User talk:Hildabast

Welcome!
Hello, HB-NCBI, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Please come and see us at WT:WikiProject Medicine.

RexxS (talk) 18:27, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Welcome Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (please reply on my talk page) 18:49, 13 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Welcome from here too! -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 18:52, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Wikipedia! Remember if you have any questions or concerns you have our ears, just contact drop us a note. Peter.C  •  talk  •  contribs  16:18, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Great to see you! —MistyMorn (talk) 17:14, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Edits
Yes nicely done :-) There is so much that needs fixing. Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your talk page please reply on mine) 00:48, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, your talk page contributions look excellent too :) So much that needs, erm... "conveying". —MistyMorn (talk) 17:24, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Medicine
Hi I'm contacting you because, as a participant at Wikiproject Medicine, you may be interested in a new multinational non-profit organization we're forming at m:Wikimedia Medicine. Even if you don't want to be actively involved, any ideas you may have about our structure and aims would be very welcome on the project's talk page. Our purpose is to help improve the range and quality of free online medical content, and we'll be working with like-minded organizations, such as the World Health Organization, professional and scholarly societies, medical schools, governments and NGOs - including Translators Without Borders. Hope to see you there! --Anthonyhcole (talk) 08:06, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Edit-a-Thon
Hi Hilda,

I am about to chime in, but have yet to find any articles that are being worked on. Pointers appreciated. Thanks! -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 19:01, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Ketogenic diet
Your interest in updating the ketogenic diet article has prompted me to have another look on PubMed. It seems the journal authors have been busy since I last had a proper look. Since it has been three years since it was last overhauled, I've started compiling a list of new sources to examine. See Talk:Ketogenic diet/NewSources. Given my glacial editing speed and lack of free time, this could take a while. Are you interested in helping? What is your journal access like? Colin°Talk 21:39, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

My journal access couldn't be better (I'm at the National Library of Medicine), but I also have the free time problem. What I could do is myself up to watch out for any trial (I know, unlikely, but if one were to emerge, would want to know about it) and good reviews, and if you had a section for those, I'd post those. Hildabast (talk) 02:07, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library now offering accounts from Cochrane Collaboration (sign up!)
The Wikipedia Library gets Wikipedia editors free access to reliable sources that are behind paywalls. Because you are signed on as a medical editor, I thought you'd want to know about our most recent donation from Cochrane Collaboration. Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 20:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Cochrane Collaboration is an independent medical nonprofit organization that conducts systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health-care interventions, which it then publishes in the Cochrane Library.
 * Cochrane has generously agreed to give free, full-access accounts to 100 medical editors. Individual access would otherwise cost between $300 and $800 per account.
 * If you are still active as a medical editor, come and sign up :)

Flexible referencing from a PMID
Hi Hildabast, In response to your WT:MED query, the easiest and most flexible way I know of building references from PMID without using the automated Cite PMID template is to use the Cite journal template via a form which appears as a pop-up within the default Wikipedia interface.
 * 1) In the default editing window, locate drop-down Templates menu at the left of the main toolbar: to visualize it, you may may need to click on Advanced and then Cite in the main toolbar.
 * 2) From the drop-down Templates menu, select cite journal, which will evoke the form as a pop-up.
 * 3) Enter your PMID (or a doi) in the pop-up form and click on the magnifying glass icon alongside. This will fill in the form and allow you to do further editing such as adding the url, PMCID, doi etc (for certain actions, such as entering the PMCID you'll need to click on Show/hide extra fields).
 * 4) You can preview/parse what you're doing (as well as checking the details of the reference, I like to clean up a few details in the automated text, such as a superfluous period that gets inserted at the end of the article title).
 * 5) When you're ready, just click Insert and you're done.

I know there are ways of editing the output of the Cite PMID template, but like you I haven't found it particularly intuitive. Hope that helps, —81.157.7.7 (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks - yes, that's what I do, and people sometimes go in afterwards and add the PMID to the reference and then the work was all for naught, because the URL was somewhere else (like the author's university website, or a different PubMed database than PubMed or PMC) and it's lost - or at least, it seems to me it always want to use the PMID as the link and ignores the other link, but I'll try again. Hildabast (talk) 17:24, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry about that - out of my depth there, I'm afraid. —81.157.7.7 (talk) 18:18, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I took a look at this diff: . For me at least the link from the title to the pdf of the full text worked fine both with and without  the PMID. Of course, the PMID link itself (ie PMID 2501523) will always redirect to the PubMed entry because that's what these PMID links do.  81.157.7.7 (talk) 07:39, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I'l try again next time - thanks! Hildabast (talk) 10:57, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * No problem. (This ip thinks you're a great contributor!) 81.157.7.7 (talk) 13:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, that's so nice! Thanks! I have a lot to learn, but I'll get there. Hildabast (talk) 19:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
 * It worked - goodness knows what I did wrong before! Thanks! Hildabast (talk) 21:54, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

-- Just spotted the link to your blog. Lovely! I've sent it to friends.

