User talk:Gnanapiti

Wodeyar
This article is essentially an "uncited" repeat version (for most part) of Kingdom of Mysore. Since we are working on the Kingdom of Mysore for FA, the "Wodeyar" article needs to be reduced to a stub or short article describing what the name means etc.Dineshkannambadi 19:21, 16 September 2007 (UTC)


 * Surely the Wodeyar chronology info can go as it is repeated in Mysore Kingdom .Info on growth of Kingdom, Tipu, Haider Ali dont belong there anyway. We can keep the lead paragarph, "curse of Wodeyar" etc and clean it up later.Dineshkannambadi 21:52, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Perhaps a detailed message (later on) to Rajachandra when we are ready to go for FA for Mysore Kingdom to help trim the Wodeyar page would do.Dineshkannambadi 22:47, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Warning
Do not remove my posts from talk pages, why do you have a tag on the front of your page which says you practice good faith, that is false because you are a vandal. Accept tha facts that Shahrukh Khan is Muslim, and learn to live with that.--Khan1982 16:14, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

Keynes
I am sure there is little chance of people thinking I am J M Keynes, the economist. He died before wikipedia came up, so I think I'll stick to the name until somebody gets confused. I did not know the policy with choosing IDs, but I am glad I did not choose a recently deceased person instead, so I'm still on safe ground. Thanks for the concern though, I appriciate it. --Keynes.john.maynard 19:49, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

copy edits
Gnani, a very experienced copy editor helped us on the Karnataka FA with his copy edits. Do you recall his name?. Perhaps we can get his help for Mysore Kingdom related articles.Dineshkannambadi 11:59, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * User:Writtenright. Thanks, - KNM Talk 14:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sarvajna Manauscipts.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sarvajna Manauscipts.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 00:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

Copyvio image
Hi Gnanapati, The Image:Bulltemple.jpg you uploaded is copyrighted (see ) and seems to elegible for speedy deletion. Perhaps you can request the photographer to release it under a "free" license and re-upload it. I didn't want to template an experienced editor like you, but if you are interested in the technical details regarading wikipedia policies you can see the links at. Regards. Abecedare 02:00, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Bhadrawati
Do you have an image of the Bhadrawati Iron Works? If you do, please add it to Mysore Kingdom administration section. The current image in Bhadravati is not clear.Dineshkannambadi 19:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Absolutely. Put them in the Music section. you should add them to Musicians of Mysore Kingdom also (19th-20th century paragraph I think). Make sure the permissions are ok. What happened to the Sarvagnya manuscript image?Dineshkannambadi 19:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

dasara
Hi. Can you get permission for a Dasara procession painting from this collection of Kamat. .thanks.Dineshkannambadi 14:57, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

In fact there are several examples of Mysore paintigs in that web page. If one of us could write a more detailed article on Mysore painting, we know where to get the images from.Dineshkannambadi 18:54, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Karnataka DYK hits a century
Congrats!!! We have reached a significant milestone in the Karnataka WikiProject today when the 100th DYK related to Karnataka has been featured on the main page of Wikipedia.. You can see the entire list here.

Thanks a lot for your contributions in making this happen -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 02:05, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Yakshagana
Your edit summary said "Please discuss on the Talk page." I have discussed it to death on the talk page. I have provided references from Britannica, The Sangeet Natak Academy, and Shivarama Karanth himself. Please read Talk:India for an extensive set of references. Yakshagana is not considered a classical dance form. It is traditional theatre which has elements of dance and music in it, like Jatra of Bengal and Tamasa of Maharashtra. If you do not revert you edit, I will pursue this on WP:ANI, and if need be pursue arbitration. Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  17:28, 18 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Can you please take a look at the following. They need some work.
 * Yakshagana Raga
 * Yakshagana Tala
 * Yakshagana Poetry


 * ~rAGU (talk) 19:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Sri Lanka issues
Please see: Discussion move and Specific proposal Your participation and acceptance would be appreciated. — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 21:18, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi there; just a friendly reminder that we really need your input on the proposal being discussed here. Without it, we can't craft a solution which is acceptable to everyone, and without indicating your willingness to go along with a solution, the whole process could fail.  Thanks in advance, --Haemo 19:32, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Kingdom of mysore
Thanks for the support.Dineshkannambadi 14:03, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Karnataka on Main Page
Congratulations!! It is on Main page now!!. Thanks for all your efforts!!! Also, ಕನ್ನಡ ರಾಜ್ಯೋತ್ಸವದ ಹಾರ್ದಿಕ ಶುಭಾಶಯಗಳು!!! Best Wishes of Karnataka Rajyotsava!. - KNM Talk 00:17, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Exciting. Happy Rajyotsava to you too. Gnanapiti 00:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

