User talk:HJ Mitchell/Archive 75

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 03:44, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

UK Wikimedian of the Year 2013
The Wikimedia UK AGM will be held in June, and nominations for the UK Wikimedian of the Year are currently open. If there is someone who you feel has made an important contribution to the UK Wikimedia movement in the last year please go ahead and nominate them here by 09:00 (BST) on Monday 20th May at the latest. Richard Nevell (WMUK) (talk) 12:53, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Arrest of Daniele Perazzi
Hi HJ,

What was the problem with the added section about the arrest of Daniele Perazzi? I included a verifiable source, the POV was quite neutral, it was not "original research" in any way shape or form, and it is newsworthy and accurate.

FWIW, I'm not merely sympathetic to Perazzi, I'm outraged at the Denver police's actions. Fine, the cab driver was a retard, but the fascist pigs should have figured out that it was stupid to arrest the executive of an Italian shotgun manufacturer bringing half a million dollars in custom shotguns to a gun show.

60.248.2.163 (talk) 04:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, I agree it was moronic; if you're going to allow people to buy guns from the supermarket, it's strange to arrest someone for taking a load of them to gun show. But we received a complaint at OTRS that the content was inaccurate and not really relevant to the company's article, and I tend to agree that the text as it was (assuming it was accurate) gave the incident undue weight. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  15:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 13:33, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Great job so far
Great job so far on List of sieges of Gibraltar.

I made more comments at Featured list candidates/List of sieges of Gibraltar/archive1.

I think it's close and almost ready for Featured quality, pending some additional stability of those incorporated changes. :) Cheers, &mdash; Cirt (talk) 14:44, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 09:11, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Don Wright Faculty of Music
THANKS - appreciate your fixing the "Don Wright Faculty of Music" page! 24 May 2013 --LisaRae7 (talk) 18:41, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi!
--Admitunit (talk) 13:53, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

--Aliceruth5954 (talk) 13:55, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello - Academic Dress Editathon
From John Horton

Jch8 (talk) 13:55, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

--Dean burgon (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages
Hi HJ Mitchell. :) I restored Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, as it is definitely notable. For example, it has its own entry in The Routledge Encyclopedia of Language Teaching and Learning. You can send it to AfD if you want, but it will almost certainly be kept, in my opinion. Best — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 08:59, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * That's certainly your prerogative, but I'm not sue what the benefit to the encyclopaedia is of restoring such a poor article without a single reliable source when even the subject wants it deleted. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  17:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks for your help, Tom, it was really great to have you there. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  17:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Optical Express
Hi, there are some recent edits by COI editors directly on Optical Express page. I have posted a comment on the Optical Express Talk Page and would be grateful if you could review when you get a spare moment. Thanks. Hardlygone (talk) 10:39, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look. Thanks for the heads up. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  17:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Oxford Meetup 5
Hi, I'm concerned about the low level of support for the fifth Oxford Meetup. Are you unable to attend, or is it that you haven't seen the geonotice? -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:21, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid my finances are rather strained at the minute. The £10 to New Street to meet Doug wouldn't be too much of a problem, but the £35 to get all the way to Oxford is more than I have to spend on getting to a meetup, much as I like the company in Oxford. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  17:25, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * for responding. See you next time! -- Red rose64 (talk) 18:31, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Image for Shreveport
Greetings HJ, I noticed you recently deleted an image regarding Shreveport that was used on quite a number of things including a template and the Shreport project. I would recommend in the future if an image is deleted that is high use, it might be beneficial to leave a note on the appropriate projects page. Not that you need to do that in every case, but it seems useful in the cases where its used heavily by a project. Happy editing. Kumioko (talk) 14:38, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I see where you're coming from, but it was one of a batch of images I deleted last night (some here, some on Commons) after a complaint to OTRS led me to them. I suppose a courtesy notification might not hurt, but the popularity of an image won't save it from deletion if it was uploaded in violation of somebody else's copyright. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  15:49, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Yep no worries. I fixed it in Template:WikiProject United States but lord knows when it will be implemented. There's a huge stack of changes pending implementation for that template and its growing by the day. I have several more to do still. I left the edit request template on there for a week and after no one did anything I just removed it since it apparently isn't important. Eventually if the changes become important enough then maybe someone with admin rights will implement them since I'm not allowed too. Kumioko (talk) 16:37, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 09:14, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Disruptive edits on Terry McAuliffe
Instaurare is making disruptive non-neutral edits on Terry McAuliffe, such as calling him a "tireless money man".

