User talk:EEng/Archive14

Commons is not Wikipedia


Commons is not Wikipedia

Because of the way Commons media are embedded into pages on other projects, Commons needs to work differently to other projects. They do not necessarily follow the policies of Wikipedia or other projects. Please stop citing Wikipedia policies on Commons, where those policies do not apply.

(Posted here because of this: “If you want to contact me, drop a line at w:User talk:EEng. I'm here very seldom.”)

Brianjd (talk) 12:35, 4 September 2020 (UTC)


 * You mean policies like Use common sense? I realize that's a foreign concept at Commons, common sense being in such short supply over there, but I venture there so seldom that I keep forgetting. EEng 16:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * At Commons, we have a c:COM:NCS policy. Any context for the popcorn-eating TPSs around here, or nah? —&#8205;Mdaniels5757 (talk &bull; contribs) 16:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I cropped out a vase (see File history at the bottom of c:File:Congresswoman_Pelosi_meets_San_Francisco%27s_District_Attorney,_Kamala_Harris;_March_30,_2004.jpg) and got accused of "vandalism". You can imagine my reaction . EEng 17:09, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Brianjd, what is the Wikipedia policy that EEng has been accused of mentioning on Commons? If it's WP:VANDALISM, you yourself said, EEng said that good faith edits are never vandalism, which matches my understanding of the word “vandalism”. P-K3 (talk) 17:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

What are you, some sort of anti-vaseite? -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 18:21, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm unpleasantly reminded of an incident some years ago, when I found the culture at Commons to be even more problematic than that here at en-Wiki (which, in my current state of mind, is really saying something). An en-Wiki editor got blocked at Commons over what was basically a mis-communication, and vented at the Commons admin over the admin not having understood something that they should have understood. In return, the en-Wiki editor was called a "racist", and when I pointed out that this was an inappropriate thing to say, I was threatened (unsuccessfully) with a Commons block myself. . --Tryptofish (talk) 22:00, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Obviously you're just not mellow enough to let that little jibe fly. --WaltCip- (talk)  22:07, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes! Mellow! As I understand that, they use the phrase "be mellow" to mean "don't disagree with me". --Tryptofish (talk) 22:14, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

, "They call me Mellow Yellow, (quitely rightly)". "I'm just mad about Saffron, she's just mad about me."..."Electrical banana, Is bound to be the very next phase." Oh, 1966...hit them with a mellow banana.  Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect!  04:29, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Electrical banana, Is bound to be the very next phase – Huh. Maybe Donovan was an electrical engineer. See Polyphase_system. Never thought of that. EEng 05:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I guess that's what happens following a botched vase-sectomy. --Tryptofish (talk) 17:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Whoa...colour me fazed! Mellow Yellow Electrical Banana, or somesuch, sounds like a good name for LSD, back in the day. Nowadays, we must be concerned about our Mings...er, minds. Higher phase order sounds like something from Star Trek. Kirk to Scotty: "Shift us to higher phase order!" Scotty: "Aye, Captain, 'tis faster than warp speed!"  Tribe of Tiger Let's Purrfect!  23:11, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

User talk:EEng was originally a level 2 heading, but EEng demoted it to a level 3 heading. I was not referring to the most recent incident, already described here by EEng, but rather previous sections on the talk page regarding similar incidents. Brianjd (talk) 14:38, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I think common sense is specifically banned on Commons, but I forget the link. But it was foolish not to upload the crop as a new image, which should be done in all but exteme(ly useless) cases. Johnbod (talk) 18:10, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh, just because you're a fine-arts junkie and all into vases and stuff. But I'm afraid even your criterion of extremely useless is not going to save us – check out c:User talk:EEng. (Ouch – I did unthinkingly cite some WP guidelines there.) E<b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 21:33, 5 September 2020 (UTC)


 * “Break a vase, and the love that reassembles the fragments is stronger than that love which took its symmetry for granted when it was whole.” --Derek Walcott. --GRuban (talk) 21:36, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You know about CSS image crop, right? No need to change the image on commons when you can just use the part of it that you want here. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:23, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * That always seemed problematic to me, since if the image at Commons changes in some way then your article suddenly displays a closeup of the person's shoulder. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 22:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Maybe that's one reason that commons prefers significant changes to images to be done as a new upload? —David Eppstein (talk) 22:41, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Except even any change can screw up the CSS image crop thing, and they do allow some changes (even if no one can seem to explain what those allowed changes are). So as usual it's all a house of cards with half-baked rules not-solving the problem. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 22:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * All you had to do after you cropped it was click on "save as new image", but no, you had to devase the original. 😂 <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 17:29, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Infobox image syntax
Re Jean Berko Gleason, please remember to WP:AGF. What and I both did in this article was to fix the image syntax so that the article is not listed in Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images per the documentation there and at WP:IBI.

The current version of the article is listed in Category:Pages using deprecated image syntax and is susceptible to being fixed again, although this category is not currently addressed as attentively as Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images.

I would appreciate it if you did not disparage editors acting within consensus with edit summaries like "pay attention" or "you f***ed it up".

If you feel the image needs to be displayed in a non-default ratio, you should ask at for support of upright. <b style="color:#00FF00">MB</b> 03:15, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * AGF means I'm supposed to assume you're trying to help, and of that I have no doubt, but at the same time WP:CIR says that I don't have to blindly pretend you know what you're doing, which you don't.
 * I made an editorial decision that the reader's experience would be improved by adding upright to adjust the size of the image, though in doing so I unthinkingly used thumb instead of (as called for by WP:IBI) using frameless – sorry, force of habit.
 * Instead of simply correcting thumb to frameless (as – I repeat – called for by WP:IBI, which you are citing) you mindlessly reverted my change . So, yeah, you didn't (as your edit summary claimed) "fix" anything; instead (as I said ) you fucked it up.
 * I realized my mistake and reinserted the size adjustment using frameless.
 * And now you're here telling me that the article is listed in Category:Pages using deprecated image syntax (apparently one of those categories gnomes use to give them something to do so they can feel useful) and therefore is susceptible to being fixed again. In other words, apparently having nothing useful to do, you plan to spend your time "fixing" something that isn't broken, and in fact is in complete compliance with the guideline you yourself cited: WP:IBI.
 * And after all that you've got the nerve to suggest that if *I* feel the image needs to be displayed in a non-default ratio then *I* should ask at for support of upright. No, if *you* want to clear your stupid categegory then *you* ask at for support of upright, after which *you* can go around removing frameless (or whatever floats *your* boat) without messing up the appearance of the articles involved.
 * In the meantime don't fuck with what the reader sees just to clear your stupid misbegotten category. Productive editors have precious little tolerance for this kind of mindless gnoming. Got it? <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 05:23, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * P.S.: WP:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2020_October_5.
 * No answer. Huh. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 06:36, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Might still be scrolling? Lev!vich 07:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * When I get around to it I'm gonna squash you like a bug. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 07:07, 6 October 2020 (UTC)