And I am honoured to be a part of an awesome group like ours.Dineshkannambadi 00:27, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * ರಾಜ್ಯೋತ್ಸವದ ಶುಭಾಷಯಗಳು. It will be even sweeter this time with the appearance of Karnataka on the front page -- ¿Amar៛ Talk to me / My edits 01:03, 1 November 2007 (UTC)


 * ರಾಜ್ಯೋತ್ಸವದ ಶುಭಾಶಯಗಳು. Rajyotsava is made even significant with the appearance of Karnataka on Main page. -- Naveen (talk) 02:20, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

K of M
ThanksDineshkannambadi 15:07, 4 November 2007 (UTC)

Thanks; of course
Hey thanks! Feel free to remove everything which is POV, but I repeat - POV. Please don't remove things which are very well referenced. I'm grateful to you for taking care. Much appreciated. Best regards, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  20:15, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh and BTW, yes I did want the article to reach an FA status, but I guess it was not there yet, and respect everyone who supported and opposed, including you - dear Gnanapiti. Thanks, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  20:21, 5 November 2007 (UTC)


 * What and/or how is that twaeking? A ref is provided. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  17:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I've added a source to that. Let's get to some more important things. According to you, is askmen.com an RS? Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  17:12, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * In the second refs, (quote) - "Credited with bringing a change in the image of Hindi film heroine, the dimpled lady from Himachal is known for her steadfast approach and honesty." Best regards, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  17:15, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Could you please write a message to Blofeld? He's left Wikipedia because of the fights on Zinta's article. Shahid •  Talk 2 me  17:21, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks, it's OK!!! I like it that way when it's neutral, and at the moment, I like you friend :). Do you think Blofeld comes back? I'm afraid! Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  17:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Do you find the quote re her father unnecessary? "Father's death is a terrible experience for everybody" - that's the POV here. Angelina Jolie is not on good terms with her father, and her background section is full of quotes, describing that. It's really important to me Gnanapiti, and it's neutral Btw.
 * I'm ok with the removal of "Variety of diverse" - LOL. Regards, Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  18:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Halegannada.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Halegannada.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:06, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Equilibrium
Hi Gnanapiti, Thanks for adding "pepper" in your edit summary "chicken alone was proved dubious, not pepper" accompanying your edit on the India page. Although I didn't completely agree with your edit summary (since both the archaeological and the genetic evidence for sugar and oranges is beset with the same uncertainties as those for chicken), I did agree that the case for "black pepper" is much stronger. So, I first simply reinstated "black pepper." But, later, realizing that "black peppper" and "chilli pepper" are more spices than foods, I changed the "foods" to "spices." The sentences on "Indian cuisine" in the culture section now read: Indian cuisine is characterized by a wide variety of regional styles and sophisticated use of herbs and spices. The staple foods in the region are rice (especially in the south and the east) and wheat (predominantly in the north). Spices originally native to the Indian subcontinent that are now consumed world wide include black pepper; in contrast, hot chilli peppers, popular across India, were introduced there by the Portuguese. I only realized this morning that they have a kind of symmetry: they start out with a general statement about the cuisine(s) and the spices, and then follow up with a sentence each (involving examples or vignettes) on the staple foods and spices. Thus, even in seeming antagonism, equilibrium can be reached if people make and acknowledge substantive points. So, thanks! Fowler&amp;fowler «Talk»  14:50, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Image
Hi Gnanapiti. I am curious to know why the image which I uploaded (Image:Dravidian(people).jpg) was deleted, and why it was considered as "Patent nonsense and gibberish, an unsalvageably incoherent page with no meaningful content" (G1 Category for Speedy Deletion). The image had been created as a collage from images which had already been uploaded on Wikipedia. It was also done to show some famous people who were Dravidian, and I think that I had covered most states, ethnicities and fields (such as cinema, politics, etc.) Daavir 01:20, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Bollywood
Why are the figures not true if it is well referenced with a RS source? Shahid •  Talk 2 me  06:26, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * A reply please? :) Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  06:42, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Kannada literature
I'll shoot through a few more Kannada writers tomorrow if you like -his bibliography needs addressing -although it looks like the Times of India is a bit vague on his works. I often look at adding images for deceased people where a free image can't be located. This is partly why I was offended by the Bollywood blog thing where I spent weeks trying to get us a secure deal which I believed was valid to help WP India and wikipedia in general and see it trying to be deleted. I would rather not have had to confront anybodu. Best regards  ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦       "Talk"? 22:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Nicely done. Perhaps you could expand and ref K. V. Akshara a little  ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦       "Talk"? 23:02, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

