्त्री, but not Urdu—वज़ीर-ए-ख़ारिजा ; knowledge/science—ज्ञान/विज्ञान, but not इल्म. Use spoken Hindi's ये and वो instead of यह and वह / वे. Do not use the title of respect जी after names, it is unencyclopedic. Thus: कृष्ण / श्री कृष्ण but not कृष्ण जी. Use the आप form and its corresponding 3rd person verbal conjugation for writing about respectable persons. Thus: श्री वाजपेयी मध्य प्रदेश में जन्मे थे. But not: वाजपेयी मध्य प्रदेश में जन्मा था. But do not use the pronoun "आप" itself in-text in biographies.
 * 7) English should be used sparingly, only when required; i.e., if the corresponding शुद्ध हिन्दी word is too "difficult and not generally encountered", or if it is a proper name of non-Indian person/place/terminology/title, or if the user is highly unsure of the proper translation. It is recommended (but not required) for English-to-Hindi translation while writing articles, the Shabdkosh online dictionary should be used. For each English word, that alternative should be used which is generally encountered in everyday spoken Hindi, and also fits well into the context. Use of intelligent guesses for newly encountered words is also allowed, and so are translations encountered in Hindi-dubbed TV documentaries, Hollywood films, Hindi-translated books, etc. e.g., दमपिशाच for en:Dementor (used in dubbed HP films).
 * 8) If used, it is recommended to use the English words within the articles using the English (Roman) alphabets rather than devanagari (or better, the devanagari transliteration should be used in the sentence, followed by the English word in Roman alphabet in parentheses). Such words should be italicized and not put in quotation marks. Preferably, there should be an in-page interwiki link (like :en:) on the word to the English wikipedia. If the word comes as an integral part of a sentence, so as not to break the continuity, the en: prefix should be hidden by writing the word again after the pipe sign (piped link). Thus, recommended:  Whence,
 * 9) *हैरी पॉटर ने Pensieve के अन्दर Little Hangleton गाँव में लॉर्ड वोल्डेमॉर्ट की माँ Merope Gaunt को देखा
 * 10) *Resplendent Quetzal पक्षी के ऊपर एक मेक्सिकन पादरी डा० Pablo de la Llave ने काफ़ी शोध किया था
 * 11) Always start the first 1 or 2 lines of the article giving its definition (from any standard dictionary/other wiki) or suitable introduction. Thus, recommended: ललिता सहस्रनामन हिन्दू धर्मसुधारक आदि शंकराचार्य द्वारा रचित देवी दुर्गा को समर्पित एक पूजा-मन्त्र है, जिसे कई हिन्दू रोज़ श्रद्धा से जपते हैं । But not: ललिता सहस्रनामन मन्त्र जपने के लिये लड्डू-पेड़ा, ताम्बुल, सिन्दूर, लाल चुनरी के साथ नित्य इस मन्त्र का पाठ करें, तो जल्द ही गड़ा हुआ ख़जाना मिलेगा । Recommended: वैमानिक अभियान्त्रिकी (en:Aeronautical engineering) विमानों (en:Aircrafts) की अभिकल्पना, निर्माण और प्रचालन करने का विज्ञान, कला और कार्य है । (translated from Eng. Webster's New World Dictionary). But not: आजकल वैमानिक अभियान्त्रिकी के लिये देशभर में कई कॉलेज खुल गये हैं, जिनमें अग्रणी स्थान यूटोपिया स्थित लालू-यादव टेक्लिनक कॉलेज का है ।
 * 12) For names of countries, cities, places, languages, people, books, films, technical vocabulary, mythology, etc, start the article like this:
 * 13) * 1.
 * 14) * 2.
 * 15) * 3. phonological transcription
 * 16) * 4.  For country names, only the standard short form of the name is needed in the first line. If there is a common name for a difficult word in Hindustani, also mention it. Whence: अपोलो (अंग्रेज़ी : en:Apollo; यूनानी : Aπollων अपोल्लोन) प्राचीन यूनानी धर्म (ग्रीक धर्म) और प्राचीन रोमन धर्म के सर्वोच्च देवता थे । If you don't give the interwiki English/another language link (which would be deemed to be the default reference), then you MUST provide an appropriate reference.