 * fwiw Special:Diff/982135565. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 11:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Most kind of you. I'll leave it to to alter the article to take advantage of it, thus notching down that silly list by one. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 18:11, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Speaking of the list, I don't know why, if the issue matters that is, we don't just unleash a bot on it. It could take care of most cases without issue, where alternative parameters exist. 86,514 pages is way too much for human review - and for something that can be automated is likely a great waste of peoples' time. Seems like a task designed for the machines, as long as one pays the server bills and gives it some thanks . ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 18:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It's simpler than that. AFAICS, it used to be that there was only an |image= parm in infoboxes, so the way you sized the image or added an alt was to use the extended image syntax in that single field. At some point someone got it in their heads that this was undesirable in some way (in just what way no one seems to know), and began adding separate |image_size= and |image_alt= parms to the infobox templates, so that you wouldn't need the extended image syntax. (Again, in what way it helps anything to not use the extended image syntax isn't clear.) But they didn't do this to all infoboxes, so in infoboxes that hadn't been augmented you still had to use the extended image syntax.Meanwhile, some do-gooder got the idea to create this "Category:Pages using deprecated image syntax", implying that there's something actually wrong with using the extended image syntax, so that other do-gooders (as seen above) get the idea they should seek out and kill its use even where that removes function such as image size. It's all a complete waste of time. Until someone can explain why not, the extended image syntax was, and is, fine. It did, and does, what's wanted. It can just stay. No one needs to do anything. No infoboxes need new parameters. No category is needed. No bot or human review wanted. Complete waste of time. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 18:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Especially since the existence of convenient parameters to size images by absolute numbers of pixels encourages editors to do so, inappropriately, when they should be using upright= relative sizing. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * EEng, I share your feelings about this. Over time, I've become increasingly dissatisfied with the let's-police-technical-details-that-have-no-value-for-our-readers mentality that has become a part of Wiki-culture (especially in templates and categories). If I wanted to be charitable, I would note that we have a lot of editors who are on the spectrum, and who are drawn to these things. (And before anyone blows a gasket, I hasten to add that I have no idea about, nor am implying anything about, the editors in this dispute. Also, there are many on-the-spectrum editors whose work I appreciate very, very much.) But I wish those editors would stick to tasks that are actually helpful to our readers. And, regardless of the underlying reasons for any editor's work, there is too much pointless creation of distractions for editors who actually want to contribute content, and too much tolerance of it. Worse, the trivia police tend to revise guidelines that no one else pays attention to, and then they say "but look what the guideline says!". Sighs loudly.
 * And as I ponder this annoyance, I also want to formally and officially apologize to you for that time, years ago, when I gave you a hard time over the formatting of the Gage page. In hindsight, I was wrong. What matters is what our readers see. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:56, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Since in literally 5 minutes I'll be getting in the chair for a root canal, that's a particularly well timed bit of pleasant news. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 22:22, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * That's me: pleasant as a root canal! --Tryptofish (talk) 22:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't sell yourself short:, I'm saying you're better than a root canal. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 03:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Very few people would agree with that. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:22, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Totally commenting on this almost a year after the fact but suck it up buttercup., you are most definitely better than a root canal. Carry on. -- A Rose Wolf  12:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * OK, but just barely. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * We're bubblin' on the Top 100, just like a mighty dread! -- ARseWolf 123 (talk) 21:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I think it's a mixed bag, generally speaking. The difference between infoboxes using birth_date, BirthDate or DateOfBirth doesn't matter either to the readers - the output is the exactly the same. But it's a slight pain in the ass if every other infobox uses a totally different parameter name and doesn't support the aliases. That's one area that should probably be kept consistent, so editors don't need to waste time reading docs after their chosen parameter doesn't output anything. Considering 'value for readers' is a hazy line; taken literally it's likely the majority of wiki-activity isn't productive, including most work on Category:Wikipedia backlog and various tracking cats, project-space pages, discussions, essays, templates, cats, etc. And maybe it isn't, since no matter what area of the wiki people stop working on (maintenance, administration, or others) the project always keeps going, apparently without novel noticeable issues. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 22:32, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I used to be "on the spectrum," but now I just boss people around about infobox image syntax. Martinevans123 (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2021 (UTC) p.s. did someone just say "fuck it up buttercup"??
 * Sounded that way to me, but I was in my cups. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:32, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * I think there's enough of that going around. I've heard it's in the water!-- A Rose Wolf 15:31, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Hive mind to the rescue
One of you s will know this... Within the past few months I told a story about a school board meeting when I was in high school. It wasn't here, but I can't think of where. Might have been a user talk or article talk or WP talk. Anyone recall? <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 05:31, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I vaguely remember this! Something about not decorating biographies with photos of replacement school buildings for a school with different buildings that the student had attended? But I don't remember where, either. It doesn't seem to have been my talk. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:39, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Funny how the mind connects things. That would have been a discussion with re Kamala Harris, and your recollection seems right, but I think the discussion branched off somewhere else, which is where I made the post I'm looking for. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 05:47, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I remember reading your anecdote. Something about how brilliant you were in arguing your case before the school board, even though "the man" tried to get you to shut up. In the end, everyone recognized how right you were. But I do not remember the exact context. We tangled a bit about the childhood of Kamala Harris. I had been in Berkeley and had taken photos of her childhood home (remarkably unchanged) and the school she had famously been bussed to. You were quite harsh about my school photo, saying that any ignoramus (not quoting precisely) should know by the characteristic California school architecture that the school had been completely rebuilt since Harris attended, and that my photo was ignorant crap. I tucked my tail between my legs, slinked off, and did not object to removal of the photo from the article, since I was clearly up against a more formidable intellect. Anyway, I hope this helps refresh your memory. Always happy to try to be of assistance. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  06:03, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * slinked off – Surely you mean slunk off. (Dig – dug; cling – clung; sling – slung; slink – slunk.) I too am always happy to be of assistance. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 09:04, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Do you have any amusing images about pedantry? <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  04:44, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Let me check my files: peddlers... pediatricians... pedicabs... Wow! Nothing on pedantry. I've got pederasty – will that do? <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 05:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Please refrain for the benefit of all of us, although your never-ending helpfulness is charming. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  05:11, 9 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Y'all clearly do not know how to use the Wikipedia search function: . -- Softlavender (talk) 07:19, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's it. Thanks! <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 09:04, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Stink, stank, STUNK! -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 10:09, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * That link to the earlier discussion makes for interesting reading. So EEng has had a "career as an irritant". And here I always assumed that he did it for free. So, Mr. Know-It-All, your high school principal "kept a tarantula in his office named Harriet". What a strange name for one of his offices! --Tryptofish (talk) 19:33, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * No kidding, when I wrote that I thought, "Which one of this bunch is going to call me on that?" <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 21:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey,, maybe Tfish has an amusing image on pedantry. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 05:04, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * All I want to know now are the names of your principal's other offices. I am hoping that at least one was called Vampire bat. I am in an October mood. <b style="color:#070">Cullen</b><sup style="color:#707">328  Let's discuss it  05:17, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * He had just the one. One day I asked the school psychologist, who was an accomplished calligrapher, to make a little placard: Lasciate ogni speranza, voi ch'entrate, which I then glued to his (the principal's) door. I understand it stayed there until he retired. It was an unusual school. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 05:39, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * And I imagine that you made it particularly queer. So for that image you want me to find, do you want a photo of me teaching, or of you teaching? --Tryptofish (talk) 22:16, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I just remembered something else. Somehow I came into possession of the guts of a little music box, like this Music_box_elements.jpg, which played . One day I got into his office and screwed it to the back of his desk next to where he sat. He loved it. He'd crank it for students in hot water. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 20:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