I have no idea how much online info there is on Kannada poetry, but it would be good to have series of articles on some of these writers works, poems and novels etc. I always think this encyclopedia looks more resourceful when some of the works of these people are documented  ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦       "Talk"? 23:07, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes reliable sources is always a problem -we certainly can't write an encyclopedia based on junk. Perhaps there is a library in Bangalore or something (if you live in Karnataka) which has the books or scholarly extracts discussing them. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦      "Talk"? 23:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

OK Gorur Ramaswamy Iyengar. I'm off to bed now. Best regards  ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦       "Talk"? 23:17, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

Hi. Could you try to find some info on Honnuhole River - I cleared a link earlier. There must be some info available. Gracias ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦     "Talk"? 18:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Great. Sivanasamudra Falls I also saw red linked. If I can get some info on that later I'll stub it. Thanks and sorry we had to cross paths with that Sarvagnya thing. Regards ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦      "Talk"? 19:01, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I am glad to be of service.
Dear Sir: I am glad to be of service. And please let me add that I also have no particular "axe to grind" against feminism, as I tried to make clear: the feminists surely have many valid points to make which merit careful consideration. Do we wish to bring back suttee? How many poor wives throughout history have been beaten by drunken husbands? The feminists are right: enough is enough! I merely wish to shield the English language, which is my mother, my sister, and my daughter, from verbal abuse by the well-intentioned but inerudite mobs of 20th Century opinion. I once had a French professor named Rosmarin from Montreal who was perfectly bilingual. He said: "I detest this term 'chairperson'." It's just not beautiful English. Namaste, Writtenright 04:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)Writtenright

Hinduism
I dont understand why we're rounding the numbers off. Isn't 800 million still pretty far away from 1 billion?TelusFielder

South India
Hi Gnanapiti,

I would like to invite your attention in to the discussion happening at Talk:South_India. Some users think that Maharashtra and Orissa are also be considered as South Indian states. Some others think the opposite. Your comments on the issue will add value.

Thanks in advance, -- Rajith Mohan (Talk to me..) 08:42, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Happy New Year
To you.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 23:55, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Hmm, unfortunately I won't be available when the Indian Test team comes to town, so no photo of Kumble....I will be around when the ODI comes to town though.  Blnguyen  ( bananabucket ) 07:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Poverty in India Image
There is a discussion going on regarding whether or not the following image should be a part of the Poverty in India page. Most Poverty in *Country* pages do not have any images, at most 1. User:Otolemur crassicaudatus has brought many images showing extreme poverty in India and has tried to mislead people into thinking this is the way a majority of poor Indians live. There is a vote in which your input would be appreciated. You can find this discussion here

I feel that the the Bodhgaya Beggar image does not represent poverty in India correctly because:
 * The beggar in Bodhgaya image does not accurately depict poor people in India because they do not look like this. This man is an exception. To say that this man represents all poor people in India is very wrong. A small minority of Indias poor are disabled. Most living under the poverty line work long hours fishing, farming or as construction workers. This picture shows a man whose legs have been broken. Unless a majority of India's or even a fraction of the poor have legs like this, the image is irrelevant and undue to the poverty in india page.
 * Poverty and Disability are not connected in any way. There are thousands of super rich people who are disabled.
 * There are 11 country articles on poverty
 * These have NO images: Poverty in Pakistan, Poverty in Africa, Poverty in China, Poverty in Australia, Poverty in Canada, Poverty in Malaysia, Poverty in Switzerland, Social issues in Brazil,
 * These have 1 image Poverty in the United States, Poverty in France
 * The Poverty in India page is the only one with more than 1 image. And the only reason for this is because User:Otolemur crassicaudatus has brought more and more images onto the page.