Btw, perhaps I should apologise for not having seen your reply here before posting mine a bit further down  - it may have all looked a bit strange... Anyway, over to you, young Goldilocks! 86.161.251.139 (talk) 16:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * On the contrary, you look to be on your way here to your next Gold.... And your communication skills will help you avoid setting the best against the good 86.161.251.139 (talk) 10:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC) #bear-of-very-little-brain

Disambiguation link notification for July 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Miscarriage, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CVS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:42, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

MR versus ID
You could bring up the discussion on the talk page again Talk:Mental retardation. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 01:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

PubMed Health
Hi - just wondering why this nice.org.uk/glandular-fever] doesn't seem to turn up here (cf ) Am I missing something?

Also, when I click the Systematic reviews filter button I get the patient-oriented A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia. Is that perhaps because ADAM takes his information from systematic reviews? 86.161.251.139 (talk) 10:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * G'day! We don't have the Clinical Knowledge Summaries at PubMed Health, although we're thinking about it. They're not systematic reviews though - we're in the process of going the health technology assessment agencies getting their systematic reviews, not everything that they do. We've been concentrating on building up the systematic review collection, and consumer information, so we still don't have a lot of clinician information. We digitise the NICE clinical practice guidelines because they conduct systematic reviews to do those, so it's the systematic review that we're including. A.D.A.M. is the medical encyclopaedia content we currently use - it's separate from the systematic review content (although unfortunately at the moment if you use a Boolean operator in the search absolutely everything comes up in the centre - which is on my to do list to see about changing). About what we do for encyclopaedia content - that pre-dated my arrival. "Watch this space", basically. 98.233.38.200 (talk) 12:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Doh! The first question was a bit of a dumb one... I asked because, although not strictly speaking a systematic review, the clinical information contained in the Clinical Knowledge Summary appears to have been based on NICE assessment nice.org.uk/glandular-fever#!supportingevidence] of literature gathered with a somewhat systematic search strategy nice.org.uk/glandular-fever#!searchstrategyforpublication]—a factor which led me to weight it highly (as an "ideal source") when trying to provide pertinent descriptive information here. 86.161.251.139 (talk) 06:52, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Fwiw, the idea of PMH ID numbers you mentioned (somewhere) seems to me a worthwhile one. Support... 86.130.63.47 (talk) 21:00, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Yay
Thanks for being here and doing what you're doing. (You too IP!) --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 18:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Aw, that is so nice! Thank you! Hildabast (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Great to see you around again, Hilda! (And thanks to Anthony too!) 86.130.63.47 (talk) 20:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Birth control/GA3
It's been over three weeks since you posted to your GA review here. What is left to be done on the article or its review, and will they be done soon? Please post there at your earliest opportunity. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 19:33, 11 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Yikes, I got caught up in work projects. Should be finished this week. Hildabast (talk) 20:59, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Merging Mental retardation into Intellectual disability
Hi, Hildabast,

All the sources I have been consulting recently for edits to IQ classification and related articles strongly agree that terminology has changed, and what was formerly known as Mental retardation is now called Intellectual disability. The ICD 10 system of terminology appears to be the only one that hasn't fully made the switch, but the reliable secondary sources aren't waiting, and DSM-5 has made the switch. The National Library of Medicine medical subject heading has made the switch also. So I think that the two existing articles need to be merged. I have been reading up on the Wikipedia documentation about how to merge two articles with long edit histories, and that is not easy. I am willing to do all the work, but first of all I will gather the source citations to post to the talk pages of both articles. I hope you will look on as I do the work to make I sure merge the articles correctly. -- WeijiBaikeBianji (talk, how I edit) 02:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eye, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vision (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Reviewed article
no problem about reviewing your article! You earned it by making one that follows all of the guidelines of Wikipedia's new page requirements!

Tritario (talk) 13:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

NIH articles
Hi Hilda.

I'd like to upgrade all of our coverage of the NIH, so I've just started three articles:


 * National Institutes of Health Clinical Research Training Program
 * Foundation for the National Institutes of Health
 * National Institutes of Health Common Fund

Do you know anyone at NIH that might be willing to review completed articles or offer me guidance on content or sources as I go? Ideally, I'm looking for someone with a good grasp of NIH's structure, history and functions, whose job description covers this kind of thing. If you can't think of anyone, is there someone at NIH with overall responsibility for their online presence that I could talk to about this? --Anthonyhcole (talk · contribs · email) 13:23, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit
Hi there - as you may have noticed, the tag was already removed. I'm not positive, but I'm fairly sure it would have been fine for you to do that once it was reviewed. Heck, there's probably a bot for the purpose.