 * 17) Please leave no article without an appropriate category. See the list of created categories here; you can also make a new category (pref. in Hindi). Please leave no article without at least ONE off page (like en:) interwiki link. E.g., the user can check the article name (say Apollo) on the finally redirected English page and append to the Hindi article . These interlanguage links will help a bot to update all interwiki links for that article in all wikipedias. The category and the aforementioned link should be typed at the end of the article. If the article is very small, mention it as a stub/substub.
 * 18) Use of templates is welcome. See the list of templates here. If creating a template, name it pref. in Hindi.
 * 19) Use पूर्णविराम ( । ) instead of a period (.) for ending statements. The पूर्णविराम, semicolon, colon and dash (but not comma) must come after one space after the word to prevent ambiguity. Use the international form of the Hindu-Arabic numerals (1,2,3 instead of १,२,३), as used by the Constitution and the Government of India (even for Hindi). There is no need to use the हलन्त at the end of Sanskrit words wherever it occurs. Hence, prefer: संसद over संसद्; अथर्वन over अथर्वन्. Use the proper quotation marks “” from the Insert toolbox, not "". Write dates as 2 मई 2006 (ईसवी or ईसापूर्व). Write time as 3:45 pm. Separate common suffix-words like शास्त्र, विज्ञान, ज्ञान with a hyphen. Thus: रसायन-शास्त्र. For most others, leave both the words of the noun-cluster free. Combine them into one word only if it is very common to do so. Thus: सामवेद.
 * 20) The use of ज़ for the en:voiced alveolar fricative (/z/, as in zoo, rose) is fundamentally wrong. Its nearest counterpart is the en:voiceless alveolar fricative /s/ (as in sea), and not Hindi ज (en:voiced palatal plosive). Hence, it is suggested and recommended that for the sound /z/, whether it comes in English (etc.) spellings (z) for while pronunciation otherwise, should be transcribed as स़ (स with a dot below, available in the Insert toolbox). Hence: Reason रीस़न, not रीज़न ; Roses रोस़ेस़, not रोज़ेज़. But common Hindi words borrowed from Persian/Arabic (so-called Urdu words) are allowed to continue with ज़ spelling. Thus: ज़रा, नज़र, तर्ज़. The en:voiced postalveolar fricative (/ʒ/ as in treasure), inexistent in Hindi, can similarly be transcribed with श़. Thus: treasure ट्रॅश़र. The nukta (dot) available in the Insert toolbox can be combined with various consonants to suggest a more exact phonetic devanagari rendering of foreign sounds. E.g., since phonetically, English Think and this are not equal to थिंक and दिस, a better transcription could be थ़िंक and द़िस. Please take care of the dot below in so-called Urdu words, otherwise the Hindi spelling is deemed incorrect.
 * 21) For the following English vowels met, mate, mat, transcribe as मॅट (short vowel), मेट (not मेइट), मैट (not मॅट, as popular in Marathi). However in contemporary Hindi and here, it is acceptable to use ए instead of ऍ. Thus: अमेरिका is more popular than अमॅरिका. For cot, coat, caught, transcribe as कॉट, कोट, कॉट (not कौट). Transcribe English /t/ and /d/ as ट and ड.
 * 22) Use half-न before त, थ, द, ध, न, instead of anuswaar अं. Use half-म before प, फ, ब, भ, म. Use the anuswaar before all the rest of the consonants (not half-ङ, ञ, ण). If the मात्रा is not above the alphabet, use chandra-bindu, but only for nasalization. Thus: अन्दर, not अंदर ; अन्त, not अंत ; हिन्दी, not हिंदी ; सम्भव, not संभव ; पंचमी, not पञ्चमी ; अंडा, not अण्डा ; कंठ, not कण्ठ ; लैंड, not लैण्ड ; आँख, not आंख. However, both forms are acceptable in contemporary Hindi as well as here; the prec. are just recommendations.
 * 23) When proceded by another vowel, use the pure vowels instead of य (unless the य is clearly articulated while pronouncing). Thus : जाएँ, not जायें (not जावें) ; आएगा, not आयेगा . However, both forms are acceptable in contemporary Hindi as well as here.
 * 24) Please pay careful attention to the masculine/feminine gender (and singular/plural) in adjectives and verbs, else the sentence becomes ungrammatical.

