User talk:JosephBarillari

Hello Joseph! Welcome to wikipedia! I hope you can make useful contributions and have fun. About the article you created, maybe you should consider moving it to a new page, where THE does not appear in the title. Wiki's naming conventions (see How to edit pages - link in Main Page) preffers names without Thes, for obvious reasons. You find Move Page in your side bar, and then... follow the instructions. Any question, please just ask in my Talk Page. Cheers, Muriel Gottrop 16:11, 1 Nov 2003 (UTC)

Joseph, thanks for all the work on the NFL page. Have you noticed PREVIEW, so that you don't have to save multiple iterations in a short period? This eases the burdon on the databse servers... Rick Boatright 05:26, 30 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Re NFL disambiguation, I've tried twice. Feel free to try. I did went through and edited EVERY occurance of NFL to the National Foolball League and then created the redirect diambiguation page so that folks searching for NFL could find the National Forensic League. Why don't YOU try it. Right now, NFL is a redirect. Go ahead and creat the disabiguation and I'll back you up. Rick Boatright 03:16, 31 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Collection agency
In response to your having placed that To meet Wikipedia's quality standards, this article or section may require cleanup. notation on the Collection Agency article.

I would like to say that if you read the article you'll notice that it is encyclopediatic. The only exception to that is the portion entitled "How to deal with a Collection Agency", which is wrote specifically for the purpose of Enlightening someone on (oddly enough) on how to deal with a collection agency.

Now if you have a problem with there being a single portion of the article being advisory, may I suggest that you read some other articles on Wikipedia? While doing so you may note that other articles are wrote much like my own. Encyclopediatic, with a small advisory section either at the end, or in some other limited section. Seanr451 06:20, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Regarding the "advice" section -- I'm not entirely convinced that the section (or any "advice" section) belongs in an encyclopedia article, but that's not the real reason I put the "cleanup" notice on the article. My main concern was that the language of the section was fairly informal (frequent use of "you", for instance). Of course, I'm not the arbiter of these things; I'd recommend bringing up the matter on the article's talk page. Thanks for writing. best, jdb ❋ (talk) 06:25, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
 * And yet I have seen sections just like that, both on Wikipedia, and in print encyclopedias. Seanr451 06:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

B&L not a copyvio
Please read Talk:Boston and Lowell Railroad. --SPUI 21:55, 16 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Princeton Junction
Princeton Junction is not the name of an incorporated area; West Windsor is the incorporated area. --SPUI 06:39, 29 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Star Trek
I moved This Side of Paradise (Star Trek episode) to This Side of Paradise (Star Trek). For future reference, if you move an episode of Star Trek, DO NOT put "episode" after the name. Just put "(Star Trek)". All the others are the same, I'd like keeping them in a similar format. Thank You Cyberia23 17:17, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Trollnet
Why to delete the Trollnet article? It's simple troll organization, it's information and Wikipedia needs it. 200.172.115.194 02:36, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

List of Troll Organization
Wikipedia is Information. And I revert your deletion in List of Troll Organization. Please, before to make this again, discuss it 200.172.115.194 02:55, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Redirects
It seems all you do for edits is redirect pages that really should not be redirected. Most all of the time they contain useful information and rightly deserve their own page. Please stop the attempts at over-simplification. --Trypa 05:45, Mar 19, 2005 (UTC)

New York City
Hi. I'm curious about your New York City edit comment, subsequent edits are unacceptable without justification. Could you explain that? --RoySmith 14:42, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

At-grade urban rail transit
Sounds decent, but unfortunately is not used (zero google hits). "Surface rail" might work - any comments? --SPUI (talk) 21:55, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * I'm moving this conversation to Talk:Streetcar, where others can perhaps add to it. --SPUI (talk) 23:37, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)

MIT elevator
That is something else, how old IS that thing? Thanx 68.39.174.150 05:58, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I've no idea, unfortunately. You could email MIT facilities and ask -- it's in one of the maclaurin buildings; can't recall which one. If you send them the picture, they'll probably recognize it. jdb ❋ (talk) 06:17, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)

UrbEx Talk Page
I'd appreciate it if you stopped restoring the page on Urbex Talk that contains personal details ahout me. This information is not public, it was posted by Ben Brockert (I've already filed a complaint with a sysop against him) and I do not want it public. These are details of my personal life that have nothing at all to do with Urban Exploration and therefore do not belong in an encyclopedia article about that subject.

-av


 * My apologies. I'm not a forum regular and had assumed that if the information had been posted to WP, it was well-known. jdb ❋ (talk) 16:44, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your support in this mattar. Have a nice day.


 * It is well known, it just seems that Av is trying to put the water back behind the dam, or whatever the appropriate parable would be.
 * Were you on [Underground]? I recognize your name, but can't place it. &mdash;Ben Brockert (42) UE News  03:14, May 12, 2005 (UTC)
 * I've lurked on some UE lists. I've edited some of the WP articles on UE; you might have seen my name there. jdb ❋ (talk) 06:34, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Boston?
Greetings; are you in the Boston area? We are having a local meetup in two weeks, and it would be great to see you there. +sj +
 * Thanks. I'll keep an eye on []. jdb ❋ (talk) 06:33, 12 May 2005 (UTC)

Image copyright
Most of your images are very well tagged, I just noticed a few that need some work. The following I don't know if you took them and what license they fall under:
 * Image:Iad-terminal.jpg
 * Image:Gestahl -- Amano.jpg

The following I assume you took yourself, but haven't indicated so on the image itself.
 * Image:1984-prade-2004.jpg
 * Image:1954-prade-2004.jpg.jpg
 * Image:MBTA Green Line Longwood Med Station.jpg
 * Image:Kendall MBTA Station.jpeg
 * Image:Harvard Stadium.jpg
 * Image:MBTA Green Line Longwood Station.jpg
 * Image:Harvard MBTA Station.jpeg

Once you clear up the source/license, you can remove the PUI and no source tags, but I request that you don't delist them from WP:PUI, so that other people can confirm that they are sourced and licensed correctly. Cheers. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 07:08, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that. I have no idea why I tagged the stadium and the Amano picture as yours. I did search on your contribs and found them, and forgot to check the uploader. Cheers. Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 20:52, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)

Thomas Cole
I was fortunate to pull a large package of fine art off of suprnova.org (before it went down) that someone had put together from various websites, doing most of my work for me. I am working on a Visual list of American artists and those images were part of that work. I have about 7 more artists to finish from that archive but the rest of the artists that are blank will have to be done manually. I do however use the upload.pl script that is provided over on wikicommons to automatically upload the photos. Cobalty 30 June 2005 06:14 (UTC)
 * This was an issue at one point but was cleared up when the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Corel in The Bridgeman Art Library, Ltd., Plaintiff, - versus - Corel Corporation, et ano., Defendants. The court ruled that while it takes skill to create an accurate reproduction of a two dimensional artwork, it requires no artistic merit. Therefore, the reproduction is not subject to copyright.  If the photographer were to crop the image or change the colors, then they would have altered a public domain image in a way that could be copyrighted.  An example of this would be Marcel Duchamp's L H O O Q (1919).  The image of the Mona Lisa is public domain, however, Mona Lisa with a moustache is not.

Thanks for posting the BIB photo
Thanks for uploading the BIB photo! I used to work for AMC Theatres, which is why I know all about BIBs (they have a lot of them hooked up behind the concession stands at all AMC megaplexes) but obviously since I don't work there any more, I can't easily get into the syrup room to get a picture.

It's hilarious how most people have no idea where their soft drinks come from. Well, at least now they can learn about it on Wikipedia.

--Coolcaesar 02:25, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Manual pull station photo
First of all, excellent photo on the manual pull station article. Wondering if you'd also be willing/able to incorporate a few words about the old street alarm boxes into the article text, since it's definitely something that ought to be included. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:52, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

QSAR article copyright problem
Thank you for your copyright notice. Quantum Pharmaceuticals authorized such use of its content. For the chicking of authorization one can contact office /// at //// q-pharm.com

Tempest in a teapot
WP:AN/I

Dusty Rhodes - Wrestling Observer awards
Hi there. Just to clarify, the Wrestling Observer awards are not vandolism. I am a regular Wikipedia user with over 3500 edits and have never vandolised a page. :) Other big names have also won "negative" awards from the Observer, including Hulk Hogan and Gorilla Monsoon. The awards are all summarised in the January 16 2006 edition of the Wrestling Observer Newsletter. Whilst I will re-add the awards, it's good to see people are keeping an eye on things! Essexmutant 11:06, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Hi there, thanks for your response. No problem whatsoever. Essexmutant 08:39, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

Relaxed > Disturbed

 * Wiki-star: I am kind of loosing my cool right now. You mentioned within the NFL Article that the external links are more confusing than helpful. Could you please better explain yourself so that we can get the problem fixed. And please make sure that your explanation is logical, as i am finding out that many people are picking on newbies, and i am getting irritated. Thank you very much.

Wiki-star 05:24, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Prestige and academic boosterism
You wrote:
 * Hear, hear. If the word "prestige" (and all its variants) were striken from all of the Ivy League articles, Wikipedia would be a better place

Please help with this. Talk of "prestige" is a contagious disease, because academic boosterism is competitive. The commonest defense of rankingcruft and assertions of prestige is that "the article on [rival] has it." Things are in better shape than they were a year ago, but it would be very helpful if more editors would assist in toning down peacock terms and trimming gross boosterism. I've been trying with some success at least to get rankings and such out of the lead sections and into separate sections with titles like "ranking and reputation;" to keep down the total number of items in such sections; and (most important) to remove or balance selective citations of rankings in which a university happens to rank favorably. (You can almost bet that if an article mentions the number of Rhodes scholars, that is an institution that has had relatively few Nobel laureates... and vice versa). Typically, boosters will revert if only one editor removes a brag--suspecting I suppose that its removal is a hostile act by a booster of a rival school--but may not if it's clear that more than one editor is participating. Dpbsmith (talk) 14:53, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Kudos on the Luntz catch
Assuming it was you. I've done work on that material, attempting to make it more NPOV, and never realized it was lifted from his own site. I just thought it was probably written by a supporter of his, explaining the flattering style. Boy is my face red. Good work. -Kasreyn 10:32, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Another copyviol
Ok, I've caught one myself. The article on Sandy Linter appears to be a direct rip-off from this page. I'd like to deal with this, but could you walk me through what to do? -Kasreyn 04:39, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks! -Kasreyn 05:02, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
 * I added the copyvio note. Is there some sort of warning template I should put on the talk page of the user who added the plagiarized material?  Because I've found who did it.  -Kasreyn 05:09, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

List of shock sites
Someone has put this up for deletion yet again. Care to cast your vote? Skinmeister 10:40, 15 April 2006 (UTC)

List of very special episodes
You have recently recreated or reposted material which previously was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not recreate this article without prior approval from an administrator or you may be blocked from editing. We ask that you respect what Wikipedia is not. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may seek an independent deletion review. --Crossmr 05:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
 * that is a standard template to be left when someone recreates an article which has been deleted in accordance with the policies here on wikipedia. If you have an issue with it I suggest discussing it on the template page at Template:Recreated.--Crossmr 00:23, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

TidBITS
Another editor has added the  template to the article TidBITS, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

==File source problem with File:Fine-hall-princeton.jpeg== Thanks for uploading File:Fine-hall-princeton.jpeg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shizhao (talk) 08:21, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Orange-line-state.jpg
File:Orange-line-state.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Orange-line-state.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case:. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 16:14, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Mbta-park-street-under.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Mbta-park-street-under.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:52, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
 * File:Blue-line-mbta-subway-tunnel.jpg is now available as Commons:File:Blue-line-mbta-subway-tunnel.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 17:29, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Afd nomination
Hi there, I dont know for sure if you have been notified but an article you created has been nominated for deletion, George H.W. Bush vomiting incident. You may be interested in providing input in the deltion discussion. Thanks Ottawa4ever (talk) 17:19, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Penis bird
I have nominated for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 20:45, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Farina-cereal.jpeg
 Thanks for uploading File:Farina-cereal.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:30, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Bollard.jpeg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bollard.jpeg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 08:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

File:South-station-silverline.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:South-station-silverline.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  S ven M anguard  Wha?  00:54, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

File deletion on Commons
On the off chance you happen to see this, I've nominated a file you originally uploaded to en.wikipedia (since moved to Commons by DanTD) for deletion here. Thanks, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 13:31, 31 July 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

List of Final Fantasy VI locations listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Final Fantasy VI locations. Since you had some involvement with the List of Final Fantasy VI locations redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 11:41, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

George H. W. Bush vomiting incident listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect George H. W. Bush vomiting incident. Since you had some involvement with the George H. W. Bush vomiting incident redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --- Coffee  and crumbs  21:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bush-japanese-pm.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Bush-japanese-pm.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Loading dock for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Loading dock is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Loading dock until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 17:59, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of George H. W. Bush vomiting incident for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George H. W. Bush vomiting incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/George H. W. Bush vomiting incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --- C &amp; C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 06:42, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Foreign Extemporaneous Speaking for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Foreign Extemporaneous Speaking is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Foreign Extemporaneous Speaking until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JayJayWhat did I do? 02:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bush-japanese-pm.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Bush-japanese-pm.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:08, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Duet Acting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duet Acting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Duet Acting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 00:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Oratorical Interpretation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oratorical Interpretation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Oratorical Interpretation until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/they)Talk to Me! 00:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)