Be well!

Quantumobserver (talk) 04:07, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

eating crow
uh.... finally followed your link to this page and the NIH. I didn't realize exactly how much of an expert you are in bringing Cochrane reviews to the masses - thank for participating in the discussion. I've added a couple of (less defensive) points at the talk page. Ian Furst (talk) 14:21, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the links to PubMed Health, new site to me. Read through the wisdom teeth pages  and . Wanted to send on some feedback - not sure if this is a good place or not, if not - please ignore.  The "Wisdom teeth: is it better to take them out" is out of date (reflects an older Cochrane study?) and refers to a 1% permanent sensory nerve injury rate (overestimate, from the majority of literature).  The fact sheet refers to paracetamol (North Americans' are unlikely to know what this is) and "paralysis around the tooth" (motor nerve impairment) which is not a complication of the surgery.  Finally, the fact sheet states, "Impacted wisdom teeth do not cause problems for most people." but I don't think the statement is based on longitudinal studies where impacted wisdom teeth that communicate with the mouth are retained (which, generally, show a progressive age-correlated periodontitis and resorption on the adjacent teeth).  It appears the statement is based on the RCT which either removed or retained the teeth.  I wasn't sure if this is something that gets updated frequently (or if something you would normally look at), but I thought I'd type. Ian Furst (talk) 02:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

dentin hypersensitivity proper summary of Cochrane review
If you have a minute, can you take a look at the plain language summary for intervention review on dentin hypersensitivity. I need to put a summary in the article on toothache in the prognosis section. When I read the review, it states that the meta-analysis shows 6 studies met criteria, all six showed objective improvements in hypersensitivity. Three of six, assessed subjective improvement in hypersensitivity and none found any difference. The PL summary reads, "This review of trials found there was not enough evidence to show that potassium is effective in desensitising teeth. More research is needed." without reference to the objective assessments. Do you think we should be including a short statement about the effect? Something like "The authors from a Cochrane review concluded that there was a decrease in sensitivity when tested with dental instruments or blasts of cold air, but subjectively the patients found no difference with the use of the toothpaste" or does the lack of data preclude us from stating a conclusion regarding objective assessment. Thank you for any help. Ian Furst (talk) 01:32, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
Good effort and excellent declaration on article Lisa Bero.

Jrcrin001 (talk) 01:15, 10 March 2014 (UTC) 

The Pulse (WP:MED newsletter) June 2014
The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the User WPMed template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.

BMJ offering 25 free accounts to Wikipedia medical editors
Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Medical Translation Newsletter
 Wikiproject Medicine; Translation Taskforce

Medical Translation Newsletter

Issue 1, June/July 2014 by CFCF, Doc James

sign up for monthly delivery



This is the first of a series of newsletters for Wikiproject Medicine's Translation Task Force. Our goal is to make all the medical knowledge on Wikipedia available to the world, in the language of your choice. note: you will not receive future editions of this newsletter unless you *sign up*; you received this version because you identify as a member of WikiProject Medicine

Spotlight - Simplified article translation

Wikiproject Medicine started translating simplified articles in February 2014. We now have 45 simplified articles ready for translation, of which the first on African trypanosomiasis or sleeping sickness has been translated into 46 out of ~100 languages. This list does not include the 33 additional articles that are available in both full and simple versions.

Our goal is to eventually translate 1,000 simplified articles. This includes:
 * WHO's list of Essential Medicines
 * Neglected tropical diseases
 * Key diseases for medical subspecialties like: oncology, emergency medicine (list), anatomy, internal medicine, surgery, etc.

We are looking for subject area leads to both create articles and recruit further editors. We need people with basic medical knowledge who are willing to help out. This includes to write, translate and especially integrate medical articles.

What's happening?

