User talk:Jay L09

hortuculture? horticulture?
Hi, in the article Grex (hortuculture), is the disambiguation an obscure scientific term I don't recognise (and not in the Oxford English Dictionary), or a non-British English spelling, or just a typo for "Horticulture"? PamD (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It's a misspelling Jay L09 (talk) 18:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Oreomunnea mexicana
Thank you for creating . Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Thank you for helping Wikipedia! Tohd8BohaithuGh1 (t·c·r) 11:21, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:


 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksmiletris.png|23px]]  Introduction
 * 5     The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * [[Image:Crystal package utilities.png|23px]]  How to edit a page
 * [[Image:Crystal khelpcenter.png|23px]]  Help
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ktip.png|23px]]  Tips
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app ksokoban.png|23px|]]  How to write a great article
 * [[Image:Crystal Clear app kedit.svg|23px]]  Manual of Style
 * [[Image:Nuvola apps konquest.svg|23px]]  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Martin 23:22, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Walpers? Mueller? Rchb.f....Mea Culpa!
I have been using the treatise on the genus Epidendrum of the Orchidaceae found in Walpers Annales Botanices Systematicae Volume 6, and find that I have mistaken the authorship. The online web page where I found a copy gives the author as Walpers. However, he died in 1853. Volume 6 is dated 1861. The title page states "...AUCTORE DR CAROLO MUELLER...", which would seem to suggest that Carl Müller wrote it. However, I overlooked the statement in the preface:

Spero fascculos sequentes nunc brevissimo tempore sequuturos, tum clarissimi Reichenbachii Orchidearum recensionem, tum clarissimi Anderssonii Graminearum collectanea exhibentes nec non indicem generalemgenerum, speierum et synonymorum orbis totius peracti. [emphasis mine]

Furthermore, on page 933, at the end of the treatise of the Orchidaceae, is the subscript ''Sed haec hactenus. Proxima serie, fato favente unus nostrum, seu amicissimus cl. Carolus Müller, se ego, reliqua publici juris facturus est. '''Rchb. fil' [bold in the original]

The next page begins the discussion of grasses.

So, the author in all cases is Rchb.f., not Müller.

Oops! Guess I'd better fix it.

sections
Hi,

You don't understand nomenclature yet. That's okay, you'll learn. Meanwhile, please restrain yourself from reverting the people who do.

Racemosi may well be a section of subgenus Spathium, but in accordance with Article 21.1 of the International Convention on Botanical Nomenclature, "The name of a subdivision of a genus is a combination of a generic name and a subdivisional epithet. A connecting term (subgenus, sectio, series, etc.) is used to denote the rank." That means that section names takes the form "Genus sect. Section", and the subgenus doesn't get a mention. Those are the rules. I didn't write them.

Hesperian 12:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

The Truth
The "Vienna Code" (a recent bit of legislation, not science) states in Article 21:

'''DIVISION II. RULES AND RECOMMENDATIONS CHAPTER III. NOMENCLATURE OF TAXA ACCORDING TO THEIR RANK SECTION 3. NAMES OF GENERA AND SUBDIVISIONS OF GENERA Article 21

21.1. The name of a subdivision of a genus is a combination of a generic name and a subdivisional epithet. A connecting term (subgenus, sectio, series, etc.) is used to denote the rank. Note 1. Names of subdivisions of the same genus, even if they differ in rank, are treated as homonyms if they have the same epithet but are based on different types (Art. 53.4), the connecting term not being part of the name.

21.2. The epithet is either of the same form as a generic name, or a noun in the genitive plural, or a plural adjective agreeing in gender with the generic name, but not a noun in the genitive singular. It is written with an initial capital letter (see Art. 32.7 and 60.2).

21.3. The epithet in the name of a subdivision of a genus is not to be formed from the name of the genus to which it belongs by adding the prefix Eu- (see also Art. 22.2). Ex. 1. Costus subg. Metacostus; Ricinocarpos sect. Anomodiscus; Valeriana sect. Valerianopsis; Euphorbia sect. Tithymalus; Pleione subg. Scopulorum; Euphorbia subsect. Tenellae; Sapium subsect. Patentinervia; Arenaria ser. Anomalae; but not Carex sect. "Eucarex".

21.4. The use of a binary combination instead of a subdivisional epithet is not admissible. Contrary to Art. 32.1(c), names so constructed are validly published but are to be altered to the proper form without change of author citation or date of publication. Ex. 2. Sphagnum "b. Sph. rigida" (Lindberg in �fvers. F�rh. Kongl. Svenska Vetensk.-Akad. 19: 135. 1862) and S. sect. "Sphagna rigida" (Limpricht, Laubm. Deutschl. 1: 116. 1885) are to be cited as Sphagnum [unranked] Rigida Lindb. and S. sect. Rigida (Lindb.) Limpr., respectively. Note 2. The names of hybrids with the rank of a subdivision of a genus are formed according to the provisions of Art. H.7. Recommendation 21A

21A.1. When it is desired to indicate the name of a subdivision of the genus to which a particular species belongs in connection with the generic name and specific epithet, the subdivisional epithet should be placed in parentheses between the two; when desirable, the subdivisional rank may also be indicated. Ex. 1. Astragalus (Cycloglottis) contortuplicatus; A. (Phaca) umbellatus; Loranthus (sect. Ischnanthus) gabonensis. Recommendation 21B

21B.1. Recommendations made for forming the name of a genus (Rec. 20A) apply equally to an epithet of a subdivision of a genus, unless Rec. 21B.2-4 recommend otherwise.

21B.2. The epithet in the name of a subgenus or section is preferably a noun, that in the name of a subsection or lower subdivision of a genus preferably a plural adjective.

21B.3. Authors, when proposing new epithets for names of subdivisions of genera, should avoid those in the form of a noun when other co-ordinate subdivisions of the same genus have them in the form of a plural adjective, and vice-versa. They should also avoid, when proposing an epithet for a name of a subdivision of a genus, one already used for a subdivision of a closely related genus, or one which is identical with the name of such a genus.

21B.4. When a section or a subgenus is raised to the rank of genus, or the inverse change occurs, the original name or epithet should be retained unless the resulting name would be contrary to this Code.'''

E. sect. Racemosi
I've deleted the category per your comment on the talk page.

I've also restored the subgenera category text to User:Jay L09/Epidendrum subgenera. I apologise for deleting that. I did try very hard to retain all the information that you posted here while I was cleaning it up; I must have overlooked that one. As a rule, category text should only be a few sentences. If you want to contribute extensive notes on Epidendrum subgenera, you should create a separate article for it; perhaps List of Epidendrum subgenera. Or you could handle it all the ranks in a single article Taxonomy of Epidendrum. Or, if this all follows a particular arrangement, such as that of Reichenbach, you might consider creating Reichenbach's taxonomic arrangement of Epidendrum. An example can be found at Bentham's taxonomic arrangement of Banksia.

Hesperian 01:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

See the comments on your AN3 report
Hello Jay L09. Please take a look at the comments that were added to WP:AN3. If you still have questions about what happened, you could add them at the noticeboard, or raise them with Hesperian directly, whichever you prefer. EdJohnston (talk) 03:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

US plant patent reference on Red Delicious page
Hi Jay L09, I created a US plant patent template:. See some example usage on the Red Delicious page. Nothanks23 (talk) 21:09, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

answered. --Snek01 (talk) 18:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

TaxonIds
A discussion is under way at Template talk:TaxonIds concerning the desired appearance of the identifers shown by TaxonIds. As a contributor to the last discussion, your input will be greatly appreciated. --Stemonitis (talk) 06:42, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Coconut oil
Hi Jay, thanks for sorting that issue with coconut oil as hair protein fixative, and drawing my attn. to it. All clear now. The page is at last starting ot look better. Best,  Trev M ~  20:56, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrolled
Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:
 * This permission does not give you any special status or authority
 * Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
 * You may wish to display the Autopatrolled top icon and/or the User wikipedia/autopatrolled userbox on your user page
 * If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it
 * If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 21:34, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Juglans sect. Rhysocaryon
Category:Juglans sect. Rhysocaryon, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. I know that taxonomists have created this subgeneric divisions and it's excellent that the main Juglans articles describes this. The point is that these categories are too small and will remain too small for Wikipedia's categorization scheme. 21 species is a perfect size for just a single genus category without subcategories. It's only with larger, more complicated genera that subgenus or section categories become necessary. Please weigh in at the discussion linked in this section. Cheers, Rkitko (talk) 03:03, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

McNamara, 2010
Hi,

Based on your recent comment at the RSN, do you have access to McNamara? I agree it could be a good source, but does it talk about coconut oil specifically? The abstract just mentions palm oil. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 17:05, 15 March 2011 (UTC)


 * All I found was the abstract, which only mentions palm oil. There is, however, a bigger debate:  saturated fatty acids vs. trans-fatty acids (or fats naturally low in unsaturation vs. partially hydrogenated fats).  Thus my suggestion that this reference be used together with two others as the basis for a new and completely different article. — Jay L09 (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * I assume you're talking about Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease controversy? That's a page that needs to be moved to user space and worked at for a while I think.  The structure alone makes me cringe.  I'm not opposed to McNamanra being used, but the way it was used previously and it's focus on palm oil makes me reluctant to endorse it's use on coconut oil.  WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 17:53, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Ah, thank you for looking up the page. It would not be new at all.  I too would cringe at the use of this reference on coconut oil.  I would also hope that it would not be used on palm oil. — Jay L09 (talk) 18:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Juglans regia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Linolenic acid (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Podochilaeae


A tag has been placed on Category:Podochilaeae, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This category is an accidental mispelling of Podochileae, and is thus empty

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AioftheStorm (talk) 20:36, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Zygopetilinae


A tag has been placed on Category:Zygopetilinae, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

This category is an accidental mispelling of Zygopetalinae, and is thus empty

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. AioftheStorm (talk) 20:41, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Laeliinae sensu MCMXCIX
Category:Laeliinae sensu MCMXCIX, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rkitko (talk) 22:36, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Cattleya subgenera
Category:Cattleya subgenera, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rkitko (talk) 23:18, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Maydeae


A tag has been placed on Category:Maydeae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 03:06, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Corallorhizinae


A tag has been placed on Category:Corallorhizinae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 22:38, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Listerinae


A tag has been placed on Category:Listerinae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:19, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Coelogyneae


A tag has been placed on Category:Coelogyneae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:30, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Gastrodiinae


A tag has been placed on Category:Gastrodiinae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bifrenariinae


A tag has been placed on Category:Bifrenariinae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:33, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lycastinae


A tag has been placed on Category:Lycastinae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:40, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Ornithocephalinae


A tag has been placed on Category:Ornithocephalinae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:42, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Dichaeinae


A tag has been placed on Category:Dichaeinae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Calypsoeae


A tag has been placed on Category:Calypsoeae requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 19:38, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Cryptocentrum


A tag has been placed on Category:Cryptocentrum indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 15:12, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Podochilinae


A tag has been placed on Category:Podochilinae indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 18:11, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Aeridinae nothogenera


A tag has been placed on Category:Aeridinae nothogenera indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:08, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Laeliinae nothogenera


A tag has been placed on Category:Laeliinae nothogenera indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:09, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Oncidiinae nothogenera


A tag has been placed on Category:Oncidiinae nothogenera indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:10, 25 November 2022 (UTC)