John Harvard
The first substantial version of the article had full dates, and it's standard in biographies. GiantSnowman 21:03, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I'd prefer you raise such things on the article's talk page. But whether a bio's opening parenthetical give full birth/death dates, or just years, is not a WP:DATERET issue, and "standard" (your word for usual) does not mean universal or required. See Manual_of_Style/Biography. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 21:26, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * And I'd prefer you to raise such things on the article talk page rather than continue to revert. No, "standard" means "encouraged" ie every FA I can recall features full dates. Stop twisting Manual_of_Style/Biography (which I referred you to in the full place) which states "These dates (specific day–month–year) are important information about the subject" (my emphasis) and "if they are also mentioned in the body, the vital year range (in brackets after the person's full name) may be sufficient to provide context" (my emphasis). You've also conventiently ignored the first full version from 16 years aho which used full dates. Care to comment? GiantSnowman 21:37, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The MOS that you so adamantly point to says "if they are also mentioned in the body, the vital year range (in brackets after the person's full name) may be sufficient to provide context". So in your insistence that year ranges are insufficient, you are pushing a position that is actually in contradiction to the MOS, rather than being supported by it. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:15, 13 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Except of course Harvard's birth date is not mentioned in the article... GiantSnowman 08:15, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Article, infobox, whatever. The distinction matters only to checklist-obsessed scriptkiddies lacking judgment of their own. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 17:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * To what D.E. has said I'll just add that you keep talking about how some version from two decades ago had it, as if this is a WP:DATERET issue, which it's not. Good articles are made by applying sound editorial judgment, not filling in blanks on a form. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 04:12, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh look at today's FA Muhammad III of Granada which has...full dates! GiantSnowman 08:10, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Only those inhabiting the incestuous FA bubble hold up FAs as paragons. The idea that the very first thing on which we should squander one of our most precious resources – the reader's attention and desire to keep reading – is the specific date of the year on which someone was born and died, as if our target demographic was astrologers, is Exhibit A for the stupidity of the FA process. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 17:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Something you're both forgetting - "may be sufficient". My point is that is not sufficient. GiantSnowman 08:21, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * A point you assert with nothing to back it up. If you want to further pursue this preoccupation with form over substance open a thread on the article's talk page. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 17:00, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * [edit conflict] What is your explanation for why it is critical to bring the readers' attention to the date of his birth, and not just the year, as the first thing they see about him? Among the other facts that could be stated about him at equal length in the lead sentence, why is this one the most important? You are asserting this with no justification, making your argument highly unconvincing. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * PS if you want an opportunity for a bigger crusade about dates and date formats, take a look at the recent contributions of  (the ones where the edit summary includes "Add: date" or some other combination of additions including dates). All the added dates are in YYYY-MM-DD format. (I happen to like this format for accessdates but I don't think it's acceptable for publication dates, and they're being added as publication dates.) —David Eppstein (talk) 20:55, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Jesus, you're more pissed off about this than I am. That's a lot of pissedoffedness. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 22:33, 14 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Not at GS today, though. Instead I am pissed off about having to spend all my editing time running around after Citation bot and cleaning up its many messes, and at its owner's intransigent attitude when anyone points out that it is not housebroken. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:58, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

A reminder
Just a reminder to talk-page stalkers that this is not that place to say anything that could be interpreted as implying that have put anywhere from 100,000 to 2,000,000 Americans on a conveyor belt to death since January 1 – they just haven't arrived at the crematorium yet.
 * Donald Trump is a sociopathic-narcissist-racist criminal moron whose selfishness and stupidity

I'd ask everyone to confirm here that they understand that they shouldn't be saying that have put anywhere from 100,000 to 2,000,000 Americans on a conveyor belt to death since January 1 – they just haven't arrived at the crematorium yet.
 * Donald Trump is a sociopathic-narcissist-racist criminal moron whose selfishness and stupidity

<b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 19:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC) have put anywhere from 100,000 to 2,000,000 Americans on a conveyor belt to death since January 1 – they just haven't arrived at the crematorium yet. have put anywhere from 100,000 to 2,000,000 Americans on a conveyor belt to death since January 1 – they just haven't arrived at the crematorium yet. with plaintext links? Levivich&thinsp;<sup style="white-space:nowrap;">[dubious – discuss] 15:31, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * I don't actually want to be the one pointing this out but I do need to remind you that contentious information about living persons is required to be referenced inline anywhere it is published on Wikipedia, including user talk pages. If you're concerned that the information above might be considered contentious in good faith, please consider backing this up with a reliable source. I'm sure you can find one. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 14:47, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * SMirC-chuckle.svg <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 14:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Our good friend Ivanvector is absolutely correct. Do not post anything implying that
 * Donald Trump is a sociopathic-narcissist-racist criminal moron whose selfishness and stupidity
 * without a reliable source. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 14:57, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Fix your typo - oh, and here is a RS. (Not meant to encourage you).SMirC-facepalm.svg <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 15:03, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Question: Do the refs have to be in citation templates, or is it OK if I reference Donald Trump is a sociopathic -narcissist -racist criminal moron whose selfishness and stupidity

they just haven't arrived at the crematorium yet. - Levivich&thinsp;<sup style="white-space:nowrap;">[dubious – discuss] 15:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * The verifiability policy is satisfied if you've identified the source; the method by which you do so is a manual of style matter. So yeah, excepting that this might be WP:SYNTH, I think we're done here. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:43, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Maybe it would be better as two sentences to avoid Synth: Donald Trump is a sociopathic -narcissist -racist criminal moron. His selfishness and stupidity have put anywhere from 100,000 to 2,000,000 Americans on a conveyor belt to death since January 1 –


 * Actually, it should be stated that this is not the place where you share the opinion of [RS] who have called Trump a...yada yada, and the opinion of [RS] who said... and...well, you get the drift AND by doing it that way, you avoid SYNTH. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 16:05, 20 March 2020 (UTC) Underlined correction to align w/EEng's context. 20:04, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , it looks like the Museum here will be pretty busy for the next five years. Sir Joseph (talk) 16:17, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , what? The Dems are choosing between Statler and Waldorf, how can they possibly lose?
 * Honestly, all jokes aside, if that guy sends me a check for $1000 I just might vote for him. Unless Biden sends me more. Not because I think he is the best candidate, but because I want to encourage future candidates to send me cash during election years. Levivich&thinsp;<sup style="white-space:nowrap;">[dubious – discuss] 16:20, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You may be on to something, Lev!! I like your thinking. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 16:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * You may be on to something, Lev!! I like your thinking. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 16:22, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

sociopathic-narcissist-racist criminal moron whose selfishness and stupidity have put anywhere from 100,000 to 2,000,000 Americans on a conveyor belt to death since January 1 – they just haven't arrived at the crematorium yet
 * , Actually, it's dead-even at Predictit since the Dems got smart and dumped Sanders. But blaming Trump on Coroavirus is pretty stupid and also wrong. I don't like Trump, I'm also a political independent in a purple state (and I think Bloomberg was poor timing). I know Trump banned incoming flights from China and people complained. I know people will complain no matter what Trump does, but sometime he does the right thing. And sometimes the NYTimes will chop his quotes in half just to make him look bad, like when he told states to look into getting masks and supplies on their own, and then added he will be there for them and fund it. Everyone knows supply chain is best at a local level, but the NYTimes ran "President tells states, you're on your own." So why not tone down the rhetoric and stupidity. That's not what we need now. As the former (Obama-Era) FEMA chief said when he was on MSNBC right before he walked off the air, "I don't need to deal with this from bull shit people." Sir Joseph (talk) 16:27, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * He banned flights from China but left huge loopholes for ships' crews and so on, and pretended that walls an closed borders would solve the problem. he told states to look into getting masks and supplies on their own, and then added he will be there for them and fund it – what the fuck does "be there for them" mean??? This needs to be a full-court press, all-hands-on-deck, no-effort-or-expense-spared, every-avenue-pursued war effort. People are going to die for lack of ventilators starting in two to four weeks. Every extra ventilator produced will save 10 lives over the next eight months; every mask will save 1/1000 of a life – and President Trump – who as I keep stressing I am not labeling a
 * – as late as yesterday was saying he wasn't invoking the War Production Act to order companies to start producing these vital things because "we might not need it". So get real. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 20:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)