I've () taken on the role of community organizer for this project, and will be working with this until December. The goals and timeline can be found here, and are focused on getting the project on a firm footing and to enable me to work near full-time over the summer, and part-time during the rest of the year. This means I will be available for questions and ideas, and you can best reach me by mail or on my talk page.
 * IEG grant

For those going to London in a month's time (or those already nearby) there will be at least one event for all medical editors, on Thursday August 7th. See the event page, which also summarizes medicine-related presentations in the main conference. Please pass the word on to your local medical editors.
 * Wikimania 2014

There has previously been some resistance against translation into certain languages with strong Wikipedia presence, such as Dutch, Polish, and Swedish. What was found is that thre is hardly any negative opinion about the the project itself; and any such critique has focused on the ways that articles have being integrated. For an article to be usefully translated into a target-Wiki it needs to be properly Wiki-linked, carry proper citations and use the formatting of the chosen target language as well as being properly proof-read. Certain large Wikis such as the Polish and Dutch Wikis have strong traditions of medical content, with their own editorial system, own templates and different ideas about what constitutes a good medical article. For example, there are not MEDRS (Polish,German,Romanian,Persian) guidelines present on other Wikis, and some Wikis have a stronger background of country-specific content.
 * Integration progress


 * Swedish Translation into Swedish has been difficult in part because of the amount of free, high quality sources out there already: patient info, for professionals. The same can be said for English, but has really given us all the more reason to try and create an unbiased and free encyclopedia of medical content. We want Wikipedia to act as an alternative to commercial sources, and preferably a really good one at that. Through extensive collaborative work and by respecting links and Sweden specific content the last unintegrated Swedish translation went live in May.
 * Dutch Dutch translation carries with it special difficulties, in part due to the premises in which the Dutch Wikipedia is built upon. There is great respect for what previous editors have created, and deleting or replacing old content can be frowned upon. In spite of this there are success stories: Anafylaxie.
 * Polish Translation and integration into Polish also comes with its own unique set of challenges. The Polish Wikipedia has long been independent and works very hard to create high quality contentfor Polish audience. Previous translation trouble has lead to use of unique templates with unique formatting, not least among citations. Add to this that the Polish Wikipedia does not allow template redirects and a large body of work is required for each article. (This is somewhat alleviated by a commissioned Template bot - to be released). - List of articles for integration
 * Arabic The Arabic Wikipedia community has been informed of the efforts to integrate content through both the general talk-page as well as through one of the major Arabic Wikipedia facebook-groups: مجتمع ويكيبيديا العربي, something that has been heralded with great enthusiasm.

Integration is the next step after any translation. Despite this it is by no means trivial, and it comes with its own hardships and challenges. Previously each new integrator has needed to dive into the fray with little help from previous integrations. Therefore we are creating guides for specific Wikis that make integration simple and straightforward, with guides for specific languages, and for integrating on small Wikis.
 * Integration guides

Instructions on how to integrate an article may be found here

News in short


 * To come
 * Medical editor census - Medical editors on different Wikis have been without proper means of communication. A preliminary list of projects is available here.
 * Proofreading drives


 * Further reading
 * Translators Without Borders
 * Healthcare information for all by 2015, a global campaign

Wikimedia DC Annual Meeting and more!




Hello, fellow Wikipedian!

I am excited to announce the upcoming Wikimedia DC Annual Meeting at the National Archives! We'll have free lunch, an introduction by Archivist of the United States David Ferriero, and a discussion featuring Ed Summers, the creator of CongressEdits. Join your fellow DC-area Wikipedians on Saturday, October 18 from 12 to 4:30 PM. RSVP today!

Also coming up we have the Human Origins edit-a-thon on October 17 and the WikiSalon on October 22. Hope to see you at our upcoming events!

Best,

James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 08:09, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

End-of-the-year meetups


Hello,

You're invited to the end-of-the-year meetup at Busboys and Poets on Sunday, December 14 at 6 PM. There is Wi-Fi, so bring your computer if you want!

You are also invited to our WikiSalon on Thursday, December 18 at 7 PM.

Hope to see you at our upcoming events!

Best,

James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 02:22, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Museum hacks and museum edits
 Hello there!

Upcoming events:


 * February 6–8: The third annual ArtBytes Hackathon at the Walters Art Museum! This year Wikimedia DC is partnering with the Walters for a hack-a-thon at the intersection of art and technology, and I would like to see Wikimedia well represented.
 * February 11: The monthly WikiSalon, same place as usual. RSVP on Meetup or just show up!
 * February 15: Wiki Loves Small Museums in Ocean City. Mary Mark Ockerbloom, with support from Wikimedia DC, will be leading a workshop at the Small Museum Association Conference on how they can contribute to Wikipedia. Tons of representatives from GLAM institutions will be present, and we are looking for volunteers. If you would like to help out, check out "Information for Volunteers".

I am also pleased to announce events for Wikimedia DC Black History Month with Howard University and NPR. Details on those events soon.

If you have any questions or have any requests, please email me at james.hare@undefinedwikimediadc.org.

See you there! – James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 03:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Wikimedia DC celebrates Black History Month, and more!
 Hello again!

Not even a week ago I sent out a message talking about upcoming events in DC. Guess what? There are more events coming up in February.

First, as a reminder, there is a WikiSalon on February 11 (RSVP here or just show up) and Wiki Loves Small Museums at the Small Museum Association Conference on February 15 (more information here).