I, LitmusCycle, and Safehaven86 have made it clear that his edits are non-neutral and does not belong on the article, but he does not seem too care.

Instaurare also make edits to Ken Cuccinelli who is the direct opponent to Terry McAuliffe in the coming election, which I believe is a conflict of interest. Illegal Operation (talk) 00:39, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Illegal Operation, can we please work together instead of you trying to shut me down with ridiculous insinuations? Instaurare (talk) 15:44, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * That won't be passible since you ignore everyone else. Illegal Operation (talk) 23:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)


 * The article talk page shows that is not true. Instaurare (talk) 00:30, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

htOptimal_Computing_Budget_Allocation
Hello my name is Alexandre Cheytanov and I am doing research on Optimal Computing Budget Allocation. Through my research I found this link to view research by one my previous professors. The link is provided below. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimal_Computing_Budget_Allocation I see that the article has been removed due to promotional/advertising. I would still like to read the article. I have emailed the professor who did the research but he does not have a copy of the specific article. Could you please send me the article that was posted under this link vie email at &lt;redacted>

Thank you very much
 * Done. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  16:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Rollback?
Hello, HJ Mitchell. I chose your name randomly from the list of administrators willing to grant rollback, and I'd like to request the tool. I've been patrolling the recent changes page for a while and have been using Twinkle to rollback edits. When I was first using TW on recent changes, I made some errors, but learned from them quickly. At this point, I think I'm using TW correctly and fairly, and would like to venture into the world of being a "Rollbacker". I'd certainly appreciate it if you would see fit to allow me the privilege. Thank you. -- Winkelvi ● ✉ ✓ 00:14, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Done. A lot of your experience is very recent, but you seem to be on the right track. As long as you're as careful with rollback as you were with Twinkle when you knew I'd be scrutinising your reverts, you'll be fine. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  16:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations!

 * Thanks Nick! HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  16:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Oxford Meetup 6
I'm sorry that you were unable to attend the fifth Oxford Meetup. I intended to send this message on Monday, but I've been a bit busy, sorry.

Several of us would like to continue with the monthly plan, since trying to make a two-monthly cycle fit into the University terms doesn't work very well. It does occur to me that "first Sunday" is 7 July, which would clash with Coventry 8. Perhaps one of them could be second Sunday (14 July) which probably clashes with London 71, for which no date has yet been set, but there were reports at Oxford - I think from - that the London attendances are down. A page has been created about the sixth Oxford Meetup; please sign up if you think that you are able to attend - if the date or venue are unsuitable, please comment at its discussion page.

Please spread the word to anybody else who you think might be interested. The next UK meetups are at: London, 16 June; Manchester, 22 June; and Coventry, 7 July. -- Red rose64 (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I deliberately scheduled Coventry for the nearest date in the future that didn't clash with anything; if both are on the same day, I won't be able to make Oxford, but I think it would be unfortunate for two meetups so close to clash. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  16:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

History of Gibraltar
Hi Harry, you'll recall that you contributed to the FA review of History of Gibraltar few months ago. I've nominated it at TFAR for July 13, the tercentenary of Gibraltar becoming a British territory. If you have any thoughts on this you're very welcome to comment at Today's featured article/requests. Prioryman (talk) 20:31, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 00:13, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Re: Small Soldiers
This is a little late since I went on a wikibreak, but thanks for the heads re use of undo/pending changes. --Jtalledo (talk) 11:39, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

a section was deleted, which is Vandalism and offending NPOV
I will appreciate your advice, concerning what can be done if Wikipedia rules are offended. The section British_diplomacy_in_support_of_the_Arabs was deleted by user:pluto2012. In my opinion, this deletion is offending these 2 rules:
 * Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia.
 * do not remove sourced information from the encyclopedia solely on the grounds that it seems biased. Instead, try to rewrite the passage or section to achieve a more neutral tone.