 * According to the stats and the high number of cases in New York, maybe Cuomo should have started sooner with his efforts and stop depending so much on the federal government. State governments are the ones at ground zero. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 21:02, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Governors cannot invoke the War Production Act . However, Cuomo did offer companies, including startups, premium prices for robes, masks, etc.
 * Trump: “I take no responsibility at all.”
 * Cuomo: “I take responsibility, these decisions are mine. Get mad at me.”
 * O3000 (talk) 21:21, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * NPR the 18th. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 21:39, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , Have you ever dealt with the Federal government and requisitioning? Why should all the states have to put in a request for masks from DC when they can do it themselves better and cheaper if they can get it from a supplier closer to home? That's the latter part of the quote the NYTimes left out. Parly JIT and partly that Trump said he'll fund it and be there for states that need funding and supplies, but said it's best to use your own resources. The NYTimes ran with the headlines that Trump said "you're on your own." When that is not what he said or meant. And it's your vile and nasty TDS that makes me, a real independent in a purple state, who doesn't like Trump at all, vote for him because I can actually see things with a clear unbiased eye, unlike you. I apparently don't fall for Chinese propagnda.Sir Joseph (talk) 21:37, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * "you're on your own." When that is not what he said or meant – That's clearly what he meant. He has no idea what's going on or what to do. He's a compulsive, shameless liar.Have you ever dealt with the Federal government and requisitioning? – Yes, actually, I have, but this isn't about "requisitioning" – we're not talking about office supplies and garbage cans. Ground was broken on the Pentagon in September 1941 and the first occupants moved in the following April; when it's important, it can get done – if competent people are in charge.This has nothing to do with Chinese propaganda. The Chinese government is run by selfish, greedy motherfuckers who don't give a shit about the people for whose good they're supposed to be working, or about the rest of the world; that's been true for a long time and I can't do anything about it. The sadness is that, at present, the American government is run by the very same kind of people. If you can't see that you're delusional. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 00:15, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Update: Headline today (NYT): "Former Labradoodle Breeder Tapped to Lead U.S. Pandemic Task Force" – more Chinese propaganda, I suppose. By the way, how's that JIT thing working out? <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 01:54, 24 April 2020 (UTC)


 * Ok, it's time for Buddy Hackett. Laughter truly is the best medicine. Hackett keeps me in stitches without having to make a single suture. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 22:09, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Before I forget - don't fall for fake news telling you that all you need is a mask and gloves to go to the grocery store. It's a LIE!! Everyone else had clothes on!! <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 23:03, 21 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Wait, what?! That was not made clear from the outset. I want to be grandfathered in. --valereee (talk) 17:44, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Will you settle for being grandmothered in? <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 17:54, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , yes, yes, I knew someone would bring that up. Grandfathered, grandmothered, grandxthered. Whatever pronouns and nonbinary descriptions work for the general progressive public. --valereee (talk) 19:11, 20 March 2020 (UTC)
 * , er, I hope it was clear that was a joke :) social anxiety due to hearing crickets when making a joke --valereee (talk) 16:15, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * We all cool, don't worry. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 16:19, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
 * SMirC-chuckle.svg Absolutely, Ms V - you one-upped us in a fun way!! I echo what EEng just said - 😎. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em;color:#A2006D">Atsme Talk 📧 16:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

A reconsideration
Back in March, in this very thread, I counseled my fellow editors not to post anything implying that Donald Trump is a sociopathic-narcissist-racist criminal moron whose selfishness and stupidity have put anywhere from 100,000 to 2,000,000 Americans on a conveyor belt to death since January 1 – they just haven't arrived at the crematorium yet without a reliable source. Well, it's been six months and time to take stock again. In my modest opinion we are now more than justified in stating openly what has long been obvious i.e. that Donald Trump is a sociopathic-narcissist-racist criminal moron whose selfishness and stupidity have put anywhere from 100,000 to 2,000,000 Americans on a conveyor belt to death since January 1 – they just haven't arrived at the crematorium yet. Source: "Trump’s Deliberate Coronavirus Deception" (among many others).

So it's time to get real. An elderly colleague of mine – a World War II veteran, a fine mathematician and wonderful teacher, a man whose boots Donald Trump is not worthy to lick – suffocated alone in a nursing home because of Trump's greed, stupidity, narcissism, and criminality. So fuck you, Donald Trump, fuck the racist father who begat such a slime bucket as you, fuck the agent of Satan who put a hole in the condom that God had intended would spare the world the stain of your existence, fuck the rest of your criminal family, fuck the morons who voted for you, and fuck any morons who vote for you again. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 18:15, 12 September 2020 (UTC) P.S. If you don't like the foregoing, get your head out of your ass. P.P.S. If you voted for Trump and aren't a moron, then fuck you double, since you knew better but did it anyway.
 * I am so very sorry to hear about your friend, and I agree wholeheartedly with your description, your "modest opinion", and your anger. We have lost, and will continue to lose, many good people. "Fine mathematicians", kindly bus drivers, selfless healthcare workers, the nice neighbor...the list goes on and on. We value the kind comfort and wisdom of an "older friend", the human potential of those just a bit, and even quite a bit younger..each person is such a dreadful loss. "No man is an island entire of itself;...any man's death diminishes me, because I am involved in mankind." Donne expressed it so well. With sorrow for your loss,  Tribe of Tiger  <sup style="font-family:Segoe print;color:#B22222">Let's Purrfect!  04:16, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Your thoughtful words are most comforting, as is the vision of Donald Trump being sodomized in hell by Russian whores wearing red-hot barbed-iron strap-ons while Melania sticks needles into his tiny, misshapen penis. Satan was on Fox News the other night explaining it all, and complaining about the headaches Trumps's causing him. He's had to build acres of new tortures just for the Cabinet alone, and Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Tojo, and Pol Pot are up in arms because the VIP wing is full and one of them's gonna have to bunk with Trump, which none of them wants to do because he's so stupid and boring. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 05:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You are most welcome. The devastation that one, unprincipled, dishonorable person in a supreme position of power can cause is truly horrifying. And quite terrifying. In your creative imaginings, I think the lying tongue would be first to go. Please, try to remember the good experiences with your dear friend, who is free from suffering. Imagine the knowledge that is now clear to him, the mathematical joys and marvels of the universe! I hope some good thoughts of what "Heaven" is like for your dear friend will give you some comfort. I know you are suffering, and again, I am so very, very sorry. Sending you a nice, My Cat Jeoffry "Tiger" hug, Sincerely,  Tribe of Tiger <sup style="font-family:Segoe print;color:#B22222">Let's Purrfect!  08:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Let me attempt to offer some comfort about your loss, as well. Also, as it happens, a few days ago I watched Downfall (2004 film) (on South American river prime). I highly recommend the film, by the way. But something that struck me as I was watching was how much of the film revolves around various Nazi military brass telling Adolf, with Berlin burning all around, that they could not prevail, to which the revered leader would respond with a combination of blaming everyone except himself, and promising that some half-baked inspiration that just came to him would save the day. The generals would cower until one would get up the nerve to suggest very gently that it would not be possible (by a long shot), and the supreme one would hear nothing of it, certain that his own unique brilliance would prove infallible. I may be breaking Godwin's law, but it felt eerily familiar. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:50, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you, my friend. Of course, while Hitler was fairly intelligent and surrounded himself with reasonably competent (if corrupt) people, Trump's saving grace is that he's a moron who surrounds himself with other morons who can't pour water out of a boot with the instructions written on the heel. Now back to our regular programming....
 * It never gets old:
 * Hitler finds out Donald Trump has won the presidential election
 * Hitler can't pay for dinner
 * Hitler hates flying coach
 * Hitler's Nutella goes missing
 * Hitler gets Covid and has to quarantine
 * Hitler can't get his Amazon Prime deliveries due to Covid
 * Himmler fails to unclog the toilet
 * Hitler's uncontrollable farting problem <== Curator's top pick
 * Hitler is stuck in slow motion
 * Hitler rants like a chipmunk
 * Hitler hates the Downfall parodies
 * Hitler still hates the Downfall parodies
 * <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 03:55, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Fan club
You've got [rb.gy/ydvby9 some fans]. G M G <sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk  17:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I can think of few things as pathetic as being kicked out of Wikipedia, and then writing about Wikipedia from the outside. What a sad, meaningless existence one must live to have time for that. I hope TDA is at least getting paid for this.
 * Hmm...
 * How much do you think Breitbart would pay for a tell-all expose about EEng from one of his top lieutenants? Asking for a friend. Levivich&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 17:42, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm not gonna lie that I think it would be hilarious to get them to print something Sokal-esque, outing EEng as...I dunno...a paid agent of the Wyoming government or something. Whatever is silly enough to be obvious nonsense but serious enough to get published.  G M G  <sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk  18:29, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You mean all I have to do to get famous is litter talk pages with false and inflammatory stuff? —valereee (talk) 18:34, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Do you mean you've not yet been mentioned in a source? I once apparently reverted a senior advisor to the president. You gotta step up your game.  G M G  <sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk  00:34, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You mean all I have to do to get famous is litter talk pages with false and inflammatory stuff? —valereee (talk) 18:34, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Do you mean you've not yet been mentioned in a source? I once apparently reverted a senior advisor to the president. You gotta step up your game.  G M G  <sup style="color:#000;font-family:Impact">talk  00:34, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