Now, I am very pleased to announce:


 * Tuesday, February 17 from 10 AM to 3 PM there will be #WikiTurgy at the University of Maryland. Join fellow theatre enthusiasts for a “mass act of public dramaturgy!”
 * Thursday, February 19 from 10 AM to 4 PM we are hosting the Howard University Black History Edit-a-Thon. We are working in partnership with the Moorland-Spingarn Research Center to improve Wikipedia’s coverage of African-American and African diasporic history.
 * Tuesday, February 24 from 6 PM to 8 PM we have the Black History Month “First Edit” at NPR. Help improve Wikipedia and help others make their first edit to Wikipedia!
 * Finally, our monthly dinner meetup is on Saturday, February 28.

There is going to be a lot going on, and I hope you can come to some of the events!

If you have any questions or need any special accommodations, please let me know.

Regards,

James Hare

(To unsubscribe, remove your username here.) 18:20, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Editing for Women's History in March
 Hello,

I am very excited to announce this month’s events, focused on Women’s History Month:


 * Sunday, March 8: Women in the Arts 2015 Edit-a-thon – 10 AM to 4 PM
 * Women in the Arts and ArtAndFeminism Wikipedia Edit-a-thon at the National Museum of Women in the Arts. Free coffee and lunch served!
 * More information • RSVP on Meetup
 * Wednesday, March 11: March WikiSalon – 7 PM to 9 PM
 * An evening gathering with free-flowing conversation and free pizza.
 * More information • RSVP on Meetup (or just show up!)
 * Friday, March 13: NIH Women's History Month Edit-a-Thon – 9 AM to 4 PM
 * In honor of Women’s History Month, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) is organizing and hosting an edit-a-thon to improve coverage of women in science in Wikipedia. Free coffee and lunch served!
 * More information • RSVP on Meetup
 * Saturday, March 21: Women in STEM Edit-a-Thon at DCPL – 12 PM
 * Celebrate Women's History Month by building, editing, and expanding articles about women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics fields during DC Public Library's first full-day edit-a-thon.
 * More information • RSVP on Meetup
 * Friday, March 27: She Blinded Me with Science, Part III – 10 AM to 4 PM
 * Smithsonian Institution Archives Groundbreaking Women in Science Wikipedia Edit-a-thon. Free lunch courtesy of Wikimedia DC!
 * More information • RSVP on Meetup
 * Saturday, March 28: March Dinner Meetup – 6 PM
 * Dinner and drinks with your fellow Wikipedians!
 * More information • RSVP on Meetup

Hope you can make it to an event! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please let me know.

Thanks,

James Hare

To unsubscribe from this newsletter, remove your name from this list. 02:25, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Nora Volkow
Hello! Your submission of Nora Volkow at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! George Ho (talk) 06:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Link for prose count: User:Dr pda/prosesize. Hope this helps. --George Ho (talk) 21:47, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Nina Starr Braunwald
Hello! Your submission of Nina Starr Braunwald at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --L235 (t / c / ping in reply ) 22:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Vivian Pinn
Hello! Your submission of Vivian Pinn at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SusunW (talk) 23:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Please see new note on DYK nomination template. Yoninah (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Vivian Pinn
Allen3 talk 12:04, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Judith Vaitukaitis
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:02, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Upcoming attractions in DC
 Hello!

Here are some upcoming DC meetups in April and May:


 * Tuesday, April 14: National Archives Hackathon on Wikipedia Space with American University – 2:30-5pm
 * See the latest work on the Wikipedia Space exhibit in the new NARA Innovation Hub and brainstorm on new ideas for a public exhibit about Wikipedia
 * Friday, April 17: Women in Tech Edit-a-thon with Tech LadyMafia – 5-9pm
 * Team up with Tech LadyMafia to improve Wikipedia content on women in the history of technology.
 * Saturday, April 25: April Dinner Meetup – 6 PM
 * Dinner and drinks with your fellow Wikipedians!
 * Friday, May 1: International Labour Day Edit-a-Thon – 1:30 PM to 4:30 PM
 * An edit-a-thon at the University of Maryland

Hope to see you at these events! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please let me know.

Cheers,

James Hare To remove yourself from this mailing list, remove your name from this list. 22:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Upcoming attractions in DC
 Hello!