I have complained at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard but no one is taking care. The offender does find errors in the removed section, but claims for a lack of other views. In my opinion there is no other view, but even if it would exist, it should be added to the section rather than deleting it.

What can be done in order to enforce the Wikipedia rule? Ykantor (talk) 11:41, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: May 2013
Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 22:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre
{||}

Petition
Hi, I saw you are the admin who semi-protected this article, see, there is one paragraph which was lost in the middle of this edition, it's the first one which starts like this: "Two Royal Egyptian Air Force (REAF) Spitfires bombed Tel Aviv. One of them..." Could you restore it? Thank you in advance. Kordas (sínome!) 09:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You should be able to do it yourself—it's only semi-protected (ie you only need 10 edits and a four-day-old account to edit it). Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  14:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Peter Penfold/GA1
Wondering if you've had any time to look further at Talk:Peter Penfold/GA1? Looking over it, there are only really two things that need to be done to meet the criteria: some very minor things regarding the lead; and a couple of statements that could use a better source than Penfold himself. - Shudde  talk 10:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Petition
Hi, I saw you are the admin who semi-protected this article, see, there is one paragraph which was lost in the middle of this edition, it's the first one which starts like this: "Two Royal Egyptian Air Force (REAF) Spitfires bombed Tel Aviv. One of them..." Could you restore it? Thank you in advance. Kordas (sínome!) 09:45, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
 * You should be able to do it yourself—it's only semi-protected (ie you only need 10 edits and a four-day-old account to edit it). Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  14:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 08:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Peter Penfold/GA1
Wondering if you've had any time to look further at Talk:Peter Penfold/GA1? Looking over it, there are only really two things that need to be done to meet the criteria: some very minor things regarding the lead; and a couple of statements that could use a better source than Penfold himself. - Shudde  talk 10:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Indeed, and neither of those should be too difficult to address. I've been busy in real life recently and I have limited time online at the moment, but I should be able to make some progress before the end of the week. Thanks for your patience, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  16:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

inquiry for copyediting improvements Christopher Nolan
Hello sir, I'm looking for someone to look over and do a quick pass on this bio. English is not my first language so I'm having problems with writing good/great prose. Would be much appreciated

Sammy J.Sammyjankis88 (talk) 22:47, 13 June 2013 (UTC).
 * I can probably find time to run over it later this week or early next. Do you just want me to have a quick look or are you looking to nominate it for GA/FA? HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  16:53, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the reply HJ Mitchell! I would love to see the article reach GA or even FA sometime in the future, but I don't see myself as a good enough editor for that. While I have the knowledge, English is not my first language and I'm struggling to write longer coherent sentences. I'm sort of waiting for a more experienced editor to take over the command. Anyways, the first step would be to have someone go over the prose and fix whatever they think need to be fixed. Any help or contribution is greatly appreciated.

SammyJ. Sammyjankis88 (talk) 23:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC).

Oxford Meetup 6
Hi HJ; further to User talk:HJ Mitchell/Archive 75, a date for London 71 still hasn't been set, so I propose to shift Oxford to 14 July 2013, the second Sunday in July, thus avoiding a collision with Coventry. Hopefully, this means that and yourself will be able to make it. Do you have an opinion? -- Red rose64 (talk) 16:25, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi, since Coventry 8 have a prior claim to the date, and given that nobody has (yet) claimed 14 July for any UK meetups, I have decided that Oxford 6 should be held on 14 July 2013, and not 7 July as previously advertised. In this way, those who wish to attend both may do so. I hope the revised Oxford date is convenient for you. -- Red rose64 (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Redrose, thanks for re-scheduling. I don't think there are many people who would struggle to decide between Oxford and London, but I think meetups in two relatively close provincial cities would have been unfortunate. I can't speak for Doug—he might be off enjoying his new-found freedom—but I'll be there if I can. Btw, you really should come up to a Coventry meetup one of these days. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  17:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I've had one apology for absence already. I'll try to come to Coventry some time; I have a friend who lives in Allesley Park, who is an active CAMRA member. Trains from Didcot are funny: I always need to change at Oxford, where there is one train per hour to Coventry. On weekdays it's a 25-minute wait at Oxford; on Sundays it's supposedly 7 minutes, but the train that gives that 7-minute wait doesn't always run, so it could mean waiting 20 mins at Didcot for one that does run, then 50 mins at Oxford. I gotta be sure... -- Red rose64 (talk) 18:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, I said I didn't think there were *many*; WSC is evidently one of the few. Don't they have buses—they're a bit like single-carriage trains with rubber on the wheels ;)—from Didcot to Oxford? HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  19:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Indeed, yes, with 17 mins to get from Castle Street to the station, it can be done; last bus home is 18:30 so last train from Coventry is 17:25. -- Red rose64 (talk) 20:22, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Gibraltar sieges
Hi HJ, I think you may have addressed my concerns at FLC, but you haven't responded to the comments? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi TRM, I addressed one of them the other day, but I've not been online since then. I'll try to get back to the FLC by the end of the week. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  16:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Cool, no stress. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 22:47, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Rfa Preparation
Hi, HJ! My name is EnglishEfternamn, or EE, for short. I am writing because I have been on Wikipedia since 2006. I however, left WP in 2007 and have recently returned. I know I am trying to move things along very quickly, but I aspire to be within the scope of adminship inside of the next month or so. Would you be willing, as an experienced user, to guide me into that process? Keep in mind I'm not asking you to nominate me now (or ever), I'm simply asking for guidance on how I can move in the right direction. Cheers! EnglishEfternamn *t/c*  05:50, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If I can provide a few tips as well:
 * your edit count is far below the typical 5,000 minimum (you have 1833)
 * you will need at least 8-12 months in a row of consistent 200+ edits per month - any long breaks are huge negatives (especially 6 years)
 * you need to have a better ratio of article edits to talkpage edits (only 1/3 of your edits have been to articles)
 * if you're actually asking someone about becoming an admin, then you're going about it the wrong way ... when at least a half-dozen respected editors ask you, then it might be time
 * You have a lot of work over the next year to become even remotely close to being admin-ready. Good luck (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 09:14, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Some reading for you, EE: WP:Advice for RfA candidates. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:20, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you BWilkins and Kudpung. EnglishEfternamn  *t/c*  03:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVII, June 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:10, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Email
Hi HJ - just wondered if you got the email I sent last week, and if so whether you've had a chance to consider it? Thanks. An  optimist  on the  run!  14:34, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah yes, I promise I'm not ignoring you, I'm just busy! I'll get back to you soon; probably the weekend. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  15:59, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:48, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Peter Penfold passed
I've passed Peter Penfold as a Good Article. Congratulations, it was a very interesting article to review and was well written. There are still a couple of comments on the review page that you may find useful. Let me know if any of them are unclear. I've listed the article under Heads of state and heads of government because Penfold was Governor of the British Virgin Islands for a time. Feel free to move the listing to another subheading if you feel there is a more appropriate one, but hopefully I've got it right! - Shudde  talk 08:32, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks very much for your help (and for your patience!). I'm sure it'll be okay under that heading, and somebody can move it if they feel strongly. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  14:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Rainbow Dash
This redirect is locked but I was wondering if it could be added to Category:Pegasi which I hope can be used to keep track of all articles and/or redirects pertaining to Pegasus and/or Pegasus ponies. Ranze (talk) 13:32, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I can't see any harm in it, so done. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  14:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Klemens Murańka
Hi.