 * This user is being uncivil and unyielding. This user has tried to have my user page deleted because it said America is priceless!
 * This image is being used by User:Otolemur crassicaudatus to display his dislike of India and to mislead people into thinking that this is the plight of millions of poor Indians. This user has often added images showing extreme poverty to many India relating articles. Even though this user knows that poverty is present in every country and that extreme poverty is not a fair representation of the Indian economy, this user has previously tried to add an image of children washing their clothes in a mud puddle to the economy section of the India page. This user has added this image to the poverty section of the Economy of India page, when a graph showing poverty would make more sense.
 * WP:Undue says:
 * We should not attempt to represent a dispute as if a view held by a small minority deserved as much attention as a majority view. Views that are held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views. To give undue weight to a significant-minority view, or to include a tiny-minority view, might be misleading as to the shape of the dispute.

This can be applied to this because a very tiny fraction of poor people in India are disabled. Most work very hard trying to make a living for themselves. This image is misleading. Nikkul (talk) 02:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Changes to Music of Karnataka
There is no evidence that Karnataka Sangeetha was formally renamed as Carnatic music by any respected music scholar. Please allow the valid changes to Music of Karnataka. Even it was done one should use the original name first. The intention of the edit is not to remove ‘Carnatic Music’ which is somehow in use by some. The purpose is to present accurate information.Naadapriya (talk) 08:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Please ignore
Please ignore the babblings of someone who fails to observe Wikipedia policy and procedure - his POV was rejected and he is clearly unable to accept it, in which case, Wikipedia is not the place for him. Meanwhile, thank you so much for making Wikipedia a better place by undoing the disruptive edits made to articles like Music of Karnataka. :) Regards - Ncmvocalist (talk) 10:01, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

input
I Need your input on Kannada literature talk page.thanks.Dineshkannambadi (talk) 16:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Uttar Kannada
By mistake those links were added. Thanks for deleting.

Tangi-tamma (talk) 02:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Chittani.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Chittani.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 01:55, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

South India
I've re-inserted one of your edits, "South Indians are "Dravidians". Though, Republic of India, as a country does not distinguish races, this word has to be mentioned there, as "Dravidians", has it's own article (not just a stub). In that article, it's mentioned that Dravidians live in SI, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. It could be thought that, it's used in a ethnic way rather than racistic way. Mugunth(ping me!!!,<FONT COLOR="#FF8000">contribs</FONT>) 03:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Gnanapiti<BR> Just saw your busy note and dropped by to say hello. Hope everything is alright. - KNM Talk 22:13, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Joga
Hoi, I searched lot of water falls. It appears that the Jog is the highest/deepest in Asia. We have to confirm this. However, I for going ahead and making the claim. I have searched may water falls database etc and also all falls listed in wiki. If there is a dispute we can review it. It is a way to confirm what we believe. apparently there is no way we can confirm it other than believing the sources on the internet. Let me know.

~rAGU (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 18:04, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mungaru Male.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mungaru Male.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BlueAzure (talk) 18:31, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:INDIA Tagging with TinucherianBot for WikiProject Karnataka
FYI- Your attention and help is requested .You are receiving this note as you are the member of the project -- <em style="font-family:Kristen ITC;color:#ff0000"> TinuCherian  (Wanna Talk?) - 05:06, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sudeep
A tag has been placed on Sudeep requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Amog | Talk •  contribs 08:25, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Telugu script needed
Hi, can you add the Telugu script at Chaunk? Thank you, Badagnani (talk) 17:45, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

SRK
Do you think the controversies section is needed at all? Apart from being poorly sourced and terribly written, it's non-notable. SRK has been of so many controversies in his life - and mentioning only two pieces is POV. Also, the Manoj Kumar controversy belong more to the Om Shanti Om article, and the Salman Khan one is one of many tiffs he's been involved in. The cases are so briefly described and IMO ruin the article. Just nonsense. ?? Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  21:09, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You took the words right out of my mouth. That's exactly what I think (and said:))). I can't remove it unfortunately, but if you can, please do. Or please note that on the talk page. Shahid  •  Talk 2 me  21:18, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

