User talk:HiDrNick

Your notification to me
You alleged that I made an edit to a page concerning some type of molecule...

This concerns me, not because I am ashamed/guilty of any malicious act, but because I never made any such edit. Perhaps the notification of the edit was sent to the wrong I.P.; other possiblities, such as someone else operating under my I.P., are the concern I feel.

I wanted to respond to let you know that I wouldn't make any sort of joking-edit (i.e. the edit that was allegedly made on the page.. very silly), and that other nonproductive edits from this I.P. should be approached cautiously (I'm not sure what that means in substantiation).

Regards, M.Ciesler — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.195.236.12 (talk) 00:54, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Goodness, that notification was left way back in October 2009. IP addresses can change fairly often, so I imagine that message was not actually intended for you, but rather someone else who was using that address back then. If you enjoy editing Wikipedia and would like you avoid this issue in the future, you might consider registering an account; of course, it's not required, and IP contributions are always welcome.  Hi DrNick ! 01:23, 25 May 2011 (UTC)

Important Notice: Your 2013 Arbitration Committee Election vote
Greetings. Because you have already cast a vote for the 2013 Arbitration Committee Elections, I regret to inform you that due to a misconfiguration of the SecurePoll we've been forced to strike all votes and reset voting. This notice is to inform you that you will need to vote again if you want to be counted in the poll. The new poll is located at this link. You do not have to perform any additional actions other than voting again. If you have any questions, please direct them at the election commissioners. --For the Election Commissioners, v/r, TParis

A barnstar for you
I'm humbled. Like two ships in the night; I was in the middle of a post on your talk page. Thanks, Hi DrNick ! 14:45, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I made no error
I saw that the page had an error. Somebody must have let their child get on the computer while the page was open. It had the error that the cats "emerged" 25 million years ago. Now I am not going to lie to you, I have not been on too many walks in my lifetime, but not a single one of the few walks I have been on included a new species flying out from a rock or dirt mound. What luck the person that witnessed such a thing as a whole species of cat "appearing" must have had. Jake Dinger — Preceding unsigned comment added by VinceCarter32 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Involved admin
Good summary, but I think you meant "lifted by any uninvolved administrator". Bishonen &#124; talk 22:13, 15 March 2015 (UTC).
 * Derp. Fixed.  Thanks for the heads up.   Hi DrNick ! 22:40, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Please don't remove comments from the talkpage.
The comments at Talk:2015 University of Oklahoma Sigma Alpha Epsilon racism incident are part of an ongoing discussion about whether or not to tone down the discriminatory tone towards the fraternity brothers and whether or not the Obama administration flouted the separation of powers. It's all relevant to the article. Please don't remove them.Zigzig20s (talk) 14:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * This is the edit being referenced.  I'm not going to edit war over this, but will continue to remove screeds when I see them.  Please keep your comments on the talk page focused on the article and reliable sources.  Wikipedia is not a forum for offering your opinions about current events.  Your editing around this topic is bordering on disruptive.   Hi DrNick ! 15:17, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

New edits
Hi Nick. I fundamentally disagree with this edit, which removed relevant information and was done without consensus. The fact that Boren's action was "illegal" is not excessive information; it is new information. The same goes for the fact that Boren's actions reflect badly on the university. I also disagree with this edit, which added some information about another chapter, which is off topic. I also believe this edit is not particularly helpful, as it is a direct quote. Please let me know if you would like to revert all those edits. If you don't, please let me know why not. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 17:25, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I have little interest in getting into a proxy edit war. Let's be patient and see how the article shakes out.   Hi DrNick ! 19:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

WP Conservatism
The WP Conservatism has been removed from the SAE racial incident page. Would you please add it back? I still don't feel welcome on that page, but others at the WP will be interested as it falls within its scope (constitutional issue), so the tag should not have been removed. Thank you.Zigzig20s (talk) 00:01, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Islamic Calendar: Maome image of Mohammed forbidding intercalation
Sorry to try and drag you back into this but I think a bit of expansion on your closing statement may or it might be wishful thinking help reduce the issues with an IP editor. SPACKlick (talk) 14:25, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I've been following the thread on the talk page. In my experience, the best way to handle an editor who refused to drop the stick is to just not engage them, but I'll see if I can think of something intelligent to add.  Hi DrNick ! 14:55, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

New question raised regarding Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/April 2015 move request
Some opposers of this move have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence", which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:38, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

RFA
Thanks for all the kind words! The best part about Wikipedia has always been the people :) Best regards, Sandy Georgia (Talk) 02:56, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Alas, it was worth a try. I had hoped to garner runaway support before you had a chance to shut it down.  Perhaps you could drop a prominent note on your talk page the next time you go on vacation?  Cheers,  Hi DrNick ! 13:01, 11 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:SanFranBan listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect SanFranBan. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:SanFranBan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. GZWDer (talk) 16:37, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. Cheers,  Hi DrNick ! 13:13, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

I have emerged victorious... this time: SanFranBan. Redirects are cheap! Hi DrNick ! 00:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the barnstar
A well done for administrative work on Wikipedia is a breath of fresh air. A lot of feedback for such work is along the lines of "you suck"---not that I can blame someone for being upset with me, for example, for deleting their article. Thanks again! Maxim (talk)  14:11, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Wbm1058's RfA
Hi there. Thanks for your recent bold clerking experiment at Requests for adminship/Wbm1058, but I feel that consensus at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Wbm1058 was against what you did. Over the past few hours, I've messed about quite a bit with that RfA, and basically undone all your hard work. I'm too tired to find diffs and links and stuff; I trust you can find and understand my changes. I hope you find the "hatting" compromise, which is currently implemented, okay. I genuinely do appreciate the bold efforts you made to improve the RfA format, but I worry it might have been at the expense of Wbm1058 and his RfA. I've started a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship in response to all of this, which you may like to opine at. — Bilorv(talk)(c)(e) 22:25, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * No worries, . Thanks for the note.  If hatting long comments at RFA becomes the norm, I'll consider my efforts a success, and I hope that you will, too.  Cheers,  Hi DrNick ! 00:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

RFA vote
Bit random but thanks for restoring my !vote, After looking through the revisions just now to see what the hell's been happening I was bloody shocked to see my !vote disappear altogether, One of these days this place will give me a heart attack , Anyway thanks again, Happy editing. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:52, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!
Happy Holidays text.png Hello HiDrNick: Enjoy the holiday season and winter solstice, and thanks for your work to maintain, improve and expand Wikipedia. Cheers, North America1000 16:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Use {{subst:Season's Greetings}} to send this message

SanFranBan
I just stumbled upon Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2015_June_28 as I wanted to create such a redirect. I'd support getting it undelete if you ever decide to restart the discussion (please ping me if this happens). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:15, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:SANFRAMBAN is a valid redirect nowadays, yet my redirect was deleted in 2015. 🙄 Dubious. Hi DrNick ! 23:02, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sean Parnell (Pennsylvania politician)


The article Sean Parnell (Pennsylvania politician) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:NPOL"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:00, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sean Parnell (Pennsylvania politician) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean Parnell (Pennsylvania politician) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sean Parnell (Pennsylvania politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sedan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Fluorescence in calcite
Sadly no one explained the fluorescence in the calcite crystal on the Main Page, but thanks for trying to encourage a response. I have now moved my request to the Science Reference Desk. Jmchutchinson (talk) 07:46, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)