You userfied to User:Shoessss/Klemens Murańka after the Articles for deletion/Klemens Murańka but no longer seems to be very active. Muranka has been competing at the World Cup level since 2011 and has one WC podium finish as part of the Polish team. Could you either move this article to mainspace where I will add the world cup info or transfer to my user space where I will work on it and move it?

Thanks. -- Whpq (talk) 10:30, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:46, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Edward Charles Ingouville-Williams
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:07, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * Cheers mate. I'll buy you a physical pint if you're ever in the UK! HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  17:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2013
Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 15:18, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks Roger! Glad to hear it's still going strong in Gib. Drop by for a cuppa sometime. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  13:41, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 09:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Reassessment
Reposting since it got archived Hi HJ, I hope all is well. I know you are away, but if you get a chance to do this it would be great. One of the conditions of my return was that you would review the restrictions after six months. Since that time has elapsed, I was wondering if you would reassess. Thanks for your consideration. Instaurare (talk) 06:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Just noting I've seen this. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  16:38, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Instaurare (talk) 20:22, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi HJ, any updates? Instaurare (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Instaurare (talk) 22:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Instaurare (talk) 22:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi HJ, with respect, it has been well over three months now. Please advise. Thanks! Instaurare (talk) 20:35, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Instaurare (talk) 21:16, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Instaurare (talk) 18:42, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Instaurare (talk) 20:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Okay, I'll lift the restrictions, but for your own sake if nothing else, be careful. I'm not around regularly enough to pick up on these things, but if you start making edits that don't abide by both the letter and the spirit of policy (and relevant guidelines, ArbCom rulings, etc), I suspect it won't be long before you're in an even worse position than you were with the restrictions. For crying out loud be careful. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  08:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

220, 221 and 222
Hi HJ; I made it onto that train - the doors shut 5 seconds after I jumped on. As it was passing us, I forgot to check which class it was - I could have pointed out the bogies. I only noticed when I got off at Oxford that the train consisted of a and a  coupled together, so at the join, you would have seen something like this - notice how the wheels of the Class 220 unit (left) are very much exposed compared to the other; in fact, the only components that obscure the wheel are the brake caliper and that footstep. On the class 221, there is the bogie frame, including one of the suspension springs. On class 220, the refreshment facilities consist of little more than a trolley. has the same bogies as Class 220, but has "full" refreshment facilities - you can get hot food, I think that it's via a microwave oven. -- Red rose64 (talk) 18:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hey Redrose. I saw you get on the train, but alas it pulled away just as Widefox got to the top of the stairs (if I had a penny for every time that happened...). The difference is obvious now you point it out, thanks! As to the 222, I don't trust East Midlands Trains' definition of "hot food"! Much as I'd like to, I probably won't be able to get to Oxford at the weekend. I've already committed to Chester and I'd like to support Bristol while it's getting off the ground, and I don't think I can afford a third train journey, even being creative with how I buy tickets. I'll do my best to get to the next one. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  17:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Apparently Class 222 also has fewer seats per coach - and therefore more kneeroom - than the other two. -- Red rose64 (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I've just found the bit of paper from last Sunday, so, but it's only got a few names on it. Around that table, there were ten people at one time or another, but I only have six handles: ; ; ; ; ; and . I'm still two people short. Do you recall who they were? -- Red rose64 (talk) 16:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Now the kneeroom I believe. was there; as to the rest, I don't know. There was at least one who didn't have a username, and obviously others are very careful about what information they share about themselves.  HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  08:26, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 17:55, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Ahhhhhh! Helpppp!
Something has happened to the content box on Children Act 1989.. Helpppp! Its not a big deal.. but if you could look at it for me? ツStacey (talk) 18:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Nevermind.. it seems to have happened to lots of pages =S Someone messed up somewhere.. ツStacey (talk) 18:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
 * See WP:VPT. -- Red rose64 (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Main Page appearance: British military intervention in the Sierra Leone Civil War
This is a note to let the main editors of British military intervention in the Sierra Leone Civil War know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on August 10, 2013. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director or one of his delegates (,, and ), or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. You can view the TFA blurb at Today's featured article/August 10, 2013. If it needs tweaking, or if it needs rewording to match improvements to the article between now and its main page appearance, please edit it, following the instructions at Today's featured article/requests/instructions. The blurb as it stands now is below:

The United Kingdom's military intervention in Sierra Leone in May 2000 was the first large-scale intervention by British forces in the country's civil war. A team was dispatched under Brigadier David Richards (pictured in 2012) to evacuate foreign citizens after the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) advanced on the country's capital, Freetown. British forces then began to assist the U.N. Mission in Sierra Leone and the Sierra Leone Army (SLA). They first came into direct contact with the RUF 10 days after arrival, when the rebels attacked a British position near Lungi International Airport. While training the SLA for confrontations with the RUF, a British patrol was taken captive by a militia group known as the West Side Boys. Negotiations achieved the release of five soldiers; three weeks later, British special forces freed the remaining six, restoring confidence in the British mission. The RUF began to disarm after political pressure and economic sanctions were exerted on its supporter Liberia. The British training teams were replaced by an international force in September 2001. The mission's success vindicated several concepts, including the retention of high-readiness forces. UcuchaBot (talk) 23:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in an interview in The Bugle newsletter
Hi Harry, In the upcoming edition of The Bugle Ian and I would like to run an interview with editors who have an interest in military history topics and are also active in Wikimedia chapters about their experiences with the chapter(s). If you're interested in participating, I'd appreciate it if you could respond to some or all of the questions at WikiProject Military history/News/July 2013/Interview by next Monday 22 July. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Nick, thanks for the pointer. I've left sme replies there. Feel free to move them or format them as necessary. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  19:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot for this - those are very interesting comments. Nick-D (talk) 11:31, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

WLM +
Harry. Thanks for your message on my talk page. As I say there, I shall not be at the Chester Wikimeet. IRO Wiki Loves Monuments, this seems to be concerned with taking photographs. So far as Cheshire is concerned, most of the Grade I listed buildings already have photographs, and so do a high proportion of the Grade II*. The major absentees are the country houses, for which there are frequently problems with access. I do not wish to commit myself to anything at present, but please keep me in touch with local happenings. Cheers. I'll watch this page for any response. --Peter I. Vardy (talk) 13:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Peter. Sorry, I didn't see the section further up. Hopefully there'll be a next Chester meetup and we'll meet there. Wiki Loves Monuments is of course primarily about taking photographs, but it's also about getting people involved in Wikipedia and getting existing Wikipedians together to do interesting things. It's also a key to other things, for example there have been discussions with English Heritage and its equivalents in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, so there's a possibility of an ongoing relationship with them that could be useful to those of us who write articles on listed buildings. Oh, and I expect if WLM is reasonably successful this year, we'll expand it to Grade II in the future—we kept it simple this year because it's the first time for the UK. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  14:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Optical Express
Hi, I have posted a message on the Optical Express talk page re POV editors breaching previous agreement around consensus and direct edits. I would appreciate if you could visit and comment. Thanks. --Hardlygone (talk) 14:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the pointer. Golfbravoecho is clearly in the wrong and doesn't want to stick to the agreement, so I've blocked them. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  14:52, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Just to note, there were some previous edits which I highlighted an alternative for on the talk page too as I felt there were aspects of original research in some of the words used. I appreciate you looking at this --Hardlygone (talk) 14:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't really have time at the minute to try an adjudicate thins on the talk page (besides, you see o be doing a good job), but I'll intervene if I see somebody's conduct fall that far below the standard for an encyclopaedia editor. What is it with that article? HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  15:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXXVIII, July 2013
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:46, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 July 2013
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 21:36, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

X-Cops
Hello. I recently submitted "X-Cops" to FAN, and I was told it looks good but that it would be a good idea to get it looked over "by someone who's fresh to it". Is there any chance you could look over it, and then drop a few comments off at the FAN page. Thanks!--<font face="Arial Black"> Gen. Quon  (Talk)   14:57, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm afraid I'm unlikely to have time at the minute. Sorry. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  17:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)