BIMARU as a derogatory term
The section heading "People who wish to denigrate the Hindi speaking states of India talk of them by using the epithet BIMARU states and highlight the following characteristics:" is perfect, isn't it? BIMARU is a derogatory term as well, which was earlier not reflected in the article at all. Please don't take it personally.. 122.169.83.195 (talk) 16:57, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Restoring User:Sarvagnya's tags
I would like to pursue your restoration of the tags added by User:Sarvagnya followed by this opinion of yours. I would like your answer to the following 1) What is original research in the article? 2) What has been sythesised? 3) What are the citations you want checked? 4) Why you think it is only one sided (POV)? I would like you tell me the other side of the story and let us make it NPOV. I would appreciate pointed and precise answers to all the 4 quos. Thanks.  Docku: “what up?”  03:00, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Discrimination faced by the Bihari community in India
You have edited the article, Discrimination faced by the Bihari community in India. I would suggest you to read this article - Discrimination, before you make any personal judgment and restore to edits like this, so as to delete information related to prejudicial treatments faced by Biharis. I appreciate some of your edits, which add more information to the article and makes it a NPOV. Thank you. Manoj nav (talk) 09:41, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

hiii
r u a BOT operated by User:Sarvagnya,i think so —Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiTestingPage (talk • contribs) 11:15, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Folk Art?
It is very sad to note that Yakshagana has been placed next to folk dances like Bhangra. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_folk_dances. We need to do something about it. Yakshagana rhythms are one of the most sophesticated and complicated for any art in India strictly follows classical Tala system and not folk groves as in Bhangra. The dance needs years of learning of abhinaya and practice of scholarly debate. The dialog is spontanious and improvisation of all of its part, dialog, dance and music is a unique feature not seen in any other art form. We need to create a section called semi classical art forms and add Yakshagana.

~rAGU (talk) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raguks (talk • contribs) 21:39, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Purandaradasa.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Purandaradasa.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:03, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Kanakana Kindi.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Kanakana Kindi.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Yakshagana
We need to revamp the Yakshagana page. I have tried to add information but needs a new organisation and more artistic pictures. Thanks. ~rAGU (talk)

Hoi, I have been trying to gather some people to edit Yakshagana add info but failed. Please try you seem to have more contacts. I have added Chande, tala, Maddake etc articles. Please take a look and add if you can. Thanks Ganapathi.

~rAGU (talk)

AfD nomination of Allegations of State terrorism by Sri Lanka
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Allegations of State terrorism by Sri Lanka. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Allegations of State terrorism by Sri Lanka. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:31, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Media bias in India
Though I have writing to wiki I am new to Wikipolitics. "Media bias in India" got deleted by comments and votes of those who either did not care, did not know or had vested interests. I will be thankful if you can create or revoke and allow an article of that nature mature. I only write and lack energy and time to fight politics. Thank you for the support, ~rAGU (talk)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Gnanapiti! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:40, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) K. V. Akshara -

Request for peer review.
Hi Gnanapiti,

I am Tejaswi, a native of Siddapur, Uttarakannada. The article Namadhari naik belonging to Karnataka wikigroup, is edited by me and deals with the community history of the Namadharis/Halepaiks of Uttara Kannada. In creating this article i have referred to most of Kannada literature sources, some of which are really rare [ex; Bombay gazetteer in Karnataka: Dharwad,Belgaum,Bijapur and Kannara districts, Venkataramgo Katti; Kaada toreya jaadu: Autobiography of Kadidal Shamanna; Kagodu ondu nenapu, C.B.Chandrashekhar;The Nayakas of Ikkeri, K.D.Swaminathan;,Bimba-Pratibimba, Dr.L.R.Hegde;D.L.N Avara Ayda Lekhana, Kamala Hampana]. These form a necessary part of the glorious literary tradition of Kannada language and need to be seconded. hence i request you to kindly review the page.

offlate, i have been facing unilateral notices on the material without a proper knowledgable discussion on the topic. the member issuing notices seems to lack relevent knowledge in the subject and is defintely biased. but the warnings and unwarranted editing may lead to the page loosing out on the precious information derived from above mentioned sources. So i request neutral observers like you to review it and opinionate. thankyou

Tej smiles (talk) 17:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

New heading 'Historical reference' added to Belgaum Border Dispute.
Plz check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belgaum_border_dispute#Historical_Reference. I have added new info which should change the way this dispute has been seen till now and tilt the balance in Karnataka's favour. It is obvious that it might face war-editing from certain sections. I request you to follow the page and ensure the truth prevails.

Tej smiles (talk) 17:45, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedians from Karnataka
Hi, I'm trying to put together a list of Wikipedians from Karnataka. I'm also trying to gather together the contacts. The idea is to build a network of Wiki enthusiasts, contributors from the region that could help sync off-line Wiki activity, bring together people who can work together in effectively reaching out to the public in the region on using Wikipedia and related open content projects. Can you help by sending your contact and also by referring editors from Karnataka you've come across on Wikipedia? Thank you, --H P Nadig \Talk \Contributions 19:37, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Udupi and Dosa
you have been involved in a an edit war with an IP for a long time and are reverting my edits without participating in any sensible discussion. I started the discussion here and please explain why all those random references make any sense. -- Car Tick  23:27, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Random references? For starters, better than NO references. Gnanapiti (talk) 00:27, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Sep 2010
Hi, Can u please upload any licence free images of Puneet rajkumar and Raghavendra rajkumar. Ur Rajkumar image also not very good. If possible please upload another rajkumar image. (Kannadakumara (talk) 19:42, 22 September 2010 (UTC))
 * The image of Rajkumar is not clear because this was taken in a non-digital camera long time back and now cropped to fit the purpose. Can't help it. I do have Puneet and Raghavendra's images. Will upload them. Gnanapiti (talk) 14:31, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Agumbe morning.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Agumbe morning.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 13:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Agumbe malgudiroad.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Agumbe malgudiroad.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 13:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Agumbe malgudihouse.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Agumbe malgudihouse.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 13:45, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Bhadra dam.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bhadra dam.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 18:06, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Karnataka Userbox
Just letting you know that WikiProject Karnataka now has a userbox: User WikiProject Karnataka. --Ashershow1talk • contribs 00:22, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

March 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Idli. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''This is your final warning. Three editors have disagreed with you, yet you present no argument other than you don't agree or like it.'' &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  18:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Request
Please work on articles "Kannada language", "Kannada people", "Kannada script" and make them featured articles (Kannadakumara (talk) 18:10, 7 June 2012 (UTC))

FAR
I have nominated Bangalore for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here.  →TSU tp* 09:03, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

About Havyaka Origin
Hello, from this edit I came to know that you've mentioned about a Shilaashaasana near Varadahalli. Can you please provide more info on that? Where exactly is it? Harish / talk / Contributions 14:57, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Vrushasena Naveena.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Vrushasena Naveena.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 16:29, 4 July 2012 (UTC)


 * You can also see commons:User_talk:Titodutta --<span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#ED791A 0em 0em 0.8em,#F55220 -0.8em -0.8em 0.9em,#1D6B00 0.7em 0.7em 0.8em;"> Tito Dutta  ✉  18:41, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Linganamakki dam.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Linganamakki dam.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:48, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Yakshagana - unclaimed statements removal
Namaskara. I observe you have developed Yakshagana article, but now I observe in the article that so many edits have been done which were unsoursed and some against wiki policy ( such as, a link is added in the middle of the article!) Can you kindly have a look and do some clean up. I am also trying to improve it, but I am not good at copy editing. Thank you. Pl.donot feel otherwise for writing this directly to you.Rayabhari (talk) 04:11, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Mehandi.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mehandi.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.imagestation.com/8536618/3932363420 (dead link). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <font color="#CE2029">Super <font color="#FF3F00">Mario <font color="#FF8C00">Man  22:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Kranti Kannada Daily for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kranti Kannada Daily is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kranti Kannada Daily until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bharathiya (talk) 14:37, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Usha Kirana for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Usha Kirana is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Usha Kirana until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Bharathiya (talk) 01:04, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VKGokak.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:VKGokak.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:14, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Chittani Dancing.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Chittani Dancing.jpg, which you've attributed to Mr.Upadhya(http://www.aupadhya.com/yak/). I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Kuvempu.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Kuvempu.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:17, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Hanumantha.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hanumantha.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:45, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Mahiravana Edaneeru.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mahiravana Edaneeru.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Devendra Shivashankara.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Devendra Shivashankara.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:45, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Uloopi Mantapa.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Uloopi Mantapa.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. <span style="background: turquoise;font-family: 'Segoe Script', 'Comic Sans MS';">(t) Josve05a  (c) 16:42, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kuvempu sign.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Kuvempu sign.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Shivaramakaranth.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Shivaramakaranth.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION : This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KSNa.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:KSNa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Yakshagana Progress.jpg


The file File:Yakshagana Progress.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "orphaned image, no encyclopedic use, questionable license"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:LS2005-Shimoga
Template:LS2005-Shimoga has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:57, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Karnad, Karnataka


The article Karnad, Karnataka has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Utterly lacking in sources and coordinates, so we can't even cheat by looking at a map. Not listed in the Census of India. Fails WP:V."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:07, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:G Adiga.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:G Adiga.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)