User talk:Him9

Welcome!
Hello, Him9, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Glass Coach&, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 00:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Glass Coach" ,(the one with a crown)


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Glass Coach" ,(the one with a crown) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.  GPL93 (talk) 00:16, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm JackintheBox. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Prinsjesdag— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. J ACKINTHE  B  OX   • TALK 00:50, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Glass Coach" ,(the one with a crown)


A tag has been placed on Draft:Glass Coach" ,(the one with a crown) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

"The creator appears to have moved on and created the article (Glass Coach (Dutch royal carriage))"

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 11:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Disruptive editing
Please stop your disruptive editing at Beatrix of the Netherlands. She is not the Queen of the Netherlands any longer. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:07, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Toyota Coaster
Hi! I did some rearranging of Toyota Coaster but my information is mostly for the pre-1984 models. Do you know much about the Coaster after 1984?  Stepho  talk 09:01, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

June 2020
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Toyota Coaster. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Stop replacing images with your own, The next time you do you'll be blocked. Thank you. – Davey 2010 Talk 01:42, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Alexander Dennis Enviro500 MMC, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:27, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for told that point Materialscientist,I understand that you refuse me to make that dissition.I will familiarise this problem.E500 MMC is different from E500 so I decided to separate them. Him9 (talk) 14:36, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Davey 2010 Talk 10:34, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

May 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Myint Swe, you may be blocked from editing. ― Tartan357  Talk 01:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
― Tartan357  Talk 01:12, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

List of US veeps.
I don't know why you're being so pig-headed about putting a presidential photo of Nixon in the List of vice presidents of the United States article. But, I'm not interested in an edit-war. If somebody else reverts you? I strongly suggest you don't revert back, or they'll likely have you blocked. GoodDay (talk) 15:18, 26 May 2021 (UTC)

July 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Wilhelmina of the Netherlands, you may be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 07:07, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

September 2022
Hello, I'm Rosbif73. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Prince of Wales have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Rosbif73 (talk) 11:33, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

That's true.However,most of the titles should change to Charles III including changing the profile of diana. Him9 (talk) 11:36, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Duchess of Edinburgh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Her Majesty. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

October 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. You've been warned multiple times about making stuff up or not checking facts. DrKay (talk) 07:44, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Him9! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 07:46, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Your Welcome Him9 (talk) 08:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

November 2022
Thanks for contributing to the article Royal Regiment of Wales. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 11:05, 17 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Him9! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Duke of Edinburgh that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. ''You appear to have been warned many times not to change content without checking your facts and providing a citation. Charles has not been Duke of Edinburgh since he became king.'' Celia Homeford (talk) 14:32, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The title merged with the crown does not mean extinct.Should the extinction date be removed before the king’s death Him9 (talk) 14:49, 6 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Duchess of Edinburgh. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 17:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

January 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 17:58, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

February 2023
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 16:28, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Duke of Edinburgh. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. DDMS123 (talk) 06:05, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

April 2023
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Duke of Edinburgh. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. DDMS123 (talk) 05:13, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 05:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

May 2023
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Duchess of Edinburgh. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. DDMS123 (talk) 06:24, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Duke, you may be blocked from editing. DDMS123 (talk) 06:26, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

July 2023
Hello! I'm DDMS123. Your recent edit(s) to the page Royal Victorian Order appear to have added incorrect information, so they have been reverted for now. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DDMS123 (talk) 18:41, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @DrKay Noting that this has continued post block. TylerBurden (talk) 19:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping. I have re-blocked for a further 3 months. DrKay (talk) 19:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)