User talk:Imtitanium

Welcome! '''Things I'd do to your ASS. Dayumm.'''

Talkback
Look at my talk page and Administrator intervention against vandalism -- Njavallil  ... Talk 2 Me  15:37, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

 * Thank you. I appreciate it.--  I'm Titanium chat  15:11, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank You! :) --  I'm Titanium chat  11:39, 16 October 2012 (UTC)


 * FWIW Imt., while you may not appreciate me saying so, I also think you have turned a corner in the last few weeks. Leaky  Caldron  11:47, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Tito Dutta (talk) 11:49, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
— Mr. Stradivarius on tour  (have a chat) 06:38, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

Your recent comment
Hi again Imtitanium. I just saw this comment you made at Dharmadhyaksha's talk page, and it seems that you are treating your relationship with him as a kind of "battle" to be "won". I think you would do well to read the advice at our policy No personal attacks, and be aware that Wikipedia is not a battleground, but a place to collaborate with other editors. If you disagree with another editor, then we expect that you talk together in a calm and civil fashion, and if talking with them doesn't work then we expect you to follow Wikipedia's dispute resolution system rather than resort to edit warring or incivility. It helps a lot if you focus on the content that you are discussing, and don't mention other editors' personalities or what you think their motives are. If you would like to do some reading to really get to grips with these ideas, I also recommend Wikipedia is not about winning and all the essays linked at the bottom of Assume good faith. Again, let me know if you have any questions. Best — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 13:04, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * He got personal, not me. He keeps being partial towards me and that to you is of no value of course. --  I'm Titanium chat  13:15, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * On that talk page I don't see any comments from him which make any personal remarks about you. He restricted his criticism to the content, not to the contributors.  If I've overlooked a personal attack please quote it here and maybe we can get an uninvolved editor to help resolve the matter. —Psychonaut (talk) 13:18, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * You might be right, but for accusations like this we need evidence, otherwise it falls under one of the definitions of a personal attack: "Accusations about personal behavior that lack evidence." Could you post the evidence of him being partial towards you here? (Preferably including diffs.) If you give me an idea of where I should look I'll go and assess the situation. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 14:18, 17 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I swear to God i have no clue how i got involved with you ppl. I hate Wikipedia now. I have a real life guys. I'm out of here, I'm gonna get myself into no correspondences anymore. U think i'm wrong? block me. U think i hurt someone, block me. I DONT CARE ANYMORE. I forgot that i have real ppl to attend to. This is so messed up i swear. --  I'm Titanium chat  15:43, 17 October 2012 (UTC)

September 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. ''Your edits to the "Controversy" section of Bigg Boss 7 contained negative information about a living person, and the references you provided did not back up your claims. By my count this is the third or fourth time you have inserted information into an article and falsified the references. Please stop this immediately.'' Psychonaut (talk) 14:09, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Bigg Boss, you may be blocked from editing. Martinian  Leave a message!   16:58, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013
Your addition to Bigg Boss 5 has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Psychonaut (talk) 17:25, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
I've just blocked you for one week per this AIV report. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:31, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

need your help
can u please see wht r the issues on this page, as i dont knw much abt editing stuff http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Numm — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.220.215.12 (talk) 16:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Non-admin comment: Its high time now that you start understanding copyrights and stop copying stuff from other places to Wikipedia. You have been warned for that on multiple occasions. Your talk page history shows numerous warning related to copyvios. Examples: 1, 2, 3 and these date to 2012. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 05:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)
 * It's none of your freaking business. Don't talk to me if I am not talking to you. Bye.--  I'm Titanium chat  05:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. –Psychonaut (talk) 08:58, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Imtitanium, as you can not edit the noticeboard, you can put whatever you wish to say over here and then me or someone can take it up to ANI on your behalf. §§ Dharmadhyaksha §§ {T/C} 09:51, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Based on your responses above, you clearly have zero desire to understand copyright policies or contribute constructively, so the block is indefinite now. Wizardman 13:52, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


 * You know that this was removed as a copyvio. The reason was explained here. You even acknowledged and repaired the issue in that article. But you later put the copyvio text into another article, here. If it's unacceptable for one article, it's unacceptable for another. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 10:27, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * has been blocked from editing now as well for block evasion. I want to make sure that you know that it is against policy to edit any page other than your talk page while you are blocked. Doing so can result in your indefinite block (which may be lifted if you convince people that you understand policy and will comply with it) becoming permanent. Any edit you make while you are blocked from any IP or account can be deleted just because you made it. It's much better, if you hope to continue editing, to work with the processes to negotiate an unblock.


 * The main issue you would need to overcome is violations of copyright policy. It doesn't look good, that you seem to have deliberately restored content that you knew had been removed for copyright issues. And it isn't encouraging that even with something so simple as copying from one article to another, which you are allowed to do if you follow instructions, you did it without bothering to follow them. It suggests that you don't much care about complying with copyright policy. An unblock wouldn't be a good move on our part unless we can believe that this will change - that you will care and that you are able to follow those rules.