Here are some upcoming DC meetups in April and May:


 * Tuesday, April 14: National Archives Hackathon on Wikipedia Space with American University – 2:30-5pm
 * See the latest work on the Wikipedia Space exhibit in the new NARA Innovation Hub and brainstorm on new ideas for a public exhibit about Wikipedia
 * Friday, April 17: Women in Tech Edit-a-thon with Tech LadyMafia – 5-9pm
 * Team up with Tech LadyMafia to improve Wikipedia content on women in the history of technology.
 * Saturday, April 25: April Dinner Meetup – 6 PM
 * Dinner and drinks with your fellow Wikipedians!
 * Friday, May 1: International Labour Day Edit-a-Thon – 1:30 PM to 4:30 PM
 * An edit-a-thon at the University of Maryland

Hope to see you at these events! If you have any questions or require any special accommodations, please let me know.

Cheers,

James Hare To remove yourself from this mailing list, remove your name from this list. 23:16, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Nina Starr Braunwald
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 07:17, 24 May 2015 (UTC)

Precious
  "easy, free access to the highest quality health information"

Thank you, Hilda, interested in "ensuring people have easy, free access to the highest quality health information based on unbiased health research", for quality articles about women scientists Judith M. Lumley and Lisa Bero, for making other women in the field known via the DYK process, for a model template, - you are a model, an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC) Five years ago, you were recipient no. 1219 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:00, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

February events and meetups in DC
Greetings from  Wikimedia DC !

February is shaping up to be a record-breaking month for us, with nine scheduled edit-a-thons and several other events:
 * On Friday, February 12, NPR will host a Black History Month First Edit event.
 * On Saturday, February 13 and Sunday, February 14, we're working with the Wiki Education Foundation to hold a series of four edit-a-thons at the AAAS 2016 Annual Meeting.
 * On Tuesday, February 16, we're holding the Smithsonian American Art Museum and American University WikiWorkshop with Professor Andrew Lih's class.
 * On Saturday, February 20, the Smithsonian American Art Museum will host the African American Artists Edit-a-Thon.
 * On Friday, February 26, Howard University will host its second annual Black History Month Edit-a-Thon.
 * On Saturday, February 27, we have three different events. In the morning, we're holding an Accessibility Edit-a-Thon at Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library.  In the afternoon, we'll host our second February WikiSalon at Cove Dupont Circle, followed by our monthly dinner meetup at Vapiano.

We hope to see you at one—or all—of these events!

Do you have an idea for a future event? Please write to us at [mailto:info@wikimediadc.org info@wikimediadc.org] !

Kirill Lokshin (talk) 16:41, 10 February 2016 (UTC)

''You're receiving this message because you signed up for updates about DC meetups. To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the list.''

March events and meetups in DC
Greetings from  Wikimedia DC !

Looking for something to do in DC in March? We have a series of great events planned for the month:
 * On Wednesday, March 9, we'll host our first March WikiSalon at Cove Dupont Circle.
 * On Friday, March 11, the National Archives will host the Women in the Civil War Edit-a-Thon.
 * On Saturday, March 19, the Smithsonian National Museum of the American Indian will host the Color History with the Smithsonian! event, and we'll hold our second Accessibility Edit-a-Thon at the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial Library.
 * On Sunday, March 20, the American Chemical Society will host the Computers in Chemistry Edit-a-Thon.
 * On Saturday, March 26, we'll host our second March WikiSalon at Cove Dupont Circle, followed by our monthly dinner meetup at Vapiano.

Can't make it to an event? Most of our edit-a-thons allow virtual participation; see the guide for more details.

Do you have an idea for a future event? Please write to us at [mailto:info@wikimediadc.org info@wikimediadc.org] !

Kirill Lokshin (talk) 16:30, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

''You're receiving this message because you signed up for updates about DC meetups. To unsubscribe, please remove your name from the list.''

April Fools? Nope! Welcome to the Women Scientists worldwide online edit-a-thon during Year of Science
(To subscribe, Women in Red/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Rosiestep (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2016 (UTC) via MassMessage

GLAM Boot Camp announced (June 14-16 in DC)
You have expressed interest in the GLAM-Wiki US Consortium, so you may be interested in attending the GLAM Boot Camp next month in Washington, DC. This is a training designed to help Wikipedians interested in guiding museums, libraries, and other cultural institutions in wiki engagement. Travel funding available for those in North America. Since the event is coming up soon, please be sure to add your name to the page if you are interested -- and please pass this announcement along. (You may want to share on Facebook or on Twitter.) Thanks for your interest! -MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:24, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Link for GLAM Boot Camp
My apologies - here is the link for the GLAM Boot Camp mentioned above: GLAM/Boot Camp. -Pete (talk) 04:30, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