What does one do after their 15 minutes of fame? O3000 (talk) 00:37, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I can think of few things as pathetic as being kicked out of Wikipedia, and then writing about Wikipedia from the outside. – What, you never heard of Encyclopedia Dramatica, Wikipedia Review, Wikipediocracy, ? <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 04:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Skip the drama
Hey, I saw your comment. I like the approach of directly being able to communicate with admins. Sometimes, I feel that someone is breaking a policy but I'm not sure and putting something on WP:ANI is definitely very accusatory (as if you know for sure they're bad). What kinda things did you mean by "skip the drama"? I'm curious to know your thoughts! VR talk  18:46, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I mean any time you think you can get done what needs doing by contacting an individual admin, you should try that. ANI is perhaps the most-watched page on the project, and every thread opened siphons off a huge amount of editor energy just from people reading it. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 19:10, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The last time this report was run (in 2017!) ANI was #10. I have some doubts about these results. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Well there's clearly something very weird going on, with Lea Luboshutz, Russian violinist, being the #5 most-watched page, barely edged out by Draft:Lea Luboshutz. And the main page, which is #1, actually never changes, being nothing but transclusions of other pages which host the actual content. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 20:39, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If you care, the explanation is fairly uninteresting. Someone who'd been here long enough to know better moved WP:Sandbox to Draft:Lea Luboshutz, taking all its watchers with it. Those people who are genuinely watching it will have unwatched Luboshutz as soon as the edits started showing up on their watchlist, but 99% of the Sandbox's watchers are zombie accounts who checked "add all pages I edit to my watchlist" when they set up their original preferences and subsequently made a test edit to the sandbox, and never edited again so it remains on their watchlist. (At the time of writing, the sandbox has 19,069 'watchers', only 733 of whom are actually active.)
 * The reason Main Page has so many watchers is simple; while the MP itself never changes, Talk:Main Page is one of the most active talkpages on the project and because of the way Mediawiki handles watchlisting, the two come as a package deal. &#8209; Iridescent 17:38, 15 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Now you've gone and taken all the mystery out of it! <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 18:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Sunshine
Happy first day of summer, EEng!! Interstellarity (talk) 14:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * So the year's all downhill from here. Thanks for reminding me. <b style="color:red;">E</b><b style="color:blue;">Eng</b> 15:49, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Pardon me but today is the last day of Spring. Summer doesn't start until tomorrow. Then it'll be downhill until December (finishing with 10 days uphill, like a ski jump). <b style="font:1.3em/1em Trebuchet MS;letter-spacing:-0.07em"><b style="color:#000">nagual</b><b style="color:#BBA">design</b></b> 16:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Know-it-all. <b style="color:red;">E</b><b style="color:blue;">Eng</b> 18:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * So difficult to resist the impulse to pedantry. —valereee (talk) 19:33, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep saying stuff like that and I'll be forced to follow the instructions at WP:CHILDPROT. <b style="color:red;">E</b><b style="color:blue;">Eng</b> 20:51, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Minor details. —valereee (talk) 21:32, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * @Know-it-all: I'm not even sure the Lady God knows it all.
 * I once encountered a story about Brahma-the-crator having been bored-to-the-death by knowing-it-all. Story told Kali offered help, and Brahma accepted; so Kali smashed him to godzillion piecess. All the pieces together would still know-it-all, when each one had only partial knowledge of anything and so wouldn't get bored-to-death (even when they seem to have become mortal, and some of them now trying to achieve nirvana).
 * I hope I'm not boring you to the death. --Marjan Tomki SI (talk) 15:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I guess, to me, it's a bit like getting someone's birthday wrong. At least being a day early, rather than a day late, you can style it out; the Earth can just open its birthday card the day after. Anyway, it's today now. Happy Summer Solstice everyone! (And please don't call me Know-it-all. I much prefer Smartypants.) <b style="font:1.3em/1em Trebuchet MS;letter-spacing:-0.07em"><b style="color:#000">nagual</b><b style="color:#BBA">design</b></b> 18:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Are you an admin? If not, what do you think gives you the right to unroll well made entries?
What ground do you have to stand on? I mean even if I were to disregard the repulsive nature of your commentary, the likes of you are what deter people from Wikipedia. Unless you provide a valid reason for repeatedly undoing additions to the Titanic life-boat article I'll keep undoing your loathsome behaviour every step of the way. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.158.109.204 (talk • contribs) 03:37, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Aside from the question of what the reader learns from long lists of nonnotable names with absolutely nothing to indicate who these people were (not even, say, identifying passenger vs. crew), Fandom isn't a reliable source, and I'm betting the "two books" you've mentioned aren't tehe top-quality scholarly sources which are surely available for such information. <b style="color:red;">E</b><b style="color:blue;">Eng</b> 03:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * To answer 216.158.109.204's first question, EEng holds a position higher [ Citation Needed ] than Wikipedia Administrator; Wikipedia Infallible Judge Of All That Is Right And True. --Guy Macon (talk) 04:04, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * To be clear, I'm not always infallible. I'm only infallible when I say I'm being infallible. <b style="color:red;">E</b><b style="color:blue;">Eng</b> 05:08, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Since EEng is answering why the edits deserved undoing rather than the actual question of why he had the right to undo them: The flip side of being "the free encyclopedia that anyone can edit" is that anyone can also disagree with your edits and undo them. So EEng has at least as much right to undo them as you had to make them in the first place, setting aside your rhetorical fallacy of asserting that the entries were well made as a premise of a question asking why they were judged not to be so. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:12, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Yep, editing with EEng can be a bit of a roller coaster, can't it. Personally I've never found EEng's behaviour to be loathsome; in fact, far from it. Now if you'll excuse me, I've got some chairs to rearrange on the deck of the proud and unsinkable HMS Wikipedia. Martinevans123 (talk) 07:49, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * They are always considered unsinkable until they sink. Lotus 123. Lehman Brothers. Wordperfect. Geocities. Healthcare.gov. Ask Jeeves. Digg. Myspace. Every one of them was at one time considered to be unsinkable. Yes, some of them still exist as shadows of their former greatness. but they were all failures of one kind or another. Some day the gravy train will stop. There will be a scandal, a competitor, a successful fork, a huge legal loss, a shift in how we all use computers -- something will happen. We cannot have donations increasing until Wikipedia's revenue is more than all the money in the world. --Guy Macon (talk) 08:34, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * I'm prepared to donate three ha'pence! Martinevans123 (talk) 08:41, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh fun, a Well-made play! As for EEng behaving repulsively: . But I think it would be an excellent idea to make EEng an administrator (as if that would give him a special right to unroll edits!), because then he could save everyone else time by just blocking himself. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:59, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

Brooks
Friendly feedback, this is an unfortunate choice of place to take a stand even if you are within the letter of WP:TALK. Visual jokes on the talk page of an article about a recent homicide are crass at best, and based on your extensive record of carefully considered editing I am optimistic that you will step back and re-assess. VQuakr (talk) 23:36, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your taking the time to drop by. I am not taking a stand, though I suppose Bus Stop may choose to – we shall see. Maybe some people can edit on topics laying bare the worst humanity has to offer, day in and day out, without a laugh break, but I'm not one of those stoics. I'll note that I am regularly thanked for these little gestures – and not just by the disreputable rabble who hang out here on this wretched hive of scum and villainy – so I'm afraid I'll take those thanks over the complaints of Mrs. Grundy.BTW anyone who didn't like that joke most certainly won't like . <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 00:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Possibly not. All the best. VQuakr (talk) 01:04, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Your added images
Hi EEng—why are you adding/restoring images to the Criminal history section here here and here? Why are you doing that? Bus stop (talk) 00:23, 2 July 2020 (UTC)


 * EEng is contributing to the talk page in EEng's usual style. If you don't like the contribution, you can either comment to say so in the discussion, or just ignore it.  One of those two options takes no effort and doesn't waste other editors' time.  --A&#8239;D&#8239;Monroe&#8239;III(talk)  00:36, 2 July 2020 (UTC)

Images
I am sorry to see that you've been given a hard time offsite regarding your recent editing on a high-profile article.

However, I do have to agree with other editors above that the images you added to the talkpage discussion there are inappropriate to the serious context of that discussion, to such a degree that I have removed them. As I did once before, and as others did above, I'll suggest that these humorous interpolations be reserved for contexts to which they aren't jarringly unsuited in tone. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 06:52, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Not my best efforts, certainly. But what is this, cleanup day? If you don't cut it out I'm going to hire Flyer to put together a harassment case against you. Next you'll be removing this image too. "I wonder, is it George Washington next week? And is it Thomas Jefferson the week after? You know, you really do have to ask yourself, where does it stop?" <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 07:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I hadn't seen that one. I'm actually working on an article at the moment, so I'll leave it to others to deal with the crop crap. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 07:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I think it's more of a crop crack. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 12:58, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks Brad. Paul August &#9742; 09:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Editors who may be confused
Completely unrelated to the above ... I was planning to move this page, after the MfD closed as Keep, from "Editors who may be confused" to "Editors whose usernames may be confused." I think that's a better title for the page, and likely to avoid, um, confusion, since the reference is to mix-ups of usernames and not people's addled mental states. After having posted the above, I decided it would be too much for me to make that change unilaterally and maybe look like I'm quashing another joke, so I'll just leave the idea here instead. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 07:04, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I have always considered you a gentleman and a scholar. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 07:15, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

== User talk:John Maynard Friedman § AN/I § Please revdel edit summary containing offensive, ableist personal attack from User:John Maynard Friedman ==

I'm sorry, I don't think it's allowed for me to reply at JMF's talk page. Even PermaLink/966748849 was ill advised, I do believe...the rev. I'm talking about is PermaLink/966741182. As far as deleting the thread, I do respect your advice, really, and under other circumstances I'd take it, but it's been nothing but attacks and misrepresentations from JMF, in my view. Trolls email me little man multiple times a day in retaliation for my activism against QAnon/8chan, which I haven't even done too much of lately, yet the emails keep coming. It's one of my ignored phrases on Twitter, along with little boy. I want there to be a record he said this, and an admin read it, and decided it contravened WP:CRD. I don't want it swept under the rug, because if he's willing to say this to me, who knows what other slur he's willing to call another editor who upsets him. This can't be worked out without an apology from him, and even then I'm going to avoid interaction as much as possible. It's really upset me. Wikipedia is something of a safe space for me, free of the personal attacks I suffer everywhere else online, and it's been violated. If that sounds overly SJW to you, or millenial, or leftist, or whatever, I'm sorry, but I'm not in a good place mentally right now after, well, what is mentioned at the end of my article, about me leaving the Philippines, my home of six years. I was diagnosed with major depression probably due to an adjustment disorder as it happened in February and many days all I manage to do is edit this site, and on days I don't, I do nothing or next to it. This is on top of WP:ASPERGERS, diagnosed since age 15, and OCD, which I'm not on anything for as I don't like any of the options and my obsessions don't bother me. Sorry to bombard you with info you probably don't care about, I just want you to know where I'm coming from. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 00:07, 9 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Wow, I'm really sorry this is all happening. Look, can you just take my advice (i.e. delete your post at ANI) just temporarily? Let me see what I can do because – again – ANI should be your last resort. If I fail you can always repost at ANI. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 00:21, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

John Maynard Friedman ANI clsing summary
Well said. I appreciate the positive efforts you've made toward resolving that incident. You certainly make my job as admin an easier one. So, thank you, EEng. Keep doing good. El_C 12:14, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't get too used to it. My parole officer says that put the final touch on my community service hours so as soon as the ankle bracelet's off I'll be back to my usual appalling self. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 14:16, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , since I don't want you to regret your kind words, I want to be sure you understand that...
 * This was sincerely meant.
 * This was sincerely meant.
 * This was sincerely meant.
 * OK, this was not sincerely meant, though it had a message. (The implication that the things he wrote at ANI were somehow P's fault was the last straw.)
 * The lesson? I really am the nicest guy in the world, just like you thought, and willing to go to some length to help my fellow editors, but there's a certain kind of IDHT that gets my Irish up. (I must say these partial blocks do save a lot of drama.) <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 15:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Followup: Buried in this rambling post is a point I've made before, which is that I've never understood why we go to the trouble of redacting PAs and legal threats and so on. I think it's better to just collapse  or strike them; otherwise others are left to guess what's in them, and newbies can't learn from them. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 15:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I didn't revdelete Vanisaac's comment. It remains in the permanent revisions for all to see. Sorry to see that Bison-X continues to be unhelpful by personally attacking you. I have warned them against continuing to do so. El_C 16:07, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Yeah, but even without revdel someone has to dig a bit to find what was said, so instead they imagine things; not a big deal but, as I said, I've always thought keeping things out in the sunshine is best. As for me, well, as someone once said, EEng who, and I'm fairly confident that he would agree with me on this, seems pretty much flameproof, and who is quite capable of breathing hilarious-but-scorching flame himself when the need arises. . So while I appreciate the sentiment there are others who need the defense more, and anyway I don't think any advice you give BX is going to sink in. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 17:10, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * My advise remains: to have some decorum to context. I try to view things from the viewpoint of the victim when there's victimization. Anyway, no further admin intervention is needed at this time, so I don't feel obliged to keep going on about this with them. Otherwise, they are free to bring to review anything they see fit at any time. El_C 17:24, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I actually don't know what "decorum to context" means (though it has a nice ring to it). <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 21:37, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * A sense of decorum that's governed by the context of the incident in question. It's not a riddle! El_C 21:41, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I see, sort of like "add salt to taste". <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 21:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , just so you know, Ivanvector seems to have forgotten to notify you as per WP:BLOCK that you are blocked from editing a user's talk page. I am sure it was just an oversight. Sir Joseph (talk) 04:51, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Actually, the purpose of such a surgical block is to reduce drama, and imposing such a block silently achieves that very nicely, I think. The blocked editor finds out about the block in due course if need be, and if they object they can contact the blocking admin directly – unlike with a normal block, which restricts the editor to their own talk page. (If policy doesn't actually allow such silent blocks it should, I think.) <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 05:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you agree that the block reduced drama but in retrospect I handled notification badly for this. For what it's worth and I'm sure you know already, I blocked you because you were interrupting a discussion which otherwise looked to be quickly heading for resolution among the offended parties, and while I'm sure you meant to help, their reactions to your comments should have shown you were not; I blocked when you started commenting what looked to me like parting shots. My apologies for not saying so then; I should also have said so in the discussion: clearly everyone else wasn't aware because they kept asking you to leave when you couldn't reply. Honestly I had not interpreted that the policy requires a notification, I spend most of my blocks on sockpuppets who as a rule I don't notify. Thanks to you both for the reminder. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 10:34, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Partial blocks are still new. We are in uncharted realms. Norms of decorum (that was for you, EEng) are, at this time, poorly-codified. What may seem intuitive may clash with the longstanding block policy. Still, editors in good standing deserve a notification with any sanction whatsoever, I think. Not that this is a big deal. It isn't. For my part, I welcome the input and intervention of other admins to this incident. El_C 15:17, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

White House Farm murders
Noted you have recently devoted time and focus to the Jeremy Bamber articles, EEng. I have several printed sources, and can delve. If you need any sections expanding or facts citing, let me know. Regards, --Kieronoldham (talk) 02:43, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey there! Of course I wouldn't dream of doing anything substantive on White House without you, but first ... remember Moors Murders? There are (literally) 20 books on my shelf that have been waiting a year for me to get back to that. It'll be a big job, and you're gonna need to contribute too! I thought the pandemic would be a perfect opportunity to get deep into that, but turns out there's a lot of things needing doing during a pandemic if you really look for them. But I'm committed to following through on Moors.So for now, on White House I'm just trying to clear out the underbrush. It's impossible to read, much less comprehend, because of the haphazard organization, the jumping around in time, and the tone/overdetail problems. But, again, getting into real substance will have to wait until Moors is put to bed. (Actually, two things have already come up you might be able to address: (1) there's a confused paragraph on the parents' estates -- see the {explain} templates; (2) search the word grandmother -- which grandmother disowned him?) <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 04:41, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Well *coughs* (non-COVID-19) the firm I work for is considered an essential public service,, so I had and have to work through the pandemic (not that I get public applause). I actually don't have this article on my watchlist, but may add it back. Just read sections and noted you were devoting focus. As for the Moors Murders article, it seems to have stagnated, I'll delve into that again going forward. Regards,--Kieronoldham (talk) 22:53, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Well, I've read and annotated two or three of the main works on the Moors case, but there are several more to go before I can even begin to take stock. Somewhere we (you and me and and several others) did talk about a general plan for things that needed to be done; the one I remember in particular is the article completely fails to address social impact of the case. All in good time. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 23:04, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * June Bamber was the daughter of Leslie and Mabel Speakman. They had two daughters, but no son. Pamela married Robert Boutflour in '47; June Nevill Bamber in 1949. Therefore, as both married farmers themselves, the family wealth and property was to be bequeathed (I believe) between their daughters' families. The will was changed with David(?) Boutflour's encouragement in September of '85, with Jeremy Bamber removed as a beneficiary. This link may be of interest. --Kieronoldham (talk) 23:17, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Good work. As you can see the same kind of ownership impulses are bubbling to the surface as those which caused so much trouble on Moors, so batten down the hatches. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 02:01, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Think I receive the nautical direction. Aft it is. On top, though, I have to add that greater emphasis needs to be added to the "Jeremy innocent" advocates' claims.--Kieronoldham (talk) 02:19, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You may very well be right about emphasis problem; the problem is that, as it stands, it's impossible to absorb what the article currently contains -- much less evaluate it for balance -- because of its constant jumping around.From what you say you seem to be ready to give special attention to the hatches aft, which is good because we don't want any aft holes getting in the way of whipping this article into something like readable shape. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 02:30, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Déjà vu. Whatever happened to Moors murders, I wonder... El_C 02:32, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * EEng, I devote focus on one article at a time, typically, as I am sure you know. I'm more than wiling to devote focus upon areas of concern for yous. I will refocus on the Moors Murders article too in short time. a collective focus is what we all wish for. Deja vu means something different to me... --Kieronoldham (talk) 02:50, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * El C, I'm not sure what you're asking or saying exactly, but it does seem that murder brings out the worst in our fellow editors. See also Insiders Call The White House 'Crazytown ... <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 03:12, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Good, I remain a mystery wrapped in an enigma wrapped in a vest. El_C 03:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * "Whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."--Kieronoldham (talk) 03:24, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ( responding to ping ) England has a house they call the "White House"? They're such copycats. Levivich&thinsp;[dubious – discuss] 06:39, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

The first two gifts fell a bit flat. 

However, I am nothing if not persistent. I just see you as especially difficult to amuse, a fun side quest on Wikipedia. "Amuse EEng with a template".

So, let's see if I've managed it this time.

See. Despite its name,.

It's got some bugs, but haven't we all? (Don't answer that.) Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 21:00, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Added to the toolbox . But really, my man, no need to shower me with such gifts. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 01:13, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
 * --Mdaniels5757 (talk) 01:18, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Aaron Molyneaux Hewlett
Hi there -- I'm afraid I don't totally understand the message you left on my talk page. If there are issues with the sourcing I'm more likely to leave this article as-is and just aim for some other DYK options in the future. It would be super helpful if someone could look at whatever is in the actual print archive at Harvard because I think there is some primary source stuff there that might allow me to cut out Family Search as a source entirely which would be great. Jessamyn (talk) 19:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I have a soft spot for nonacademic Harvard staff (see Charles Apted andn ) because they're usually characters. I've tagged some of the sources for further improvement. Not for a while, but sometime in the future I'll pull up his material at Harvard Archives and see what we can do with that material. Ping me in a few months if I haven't done it yet. When we've done all we can we can get a WP:Good article review and thence to DYK, for which there are a number of good hooks -- and the photo with his equipment, cropped a bit, would be good on the main page. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 21:18, 9 March 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, I forgot to add a section header
Saw this and it reminded me of you. Well, one bit did. I'll leave it to your readership to decide for themselves which bit. <b style="font:1.3em/1em Trebuchet MS;letter-spacing:-0.07em"><b style="color:#000">nagual</b><b style="color:#ABAB9D">design</b></b> 16:55, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm ashamed to say I missed this until now. Every is required to click. <b style="color:red;">E</b><b style="color:blue;">Eng</b> 05:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * What's a couple of years between friends? It's understandably easy to miss a message or two when your letterbox encompasses the entire ground floor. <b style="font:1.3em/1em Trebuchet MS;letter-spacing:-0.07em"><b style="color:#000">nagual</b><b style="color:#ABAB9D">design</b></b> 16:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Thus proving the value of keeping some of these threads live well past their normal expiration date. I duly clicked on the link and was duly amused. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:56, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I do worry that he might be having to climb in through his bedroom window, and he's preparing food in the bathroom on a camping stove, but it does provide some amusement on a rainy day. <b style="font:1.3em/1em Trebuchet MS;letter-spacing:-0.07em"><b style="color:#000">nagual</b><b style="color:#ABAB9D">design</b></b> 21:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

You may want to archive your talk page
WP:ARCHIVE. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:56, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'd never heard of this "archiving" concept before. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 21:01, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Theresa May may want to resign. Donald Trump may want to remove his hand from the "send tweet" button and engage brain before posting. However, we can't always get what we want. <b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b> <sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk) <sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)  21:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Maybe Trump will declare my talk page a national emergency. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 21:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Does no one notice this irony: one of the things that makes your talk page so big, is all the notes from people complaining that your talk page is too big? (BTW the reason you were graced with a custom "archive this" notice instead of a template is because the user got a lot of grief for templating me to archive my talk page. Even though mine is a tiny seedling compared to your magnificent tree here.) -- MelanieN (talk) 22:49, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
 * "Hey you Mexican kids, get off my 1,000 mile long lawn!!" --President James. K. Veto (too late for Talk) 23:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)

What I want to know is why do your talk page archives cap out at under 100 threads but your main talk page is 300+? This is completely backwards and against all conventions of decency. It's like you're thumbing your nose at the universe. Leviv&thinsp;<span style="display:inline-block;transform:rotate(45deg);position:relative;bottom:-.57em;">ich 16:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

A very, very clever gothca!

 * From a discussion on an article talk page :


 * Support for the reasons given above. BushelCandle (talk) 00:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. GorillaWarfare (talk) 02:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Support. You can all thank me later. <b style="color:red;">E</b><b style="color:blue;">Eng</b> 04:13, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * They can only thank you if they can load your talkpage. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 15:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * "... surrounded by a rocky coastline that's covered with petrified tree trunks.... Martinevans123 (talk) 12:30, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Sorry
138.75.82.114 (talk) 08:13, 5 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Wait, 885 kilobytes? Jesus. 138.75.82.114 (talk) 08:15, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * The Bible's like 4MB; this page ain't half as holy. Levivich 06:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
 * @Levivich: The Bible is only 4 million characters long?! That doesn't seem right for a 'book' consisting of 30 or so books. But hey, what do I know? 138.75.82.114 (talk) 07:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Notre-Dame de Paris fire: Difference between revisions
You make me laugh ~ mitch ~ Mitchellhobbs (talk) 01:13, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Vive la différence! <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 01:24, 19 April 2019 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Notre-Dame_de_Paris_fire&diff=next&oldid=893358254 Revision as of 20:57, 20 April 2019 EEng I was just seeing if you were paying attention I knew it wouldn't lasted long Mitchellhobbs (talk) 22:48, 20 April 2019 (UTC)


 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Notre-Dame_de_Paris_fire&diff=893648089&oldid=893646972 Latest revision as of 18:40, 22 April 2019 188.108.153.142 moved it ~ but I think it flows well there ~ what do you think? Mitchellhobbs (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I think the IP is preoccupied with making images in a vertical stack all have the same width, which is a good thing in general, especially when they're vertically adjacent, but not so important if there's substantial distance between them. IAnyway, it's OK either way -- too early to spend much time on layout because the article will grow a lot over the next few weeks and then it will become clearer where to place the images. See my comment here . <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 18:58, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

A fitting tribute on Good Friday, perchance.

 * Glad to see you again, and thank you. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 21:41, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I note you are still on patrol. <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 01:41, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, you know how I get once I taste blood. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 01:53, 20 April 2019 (UTC)

Archiving mayhem
I was wondering how this archiving happened, but beat me to fixing it. It turns out this was the culprit. Fixed now. Retro ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 00:30, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * , editor says you beat him. We try to avoid violence here at Wikipedia, so please refrain from beating other editors. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 00:50, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Category:Wikipedians who beat other Wikipedians? — Paleo  Neonate  – 00:59, 1 June 2019 (UTC)


 * Well, I have been called a shill for pretty much every company, service and product mentioned at User:Guy Macon/Yes. We are biased. (and a paid shill for the "Twisty Bulb Cartel" when I mentioned that compact fluorescent bulbs use less energy than incandescent bulbs, but LED bulbs use less than either), So a special "when did you stop beating your fellow Wikipedia editors?" award seems like it would fit right in on my shelf... --Guy Macon (talk) 01:56, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:SANFRANJANBANSFRAM listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SANFRANJANBANSFRAM. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:SANFRANJANBANSFRAM redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Oshawott 12 ==== Talk to me!  01:30, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Just to be clear
Everyone is very busy discussing where to draw the line on being rude and unpleasant, but making lame jokes is completely unacceptable. Triptothecottage (talk) 03:28, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * I think it's the lameness that offends. These are highly cultured people, after all. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 03:56, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
 * What is the meaning of it? KoopaLoopa (talk) 06:18, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Nvm I think I figured it out - San Fran's Jan Bans Fram. KoopaLoopa (talk) 06:20, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * All this time we never knew you were Pastis. Your secret's safe with me.  Dlohcierekim (talk), admin, renamer 16:13, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Watch your step lest T&S disappear you for outing me. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 18:24, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Gulag-apedia. I hear Siberia is lovely this time of year.  Dlohcierekim (talk), admin, renamer 18:44, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * One Year in the Life of Ifram Denisovich. Martinevans123 (talk) 18:53, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello everybody. I read that book about fifty years ago at my boarding school. It has come flooding back. particularly the bit about the bread and the ciggy for goodness sake. -Roxy, the dog . wooF 21:26, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Since this is clearly your first time editing and I am in no way templating a regular, we hope you will choose to stay here and contribute positively. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on the redirect discussion for Wikipedia:SANFRANJANBANSFRAM by assuming I am creating a hostile environment by mocking people with peanut allergies. Please remember that even peanuts have feelings, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you and have a nice day. --WaltCip (talk) 18:42, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * EEng's talk page gets all the nuts. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:57, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * "My T&S BANFRAM brings all the nuts to the yard....": etc. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:36, 30 June 2019 (UTC)

Just a heads up that supervoted and speedy deleted the redirect per G10. WaltCip (talk) 23:26, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Seriously considering my future here.  Dlohcierekim (talk), admin, renamer 01:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Next?
Is WP:CANFRAMFANSBANSANFRAN next on your list? Fut.Perf. ☼ 10:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


 * WP:FRAMBANNED,SANFRANDAMNED,ARBCOMJAMMED —/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 10:36, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * ^^^^ Definitely the best yet. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 17:51, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * FRAM FRAMED, JAN NAMED, ARBCOM AIMED. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:49, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


 * WHOA BLACK BETTY, BAN FRAM, JAN.--WaltCip (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2019 (UTC)


 * "I have gotta Admin name of FRAMA-BANA-JANA-LAMA-DING-DONG": Martinevans123 (talk) 17:38, 2 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:CANSANFRANBANFRAM?


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:CANSANFRANBANFRAM? requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. <i style="background:#185;color:#fff;font-weight:bold;font-size:.9em;padding:2px 5px;">Anne drew</i> (talk) 21:57, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * And speedily declined. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:03, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * (edit conflict) Speedy declined. Not the same as the version that was deleted previously. Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:05, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Brad, for speedily edit conflicting you! --Tryptofish (talk) 22:07, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia:CANSANFRANBANFRAM? listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect CANSANFRANBANFRAM?. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:CANSANFRANBANFRAM? redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. <i style="background:#185;color:#fff;font-weight:bold;font-size:.9em;padding:2px 5px;">Anne drew</i> (talk) 22:08, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


 * WTF? The moon must be in clueless. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 22:17, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


 * "CANJUNEMOONSHAKESPOONMOONEYSOON"?? Martinevans123 (talk) 22:26, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * How much rue do Anne drew Andrew and Drew rue if Anne drew Andrew and Drew do rue what they do? —David Eppstein (talk) 22:35, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Moo. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:38, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I know. I just didn't feel up to the challenge. Congrats. Martinevans123 (talk) 22:42, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
 * He's a foo. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 23:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Partial list of images needing deletion because they attack or disparage:



<b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 02:41, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Wham Fram Thank You Jan? Martinevans123 (talk) 08:59, 2 July 2019 (UTC) Note: no snowflakes were intentionally harmed in the construction of this piped link.
 * ^^^^ This one is quite good too. <b style="color: red;">E</b><b style="color: blue;">Eng</b> 17:57, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
 * "Hey man, well she's a total blam-blam"!  Dlohcierekim (talk)

Greetings from Dr. Seuss

 * Improvements and extensions welcomed!

I AM FRAM. FRAM I AM. THAT FRAM-I-AM! THAT FRAM-I-AM! I DO NOT LIKE THAT FRAM-I-AM! WOULD YOU LIKE A BAN OF FRAM? DOWN ENWIKI'S THROAT TO RAM? WOULD YOU BAN HIM FOR A YEAR? ISSUE RATIONALES UNCLEAR? PERHAPS TRANSPARENCY YOU FEAR?