 * There are other issues you should consider as well. Wikipedia is simply not the place to share your opinions about celebrities - statements like "But of course, this seems hogwash because she was literally seen jumping after it was announced that she does not have to dance. You never know where the world is going. Too much douchebaggery" just don't belong here. Our job is to neutrally summarize in due weight what reliable sources say about notable subjects. That's all. And you can't ever add a link to a biography like you did here in a way that suggests it is being used as a source for information in an article when it obviously is not - and when it doesn't come close to clearing the biographies of living people policy. Nor can you add sentences like this when neither of your purported sources says a thing about it: "The media analysing the actor's statement further reoriented the audience's attention towards the topic claiming it to be verging on bigotry and an insult to the LGBT community. Colors Viacom received around 560 complaints overnight regarding the issue."


 * If we can't trust that you are neutrally adding accurate information and fairly representing your sources, then cleaning up the copyright problems won't matter. And if we can't trust that you are respecting and following our copyright policies, then it doesn't help if the information you add is neutral and appropriately sourced. These two serious problems both need to be addressed if you wish to continue editing with this account; editing otherwise means that everything you add may be deleted. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
 * I have learnt this the hard way and I can assure you all this will NOT repeat. I give you my word for it. Please spare me this last time let me prove to you that I can change for the better. After this any violation on my part shall result in the indefinite ban and I'll endorse it if the situation demands. We all make mistakes and not just a couple of times. I apologize. Really. --  I'm Titanium chat  15:53, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

qdasdd

 * Does the improvement mean no more sockpuppets? Peridon (talk) 18:49, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 * And abandoning the existing ones completely? Peridon (talk) 10:28, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry I haven't been active lately. Just saw this message. I do swear, BY GOD, that I will not enter any copyright material into the articles. I will help you guys remove it, in turn. Please trust me this time. I am being extremely sincere. I have completely understood the severity of the issue. This account is important to me. I have never intentionally vandalized wikipedia. Please accept my apology and help me regain access to this account.--  I'm Titanium  chat  05:44, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * You swore you wouldn't post any more copyright-infringing material, yet you immediately proceeded to do exactly that four more times:   . —Psychonaut (talk) 06:28, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * I've removed your unblock request that was anything but an unblock request. Your talk page access has also been revoked. You can appeal further via WP:UTRS. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:42, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Pakistan User Group
You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:18, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan


'''Hi !

Wiki Loves Monuments, the world's largest photography competition, will be taking place in Pakistan this September. The competition is all about capturing the cultural monuments and heritage sites of Pakistan and uploading these images on Commons to create an online repository which will be freely available to all.

Start taking photos of the sites enlisted here and upload them in September to be eligible for national and international prizes.

Email: contact@wikilovesmonuments.pk Official website: wikilovesmonuments.pk Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WikiLovesMonumentsPK Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 8 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Pakistan

Pakistani Cultural Heritage - Edit Drive
Hi !

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan is organizing an edit drive for Pakistani Wikipedians on Pakistani Cultural Heritage throughout the month of July. Top three contributors will be given a gift pack containing Wikipedia merchandise.

You can read the event details here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:14, 1 July 2014 (UTC) You are receiving this message as a member of WikiProject Pakistan

Nomination for deletion of Template:BBHM
Template:BBHM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Psychonaut (talk) 17:41, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of I AM She 2010 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I AM She 2010 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/I AM She 2010 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 19:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of I AM She 2011 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I AM She 2011 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/I AM She 2011 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 19:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of I AM She 2012 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article I AM She 2012 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/I AM She 2012 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. <span style="font-family:'Old English Text MT',serif;color:green">The Banner <i style="color:maroon">talk</i> 19:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sylvester Rodgers


The article Sylvester Rodgers has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Notability only for being a reality show contestant. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Tayaktribe.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Tayaktribe.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Newswse.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Newswse.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Big Brother sidebar/Bigg Boss
Template:Big Brother sidebar/Bigg Boss has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. §§<i style="color:#E0115F;">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sambhavna Seth


The article Sambhavna Seth has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable actress.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Winged Blades Godric 14:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Imtitanium/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Imtitanium/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.   Alucard 16  ❯❯❯ chat?    10:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:SITribe
Template:SITribe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ApprenticeFan <font color="#919191">work  11:03, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Rohit Verma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rohit Verma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Rohit Verma& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Ravensfire  (talk) 19:07, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – June 2019
Sent by DannyS712 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 08:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2019
Sent by User:ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – January 2020
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2020
User:TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Pooja Misrra for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pooja Misrra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pooja Misrra& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 18:52, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Falconhouse Grammar School


The article Falconhouse Grammar School has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "No source and no significant coverage in reliable independent sources to show its notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahsanullah2015 (talk) 23:04, 2 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Iamshe
Template:Iamshe has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:30, 24 June 2023 (UTC)