Bronchiectasis and NTMs
You participated once in improving the page on bronchiectasis. In particular today, I am looking for support in reconciling and improving on two entries on Wikipedia involving a related lung disorder called MAC: 1. about MAI, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycobacterium_avium-intracellulare_infection 2. about MAC proper, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mycobacterium_avium_complex Five years ago a discussion was started on whether to merge the two entries, but no decision was reached. In addition, there are several problems with the existing texts, which I would describe when I hear back from you. I can edit, but need to find professional helpers for changes to substance. Can yu refer me? Others are encouraging me to do this (I have some legitimacy ;-). Seniorexpat (talk) 14:17, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Fair Use in Australia discussion
As an Australian Wikipedian, your opinion is sought on a proposal to advocate for the introduction of Fair Use into Australian copyright law. The discussion is taking place at the Australian Wikipedians' notice board, please read the proposal and comment there. MediaWiki message delivery MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

This message has been automatically sent to all users in Category:Australian Wikipedians. If you do not wish to receive further messages like this, please either remove your user page from this category, or add yourself to Category:Opted-out of message delivery

Disambiguation link notification for March 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sophie Lutterlough, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Monroe, New Jersey. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 19 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks DPL bot! Fixed Hildabast (talk) 13:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

DYK
I nominated an article of yours for DYK at Template:Did you know nominations/Louise Nixon Sutton. The main page and Wikipedia itself are severely lacking on the percentage of women articles, much less African-American women articles. SL93 (talk) 22:10, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks! If it's not too old, this one I did in the last week of March is more a DYK candidate: Carolyn Parker.Hildabast (talk) 22:15, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. DYK articles have to be created in the last 7 days or else I would have loved to consider nominating it. SL93 (talk) 22:18, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I've got lots more to do - will ping you, SL93, when I have a great one! Hildabast (talk) 22:19, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Ok. That would be great. SL93 (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Just read it SL93 - I don't know if anyone else got a PhD from NYU in a different field - Louise was definitely first for mathematics.Hildabast (talk) 22:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC) Sorry about that - I fixed the intro line on the page. Hildabast (talk) 22:24, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
 * It's fine. I fixed it. SL93 (talk) 22:25, 9 April 2017 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Thyrsa Frazier Svager at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with db-g7, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:46, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Onesimus Ustonson
Hi, it's not clear why you did a review on a DYK nomination that another editor was in the middle of. As you can see, he noted that no QPQ was done, yet you went ahead and approved it. We need more help with reviews; please choose one that someone else hasn't started next time. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 23:07, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry Yoninah, I didn't realize when I started, that that was the case. I'm still finding the setup confusing. I'll be more careful. Hildabast (talk) 02:01, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem. Drop me a line on my talk page if you have questions. Yoninah (talk) 09:34, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you Yoninah Hildabast (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Louise Nixon Sutton
Vanamonde (talk) 00:02, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Thyrsa Frazier Svager
Hello! Your submission of Thyrsa Frazier Svager at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! David Eppstein (talk) 00:29, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Nellie Griswold Francis
Mifter (talk) 01:56, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Thyrsa Frazier Svager
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:04, 6 May 2017 (UTC)

Question about doing DYK reviews
Hi, Hildablast, thanks for your message. We have a time difference, so I'm responding now.
 * Yes, those "Reviewed" lines on the nomination template indicate the QPQ that the nominator is submitting with his/her hook.
 * Regarding your review of Template:Did you know nominations/My Brother's Husband, you covered newness, length, and referencing, but do not mention neutrality or close paraphrasing. Here are the five main DYK criteria that need to be checked. Neutrality means the article is written without being pro or against the subject, and is not promotional. Close paraphrasing means that lines haven't been lifted from the sources; you can check close paraphrasing with this tool (I inserted the page name already, and made sure to un-click "Use search engine" so the tool will only check the sources in the Wikipedia article, not on the whole Web).
 * The QPQ submitted for this nomination is not complete; it does not cover all five criteria. I put a notice on that QPQ review (in future, as the reviewer, you could do that, too).
 * You put the notification template on the DYK review itself. It should be placed on the nominator's talk page. (I did that for you, too.)
 * If you suggest a new hook that includes new hook facts, you need to ask for another reviewer to complete the review, using the red icon at the bottom of the list: . (You can still claim it as one of your QPQs, though.) But if you just suggest rewriting/shortening/combining hook facts that the nominator has suggested, you can complete the review.
 * Best, Yoninah (talk) 08:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks you SO much, Hildabast (talk) 11:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Did this one crash somehow or is everything normal, ? It never got the tick, but also can't edit it any more: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Alma_Levant_Hayden Hildabast (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Alma Levant Hayden
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:32, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Alberta Jones Seaton) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Alberta Jones Seaton, Hildabast!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I've added a biography tag on the talk page."