For more information/suggestions/criticisms, please contact any one of the administrators of Hindi wiki here, preferably en:User:Magicalsaumy.

This page can also be found here. Thank you,

Cygnus_hansa 02:05, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

TfD nomination of Template:Blue Collar Comedy
Template:Blue Collar Comedy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Jesuschex 02:45, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Pradip Somasundaran
This is a message to all Category:Kerala Wikipedians

I want your opinion on this particular person Pradip Somasundaran. He claims to be a famous singer in Kerala. Now being a Malayalee, I have not heard of this person before, so I wonder whether or not you have heard of him before and set this issue straight. If so, then please let your opinion be counted at Articles for deletion/Pradip Somasundaran. Please note that by voicing your opinion as a Malayalee/Keralite will add more weight to your words.

Many Thanks --Ageo020 21:42, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

Courtesy notice of AFD debate
This is a courtesy notice. I have place up for deletion debate a number of articles that you created quite a while back. If you still have an interest in these articles, please come to Articles for deletion/U.S. Congressional Delegation from XXX and join in the debate. - TexasAndroid 14:26, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

Kerala Portal
Hi! I never had a privilage to meet you. If you are still around, please participate in the peer review of Kerala portal. Best regards,--thunderboltz<sup style="color:green;">(Deepu) 13:41, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

AfD Progressive Bloggers
You have edited the article Progressive Bloggers. This article is currently being considered for deletion under the wp:afd process. You may contribute to this discussion by commenting here. Thank you.Edivorce 23:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cochin_Airport2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cochin_Airport2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:59, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Energy portal review
Hi. Knowing that you have an interest in an unconnected featured portal, I wondered if you might like to comment on the one I've been working on - energy portal - which is now under consideration for featured status. Compared to other candidates it has had relatively few people contributing to the debate, despite being up for discussion for 2 months. If you have time perhaps you would like to take a look? The candidate page can be found here. Gralo 18:33, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Chandra Levy.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Chandra Levy.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Save-Me-Oprah <sup style="color:#3388AA;">(talk) 03:56, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Bharat Rakshak
A tag has been placed on Bharat Rakshak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jfire (talk) 22:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Huffington Post Logo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Huffington Post Logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:06, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Cnnibn.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cnnibn.PNG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --01:12, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Spin_City.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Spin_City.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 09:17, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Indian Logo.gif
A tag has been placed on Image:Indian Logo.gif requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image which is not under a free license or in the public domain and it has not been used in any article for more than seven days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 01:51, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cnnibn.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Cnnibn.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:32, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Ander Crenshaw.jpeg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Ander Crenshaw.jpeg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:07, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I nominated the image for deletion for missing evidence of permission. Hekerui (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Thomas Mantell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thomas Mantell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thomas Mantell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 22:40, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:


 * 1) Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
 * 2) Editor-focused central editing dashboard
 * 3) "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
 * 4) Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
 * 5) Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded User wikipedia/RC Patrol (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Bharat Rakshak for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bharat Rakshak is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bharat Rakshak until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#x222F; <b style="color:#070">WBG</b> converse 14:58, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Shelley Moore Capito.gif
Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia: You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.
 * File:Shelley Moore Capito.gif

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:52, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Shelley Moore Capito.gif


The file File:Shelley Moore Capito.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:John Mica.jpeg


The file File:John Mica.jpeg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Portal:Kerala
Portal:Kerala, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Kerala and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Kerala during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Church Missionary Society College High School


The article Church Missionary Society College High School has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Uncited with no notability per WP:SCHOOL"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 17:52, 17 August 2023 (UTC)