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 11:03, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled right
Hi Ms. Bastian. Just been looking through recently created articles and I've noticed that you're not marked as autopatrolled, so your articles go in the review queue. I can see you know what you're doing, so would you be willing to be nominated to be autopatrolled to save time? Happy to make the nomination for you if you want. Blythwood (talk) 11:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you, - yes, that would be great!Hildabast (talk) 11:54, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK
Hello! Your submission of Georgia Ann Robinson at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Philafrenzy (talk) 10:30, 25 June 2017 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Hildabast, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3AHildabast added] the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing!  Schwede 66  19:07, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks And thanks a lot for the tips - will do! Hildabast (talk) 17:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Georgia Ann Robinson
 So Why  12:02, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Helen Freedhoff
IronGargoyle (talk) 00:02, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Lloyd Demetrius
Dear Ms Bastian

My name is Cordula Matthias, and I am a collaborator and friend of Dr. Lloyd Demetrius. Since you were so kind as to add the title of his dissertation, I would like to ask you if you could also update the photo in his Wikipedia entrance. It is over 50 years old, and does not represent the mature person he is now. He would be very grateful if you could replace it by the photo on his Harvard website (https://mcz.harvard.edu/people/lloyd-demetrius).

Thank you very much in advance and best wishes Cordula Matthias — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:CF:71B:B023:2C01:5E70:78DB:1ABB (talk) 22:08, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Hello - I would be happy to add a photo, but the copyright of that one is unclear to me. To be used on Wikipedia, the photo should be in Wikimedia Commons, which means it needs to be copyright-free. Hildabast (talk) 01:23, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Lloyd Demetrius cont.
Dear Ms. Bastian

Now you will find a recent photo in Wiki Commons.

Thank you very much in advance for your efforts!

Best wishes Cordula Matthias — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:CF:71B:B0F6:5070:7FA6:70B3:D583 (talk) 16:21, 10 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank you - done! Hildabast (talk) 23:12, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Lloyd Demetrius III
Dear Ms. Bastian

Thank you very much indeed for updating the photo on Lloyd Demetrius' Wikipedia site! - However, there is one last request: It was felt that one photo was sufficient, and that the topical one in that big format seemed to dominate the scientific content of the site. Could that be amended?

I apologize for bothering you again.

With best regards Cordula Matthias — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:CF:71B:B0BC:2829:B920:BD24:DD7 (talk) 11:05, 11 July 2019 (UTC)


 * I reduced the size of the main photo, but I left both of them there. Seeing a person at different ages is great. Hildabast (talk) 11:49, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

Lloyd Demetrius IV
Dear Ms. Bastian

Thank you very much for adjusting the size of the more recent photo of Lloyd Demetrius. - Concerning keeping the 50 year old photo: Two portraits at different ages would be very unusual for a Wikipedia site of a scientist. Wouldn't that distract from the purpose of the site, to inform about scientific accomplishments?

Warm regards Cordula Matthias — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:CF:71B:B0BC:2829:B920:BD24:DD7 (talk) 23:43, 11 July 2019 (UTC)


 * No, it's not unusual to have multiple photos, if they are available (see for example Stephen Hawking and Albert Einstein). No, the purpose of Wikipedia biographies is not to focus only on professional lives. Hildabast (talk) 00:05, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Lloyd Demetrius V
Well, the comparisons you make are very flattering ;-), - though a bit out of proportion.

Best wishes Cordula Matthias — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:CF:71B:B0A4:587D:3989:BF86:7717 (talk) 07:52, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 04:57, 24 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks Gerda Arendt! Hildabast (talk) 20:09, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eugen Rochko has been accepted
 Eugen Rochko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Eugen_Rochko help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! echidnaLives -  talk  -  edits  03:05, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you! Hildabast (talk) 03:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Women in Red
Hi there, Hildabast, and thanks for including the Women in Red template on your user page. With all the detailed biographies of women scientists you've created, you'll certainly be a useful member. You may like to sign up under "New registrations" on WikiProject Women in Red/New members where others will be able to see your interest. It doesn't look as if you'll need any assistance but if ever you run into difficulties, please let me know. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 11:44, 17 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Done! And thanks!
 * Hildabast (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Welcome Victuallers (talk) 09:39, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red July 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:43, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red 8th Anniversary
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red August 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:25, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

September 2023 at Women in Red
--Victuallers (talk) 16:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red October 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red - November 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:22, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red December 2023
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:23, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Women in Red January 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red February 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:09, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

A bowl of strawberries for you!

 * Thank you! :)
 * Hildabast (talk) 20:20, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you!
 * Hildabast (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red March 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:22, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red April 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:42, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red May 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:17, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Women in Red June 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:20, 24 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks! Hildabast (talk) 22:00, 24 May 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red August 2024
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging